, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
Greetings from somewhere else than strahan airport (arrgh what a bloody cold and windy place it can be too at this time of the year) - I can see your objection to the geography stub if it was in actual fact "geographical feature" in one topographical sense (in which case it should be identified as such? yes?) however if we are cartographic about it - that is looking for features that are of regional importance in transportation/economic/social sense (which my university level geography insisted was what such feature would be due to its importance to strahan and hinterland) then there is no case against it. try google earth (and what a lousy level of detail we get on the west coast unless we are 10km or above!) and it is a feature cartographically/logistically, but if you're getting your bum frozen by the salt spray from ocean beach just west - you wouldnt even know if was there and probably wouldnt care anyway? Logistically the airport can mean life or death to locals where medical facilities on the west coast are insufficient, and notability or topographical importance to a damaged timber worker or fisherman is totally irrelevent - its there, and thats what counts! SatuSuro 01:39, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[ reply ]
).
The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are
.
Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page . Thank you. BigDT 15:09, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[ reply ]
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link . Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion . If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page . Thank you. – Quadell (talk ) (random ) 16:05, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[ reply ]
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions " link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion . Thank you. BetacommandBot 20:38, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
Neranei 19:05, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
[ reply ]
Thanks for the milk! You're right, cookies are so much better with milk! Hope everything's alright! :) nei 21:19, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
[ reply ]
Thanks for uploading or contributing to
here
.
Please go to
Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline
is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions " link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion . If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page . Thank you. MER-C 13:13, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
Replaceable fair use
Thanks for uploading
first fair use criterion
in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
Go to di-replaceable fair use disputed
}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template .
On the image discussion page , write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license , or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link . Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our
]
Replaceable fair use
Thanks for uploading
first fair use criterion
in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
Go to di-replaceable fair use disputed
}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template .
On the image discussion page , write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license , or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link . Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our
]
I have tagged
Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you.
MER-C 08:37, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
[ reply ]
I removed your addition of the spoiler tag to
WP:SPOILER, which states that "Spoiler warnings are usually redundant when used to cover an entire "Plot" or "Synopsis" heading." There was a large, mass removal of spoiler tags from most fictional works articles, including novels, a while back. I just thought you should be aware of the guideline for future reference.
María (críticame ) 17:13, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
[ reply ]
No problem! You missed quite a mess. :) María (críticame ) 17:17, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
Replaceable fair use
Thanks for uploading
first fair use criterion
in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
Go to di-replaceable fair use disputed
}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template .
On the image discussion page , write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license , or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link . Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our
]
Replaceable fair use
Thanks for uploading
first fair use criterion
in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
Go to di-replaceable fair use disputed
}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template .
On the image discussion page , write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license , or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link . Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our
]
Thanks for uploading
Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline
is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our
]
An article that you have been involved in editing, Nicolai Lomov , has been listed for deletion . If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicolai Lomov . Thank you. Bazaryakov 02:38, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
Hi Ben. I am sure if there are more solid and stronger references, the notability will be established and the article will be kept.
Bazaryakov 21:45, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
Hi Ben, sorry for the oversight! This won't happen again.
Bazaryakov 15:49, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
An image that you uploaded or altered,
Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the
image description page . You are welcome to add comments to its entry at
the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.
Videmus Omnia Talk 12:40, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
[ reply ]
The page you added a pic to, "some time ago" Mary Howitt , will be on the main page DYK in next couple of days Victuallers 19:09, 7 October 2007 (UTC). Why and thank you so much for the barnstar. I will find another recipient and pass on your good wishes. cheers Victuallers 14:38, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
Hi Ben. My main concern was with the term "a major music competition", specifically, the word "major". Simply winning any competition is not justification on its own for inclusion in an encyclopedia. For the three competitions given in the article, I searched on Google to look for references which would establish them as legitimately "major" competitions. I found few references to the first two other than people claiming to have won them; they certainly don't seem to qualify as "major". The third (IHSCC) has many references online, but I somewhat question if a contest involving pieces composed for just one specific instrument can be considered "major". Thoughts? MrZeebo 11:41, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
Replaceable fair use
Thanks for uploading
first fair use criterion
in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
Go to di-replaceable fair use disputed
}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template .
On the image discussion page , write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license , or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link . Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our
]
Thanks for uploading or contributing to .
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions " link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion . If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page . Thank you. Wizardman 04:17, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
Replaceable fair use
Thanks for uploading
first fair use criterion
in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
Go to di-replaceable fair use disputed
}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template .
On the image discussion page , write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license , or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link . Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our
]
Thanks for uploading or contributing to .
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions " link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion . If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page . Thank you. Podkapova (talk ) 04:19, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
Replaceable fair use
Thanks for uploading
first fair use criterion
in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:
Go to di-replaceable fair use disputed
}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template .
On the image discussion page , write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license , or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link . Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use media which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our
talk) 00:56, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
[ reply ]
Thanks for uploading
Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline
is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our
talk) 18:07, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
[ reply ]
Thanks for uploading
Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline
is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our
talk) 07:45, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
[ reply ]
Thanks for uploading
Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline
is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our
talk) 19:05, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
[ reply ]
Thanks for uploading
Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline
is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our
talk) 20:06, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
[ reply ]
Thanks for uploading
Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline
is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our
talk) 20:07, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
[ reply ]
Replaceable fair use
Thanks for uploading Image:Claudio roditi.jpg . I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use , but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:
Go to di-replaceable fair use disputed
}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template .
On the image discussion page , write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license , or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link . Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before
]
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media ).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions " link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion . Thank you. NotifyBot (talk ) 13:49, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[ reply ]
Replaceable fair use
Thanks for uploading Image:Michaelcain.jpg . I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use , but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:
Go to di-replaceable fair use disputed
}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template .
On the image discussion page , write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license , or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link . Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before
]
Thanks for uploading Image:AHD.jpg . You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content , but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions .
Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk ) 18:39, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[ reply ]
Thanks for uploading or contributing to .
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions " link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion . If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page . Thank you. Polly (Parrot ) 03:09, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[ reply ]
Thanks for uploading Image:Borge.jpg . You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content , but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions .
Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk ) 11:40, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[ reply ]
I have tagged
Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you.
Rettetast (
talk ) 15:34, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
[ reply ]
Image Copyright problem
Thanks for uploading Image:Peplowski.jpg , which you've sourced to http://www.peterboroughjazzclub.co.uk/Gallery.html . I noticed that that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
make a note permitting reuse under the this list
) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected] , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here
.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected] .
If you believe the media meets the criteria at
Wikipedia:Image copyright tags
for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link . Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged , as described on criteria for speedy deletion . If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page . Thank you. Sherool (talk) 16:51, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[ reply ]
Same issue with File:Andrew Boysen JR.jpg sourced from http://www.kjos.com/detail.php?division=1&table=author&auth_id=129 --Sherool (talk) 18:48, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[ reply ]
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered,
discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.
Skier Dude (
talk ) 07:24, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
[ reply ]
An image that you uploaded or altered,
Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the
image description page . You are welcome to add comments to its entry at
the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.
Skier Dude (
talk ) 04:56, 9 February 2009 (UTC) --
Skier Dude (
talk ) 04:56, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
[ reply ]
welcome page
if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon }}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. CryptoStorm (talk ) 00:52, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[ reply ]
The article Naomi Aho has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
no evidence whatever of notability; appears to be pure self-promotion
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be
deleted for any of several reasons
.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{]
Thanks for uploading or contributing to .
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions " link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion . If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page . Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk ) 16:55, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[ reply ]
Thanks for uploading File:Booker Arts and Science Magent Elementary School.jpg . I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see
this list ) at the site of the original publication ; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en wikimedia.org , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter OTRS pending
}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en wikimedia.org .
If you believe the media meets the criteria at
for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log . Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged , as described on criteria for speedy deletion . If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page . Thank you. Kelly hi! 00:33, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[ reply ]
Thanks for uploading File:R marlowe.jpg . I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see
this list ) at the site of the original publication ; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en wikimedia.org , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter OTRS pending
}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en wikimedia.org .
If you believe the media meets the criteria at
for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log . Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged , as described on criteria for speedy deletion . You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy . If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page . Thank you. Ronh jones (Talk) 20:25, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[ reply ]
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Non-Free content criteria but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to
the file description page and edit it to include a
Non-Free rationale .
If you have uploaded other Non-Free media, consider checking that you have specified the Non-Free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions " link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion . If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page . Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk ) 11:38, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[ reply ]
Thanks for uploading File:Donsannella.jpg , which you've sourced to Don Sannella. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see
this list ) at the site of the original publication ; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en wikimedia.org , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter OTRS pending
}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en wikimedia.org .
If you believe the media meets the criteria at
for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log . Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged , as described on criteria for speedy deletion . You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy . If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page . Thank you. Skier Dude (talk ) 05:23, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[ reply ]
A file that you uploaded or altered,
Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the
discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.
Skier Dude (
talk ) 05:30, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
[ reply ]
A file that you uploaded or altered,
Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the
discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.
Skier Dude (
talk ) 05:32, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
[ reply ]
Your upload of File:Alanlakein.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.
This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here . Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out ) 11:36, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[ reply ]
⚠ Thanks for uploading claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media ).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the
Stefan2 (
talk ) 23:07, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
[ reply ]
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
]
Thanks for uploading File:Don fendler.jpg . I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see
this list ) at the site of the original publication ; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected] , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter OTRS pending
}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected] .
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content , use a tag such as {{non-free fair use }} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use , and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log . Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged , as described on criteria for speedy deletion . You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy . If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page . Thank you. Kelly hi! 09:30, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[ reply ]
Hello, Ben Tibbetts. Voting in the
2016 Arbitration Committee elections
is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page . MediaWiki message delivery (talk ) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[ reply ]
⚠ Thanks for uploading claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media ).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion . Thank you. --B-bot (talk ) 17:04, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[ reply ]
Hello, Ben Tibbetts. Voting in the
2017 Arbitration Committee elections
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page . MediaWiki message delivery (talk ) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[ reply ]
The file File:Lilbook.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be
deleted for any of several reasons
.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page .
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the proposed deletion process , but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the talk) 01:01, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
[ reply ]
The article PjBmp2Avi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable piece of computer software. Can't find any independent in-depth sources discussing the program. Being listed on download sites isn't sufficient for notability.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be
deleted for any of several reasons
.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page .
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process , but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC ♠ (talk) 00:47, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[ reply ]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect
Pablo Diego José Francisco de Paula Juan Nepomuceno María de los Remedios Crispín Crispiniano de la Santísima Trinidad Ruiz y Picasso. Since you had some involvement with the
Pablo Diego José Francisco de Paula Juan Nepomuceno María de los Remedios Crispín Crispiniano de la Santísima Trinidad Ruiz y Picasso redirect, you might want to participate in
the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. —
the Man in Question (in question) 19:09, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
[ reply ]
⚠ Thanks for uploading claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media ).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion . Thank you. --B-bot (talk ) 02:39, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[ reply ]
The article Mike Gambit has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No evidence of passing WP:NFICTION/GNG
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be
deleted for any of several reasons
.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page .
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process , but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | reply here 17:26, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[ reply ]
The file File:Windsor Memorial Baptist Church.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be
deleted for any of several reasons
.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page .
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the proposed deletion process , but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the talk) 01:00, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
[ reply ]
The article Éric Wenger has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
topic does not fit notability guideline for biographies
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be
deleted for any of several reasons
.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page .
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process , but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the talk) 10:00, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
[ reply ]
⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Wafalogo.jpg . The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use . However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media ).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion . Thank you. --B-bot (talk ) 18:55, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[ reply ]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read
the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard
to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on
section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion
, because it is a disambiguation page which either
disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic );
disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.
Under the
see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information
.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines . If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator . Shhhnotsoloud (talk ) 14:09, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[ reply ]
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Josephbooker.jpg , has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion . Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ⟲ Three Sixty ! Talk? Work. 02:59, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[ reply ]