User talk:Cloudjpk

Hello, Cloudjpk! talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! —This lousy T-shirt— (talk) 18:04, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply ] Getting Started Contributing to Wikipedia Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: make requests Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Reliable sources Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost) Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs Talk pages User scripts

Hello! Cloudjpk, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! —This lousy T-shirt— (talk) 18:05, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

When you revert with a sentence such as "Please; read the Talk"[1] - then there is a requirement for you to actually be able to demonstrate a consensus for that edit (if it is a new edit - such as this was), or generate a consensus for this change. Since no such consensus is present in the actual talk thread[2], then i do not know what you are referring to.... --Kim D. Petersen 17:35, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:What_is_consensus?#Not_unanimity Cloudjpk (talk) 17:43, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You still have to demonstrate consensus, and no such is present. All you've done on that thread is claim (paraphrased)"My source trumps all of your sources ... because!". And you may also want to read

WP:BRD, since you appear to be neglecting the D part. --Kim D. Petersen 18:01, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

Please don't attribute claims to me I never made. Thanks for the references. Cloudjpk (talk) 18:40, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please learn how to indent. Your comments on talk pages are almost unreadable because you don't indent when answering a comment. Please see

WP:INDENT. --Kim D. Petersen 22:44, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

Sorry, how's that? Cloudjpk (talk) 23:12, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Much better - thank you :) --Kim D. Petersen 23:26, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You bet :) (Hey this is fun :) Cloudjpk (talk) 23:33, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your comments on the e-cigarette are hard to follow. The indentation, or rather lack of indentation makes the flow of the discussion hard to follow when you reply. Please indent your comments

OK! Cloudjpk (talk) 23:13, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Electronic cigarette. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
Please discuss on Talk page instead. Mihaister (talk) 21:33, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done! Thanks Cloudjpk (talk) 21:36, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please revert your last edit and join the discussion on the Talk page. Thanks. Mihaister (talk) 21:39, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I invite you do to the same. Cloudjpk (talk) 22:08, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ultrafine particle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Circulation. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:04, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I invite you to explain how "mist" has consensus, there is a talk page section on this topic, created before your edit. AlbinoFerret 01:32, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Electronic cigarette shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Mihaister (talk) 00:26, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please read this notification carefully:
A community discussion has authorised the use of

electronic cigarettes.
The details of these sanctions are described here

.

uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here

. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.

SPACKlick (talk) 12:14, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Of course, your edit was also "removing well sourced, relevant material"! Johnbod (talk) 17:54, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oh please; hardly comparable. And of course new material may be added without massively removing well sourced, relevant material. Cloudjpk (talk) 18:07, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Public Health England, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lancet. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:23, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You are involved in a recently-filed request for clarification or amendment from the Arbitration Committee. Please review the request at

Thanks, AlbinoFerret 23:59, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

Hi _Cloudjpk, this is a notification that an amendment request pertaining to Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Editor conduct in e-cigs articles has been archived with no action. You can now find it here. For the arbitration committee, Kharkiv07 (T) 03:15, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cloudjpk. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Ed Simons (conductor), Cloudjpk!

Wikipedia editor Menaechmi just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Lovely article, hope to see more from you soon.

To reply, leave a comment on Menaechmi's talk page.

Learn more about

menaechmi (talk) 18:17, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cloudjpk. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cloudjpk. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cloudjpk. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.

You continue to revert changes despite ongoing discussion on the talk page. This constitutes disruptive editing. Please stop. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SpoonLuv (talk • contribs) 17:46, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Media reports of persons hospitalized involving the 2019 vaping lung illness outbreak until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Beland (talk) 22:22, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at

I'm not engaged in disruptive editing. I was the one who requested the other editor to Talk. These are the facts. Thanks. Cloudjpk (talk) 00:30, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I was mistaken about which edit I reverted. I apologize. I have now fixed it. Thanks for your help! Cloudjpk (talk) 00:48, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please don’t remove vice president Gopal Swarup Pathak image. Why are you removing it again and again? J. Modak (talk) 16:21, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't done that. Perhaps you're thinking of someone else? Cloudjpk (talk) 20:31, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]