User talk:Goodd-002

Goodd-002 ^(chatme)

You had several errors in your automatic page archiving code - which was why it wasn't working. I took the liberty of fixing the code for you and placed old messages in User talk:Goodd-002/Archive 1 to kick the system off. Cheers. -- Begoon 22:37, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, on en.WP there are rules constraining wikilinking. Please don't link "upcoming" (it's a normal English word), nor dates, years, common terms such as "television", etc. Tony (talk) 07:36, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GSS was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject

independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid

when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bhumika Gurung.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bhumika Gurung and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
  db-self
  }}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and
  may be deleted
  .
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GSS (talk) 07:04, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GSS was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject

independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid

when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Aashika bhatia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
  db-self
  }}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and
  may be deleted
  .
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GSS (talk|c|em) 07:37, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A request has been filed for the title of [[:{{{1}}}]] requesting that it be added to the title blacklist. This has been done because the article appears to be a recreation, under a different title, of an article which is itself currently protected against recreation. Please note that titles used to circumvent the protection policy are often given the same level of protection as the original title the author is trying to circumvent, or are added to the title blacklist.

If you feel that the topic of the article meets our

Please note that repeated recreation of an article against a consensus to delete is considered disruptive and grounds for a block. Thank you. GSS (talk|c|em) 09:25, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:47, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Naagin (2015 TV series)

Do not revert that article to the monstrous pile of bloated drivel which you did here again. Thank you. -- Begoon 09:52, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

Please stop removing

maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to File:Naagin 3.jpeg, without resolving the problem that the template refers to. This may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked

from editing.

• Here:[1] you removed the {{
  WP:NFC. Begoon 13:51, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Orphaned non-free image File:Love On The Run.jpg

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 05:46, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Here is a clue - go to the file description page and examine the fair use rationale - correct any errors you have made which would cause the rationale to be invalid for that article and fix them. I'm not doing it for you because fixing your sloppy, lazy editing is becoming too time consuming, sorry. -- Begoon 07:57, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019

May I Come In Madam, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines

.

• "which will be premiered on 7 March 2016 to 25 August 2017" ??? Do you even read what you edit ??? See
  WP:CIR - my patience is running out. Begoon 14:56, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Bole Chudiyan (film) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection

.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. GSS (talk|c|em) 02:29, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Rishabh Dubey

Hello Sir! I see that you created a new article 'Rishabh Dubey' yesterday at around 16:30 hours. But, you seem to have deleted it. I am a part of the management team of Rishabh. I made sure to neutralise the original Article. You must have read it yourself since you made good edits to further make it Wikiworthy. Why has it been deleted again sir? — Preceding unsigned comment added by AmandaRex (talk • contribs) 05:30, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019

illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Yunshui 雲水 07:33, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply ]

Orphaned non-free image File:Love On The Run.jpg

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Aghori - ZeeTV.jpg

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:24, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hamari Bahu Silk.jpg

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:34, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kavach... Maha Shivratri.jpeg

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:41, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Kavach ( 2016 TV series)" listed at Redirects for discussion

Kavach ( 2016 TV series). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 7#Kavach ( 2016 TV series) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 21:10, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Orphaned non-free image File:RadhaKrishn-serial.jpeg

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:46, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:RadhaKrishn-serial.jpeg

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:45, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kundali Bhagya.jpeg

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:07, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kundali Bhagya.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Kundali Bhagya.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 16:29, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Bhumika Gurung

request

that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

talk) 01:02, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Your draft article, Draft:Bhumika Gurung

Hello, Goodd-002. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bhumika Gurung

".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion

. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:28, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]