User talk:Farzam.akbarian86

Hi, I saw the date of birth on the first page of Google Farzam.akbarian86 (talk) 05:55, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I just downloaded the current photo I just uploaded from the Disney site Farzam.akbarian86 (talk) 05:57, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Neither of those things are allowed. Like I said, images need to be freely licensed and we need actual verifiable sources for information, not just what you see on Google. Elisfkc (talk) 03:24, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Farzam.akbarian86! Your additions to

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double
  inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners
  , for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images.
  non-free content criteria
  in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 19:32, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks!      — Freoh 15:07, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, the second generation HomePod cannot be included in the original HomePod page because the original HomePod has been discontinued for 22 months. Farzam.akbarian86 (talk) 18:43, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, "cannot" is incorrect; when there is little to write about a topic, we generally combine pages (see

WP:PAGEDECIDE). Here, there is little point in having separate pages when readers who care about the 2nd generation HomePod will find most of the information about the 1st generation relevant. DFlhb (talk) 23:03, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. TheManInTheBlackHat (Talk) 20:31, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@

WP:MOVE for more information. Thanks, DFlhb (talk) 22:06, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello, the first generation HomePod product was discontinued 22 months ago and should not be placed on the same page Farzam.akbarian86 (talk) 06:47, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"should not" is a declaration, not an argument. Both generations match criteria 2, 4 and 5 of

edit warring.) Best, DFlhb (talk) 07:06, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:58, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Peugeot 508—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 21:27, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Can you please stop doing edits like this to get around the current move protection at Twitter, Inc.? There's a discussion under way on the talkpage over the future location of this page - if you think it should move to another location please seek consensus for that outcome rather than unilaterally redirecting the page. Thanks and all the best. -- Euryalus (talk) 22:17, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I suggest that you transfer Twitter, inc. to the Twitter page because this company is closed and there are the same contents on both pages. Farzam.akbarian86 (talk) 15:32, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm

• A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in PlayStation, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- ferret (talk) 12:58, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Alphabet Inc.. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. InfiniteNexus (talk) 22:34, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Hello, I'm GSK. I noticed that you recently removed content from PlayStation Vita without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. GSK (talk • edits) 14:56, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello, I'm Philipnelson99. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to State Anthem of the Soviet Union—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Philipnelson99 (talk) 19:12, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Apologies. This was a mistake on my part. Philipnelson99 (talk) 19:14, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:40, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You've been warned about this before. Do not blank or redirect an article without providing a valid explanation or you are likely to be reverted. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:41, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Universal Studios, Inc., you may be blocked from editing. Do NOT remove entire pages without consensus, and do not edit war. Thank you. JeffSpaceman (talk) 14:37, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, dear friend, a company called Universal Studios inc does not exist anymore and the page is fake, and some people made this page out of personal interest. Farzam.akbarian86 (talk) 17:47, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]