User talk:Dem393

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Welcome to Wikipedia!!!

Hello Dem393!
sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing! Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 00:24, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply
]
Getting Started
Getting your info out there
Getting more Wikipedia rules
Getting Help
Getting along
Getting technical

DYK

Updated DYK query On
Iowa Democratic caucuses, 2008, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page
.

--JayHenry (talk) 06:35, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New Hampshire Democratic Primary

I notice you reverted the inclusion of all candidates tabulated as receiving votes in the Democratic Primary. I believe this is mistaken because you have thereby switched to an incomplete recording of votes which is not the official total. The source for the votes was the New Hampshire Secretary of State's official certification: http://www.sos.nh.gov/presprim2008/dpressum.htm, and that is now final and no further votes can be added except through the recount process. In effect your change goes to an incorrect number of votes.

I don't know why the NH Secretary of State includes votes cast for candidates for the Republican primary in the Democratic tabulation but he most certainly does. I have asked about it but the most likely explanation is that, if a voter wishing to vote in the Republican primary accidentally puts their ballot paper into the Democratic primary ballot box, then it is counted as a valid vote in the Democratic primary. Sam Blacketer (talk) 11:02, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Peer review request

Myself, and only 2 or so other people are active on the Iowa wiki project. what exactly is involved in a peer review, without me having to read a long wiki page. is it just like a good article review?

talk 03:47, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

well i'll just stop being lazy, and read up on it. do you live in iowa, or just doing a political article? also, since you're new, if you need help, or have questions, feel free to ask me!
talk 04:32, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply
]
I'm doing some minor clean ups, under "Delegate allocation" where it says governor, house, and senate...since it is the governor, do the other 2 refer to state or federal house/senate? I can fix it for you, otherwise we will have an edit conflict. done editing...it looks good to me though!
talk 04:48, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply
]
Yes, I think it is Good Article ready...I'm not sure what is needed for FAs, but you should submit it for a GA
talk 02:53, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply
]


Your
Iowa Democratic caucuses, 2008

The article

Talk:Iowa Democratic caucuses, 2008 for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of said article. If you oppose this decision, you may ask for a reassessment. jackturner3 (talk) 14:43, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Mercy buckets

Sometimes its nice (and satisfying) to see what someone else can do to perk up an article you've started. I would never thought of re-phrasing it that way and it reads much better :) Thanks!

talk • contribs 00:41, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Hi! Thanks for the suggestions :) I tried to get a bit of that but had trouble because I couldn't get access to the information. For example I know there was a court case between Pandora and a rival company over copyright but apart from this I can't find a reliable source for it because I don't have access to the actual case file. And stuff on the actual company is hard to find - not least because of the language barrier.
talk • contribs 04:40, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Welcome to the WikiProject

Welcome to

TX 04:46, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Webster comments

Hi Dem393, I've replied on the FLC, per your request. Cheers! The Rambling Man (talk) 14:40, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]


I answered to your comments. Let me know what you think.

Nergaal (talk) 08:08, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

I responded to your concerns

Heat 14:10, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

I responded to your concerns

here again. --Be Black Hole Sun (talk) 08:55, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

WP:LOTM

Congratulations on getting what appears to be your first successful

WP:LOTM) 21:01, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

I responded to your concern at the above FLC.--

X 19:55, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Changing the background color

Hi. I noticed your question at the village pump. Click your top task bar "Tools" and "Internet Options" then select "COlors". Click the box to get the tick off standard windows colours and choose white for text and the background black. Then come out click "Internet Options" again and this time select "Accessibility" then tick "Ignore colors specified on web pages" . By doing this it should customise wikipedia and other sites however you wish them to be. You can also increase standard font size and change the fonts by this if you werne't aware. Count Blofeld 14:36, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FLRC: You're gonna hate me for this, but...

I have nominated

WIAFL criteria to my eyes, and the merge logic is strong. The resulting list-article, I think, will be an easier-to-keep FL in the future. — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont] ‹(-¿-)› 20:17, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

I have nominated Inept (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. –Meiskam (talkcontribblock) 17:43, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blackle

Blackle generates more co2 then it saves. Not only do most people have LCDs these days (where the black output makes no difference to energy consumption), but they have a server sitting in a building somewhere, consuming electricity so they can forward traffic to google (thus involving more network routers and a longer path) under the guise of saving the planet. Another shining example of people worried about seeming to do something rather than actually doing something productive. Sorry to appear harsh but flag waving exercises where people do things to say they are helping some cause but what they do doesn't help at all (and often hinders) really gets my goat. Tongbongschong (talk) 01:12, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join WikiProject United States

Hello, Dem393! WikiProject United States, an outreach effort supporting development of United States related articles in Wikipedia, has recently been restarted after a long period of inactivity. As a user who has shown an interest in United States related topics we wanted to invite you to join us in developing content relating to the United States. If you are interested please add your Username and area of interest to the members page here. Thank you!!!

--

talk) 04:12, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

The September 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

 
--

talk) 14:48, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

The December 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

 
--

talk) 00:34, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply
]