User talk:Fn1m
Welcome to Wikipedia!!!
|
January 2009
Queen
There is a thread for this on the talk page, if you have reliable third party sources for the information you include, you should take up the issue there. You also appear to be deleting sources to include your view, this is not acceptable, please desist in doing this, again, take it up on the talk page.--Alf melmac 22:32, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
October 2009
File copyright problem with File:JorgeCampos.jpg
Thank you for uploading
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILYsock (TALK) 00:50, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
File copyright problem with File:Campos1.jpg
Thank you for uploading
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILYsock (TALK) 00:50, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
Figuring 2002 and 2006 World Cup performance into 2010 WC Seeding
Why do you keep deleting that? It's highly probable. If it wasn't, more people would be projecting the Netherlands as a seeded team. You need to put it back Purplebackpack89 (talk) 17:23, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
- Your revert of prior performance in World Cups isn't just wrong, it's edit warring and vandalism. Purplebackpack89 (talk) 19:44, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
November 2009
This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing.
{{unblock|Your reason here}}
below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Removal of noncontroversial material content is inappropriate; as notified you can tag content that needs citation. Edit warring to keep noncontroversial material removed is disruptive, and since you have continued past warnings I have blocked you for 24 hours. LessHeard vanU (talk) 21:26, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
Your recent edits
Fn1m (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Ι incorrectly delete an edit because I didn't knew that I could use [citation needed]
Decline reason:
AS noted in the block message you ignored warnings about this. — Daniel Case (talk) 04:19, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
]
Broken Frame Tour
This is an automated message from
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on
October 2010
March 2011
This is your last warning; the next time you
- Under the terms of Republic of Macedonia. This is due to your recent page-move disruption and previous vandalism. Moreschi (talk) 13:13, 11 March 2011 (UTC)]
It's the de facto and much-used flag of the government of Libya as recognized by France, so its inclusion is not frivolous. AnonMoos (talk) 19:33, 11 March 2011 (UTC)