User talk:Blaze Wolf/Archive 2

Here is a new signature for you. Copy and paste the wikimarkup into the signature input in your user preferences to apply it :)

―

― [[User:Blaze The Wolf|<b style="background:#0d1125;color:#51aeff;padding:1q;border-radius:5q">Blaze The Wolf</b>]][[User talk:Blaze The Wolf|<sup>Talk</sup>]]<sub title="Discord Username" style="position:relative;right:22q">Blaze Wolf#0001</sub>

If you have any questions you can ask ― Levi_OP^Talk 14:13, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

Hi Blaze! First, thank you for being so kind. Second, I would love some help with how to label things. Vandalism, unconstructive, etc. I have been having actually a lot of fun with editing since I started but this whole thing has me so anxious that my stomach hurts. I would never want to push someone away from Wikipedia and I would love some help trying to avoid this in the future. I have spent some time reading through the different resources, but there is so much content to see and learn and it's so easy to make a mistake. Thank you kindly! I appreciate your time talking to me. Plutobutbigger :-) 21:44, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

@

talk

) 21:52, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

@

Blaze The Wolf: Ahhh this sounds like a great idea. I will look into it. Thanks again for being so kind! Plutobutbigger

 :-) 16:37, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

@

^Talk

_{Blaze Wolf#0001} 16:53, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Blaze,

I was just visiting some user talk pages and saw your comment. I want to thank you for posting a Welcome message along with a warning. I visit the user talk pages of a lot of new editors and this often doesn't happen, even with experienced editors. Considering there is a learning curve to working on Wikipedia and the error might be a mistake, just posting a warning with no other information on finding resources like the Teahouse to bring their questions, leaves a bad impression on a new editor. This is probably one reason why most editors who make a few edits don't become more involved in the project. So, thank you for welcoming new editors, even ones that might initially seem troublesome. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:43, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

@

^Talk

_{Blaze Wolf#0001} 01:12, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

Hey I’m not trying to be rude or forcing you to fo anything. But I wouldn’t recommend adding a section on a stupid thing you did to your userpage.

@

talk

) 00:19, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

@

CycoMa. No reason to keep around permanent memorials to mistakes which had no widespread impact. Better to write about one's successes…some editors might find it necessary to explain any past blocks they may have had, but certainly not something small like this. That said, it's your call. Psiĥedelisto (talk • contribs) ^{please always ping}

! 21:52, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

@

^Talk

_{Blaze Wolf#0001} 02:27, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
	I've noticed you spreading the WikiLove to a bunch of fellow editors with some genuinely nice comments. Thank you! ––FormalDude talk 18:57, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

@

^Talk

_{Blaze Wolf#0001} 18:58, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

Clarification of your AN/I comment

On

It's not on Wikipedia. It's referring to when I was banned on the website Fandom. ―

^Talk

_{Blaze Wolf#0001} 22:24, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

Oh right, the new name of

Wikia. I get it now. I have found it very difficult to get used to that rebranding, I keep forgetting it happened. And certainly continue to prefer the old name, lol. But that's neither here nor there—thanks. Psiĥedelisto (talk • contribs) ^{please always ping}

! 23:15, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

Alright, so in terms of contributing to Wikipedia I would like to start off small. By that, I mean entry-level understanding ways to be conducive to the encyclopedia. CosmicJacuzzi (talk) 17:09, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

• CosmicJacuzzi, the best thing (IMO) someone can do to improve the project is to provide reliable secondary sources for BLPs (biographies of living people). See this: Category:All unreferenced BLPs. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 17:12, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

Ok, thank you for the suggestion. I will definitely look into that. I do have a question about the category for all listed unreferenced BLPs. I noticed that Daniel Baron had an unreferenced tag, despite having quite a few references. My question is "Is the category for unreferenced BLPs sort of a catch-all for BLP articles that have issues with being properly sourced?" Thanks. CosmicJacuzzi (talk) 17:30, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

Geez I Didn't know any edit to a talk page would give you that notification someone left a message on it IF you'd prefer not to do find secondary sources for BLPs you could edits in areas of interest which is mainly what I do unless it's anti-vandal work or copy editing (basically changing the wording to make more sense and to fit better with other sentences) ―

^Talk

_{Blaze Wolf#0001} 17:59, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

Per your

• a game developer conference: "Video: Slime Rancher dev's guide to making games that stand out and survive"
• streamed interview: "Slime Rancher dev shares tips for making the most of the prototyping stage"
• some on sound design "Using sound design to give Slime Rancher charm without getting too gooey"

Some other random stuff, not sure if this would add to the article or just be redundant:

• Game Rant Slime Rancher 2 Should Improve Navigation seems to have come out recently but I didn't think it added much to what you already have.
• Slate Review: Slime Rancher brings players nostalgia with recent launch on Nintendo Switch is also pretty new.
• A few pieces on the portable "plortable" edition: [Nintendo Life, SuperParent, Nintendo Life (again)
• Deluxe edition and some on DLCs at Happy Gamer: "Slime Rancher Deluxe Edition Retail Pre-Order Edition Announced For April"

Article looks pretty sharp, good work! – Reidgreg (talk) 14:01, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

@

^Talk

_{Blaze Wolf#0001} 14:05, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

I'll try to do some more digging.

• I believe that this Youtube video is Popovich's talk on which the second Game Developer piece is based. You might be able to mine it for more factoids, keeping in mind that it's a primary source. Use {{cite AV media}} and {{rp}} to note the time (minutes into the video).
• A similar video from GDC 2017 youtube

• More from Game Developer
  • "Slime Rancher's lead developer tells us about his Early Access success"
  • "Video: How Slime Rancher succeeds through emergent storytelling"
  • "The unique power of emergent storytelling"
  • "Slime Rancher dev: To sell your game, give it a pulse and make it feel like home"

Background on lead programmer Mike Thomas (most of the PR is from his Monomi partner Nick Popovich):

• "Slime Rancher" gives Alumnus First Video Game Hit

If I'm reading things right, it seems like the game wasn't 'finished' until its official release version, so it was still in development while millions(?) of people were playing it on Easy Access. So you could possibly include some of that.

Also:

• Review and gameplay at ComicsVerse "SLIME RANCHER: Help Me, I’m Dying Of Cute (Literally)!"

Skybound games is mentioned only in the infobox, so would be good to have something in the prose:

• Polygon "Skybound gets into the indie game publishing business"

Merchandising:

• Kidscreen: "Nelvana broadens audience portfolio with Slime Rancher" for global distribution of merchandising
• Toybook "NELVANA TAKES ON GLOBAL LICENSING FOR MONOMI PARK’S ‘SLIME RANCHER’"

That's it for me. Got a few other things on my to-do list. – Reidgreg (talk) 17:06, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

Thanks Reid! I'll make sure to give you those barnstars I promised in my request. ―

^Talk

_{Blaze Wolf#0001} 18:00, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

Hello Blaze The Wolf! Can I please revert the redirect because I want to add more reliable sources? Vitaium (talk) 00:04, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

@

^Talk

_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 00:08, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

I want to add reliable sources from GamesKeys.net and Gamepur.com Vitaium (talk) 00:16, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

@

^Talk

_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 00:19, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for letting me help with your draft. 2.31.236.195 (talk) 18:42, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

@

^Talk

_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 18:51, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

Hi Blaze The Wolf! The thread you created at the archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both talk ) 19:03, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

Hyello. How do i change my signature like you did but with different colours. In other words "Sir... Sir, can I have your autograph sir? "

Preceding bland signature issued by LostCitrationHunter (talk) 08:38, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

@

WP:CUSTOMSIG is your starting point here! -GoatLordServant ☂ ^{(Talk - Contribs}

) 12:17, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

@

^Talk

_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 13:11, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

18:58, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

@

^Talk

_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 19:00, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Blaze The Wolf! The thread you created at the archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both talk ) 19:02, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Helping Hand Barnstar
		Well earned for daily contributions to The Teahouse. talk ) 22:47, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

@

^Talk

_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 22:48, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

Drink some!

Drink some for the help mate! You're probably very tired So you deserve it! LeggoMyEggoNOW (talk) 14:01, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

@

^Talk

_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 14:05, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Then drink the next best thing, coke-a-cola LeggoMyEggoNOW (talk) 14:09, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

@

^Talk

_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 14:18, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Sorry. I know something you can drink, everyone has it, introducing *bangs drums* water! Honestly I have no idea what you would drink LeggoMyEggoNOW (talk) 14:23, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

@

^Talk

_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 14:24, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Blaze Wolf. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{

ygm}} template.~TNT (she/her • talk

) 18:49, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

You are very welcome to alternatively, I am currently active on the Wikimedia community discord. I would suggest a more private discussion given the context, but its your choice ~TNT (she/her • talk) 18:55, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

@

^Talk

_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 19:02, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Yes I imagine that wouldn't end well for the school..! As I said in my email:

If you really wish to disclose your age [...], there is no specific policy which prevents you doing so.

The only further suggestion I have for you, should you still wish to disclose it, is to be careful how and where you do so. Many thanks ~TNT (she/her • talk) 19:12, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Will do. Thanks! ―

^Talk

_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 19:25, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Blaze, a few years ago, I created a separate GMail account just for Wikipedia business although my regular email now gets so much junk, my Wikipedia email is my new regular email address. It really makes things simpler to connect an email account without any personal information in the address and GMail is free...it's just sometimes a problem to come up with an address that isn't already taken. I recommend it. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:51, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

@

^Talk

_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 22:57, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Ultimately if you would like to reveal certain personal information, while I think it unwise and would advise you against it, I would suggest you not be stopped from doing so. However, it is not alright to restore the birthdate of children, especially under the questionable summary that it was sourced (given that the "source" is inaccessible), as you did at a recently deleted A7. If you have any questions about this please let me know. Barkeep49 (talk) 23:47, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

@

^Talk

_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 01:06, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

I didn't know that having come here after closing an OS ticket and reading the conversation above. I'm glad the message has been heard. Barkeep49 (talk) 01:26, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Blaze The Wolf,

I'm posting here after looking at a page history of Sandy Marton where you got into an edit war with an IP editor who was making a big edit and removing content but who was correcting a problem with an article and you reinstated the bad content. I just wanted to drop you a note because I noticed you primarily (but not exclusively) revert IP editors. This is not uncommon among anti-vandalism editors (some of whom ONLY revert IP editors) but you really need to look at the edit and make sure it's a bad edit before reverting it. If it's not vandalism and you are reverting more than once, then you could be cited as being in an edit war yourself. While I've read that most vandalism is done by IP editors it's not true that most IP editors are vandals, the majority are just regular editors...in fact, I edited as an IP editor for a few years before deciding to create an account and I know that's true for a fair number of editors.

I think there is also an unconscious bias among most editors to support editors who have created accounts. IP editors are also less likely to complain on your talk page if you revert them so it is less likely for there to be consequences if you make a mistake with reverting their edits. This isn't a phenomenon specific to you, it's just an observation I've seen with editors here on Wikipedia.

So, all I'm trying to say here is to make sure you are being even-handed when dealing with IP editors vs. created account editors and check edits before you revert them. Sometimes big edits and content removal is a good edit even if the edit summary isn't that helpful or explanatory. Sound good? Thank you for your work on Wikipedia. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:19, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

@

^Talk

_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 23:31, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

hi, I am posting on opera pages as a review place like another site place. but you remove my link. our link not as advertisement not much benefit for SEO because these link as a nofollow. I place it as a review. can you please tell me what's the difference between my link reference and other many sites which already show like my reference?

Dear @

@

^Talk

_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 19:17, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

If not then I will see what I can do to anonymize myself as much as possible on Zoom, although I may not be able to attend it depending on when it is due to my complex schedule. The best time for me would be the Saturday after next (although this may change). ―

^Talk

_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 19:20, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

@

Blaze The Wolf

: Thanks so much for your reply! I think you can keep anonymous on zoom if you choose the "dia in" option (or simply only showing your audio without video). We are flexible on this while linking Discord with Zoom might be a bit challenging for us :) If this works for you, would you mind fill in the survey above so we can plan the workshop with the editors? Thank again for your time! I really appreciate it!

Bobo.03 (talk) 20:05, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

@

^Talk

_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 20:08, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

@

Blaze The Wolf

: Thanks so much! We haven't had a date planned but will send out a schedule link (e.g., When2meet) to your email address by the end of this week to understand your availability (currently my understanding is you are available next Saturday (10/23)), correct? Thanks!

Bobo.03 (talk) 20:24, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

@

^Talk

_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 20:50, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

@

Blaze The Wolf: Got it, thanks! I will keep this mind when sending out the schedule survey! Meanwhile, please feel free to ping me if you have any questions! Bobo.03 (talk

) 20:56, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

@

^Talk

_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 21:00, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

@

Blaze The Wolf: Sounds good. Thank you :) Bobo.03 (talk

) 21:13, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

How do I create an entry for a business --Martin Andrew Rowley (talk) 15:38, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

@

^Talk

_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 15:44, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

Please see User_talk:JBchrch#I_moved_Draft:Museums_of_Florence_back_to_draft_space where JBchrch stated

• The applicable policies are WP:NOTESSAY and WP:PROMO. But the most important piece of policy you need to be aware of is WP:WIKIVOICE, which, unfortunately, your draft falls short of.

As I explained there, every one of those was an "incorrect" and I mean incorrect policy. If not explain how they apply. They are incorrect policy applications, and your confidence in the review process is misplaced, obviously. And of course you have given no reason at all why Museums in Paris can exist as a non-list but Museums of Florence can not.You gave no reasons. Why not? Ode+Joy (talk) 19:30, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

@

^Talk

_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 19:40, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

@

Blaze The Wolf: First, I will probably not work on it as a list. If I wanted to build a list I would have done that, as I mentioned on the talk page when I started the article. Your reasoning about Museums in Paris is, however, refreshingly correct! So contrary to popular opinion, a few people on Wikipedia actually understand policy. But you did not state how the policies quoted by JBchrch applied. I guess because you know they were incorrect. In any case, I have had enough of these nonsense discussions on the Afd. I will support your suggestions and get it moved to draft, so we can move on. Thanks. Ode+Joy (talk

) 19:58, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

@

^Talk

_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 20:03, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

@

Blaze The Wolf: I will not debate it further, but WIKIVOICE is about neutrality. This is not a controversial article, and there is no neutrality issue, given that no one disputes anything. JBchrch was just incorrect. Now, can I just move the article back to draft? I will move a few sentences to Florence itself and point the article to that section, then we will be done. The planet will survive without this article. Ode+Joy (talk

) 20:08, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

@

^Talk

_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 20:15, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

@

Blaze The Wolf: Look, I just want to be done with this dumb Afd discussion. Could you please move the page if you know how. Thanks. Ode+Joy (talk

) 20:19, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

@

^Talk

_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 20:21, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

(talk page watcher) It's not appropriate to move this to draft mid-AFD. Blaze, please make sure you don't do so. Let the AFD runs it's course, and if the topic is deleted (versus draftified), you can generally ask for a refund to draft afterwards. -- ferret (talk) 20:30, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

@

^Talk

_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 20:31, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

Note I haven't reviewed the article or looked at the in progress AFD. Simply noting the process has begun and moving it at this time is certain to result in a revert and more conflict. -- ferret (talk) 20:31, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

@

Blaze The Wolf: Can I request some type of "speedy conclusion" to the Afd? Then the course will have run. Right? Ode+Joy (talk

) 20:34, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

@

^Talk

_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 23:23, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

Blaze, I would have appreciated a ping on this. Thanks. JBchrch talk 12:35, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Hi Blaze The Wolf! The thread you created at the archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both talk ) 19:02, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

The Surreal Barnstar

This user is the kindest, brilliant, and most unique person that I have run into. He indeed adds a special flavor to the overall experience of the Wiki. He helped me out when I was under rough water and dealt with the situation with no hesitation and succeeded in doing so. This user is very helpful and understanding. I appreciate what he does for the community. I hope he continues to help assist others because he does it very well! Doge456 (talk) 03:59, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

Hello Blaze The Wolf. I'm an administrator and also a moderator on the Discord, as you may have seen. I want to give you some advice, I see you are making a lot of comments at ANI and elsewhere recently. I don't think these comments are particularly helpful, I'll provide some examples and explain the issues with them:

• Your comments in this discussion are not very helpful with regards to helping alleviate the overall dispute. As a new user, it isn't a good idea to get into disputes where passions are high, and it's especially not a good idea to be the first person to reply to the ANI not with help, but with a joke. Same goes for here- if you don't know what to do or say it's best to do nothing.
• edits like these; EEng is a regular of these noticeboards and is usually joking with his comments and edits, you pointing out to him what he already likely knew may come off as annoying. I had some similar struggles when I was younger, too. My advice is to just not comment if you're not sure if someone is being serious or not.
• I'm seeing a lot of comments at a few different places where you are guessing or admitting to not knowing everything when responding to a question from another (usually new) user. If you're not sure or are guessing, it is not a good idea to respond. You might end up giving someone advice that isn't correct, which could get them in trouble in the future. I mean this in a nice way, but because of this I really don't think you should be on the mentor list- you haven't been here long enough, you aren't currently knowledgeable enough to be one.
• Discussions like this indicate you're having a hard time figuring out what to work on and do at Wikipedia. Early on, I had the same feeling- I made pointless, unhelpful comments at noticeboards, I would file a bunch of bad AFDs, I got rejected at PERM, and I was in general really all over the place. I felt very dejected and unwelcome, and briefly quit the project. Eventually I came back and focused on one particular area (addressing copyright violations), and focusing on this area allowed me to greatly improve my editing. Now, I am a pretty widely respected administrator.
• I've noticed your above difficulties with anti-vandalism work. My advice is to not revert everything that's tagged as an issue; there's a lot of false positives tagged by software that are fine. If you're not sure if somethings vandalism, just don't revert it- there are plenty of anti vandals out there, and someone else can deal with that edit instead of you.

You are a newer editor, and a lot of your edits have been to behind the scenes stuff. This is not a healthy look for a newcomer, and in the (relatively) short time I've been an admin, I've seen this story countless times; a younger user tries to do a lot of different things and ends up being blocked in the end, because they are getting into more trouble than helping people. I will be upfront: the path you are currently on will likely end with you blocked. If you don't want this to happen, I suggest you stop your comments at ANI and other noticeboards, stop responding to questions at the Teahouse and other places, and finally, listen to the warnings and advice you have received from previous admins and users. If you don't listen to the advice from these users you are going to have a difficult time continuing on this project. My advice is to try and find a narrower area to work in and stay there for a while, and maybe expand your editing after a long time in that area- I didn't even really expand my editing that much until after I became an admin. It's that, or just taking a longer break from Wikipedia, and do something else. It's good to clear your mind and come back with a fresh prospective.

If you want to continue this conversation through DM or mail I am OK with that. Moneytrees🏝️^{Talk/CCI guide} 00:48, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

I'm not going to beat on you or add much more to what Moneytrees has already said. I just want to state that I agree with his general views here. Slow it down in projectspaces. Get some focus in on content or general gnoming. But mostly, understand that this isn't just Moneytrees, or Liz from earlier, or Nick from earlier, or me. There's a pattern here, and you really need to read and listen. -- ferret (talk) 00:58, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

So you want me to quit Wikipedia. Because it feels like no matter what I try, I always manage to screw something up. ―

^Talk

_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 01:59, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Fine. I can do that. If you don't appreciate the GOOD stuff I do then I might as well just not be here. ―

^Talk

_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 02:00, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Why would you say that either of these editors want you to quit Wikipedia when neither said any such thing? Moneytrees took a lot of time and effort to give you some excellent advice. If that editor wanted you to quit, would they have spent so much time? Please recall that on March 30, over six months ago, I told you Unless you are sure that your answer is accurate and useful, please do not respond to questions at the Teahouse. Do not guess. We all want you to keep editing, but we want you to to edit in a consistently productive way. For example, I want you to answer Teahouse questions when you are 99+% sure that your answer is correct, but please do not guess or speculate, because incorrect answers are damaging to new editors and to the Teahouse. The same general principle applies everywhere on Wikipedia. Always strive to do no harm. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 03:10, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Blaze, I want you to listen to me. What the editors above are explaining to you is to benefit you and your editing experience here while also protect the project. We can't jump to the worst conclusions here, we aren't going to do that, okay? They are trying to give you sound advice and I know it seems terse and abrupt or blunt but I want you to understand from someone that you have communicated with and respects you greatly that no one commenting on this thread wants you to quit Wikipedia. If they did then they wouldn't spend time explaining things and offering advice. I joined the Teahouse to offer help but you see that I don't answer a lot. I'm still fairly new and I am taking time to learn policies and the ins and outs of the project so I can explain things better but I will not answer unless I am very confident. You are brilliant and very knowledgeable. You are an asset to this project. Take the advice and apply it to your editing practices, please. I know it hurts to be chastised and corrected. Please do not react too quickly. I am always here to discuss things in relation to your experiences here on Wikipedia or editing in general and offer sound advice as a wiki-friend and fellow editor. --ARoseWolf 15:40, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

Hi Wolf! Hope you're fine. I've also wikistress since joining on Wikipedia. You've also? Thanks!  _regards, Orbit Wharf  ^{💬  |  📝} 04:49, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

"You've also?" I've also what? Not meaning to sound rude, I just don't understand what you mean with this. ―

^Talk

_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 13:12, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

@

^Talk

_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 13:12, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

(talk page watcher) Fairly sure they mean You have [wikistress] also? ~TheresNoTime ^{(to explain!)} 13:19, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

Ah that makes sense. Ye I sorta do, although it appears to have come from a misunderstanding of what someone else said. ―

^Talk

_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 13:28, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

I told you because you used discouraged template in your user page.  _regards, Orbit Wharf  ^{💬  |  📝} 14:27, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

Yep. And I was for a bit (still am a little but have gotten better). ―

^Talk

_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 15:20, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

Hi Blaze The Wolf! The thread you created at the archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both talk ) 19:02, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

You did not get a response to this question, which I just not saw. Did you find the answer elsewhere? This is not something I would know how to answer.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 22:29, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

@

^Talk

_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 13:07, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

I'm way behind reading the archives but I'll make a note.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 15:46, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

	The Copyeditor's Barnstar
	Good job Le0n0622 (talk) 00:46, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

@

^Talk

_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 13:40, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

@

Blaze the Wolf

: Blaze The Wolf I don't know much, since I'm new but thanks for making a lot of cool articles and stuff :)

@

^Talk

_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 18:35, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

Blaze, take care of yourself and I will see you in the Spring. --ARoseWolf 19:22, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

@

^Talk

_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 19:24, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

Hi Blaze The Wolf! The thread you created at the archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both talk ) 19:02, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

Hi Blaze The Wolf! The thread you created at the archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both talk ) 19:01, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

Hey

Link to Wikipedia page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Team_Cherry_(developer) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Person077777777 (talk • contribs) 04:01, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

@

^Talk

_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 14:09, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

Hi Blaze The Wolf! The thread you created at the archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both talk ) 19:00, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for answering my question so perfectly and in such a timely manner! Have a cookie! Also, I was sad to see on your user page how you said you are sad about the current state of wikipedia. I am a new editor (kinda), and I really like this beautiful wiki, but I do think it can get scary sometimes with senior editors reverting things and sometimes being rude. Otherwise, I think its a whacky, weird, wonderful place, but I hope this cookie cheers you up! Th78blue (They/Them/Their • talk) 21:38, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

@

^Talk

_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 21:46, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

Well then. I've never known anyone who had a cookie that did not ALSO like brownies. So here is a brownie as well. Thanks for being awesome! Th78blue (They/Them/Their • talk) 22:10, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

Also, can you help me figure out how to add a "New section" button of sorts (link or whatever) to my talk page? I'd like to use that, and I'm interested in the different types (i.e. you have a trout one )

@

^Talk

_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 22:47, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

@

Blaze The Wolf

:, the part that says "New section"s

@

^Talk

_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 22:51, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

Ah, and sorry about that ping. Thanks! Th78blue (They/Them/Their • talk) 22:53, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

@

^Talk

_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 22:53, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

1. About your discouragement: I'm very sorry to hear your discouraged. I still like your duties at the Teahouse, you're amazing there! I hope you regain your confidence and become a great Wikipedian once again!
2. About you being slightly autistic: I've never plucked up the courage to say this, but I've finally gained the confidence to - I am autistic as well. So sorry if I get a little bit tedious and angry on my (or anyone else's) talk page messages. This is the reason that's happening.
3. About you wanting to be called "Blaze" or "Wolf" or nothing at all: Can I call you "Blaze The Wolf" if I'm pinging you? (Because obviously I can't do @Blaze or @Wolf)
4. What's a furry?

WaterflameIsAwesome (talk) 23:40, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

@WaterflameIsAwesome: 1. Thanks for telling me this. I've been feeling better since I put that message there but I"m not feeling quite all the way quite yet so I've kept it.

2. That would explain a lot about your behavior and you overreacting to some things (as I do myself sometimes)

3. Yes that is perfectly fine. I mainly ask that people call me Blaze or Wolf if they're referring to me outside of a ping.

4. See

^Talk

_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 01:33, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

Ok thanks for the responses. Also, how do you do the trout slapping thing? It seems weird but cool too. WaterflameIsAwesome (talk) 02:15, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

@

^Talk

_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 02:47, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

Also I see your page move of Among Us as being in good faith, however we don't really disambiguate unless there are multiple things with the same name, in which case a disambig is needed (even then

^Talk

_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 02:54, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

Hi, I random came across your userpage and I'm sorry you're feeling discouraged. I don't blame you, boy howdy does it get disfunctional in here sometimes. Still, we're still making the encyclopedia greater every day, somehow, in spite of it all. Here is a picture of some kittens. Everyone likes kittens. Herostratus (talk) 08:45, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

@

^Talk

_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 14:10, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

November songs

Same, trying to cheer you. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:48, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

Thank you Gerda. Nice to see you trying to help me cheer up. ―

^Talk

_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 23:35, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

Hi, I very rarely bother to read other editor's user pages, I treat everyone as just another name in an edit history or a talk page conversation. Even if I get into a deep or convoluted discussion I just go by what they're saying. I find most people's user pages fairly uninteresting anyway. Yours is rather different. I realised that I had jumped to certain conclusions about you on the Ref Desk computers page, and I just wanted to apologize. Sorry you're feeling down about WP, fool comments like mine won't help either. I used to suffer from deep, dark, long-term depression. One thing that helped a lot was St. John's Wort, a herbal extract which really does work to close the trap door down to the cellar of your mind. I was eventually diagnosed with an under-active thyroid gland, for which there is very effective medication. Hope things improve for you. Best wishes, MinorProphet (talk) 14:40, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

@

^Talk

_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 14:44, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

Don't worry about it, I just managed to confuse myself somehow about you and what you do on WP. It's really not important. Cheers, >MinorProphet (talk) 15:24, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

@

^Talk

_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 15:43, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	Thank you for all your contributions and your help on the Wikipedia:Teahouse Kaleeb18 (talk) 23:10, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

@

^Talk

_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 00:05, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

Hi Blaze The Wolf! The thread you created at the archived because there was no discussion for a few days. Click this link to read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, you can create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both talk ) 19:03, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

hello,

@

Blaze The Wolf: Thankyou for replying to my message. i can understand, and to be honest it wasn't any huge delay i am not very active on Wikipedia so i didn't even notice any delay. and abt getting help is that everyone in the teahouse is referring me the WP:Young but I guess there is a problem in my device as that page is not opening. I really need someone to just explain me the steps in message itself but i guess everyone is too busy. If we talk about me being in India so i would have no problem in understanding your messages so if u could help me i would be very Thankful. (And thankyou fro writing in source format as i got to learn some codes).Thankyou again for the reply and i hope i am not irritating u by messaging u constantly to help me. if i do pls tell me. And I am really sorry to reply in short as i didn't had anything to say more. Thankyou Stobene45 (talk

) 04:43, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

@

WP:YOUNG

, what it is in a nutshell:

Feel free to write, but remember that we have some rules.

Ask the other writers if you need help. They are usually friendly.

You should never give out any personal information of any kind to anyone.

Never tell anyone about your "real" life.

The bottom 2 is simply general advice for being on the internet because some people are wanting to commit

talk

) 17:15, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

This was early. ―

^Talk

_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 13:55, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

Your page says you'd like to be cheered up. You're a champ and so grateful to have met your acquaintance. Wikipedia needs more editors like YOU! MaskedSinger (talk) 15:37, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

@

^Talk

_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 15:40, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

I’m not trying to be rude but I didn’t think you were Mormon to be honest.CycoMa1 (talk) 16:27, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

@

^Talk

_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 17:50, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

I find interesting that there are tons of Christian furries on Wikipedia.

I interacted with a Quaker furry, I’m a catholic scalie, and now there’s you a Mormon furry. I guess the Wikipedia article on the

Furry Fandom wasn’t kidding our fandom is diverse.CycoMa1 (talk

) 17:54, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

@

^Talk

_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 18:01, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

^^^. Glancing at your talk plage proves that you definitely now qualify. You have a lot of stuff under your belt now. Panini!^🥪 19:04, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

@

^Talk

_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 19:05, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Please don't rush back into things. October was not so long ago. If you do, go slow and careful. -- ferret (talk) 19:10, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

@

^Talk

_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 19:12, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Hi Blaze, saw this on your user page by coincidence and just wanted to make you're aware -- anatidaephobia isn't actually a real fear, it's a joke based on this 1988 comic by

I didn't realize you were not still in the Discord, so I removed the text which mentioned you. –

@

^Talk

_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 18:54, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

[Thank you for the

☖

19:05, 2 December 2021 (UTC)