User talk:Ezhiki/2018

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Please comment on Talk:Cary Grant

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Cary Grant. Legobot (talk) 04:47, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #293

Administrators' newsletter – January 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2017).

Administrator changes

added Muboshgu
readded AnetodeLaser brainWorm That Turned
removed None

Bureaucrat changes

readded Worm That Turned

Guideline and policy news

  • A
    WP:RFA
    and to prohibit the use of administrative tools as part of paid editing activity, with certain exceptions.

Technical news

Arbitration


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:37, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

SpacemanSpiff

Now on SIA Russia https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Vyborgsky_District&diff=817855706&oldid=420181818 78.51.214.48 (talk) 23:46, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #294

Wikidata weekly summary #295

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Capital letters. Legobot (talk) 04:35, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #296

Wikidata weekly summary #297

Administrators' newsletter – February 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2018).

Administrator changes

added None
removed BlurpeaceDana boomerDeltabeignetDenelson83GrandioseSalvidrim!Ymblanter

Guideline and policy news

  • An RfC
    Wikipedian-in-Residence
    or when the payment is made by the Wikimedia Foundation or an affiliate of the WMF.
  • Editors responding to threats of harm can now contact the Wikimedia Foundation's emergency address by using Special:EmailUser/Emergency. If you don't have email enabled on Wikipedia, directly contacting the emergency address using your own email client remains an option.

Technical news

  • A
    automatic edit summaries
    .

Arbitration


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style. Legobot (talk) 04:34, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #298

Red Army maps copyright

Dear Ezhiki, I wonder if you could advise on the possibility of using such Soviet maps in Wikipedia, e.g. could a free license be claimed for the map

http://loadmap.net/en/m11456

so that it could be uploaded in Wikimedia Commons and used for illustration purposes?

Apparently there used to be some relevant debate before, but it's been deleted so I am not aware of the current view on this matter. Best, Apcbg (talk) 09:13, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'd love to help, but I'm not an expert on copyright. If you are going to upload this to the Commons, it would be best to ask there. You will definitely need to know what year these maps were published, though.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); February 12, 2018; 16:51 (UTC)
Thanks, I'll try to seek advice at the Commons; and no, that site gives no year of publication. Best, Apcbg (talk) 12:05, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #299

Speedy deletion nomination of Khlevny

A tag has been placed on

section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned
disambiguation page which either

Under the

see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information
.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. The Mighty Glen (talk) 12:47, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #300

Please comment on Talk:A Wizard of Earthsea

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:A Wizard of Earthsea. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #301

14 years of editing, today

Hey, Ezhiki. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee!
Have a great day!
Chris Troutman (talk) 12:28, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Here's to fourteen more, and then doing it all over again :)—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); March 1, 2018; 14:04 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – March 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2018).

Administrator changes

added Lourdes
removed AngelOfSadnessBhadaniChris 73CorenFridayMidomMike V
† Lourdes has requested that her admin rights be temporarily removed, pending her return from travel.

Guideline and policy news

  • The autoconfirmed article creation trial (ACTRIAL) is scheduled to end on 14 March 2018. The results of the research collected can be read on Meta Wiki.
  • Community ban discussions must now stay open for at least 24 hours prior to being closed.
  • A change to the administrator inactivity policy has been proposed. Under the proposal, if an administrator has not used their admin tools for a period of five years and is subsequently desysopped for inactivity, the administrator would have to file a new RfA in order to regain the tools.
  • A change to the banning policy has been proposed which would specify conditions under which a repeat sockmaster may be considered de facto banned, reducing the need to start a community ban discussion for these users.

Technical news

  • CheckUsers are now able to view private data such as IP addresses from the edit filter log, e.g. when the filter prevents a user from creating an account. Previously, this information was unavailable to CheckUsers because access to it could not be logged.
  • The edit filter has a new feature contains_all that edit filter managers may use to check if one or more strings are all contained in another given string.

Miscellaneous

Obituaries

  • Bhadani (Gangadhar Bhadani) passed away on 8 February 2018. Bhadani joined Wikipedia in March 2005 and became an administrator in September 2005. While he was active, Bhadani was regarded as one of the most prolific Wikipedians from India.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:00, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Russian populated places set index

Hey Ezhiki!

I was randomming articles in boredom when I stumbled on a set index of Russian populated places called Mochalishche. I added coordinates for the one village that was missing. Thing is, I found another place called Mochalishche in Ukraine, it even has a Wikidata entry. I read some of the policy, but got pretty confused. Since you created the index, I thought I'd ask you: Should the index be replaced with a disambiguation page including the Ukranian location? Should there be a seperate disambiguation page? Should there not be a disambiguation page at all? Hecseur (talk) 16:21, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, @
disambiguation page red link requirements), there really isn't anything we can do about it until that article is written. Guidelines clearly discourage placement of red links in hatnotes. Hope this helps, but let me know if anything is still unclear. Cheers,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?
); March 5, 2018; 16:14 (UTC)
I think the best course of action will be to start creating new articles for these villages. I know the Ukrainian Mochalishche has an article on the Ukrainian Wiki which I can use to build an article on the English Wikipedia. Honestly it's past time these red links will get 'blued'. Thanks for all the help! You really helped a struggling Wikipedian out! Hecseur (talk) 16:58, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Happy to help! And as a matter of fact, encouraging the creation of new articles is one of the reasons we even bother with these set indices in the first place :)—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); March 7, 2018; 19:42 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #302

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Military history. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #303

Use
WP:EPON

Hello. Please read carefully

WP:EPON
for categorization of cities/towns.

91.124.117.29 (talk) 19:58, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, this is one piece of advice you should heed yourself. I've left you a message on your talk page; you might want to stop what you are doing and give it a more thorough thought. Best,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); March 13, 2018; 20:00 (UTC)
Don't add category like "Populated place established in X" for that cities' categories. Because the only main article (name_of_town) related to such category (subcats are unrelated). You were reverted many times not by me, see [1] 91.124.117.29 (talk) 20:10, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • From
    WP:EPON
    . There are three options:
  1. Keep both the eponymous category and the main article in the parent category. This is used in Category:Western Europe to allow that region's country articles to be navigated together. This rule is used for all geographic categories (town and cities) now.
  2. Keep just the child article. This is used in Category:British Islands, to prevent a loop. No any loops in discussed categories.
  3. Keep just the eponymous category. This is used for Category:Farmworkers in Category:People by occupation. Such "X by Y" categories sometimes cover a limited navigational set, not a topic (see #Category tree organization), thus there is no logical article content. There are no "X by Y" categories in the involved category tree.

So, the first option is used for cities categories. 91.124.117.29 (talk) 20:19, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

When supercats like "Populated place established in X" are added to a category (eponymous or otherwise), they refer solely to that category, not to every article that category contains (otherwise we would hardly ever be able to add any subcategory to a category—you work up the category tree, not down). It is that idea one must keep in mind when considering how to build a category tree.
The Moscow revert you cited is related to the ongoing re-organization of categories dealing with establishment years and is not in the same league as what you are doing. And most other examples you might be able to find are going to almost always be one-time deals similar to your activities, where the structure is changed with no regard to the big picture.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); March 13, 2018; 20:26 (UTC)
On the "three options", there is no guidance as to which areas of knowledge these options are to be applied; only examples. If you read WP:EPON closely and carefully (an advice I started with), you'll see that's where the "editor consensus" part kicks in. Once the "[t]his rule is used for all geographic categories (town and cities) now" part you added above becomes an actual part of the guideline, then there will be no reason to argue with you; until then you don't really have an argument, only an opinion.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); March 13, 2018; 20:26 (UTC)
For example, the Region (Oblast, Krai) has own category with 15 cities. For example, only four or five of them have an own eponymous categories. If we use Option 3, we have 10 related articles (not all cities!) and 5 subcategories. If we use Option 1, we have 15 cities (all cities!) and 5 subcategories in it.
WP:EPON said Keep both the eponymous category and the main article in the parent category... to allow that region's country articles to be navigated together. When the reader navigated the category, what is better? When he had 10 (Option 3) or all 15 (Option 1) cities articles in it? Why you are for Option 3? 91.124.117.29 (talk) 20:42, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply
]
I personally don't see one option being better than another. Categories grow, and eventually this example will have fifteen (eponymous) categories and no (individual) articles. Until that happens, we'd have a mix of articles (without eponymous categories) and categories. All fifteen entities are included in both cases, so where's the problem?—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); March 19, 2018; 16:14 (UTC)
The problem is to allow that region's country articles to be navigated together. When they are hidden in respective subcategories, they aren't navigated together. In other case, it's a very hard for readers to define the number of correct entities in the category and to receive the full list of entities. When all N=38 cities included (and none missed), then a reader knows, N=38 cities are located in that region. As of now, as I can see, the rule is used in most cases in the geogrpaphic tree, see for example Category:Capitals in Europe, Category:Cities and towns in Norway, Category:Cities in South West England, Category:Central European countries etc. 91.124.117.29 (talk) 15:26, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #304

So the subdistricts are not supposed to be linked from the district that contains them? Dr. Vogel (talk) 14:25, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No, it's not that. If lower divisions are linked properly, that's great. The problem here was that it was easier to kill the whole section wholesale than to fix it. For one, the terminology should match what's used elsewhere—we are not, for example, using "subdistrict" or "rural district" in the context of Russia. It wasn't even matching the infobox information. Then, the links seem to be not to the selsoviets (called "rural settlements" in Rostov Oblast, which this district is a part of), but to individual rural localities, which is not at all the same thing. And even the localities were not being linked the same way they are being linked in other articles. In all, there is a lot of background work that needs to be done before these kind of lists can be added easily; at this point they would just be creating a maintenance backlog and confuse readers.
Let me know if you have questions; I'll be happy to elaborate. Cheers,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); March 22, 2018; 14:34 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Comedian

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Comedian. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #305

Translation help

Hello. I'm trying to verify whether a whaling station was built on Big Shantar Island in the 19th century. I haven't found anything in English and most of the whaling done there was by Americans. An old steam engine on the island has been variously identified as belonging to either a Russian American Company or just American whaling station. I found two news articles (both in Russian) which appear to say a Soviet-era military settlement existed on the island. I don't entirely trust Google translate (it likes to translate a certain word into "giraffe" for some reason), so I was wondering if you could verify this? They're both short articles. I'd be grateful for any assistance you could provide me. Here are the articles in question: here and here. ST1849 (talk) 20:40, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've looked at both articles, and unfortunately neither one mentions a whaling station (or anything about the 19th century history). The first article says that the "larger islands" of the archipelago are uninhabited (except for the personnel of the weather station), but there used to be "military townlets" and "Soviet-era settlements" there, which have since been abandoned. The second article specifically states that Bolshoy Shantar used to house a military unit. No word on the island giraffe population, sadly :)
Hope this helps and let me know if you need anything further.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); March 28, 2018; 20:57 (UTC)
Thanks. I should've been more clear. Google translate didn't mention any whaling stations either. It's just that the image in the first article has been floating around on other sites as what is left of an American whaling station. I just wanted to know if the articles indeed mentioned the Soviet-era settlements. Thanks for verifying that. I'm starting to wonder if they just tell tourists it's an abandoned whaling station because that sounds more interesting than a lonely military outpost? So far I've found no documentary evidence to back up that claim. ST1849 (talk) 22:20, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Here's one of the websites that associates that steam engine with an American whaling station and mentions those elusive giraffes. ST1849 (talk) 23:38, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, that one describes the whaling aspect in a great deal of detail, but while I have no reasons to doubt the source's veracity, it doesn't look it could qualify as a
reliable source (it is an article published on a TV network site, which would normally be OK, but it is in their "blogs" section, which is not). The "giraffe", incidentally, refers to a whale fat-melting device (and I honestly have no clue why google decided to translate this term so). It was identified as previously abandoned by American (as in US American) poachers by the Khabarovsk branch of the All-Russian Preservation Society of Historical and Cultural Monuments, so perhaps that would be a good lead to continue with the research?—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?
); March 29, 2018; 15:07 (UTC)
Oh, I know. I don't trust any news site/blog written in English, let alone Russian. The problem is you can't use Google translate on books or peer-reviewed papers. I'll see if that preservation society has an English-language email I can contact. Thanks for all the translation help. ST1849 (talk) 18:12, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
If it helps, the Society's website is http://voopik.ru, and the page for the Khabarovsk branch is http://voopik.ru/region/detail.php?ELEMENT_ID=246. Not much information there, but they do have an email listed, if you want to pursue that route. If you manage to stumble upon anything else useful that you need translation help with, feel free to contact me again. Best,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); March 29, 2018; 18:52 (UTC)
Ok. Thanks for the link. ST1849 (talk) 19:01, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – April 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2018).

Administrator changes

added 331dotCordless LarryClueBot NG
removed Gogo DodoPb30SebastiankesselSeicerSoLando

Guideline and policy news

  • Administrators who have been desysopped due to inactivity are now required to have performed at least one (logged) administrative action in the past 5 years in order to qualify for a resysop without going through a new RfA.
  • Editors who have been found to have engaged in sockpuppetry on at least two occasions after an initial indefinite block, for whatever reason, are now automatically considered banned by the community without the need to start a ban discussion.
  • The notability guideline for organizations and companies has been substantially rewritten following the closure of this request for comment. Among the changes, the guideline more clearly defines the sourcing requirements needed for organizations and companies to be considered notable.
  • The six-month autoconfirmed article creation trial (ACTRIAL) ended on 14 March 2018. The post-trial research report has been published. A request for comment is now underway to determine whether the restrictions from ACTRIAL should be implemented permanently.

Technical news

Arbitration

  • The Arbitration Committee
    WP:ARCA
    .

Miscellaneous

  • A discussion has closed which concluded that administrators are not required to enable email, though many editors suggested doing so as a matter of best practice.
  • The Foundations' Anti-Harassment Tools team has released the Interaction Timeline. This shows a chronologic history for two users on pages where they have both made edits, which may be helpful in identifying sockpuppetry and investigating editing disputes.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:23, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #306

Gritsovsky

Hi. I just added the article on Gritsovsky, and noticed that your sandbox had a link to it. Are you, or do you know someone who is, good with infoboxes? --Bejnar (talk) 23:09, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take care of it in the next couple of days. Thanks for letting me know (and for creating the stub). Cheers,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); April 4, 2018; 02:30 (UTC)
You indicated that "urban-type settlements should not be included with cities and towns". Yet the article on Urban-type settlement indicates that This type of locality has been used in all 15 member republics of the former Soviet Union since 1922 when it replaced a number of terms which could have been translated by the English term "town" .... Gritsovsky is a little bigger in size than the US town that I grew up in was. Having a hospital is more than many small towns in the US have, much less a refrigerator factory. So, could you tell me why an "urban-type settlement" should not be considered a town? The satellite view certainly looks like a town. Or is the English word "town" just entirely inappropriate when talking about Russian settlements smaller than a city? If not a town, could/should there be a subsection or subsections of the {{Tula Oblast}} template for other settlements, comparable to the {{Socorro County, New Mexico}} template? Should the top settlement section have only cities? Where would be an appropriate place to discuss this? --Bejnar (talk) 23:52, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Well, just because the term can be translated as "town" doesn't mean the place is a town... "Urban-type settlement" is a very specific connotation (and by definition, an urban-type settlement is not a town, but an urban entity roughly between a town proper and a rural locality), but since the concept itself is very much Russia- and former Soviet Union-specific and has no apparent equivalents in Western countries, "town" is an acceptable translation when a place needs to be identified as something, but where an exact designation does not really matter (such as in a news coverage for an area where an urban-type settlement is located). In Wikipedia articles dealing with Russian geography, however, the designation does in fact matter.
You are completely right about the Tula Oblast template needing another section, though. I was going through those templates before, but never made it to Tula Oblast (see, for example, {{Republic of Bashkortostan}} or {{Sakha Republic}}). I'd be happy to add a section to Tula Oblast's template if you wish; just let me know. Cheers,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); April 12, 2018; 14:46 (UTC)
Yes, please. --Bejnar (talk) 16:36, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I've added them. I also just remembered that a bunch of urban-type settlements in Tula Oblast (Gritsovsky included) were demoted to a rural status a few years ago. The list now in {{Tula Oblast}} is current.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); April 24, 2018; 14:15 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox Russian city/doc

Template:Infobox Russian city/doc has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 23:26, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Germanic peoples

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Germanic peoples. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #307

Wikidata weekly summary #308

Wikidata weekly summary #309

Please comment on Talk:Mark Weisbrot

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Mark Weisbrot. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, from the Portals WikiProject...

You are invited to

Portal system
...

The Portals WikiProject was rebooted 9 days ago, and is going strong. Fifty-two editors have joined so far, with more joining daily.

We're having a blast, and excitement is high...

Our goal is to update, upgrade, and maintain portals.

In addition to working directly on portals, we are developing tools to make building and maintaining portals easier. We've finished one so far, with more to come.

Discussions are underway about how to upgrade portals, and what the portals of the future will be.

There are plenty of tasks (including WikiGnome tasks too) on the WikiProject page.

With more to come.

We may even surprise ourselves and exceed all expectations. Who knows what we will be able to accomplish in what may become the biggest Wikicollaboration in years.

See ya at the WikiProject!

Sincerely,    — The Transhumanist   03:22, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I won't be joining, but best of luck to y'all with this endeavor.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); April 27, 2018; 13:19 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #310

Administrators' newsletter – May 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2018).

Administrator changes

added None
removed ChochopkCoffeeGryffindorJimpKnowledge SeekerLankiveilPeridonRjd0060

Guideline and policy news

  • The ability to create articles directly in mainspace is now indefinitely
    restricted to autoconfirmed users
    .
  • A proposal is being discussed which would create a new "event coordinator" right that would allow users to temporarily add the "confirmed" flag to new user accounts and to create many new user accounts without being hindered by a rate limit.

Technical news

Arbitration

Obituaries

  • Lankiveil (Craig Franklin) passed away in mid-April. Lankiveil joined Wikipedia on 12 August 2004 and became an administrator on 31 August 2008. During his time with the Wikimedia community, Lankiveil served as an oversighter for the English Wikipedia and as president of Wikimedia Australia.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:05, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #311

I created this stub and will work on it in the coming days. For the Nenets AO, I do not have a slightest idea what its divisions are (and Administrative divisions of Nenets Autonomous Okrug does not help much), but if you have expert knowledge (I am sure you have) and time (I am less sure) may be you could add an infobox with proper references and write a section on administratiove status? Thanks a lot.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:02, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's been hard finding time to do anything meaningful around Wikipedia for me lately (and I'm not sure when this situation will improve), but I will certainly add your request at the top of my to-do list. However, please feel free to take a stab at this task yourself if it takes me longer than a reasonable amount of time to get to it.
As for NAO's administrative structure, it is pretty straightforward. Naryan-Mar is incorporated as a town of okrug significance, and the rest of NAO's territory comprises Zapolyarny District. (On the municipal divisions side, those correspond to Naryan-Mar Urban Okrug and Zapolyarny Municipal District). The (administrative) district is further divided into eighteen selsoviets and one urban-type settlement of district significance (that would be Iskateley), which municipally correspond 1:1 to rural settlements and an urban settlement. The administrative divisions are enumerated in this law, which you can probably find online (or feel free to shoot me an email and I'll be happy to send you a Word copy of the latest revision). Cheers,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); May 8, 2018; 15:57 (UTC)
Great, thank you very much. I will do whatever I can do, and checking hopefully takes less time than creation from zero.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:33, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I believe I have fixed the references.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:31, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
An unrelated question: in some subject templates we have first cities/towns, then urban-type settlements, and then districts (sometimes we have federal-level settlements but I am not now talking about them); in other templates we have first cities/towns, then districts, and then urban-type settlements. We probably should come with a unified design; I believe it is more logical to have urban-type settlements between towns and districts. What do you think about it?--Ymblanter (talk) 07:34, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
We used to have separate templates for districts and for cities/towns, and I think when I was merging them, I was mostly using city/town templates as a starting point, but since I wasn't merging them all in one sitting, in some of them cities/towns ended up at the top, and in others in the middle. You are right, of course, that a consistent approach would be an improvement. I would think a top-down approach—listing districts, then cities/towns, then urban-type settlements—makes most sense (with the ZATOs being listed either last, or between the districts and cities/towns), but I guess as long as everything is consistent across the board, it doesn't matter all that much. If you want to change these templates to use a certain order, I sure am not going to complain. Thanks!—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); May 16, 2018; 16:13 (UTC)
Good, thanks. Let is make it districts -> ZATO -> towns -> urban-type settlements then. I will change them (I am adding the urban-type settlements where they are missing anyway).--Ymblanter (talk) 06:01, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Music. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #312

Hi Ezhiki!! Kges1901 has tried to assist your great efforts by creating this article. I'm sure he was specifically thinking of your Far Eastern heritage ;) Please amend/change as required.. Buckshot06 (talk) 08:47, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #313

Please comment on Talk:Forever alone

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Forever alone. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #314

Administrators' newsletter – June 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2018).

Administrator changes

added None
removed Al Ameer sonAliveFreeHappyCenariumLupoMichaelBillington

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • IP-based cookie blocks should be deployed to English Wikipedia in June. This will cause the block of a logged-out user to be reloaded if they change IPs. This means in most cases, you may no longer need to do /64 range blocks on residential IPv6 addresses in order to effectively block the end user. It will also help combat abuse from IP hoppers in general. For the time being, it only affects users of the desktop interface.
  • The Wikimedia Foundation's Anti-Harassment Tools team will build
    the talk page
    .
  • There is now a checkbox on Special:ListUsers to let you see only users in temporary user groups.
  • It is now easier for blocked mobile users to see why they were blocked.

Arbitration

  • A recent technical issue with the Arbitration Committee's spam filter inadvertently caused all messages sent to the committee through Wikipedia (i.e. Special:EmailUser/Arbitration Committee) to be discarded. If you attempted to send an email to the Arbitration Committee via Wikipedia between May 16 and May 31, your message was not received and you are encouraged to resend it. Messages sent outside of these dates or directly to the Arbitration Committee email address were not affected by this issue.

Miscellaneous


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:59, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #315

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Succession to the British throne. Legobot (talk) 04:31, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #316

Wikidata weekly summary #317

Wikidata weekly summary #318

Wikidata weekly summary #319

Administrators' newsletter – July 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2018).

Administrator changes

added PbsouthwoodTheSandDoctor
readded Gogo Dodo
removed AndrevanDougEVulaKaisaLTony FoxWilyD

Bureaucrat changes

removed AndrevanEVula

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • Starting on July 9, the WMF Security team, Trust & Safety, and the broader technical community will be seeking input on an upcoming change that will restrict editing of site-wide JavaScript and CSS to a new technical administrators user group. Bureaucrats and stewards will be able to grant this right per a community-defined process. The intention is to reduce the number of accounts who can edit frontend code to those who actually need to, which in turn lessens the risk of malicious code being added that compromises the security and privacy of everyone who accesses Wikipedia. For more information, please review the FAQ.
  • Syntax highlighting has been graduated from a Beta feature on the English Wikipedia. To enable this feature, click the highlighter icon () in your editing toolbar (or under the hamburger menu in the 2017 wikitext editor). This feature can help prevent you from making mistakes when editing complex templates.
  • IP-based cookie blocks should be deployed to English Wikipedia in July (previously scheduled for June). This will cause the block of a logged-out user to be reloaded if they change IPs. This means in most cases, you may no longer need to do /64 range blocks on residential IPv6 addresses in order to effectively block the end user. It will also help combat abuse from IP hoppers in general. For the time being, it only affects users of the desktop interface.

Miscellaneous


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #320

Wikidata weekly summary #321

Wikidata weekly summary #322

July 2018

help desk. Thank you. --Jax 0677 (talk) 17:12, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

Wikidata weekly summary #323

Interested in translating some articles for WP:WIR's event this month?

Hello! Would you be interested in translating some articles from Russian to English for WP:WIR's event this month? I have a list of links of indigenous women missing from the en-wiki that I've been collected forever and it'd be nice to get some more of them translated. And if you know anyone else that would be interested, please feel free to let them know! -Yupik (talk) 03:51, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – August 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2018).

Administrator changes

added Sro23
readded KaisaLYmblanter

Guideline and policy news

Technical news


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #324

Wikidata weekly summary #325

Wikidata weekly summary #326

Wikidata weekly summary #327

Administrators' newsletter – September 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2018).

Administrator changes

added None
removed AsterionCrisco 1492KFKudpungLizRandykittySpartaz
renamed Optimist on the runVoice of Clam

Interface administrator changes

added AmorymeltzerMr. StradivariusMusikAnimalMSGJTheDJXaosflux

Guideline and policy news

  • Following a "stop-gap" discussion, six users have temporarily been made interface administrators while discussion is ongoing for a more permanent process for assigning the permission. Interface administrators are now the only editors allowed to edit sitewide CSS and JavaScript pages, as well as CSS/JS pages in another user's userspace. Previously, all administrators had this ability. The right can be granted and revoked by bureaucrats.

Technical news

  • Because of a data centre test you will be able to read but not edit the wikis for up to an hour on 12 September and 10 October. This will start at 14:00 (UTC). You might lose edits if you try to save during this time. The time when you can't edit might be shorter than an hour.
  • Some abuse filter variables have changed. They are now easier to understand for non-experts. The old variables will still work but filter editors are encouraged to replace them with the new ones. You can find the list of changed variables on mediawiki.org. They have a note which says Deprecated. Use ... instead. An example is article_text which is now page_title.
  • Abuse filters can now use how old a page is. The variable is page_age.

Arbitration

  • The Arbitration Committee has resolved to perform a round of
    Functionaries team
    , and they will be requested to assist in the vetting process. The deadline to submit an application is 23:59 UTC, 12 September, and the candidates that move forward will be published on-wiki for community comments on 18 September.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:23, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #328

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
thanks for your contribution on improving Russian-relate Wikipedia articles La.ph (talk) 19:17, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #329

Wikidata weekly summary #330

Wikidata weekly summary #331

Wikidata weekly summary #332

Administrators' newsletter – October 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2018).

Administrator changes

added JustlettersandnumbersL235
removed BgwhiteHorsePunchKidJ GrebKillerChihuahuaRami RWinhunter

Interface administrator changes

added Cyberpower678Deryck ChanOshwahPharosRagesossRitchie333

Oversight changes

removed Guerillero NativeForeigner SnowolfXeno

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • Partial blocks should be available for testing in October on the Test Wikipedia and the Beta-Cluster. This new feature allows admins to block users from editing specific pages and in the near-future, namespaces and uploading files. You can expect more updates and an invitation to help with testing once it is available.
  • The Foundations' Anti-Harassment Tools team is currently looking for input on how to measure the effectiveness of blocks. This is in particular related to how they will measure the success of the aforementioned partial blocks.
  • Because of a data centre test, you will be able to read but not edit the Wikimedia projects for up to an hour on 10 October. This will start at 14:00 (UTC). You might lose edits if you try to save during this time.

Arbitration

  • The Arbitration Committee has, by motion, amended the procedure on functionary inactivity.
  • The community consultation for 2018 CheckUser and Oversight appointments has concluded. Appointments will be made by October 11.
  • Following a request for comment, the size of the Arbitration Committee will be decreased to 13 arbitrators, starting in 2019. Additionally, the minimum support percentage required to be appointed to a two-year term on ArbCom has been increased to 60%. ArbCom candidates who receive between 50% and 60% support will be appointed to one-year terms instead.
  • Nominations for the 2018 Arbitration Committee Electoral Commission are being accepted until 12 October. These are the editors who help run the ArbCom election smoothly. If you are interested in volunteering for this role, please consider nominating yourself.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:13, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #333

Wikidata weekly summary #334

Wikidata weekly summary #335

Gone?

Are you still with us on enwiki? Haven't seen you edit for a while. I'm finding it difficult to dedicate as much time as I used to, but I hope you haven't gone for good. Fenix down (talk) 16:05, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes :)—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); October 1, 2020; 15:34 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #336

Administrators' newsletter – November 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2018).

Guideline and policy news

  • A request for comment determined that non-administrators will not be able to request interface admin access.
  • A request for comment is in progress to determine whether the Mediation Committee should be closed and marked as historical.
  • A
    proposed deletion policy
    (PROD) should be clarified or amended.
  • A
    today's featured article
    (TFA) in order to mitigate a recent trend of severe image vandalism.

Technical news

Arbitration

  • Eligible editors will be invited to nominate themselves as candidates in the 2018 Arbitration Committee Elections starting on November 4 until November 13. Voting will begin on November 19 and last until December 2.
  • The Arbitration Committee's email address has changed to arbcom-en@wikimedia.org. Other email lists, such as functionaries-en and clerks-l, remain unchanged.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:18, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox Russian inhabited locality

Template:Infobox Russian inhabited locality has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. eh bien mon prince (talk) 19:22, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #337

Wikidata weekly summary #338

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Ezhiki. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #339

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox Russian city district

Template:Infobox Russian city district has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. eh bien mon prince (talk) 15:49, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox Russian district

Template:Infobox Russian district has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. eh bien mon prince (talk) 15:57, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #340

Administrators' newsletter – December 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2018).

Administrator changes

readded Al Ameer sonRandykittySpartaz
removed BosonDaniel J. LeivickEfeEsanchez7587Fred BauderGarzoMartijn HoekstraOrangemike

Interface administrator changes

removedDeryck Chan

Guideline and policy news

  • Following a request for comment, the Mediation Committee is now closed and will no longer be accepting case requests.
  • A request for comment is in progress to determine whether members of the Bot Approvals Group should satisfy activity requirements in order to remain in that role.
  • A request for comment is in progress regarding whether to change the administrator inactivity policy, such that administrators "who have made no logged administrative actions for at least 12 months may be desysopped". Currently, the policy states that administrators "who have made neither edits nor administrative actions for at least 12 months may be desysopped".
  • A proposal has been made to temporarily restrict editing of the Main Page to interface administrators in order to mitigate the impact of compromised accounts.

Technical news

Arbitration

  • Voting in the
    2018 Arbitration Committee Elections is open to eligible editors until Monday 23:59, 3 December 2018. Please review the candidates and, if you wish to do so, submit your choices on the voting page
    .

Miscellaneous

Obituaries


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:36, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #341

Wikidata weekly summary #342

Wikidata weekly summary #343

Wikidata weekly summary #344