User talk:Gorebath

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as General Authority of Islamic Affairs and Endowments. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 11:49, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Will make sure to do this from now on. Gorebath (talk) 16:32, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I agree that aircraft isn’t “Brazilian” anymore. But B-250 first flown in Brazil and the two prototypes were also made there. This aircraft (n)ever enter in production in UEA.Paraguassuu (talk) 19:35, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Per cited sources, the aircraft carbon fiber structure was designed by Novaer in Bazil but built in Al Ain in UAE. The B-250 was first flown in Dubai Airshow 2017 and at least 24 are operated by the UAEAF and underwent production in the company's facilities in Al Ain. Saying the aircraft is Brazilian is like saying the aircraft is Canadian because it uses a Canadian Pratt & Whitney Canada PT-6A-68 turboprop in its tractor configuration. Calidus owns the IP rights of the aircraft, which is based in Al Ain in the UAE and where the aircraft production facilities are per reliable sources. Gorebath (talk) 02:23, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain to me how you came to edit the

He/she edited another page in which I watch. I watch multiple BLP articles. I checked their contribution to see if there are any BLP violations. You seem to remove any information added to multiple pages under the guise of "puffery" and "unreliable source" to things which you don't agree with which is in stark contrast to the controversial statements on BLP articles you love adding. Although sometimes adequate, I don't always agree with you on mass-blanking information under the guise of "brazen puffery". Gorebath (talk) 01:42, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I struggle to understand how a seasoned editor would not see this[1] as unencyclopedic "padding out a CV"-style content.

talk) 02:25, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

My response in detail is in that article's talk-page. Gorebath (talk) 02:40, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the

page-specific restrictions

, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{

guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here

. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

On 28 December 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Farha (film), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the film Farha, which depicts the killing of a Palestinian family by Israeli soldiers during the Nakba, became the subject of a downvoting campaign? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Farha (film). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Farha (film)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

-- RoySmith (talk) 00:04, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User:Gorebath. Thank you.The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 19:45, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sultan Al Jaber, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richard Clayton.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Sultan Al Jaber has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 22:38, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]