User talk:Danielklein

You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. I see you have proposed a merger of Lucas number into Lucas sequence. I think there are very good reasons why the articles should not be merged - I have explained these reasons on the articles' talk pages. If you want to consult other editors who are active in the mathematics area of Wikipedia you could mention the proposed merger on the WikiProject Mathematics talk page. Gandalf61 09:48, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Danielklein!

I'd like to second what Gandalf61 just said. Please mention proposed mergers of two math articles on the [[math talk page before tagging the articles. Things will probably go more smoothly that way. Anyway, I don't think the proposed merger is a good idea, for reasons I've explained both here and here. Have a great day! DavidCBryant 12:34, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Bottersnikes and Gumbles.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 12:23, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Isaac Asimov Presents The Great SF Stories 14 (1952), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://scifipedia.scifi.com/index.php/Isaac_Asimov_Presents_The_Great_SF_Stories_14_(1952). For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Isaac Asimov Presents The Great SF Stories 15 (1953), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://scifipedia.scifi.com/index.php/Isaac_Asimov_Presents_The_Great_SF_Stories_15_(1953). For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Isaac Asimov Presents The Great SF Stories 16 (1954), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://scifipedia.scifi.com/index.php/Isaac_Asimov_Presents_The_Great_SF_Stories_16_(1954). For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Isaac Asimov Presents The Great SF Stories 18 (1956), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://scifipedia.scifi.com/index.php/Isaac_Asimov_Presents_The_Great_SF_Stories_18_(1956). For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on

Thank you for uploading

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:00, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

1. S. A. Wakefield - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
2. Tony Barber (musician) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 23:45, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article S. A. Wakefield has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article does not meet Wikipedia:WikiProject Children's literature#Criteria for inclusion. A google search failed to find reliable sources to support this article.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{

]

Melbourne meetup this Saturday

	Melbourne Meetup v t e Next: Wikipedia:Meetup/Melbourne/45 - Friday 8 December, 2023 (watch) Last: 18 February 2023
See also: Australian events listed at Wikimedia.org.au (or on Facebook)

Hi there! You are cordially invited to a meetup at North Melbourne this Saturday (23 July). Details and an attendee list are at

Kwamikagami, Danielklein --

Under "Writing system" we see "Sinhala also knows hal kirama and uses two differing virama symbols depending on the basic grapheme to explicitly indicate the lack of a vowel." Could one of the knowledgable editors please clarify this? I get the impression that virama symbols are sound-killers, but I could find nothing on "hal kirama". (I assume "knows" in this sentence should be "recognizes" or "uses".) Thanks -- Jo3sampl (talk) 19:27, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Copy edited. — kwami (talk) 00:56, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. Just inviting you to the

]

Thanks mate!

	Page fixing
	Hey mate, I reversed that page on Ruby Payne-Scott but missed the two dollars! Thanks for fixing that up! Karl kloppenborg (talk) 23:50, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Penny (Australian)

You left a message on my talk page in 2010: "Where does your information about the penny being withdrawn in 1991 come from?" The Swedish Rounding page used to have this factoid on it; it has since moved to Coins of Australia. All I did was mirror the information on a more useful spot.

Better late than never! Derek Chong (talk) 02:18, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Colour names in Sinhala and English, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Orange (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:14, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Daniel. This is the only way i could figure to contact you. please forgive me if it is inconvenient. i am new to wiki. I found your input regarding the Australian accent very helpful. I am an American Actor in Melbourne (married an Australian) working on my AU accent so I can get involved over here. I want to write out my parts phonetically but feel overwhelmed as to where to start. The needs affected are my being able to contribute creatively and my need for support. Would you suggest a starting point, or perhaps I could buy you a cuppa and pick your brain. Best Wishes Karl [email protected] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kleedo (talk • contribs) 03:24, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Melbourne Meetup Next: 6 January 2013 at La Trobe City Campus Previous: 25 November 2012 This box: view talk edit

Hi there! You are cordially invited to a meetup next Sunday (6 January). Details and an attendee list are at

(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in Victoria)

The article Vicnet has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced article that fails to credibly assert notability of the subject

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AussieLegend (✉) 13:15, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Isaac Asimov Presents The Golden Years of Science Fiction, Fifth Series is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isaac Asimov Presents The Golden Years of Science Fiction, Fifth Series until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Orange Mike | Talk 00:59, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

Hello, Danielklein. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Danielklein. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Danielklein. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Danielklein. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Teahouse#How often does "What links here" get refreshed?

Did the index of articles linking through templates get correctly refreshed finally? --CiaPan (talk) 11:23, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@CiaPan: The cronjob seems to run every half-hour. I've managed to update a lot of the links via a single edit in the appropriate template. Thanks! Danielklein (talk) 03:04, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@CiaPan: I was wrong. The cronjob seems to run every quarter-hour. Danielklein (talk) 04:37, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Danielklein! You created a thread called How often does "What links here" get refreshed? at archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread . Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both talk) 19:00, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply ]

Hi, I removed the following post which said

What I mean is that no evidence or line of reasoning has been presented for IRV giving voters multiple votes. I find this claim interesting (although ridiculous) and would like to know more about it. I.e. how could anyone think that it could be true? Danielklein (talk) 13:38, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Two other editors (including me) had already explained that our

Can you please put something in the article about how one voter can have more than one vote or remove it as an unverified statement? Danielklein (talk) 13:47, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your interest in IRV! I'm not sure precisely what the issue is but I am interested in hear your thoughts. At article talk, please quote the text you are talking about. A good way to quote is to use

NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 13:51, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

A tag has been placed on

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:12, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz: What was this category for? What articles used to appear in it and why is it empty now? --Danielklein (talk) 22:21, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Danielklein! You created a thread called Sri Lankan film and actor articles at archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread . Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both talk) 19:00, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply ]

Hi Danielklein! You created a thread called Lack of evidence of notability of Sri Lankan films at archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread . Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both talk) 19:03, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply ]

I noticed that you are going to delete Sinhala film articles, James Bond and Bindu (already). I got your point. So there is no any offence about deleting James Bond film. However, it is not fair with the film Bindu. Because, the film has received positive reviews from critics, as well as nominated in many film festivals and won some awards. Therefore, as you said earlier, the film is noteworthy to include here. Because, it has some importance. If any Sinhala movie has positive or negative critic review or award nominations, I do not think it is good to delete. Reconsider about it again. I hope you will get the point.

Gihan Jayaweera (talk) 10:43, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bindu's talk page. I have no issue with notable Sri Lankan films being included on Wikipedia (and they don't need to be notable internationally, being notable only within Sri Lanka is good enough). In fact, I would love to see more good articles on Sri Lankan topics on Wikipedia as I have an interest in Sri Lanka, particularly the Sinhalese people and Sinhala language. I will be proposing more films for deletion as I find them. This is not a criticism of your work. You can ping me on each film's talk page to discuss the notability of that particular film, as it's not appropriate to get into the details on a user's talk page. --Danielklein (talk) 05:41, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Danielklein! You created a thread called Is it possible to see the pages that send the most traffic to another article? at archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread . Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both talk) 19:00, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply ]

Gihan Jayaweera

Hi, please note that @

]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Danielklein! You created a thread called Are user created imaginative illustrations Original Research? at archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread . Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both talk) 19:02, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply ]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Danielklein! You created a thread called PROD notice removed without due diligence - what now? at archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread . Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both talk) 19:01, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply ]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

A community discussion has authorised the use of

here

.

Broadly,

uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks

. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

——Serial ^# 10:13, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your request for arbitration of this issue, the Arbitration Committee has agreed that arbitration is not required at this stage. Arbitration on Wikipedia is a lengthy, complicated process that involves the unilateral adjudication of a dispute by an elected committee. Although the Committee's decisions can be useful to certain disputes, in many cases the actual process of arbitration is unenjoyable and time-consuming. Moreover, for most disputes the community maintains an effective set of mechanisms for reaching a compromise or resolving a grievance.

In all cases, you should review

]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Danielklein! The thread you created at the archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both talk) 19:02, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply ]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:21, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply ]

User category proposed deletion

You may be interested in Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2021 August 21#Category:Wikipedians who know where their towel is. It is proposed to delete this category. SpinningSpark 16:22, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]