User talk:Hallucegenia
Welcome
Go on. Leave a message.... Hallucegenia (talk) 11:38, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
Welcome
Hi, Hallucegenia, and a belated welcome to Wikipedia. You have already made some valuable and well-thought-out contributions. I'm afraid that, like many Wikipedians, I suffer from a 'satiable curtiosity. Would you care to give us a clue to your previous identity? And were you an "Ireland Collaborationist" in your previous life? Regards. Scolaire (talk) 12:15, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
- Always happy to answer questions from an Elephant Child. I have only edited Wikipedia under a couple of IP addresses, 82.30.246.119 (talk · contribs) and 82.30.246.35 (talk · contribs), so I don't really have a previous identity on Wikipedia.
- I've been watching the Wikipedia:WikiProject Ireland Collaboration board for a while, but I arrived there by accident really. At the time, I was interested in the Israel/Palestinian question, and I was looking around to see how other editors approach an area where contributors' history and background affect their interpretation of what others are saying.
- If we can get a positive outcome out of these discussions, then I think the whole Project talk page should be preserved as a case study in how to resolve conflicts in cases like this.
- Hallucegenia (talk) 14:45, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
- If we can get a positive outcome out of these discussions, it should be sent to Barack Obama as a case study in how to resolve conflicts ;-) Scolaire (talk) 19:25, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
- I'm quite encouraged by the way things are going at the moment, but then again it's just a subsidiary poll, so it doesn't really matter to people. I suppose when the main poll starts, and people feel their sense of self and of national affiliation are under threat, it could get very heated again. We shall see. Hallucegenia (talk) 07:29, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
- If we can get a positive outcome out of these discussions, it should be sent to Barack Obama as a case study in how to resolve conflicts ;-) Scolaire (talk) 19:25, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
- Oh, don't get me wrong - I'm very hopeful as well, especially compared with how I felt in January when I just unwatched all the affected pages. By that time I felt as though it had consumed all my spare time, and all my emotional reserves, for the previous eight months. I'm so looking forward to the two year freeze that will follow the result, whatever that may be. Scolaire (talk) 22:23, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
About Typhoon Morakot
I leave my opinion in
DYK for Bleeding Canker of Horse Chestnut
Materialscientist (talk) 18:00, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
news
The WORCESTERSHIRE Project Newsletter - March 2010 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
DYK for Old Hall Hotel, Buxton
Materialscientist (talk) 00:04, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
Worcs
Hi Hallucegenia, I, and quite a few other users agree with you. Attempts over the last three months to discuss it and reach some form of agreement have come to a standstill. Here is a link to some suggestions I am preparing for some form of arbitration. if and when I submit it, I will of course abide by any decision made by univolved arbitrators. At the moment, any reverts to what many readers feel to be the most correct, or nearest pronunciation, will just become an edit war. User:Kudpung/The IPA saga. please don't edit that page, but do leave any comments on the talk pages of affected articles, or in the discussions.--Kudpung (talk) 03:28, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
- Hmmm... Thanks for the background. But perhaps there is a way to find a way that meets everyone's requirements. I'll think about it, and discuss on the article talk page before doing anything.Hallucegenia (talk) 13:12, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 00:52, 27 March 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Kudpung (talk) 00:52, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
Your knowledge of local accent is extraordinarily accurate. Are you from the region? Perhaps we could meet up. I am now in Malvern, my birth town. I will be returning to my home in Thailand on 1 May. --Kudpung (talk) 18:40, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 01:57, 4 April 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Kudpung (talk) 01:57, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
RE: Khuda Bux Sheikh of Dariyabad
This is the link for reference, http://barabanki.nic.in/person.htm. --Sayed Mohammad Faiz Haidertcs 12:44, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for you work on the stub. I sort of missed the article from my log some how. But I am unable to find any additional reference for this person. Its some time problamatic to search for people who can have multiple spellings for their name and I think this is the case for him. Thanks again. --Sayed Mohammad Faiz Haidertcs 04:02, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
- You're welcome. Hallucegenia (talk) 08:19, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
When I searched for him with an alternate spelling of his middle name i.e. Baksh, I got one more reference, "Nabi Hadi (4 October 1992). Dictionary of Indo-Persian literature. Indira Gandhi National Centre for the Arts. Retrieved 21 July 2010. Can we remove "BLP" Tag now?. --Sayed Mohammad Faiz Haidertcs 06:43, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
- Done. But feel free to remove tags yourself if you think it's appropriate. Hallucegenia (talk) 13:24, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
Rollback
Hi Hallucegenia, nice work on the uBLP rescue project. I've noticed you also do some vandalism reversion, would you like me to enable Rollback on your account? If so have a read of WP:Rollback and tell me when you would and wouldn't use it. BTW that's one seriously col username. ϢereSpielChequers 11:09, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi Hallucegenia! an article you have contributed to, has been selected for the Wikipedia Version 0.8. offline release on DVD and iPhone. If you would like to make any last minutes changes or improvements, you are most welcome to do so. Deadline is midnight UTC on Monday, 11 October. See also: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Worcestershire/Archive 1#Worcestershire articles have been selected for the Wikipedia 0.8 release.--Kudpung (talk) 04:41, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 22:31, 20 November 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Talkback
Message added 16:19, 12 February 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
FYI Kudpung (talk) 16:19, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
Kwik thoughts
Looks good! Things you could do
- Put on DYK (see main page or I'll help)
- remove "needs further expansion ..." I think this doesnt need saying. Maybe remove that section till you have more
- Is it cross referenced with everything?
Got to go Victuallers (talk) 09:08, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
- Ta. Will do. Hallucegenia (talk) 09:16, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
DYK for Buxton Crescent
DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Thanks from me and the wiki Victuallers (talk) 00:03, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
woohoo!
The Empty Set Barnstar | ||
Thank you for your efforts in eliminating unreferenced BLPs! joe deckertalk to me 16:59, 28 September 2011 (UTC) | { } |
- Gee! Thanks! But the credit really goes to yourself and others who processed far more BLPs than I did. Hallucegenia (talk) 11:11, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
Hey, I noticed you're about to pass 1,000 edits to Wikipedia articles. Thanks for sticking around over the years, and for contributing so much. Steven Walling (WMF) • talk 18:34, 19 April 2012 (UTC) |
Just for context, today I was checking a list of folks who recently passed 1,000 edits in the main namespace, and your name popped up. Nice work on the Stephenson's Rocket, BTW. Steven Walling (WMF) • talk 18:36, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks. Much appreciated. Hallucegenia (talk) 10:21, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
NPG
I noticed your comment here [1] and agree with it. But you didn't do any actual edits to the article. Were you fearful of the Wikipedia establishment taking revenge? Meowy 02:15, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
- I didn't look at it in those terms, but I felt I had to be very careful in what I said even on the talk pages, and without more explicit support I was not prepared to edit the main article.
- An unbiased article would put the NPG claim more clearly: from the NPG point of view someone hacked their computers, illegally bypassed their copy-protection software, and stole their copyrighted material. The thief then compounded the felony by exporting it to the copyright equivalent of an offshore tax haven and published it to the world, thus undermining an investement of a million pounds of public money.
- Wikipedia supported this theft by blocking a NPG user who had used the only means available to them to send a private e-mail to the individual in question; revoked that indivdual's admin rights to make it impossible for him to obey any court order to delete the offending images; and then allowed a blatantly POV article about the dispute to persist on Wikipedia for the past three years - contravening its own declared policy.
- But if I put that interpretaion into into the article I would fully expect to get warned, and if I persisted I would get blocked. Sorry. It's not worth it. Hallucegenia (talk) 09:38, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
- The bigger whitewash I think is the minimising in the article of NPG's reasoning that if this sort of theft is allowed, in the future no gallery or museum or private collector will invest their time and money in producing digital images of their collections because Wikipedia will just steal them. Meowy 19:45, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
- "revoked that individual's admin rights to make it impossible for him to obey any court order to delete the offending images" - sorry, what do you mean, you mean Derrick Coetzee's admin rights were revoked? He is still an administrator, as far as I can see. Meowy 19:51, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
- Admin rights were revoked here [2]. I don't know when they were restored. Hallucegenia (talk) 20:05, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
- "revoked that individual's admin rights to make it impossible for him to obey any court order to delete the offending images" - sorry, what do you mean, you mean Derrick Coetzee's admin rights were revoked? He is still an administrator, as far as I can see. Meowy 19:51, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
- The bigger whitewash I think is the minimising in the article of NPG's reasoning that if this sort of theft is allowed, in the future no gallery or museum or private collector will invest their time and money in producing digital images of their collections because Wikipedia will just steal them. Meowy 19:45, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of Ari Wolfe for deletion
A nomination is taking place as to whether Ari Wolfe should be deleted or not. The discussion is held at the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ari Wolfe and everyone is welcome to join in on the discussion. However do not remove the AfD notice on top. WisconsinBoyClevelandRocks228844 (talk) 21:43, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
FYI on configuring "readable prose" for DYK
Your Stapleford Cross DYK nom is 1893 characters (0 words) "readable prose size", so it's OK. DYK doesn't count images, lists or quotes in the readable prose size. I thought it might help you in the future to download the DYK check tool that calculates that. It's pretty cool. First of all, you need to set up your skin's javascript page. That's an extension of your user page, like a sandbox. It won't let me do it, because it's part of your user page. So, let's try this.
- Click on User:Hallucegenia/common.js That will open an edit window, so you can add script to this and save it. "Common" just means this one will work with whatever skin you are using.
- In the blank edit window, copy and paste this:
- importScript('User:Shubinator/DYKcheck.js'); //DYKcheck tool
- Save the page
You might have to do a refresh (or not), but look to the left-hand side of your browser, and you should see "Tools". In that section you should see "DYK check". You can click that to check the size of any article.
Let me know if you have any problems with this. And good luck. — Maile (talk) 23:58, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wolverhampton Pillar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page High Cross (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
January 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Stapleford Cross may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- Heritage List entry |num=1278059} |desc=ANGLO SAXON CROSS 50 METRES EAST OF CHURCH OF ST HELEN }}
Thanks,
DYK for Stapleford Cross
nominate ) 09:07, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 28Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gravity Field and Steady-State Ocean Circulation Explorer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tethys (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 28 January 2014 (UTC) Blind revertsPlease don't make blind reverts to articles. As you can see here, you revert also reinserted a spelling mistake into the article. I am also having serious trouble understanding why such obvious facts require referencing, and why, if you really felt that they did so, did you not bother looking it up yourself. Number 57 20:35, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
kWh vs kW·h'kWh' vs 'kW·h' is currently under discussion at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers#Kilowatt-hour. Probably better to wait until that discussion ends before making wide-sweeping changes that might be unnecessary or need to be reversed. Stepho talk 22:56, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
In the interests of wrapping this up, would you (if you feel comfortable doing so) give an explicit Support or Oppose for the proposal on the table? EEng (talk) 13:42, 4 August 2014 (UTC) Hope this is OK with you[4] EEng (talk) 18:42, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
|
For your contribution to 2I/Borisov. Thank you very much!
Hashar (talk) 21:30, 25 September 2019 (UTC) |
- Well, thank you! I shall enjoy those. lol Hallucegenia (talk) 15:37, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
Disambiguation link notification for December 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
Robert Salisbury
Hi Hallucegenia, I have reverted this to redirect per NPP reviewed. You wrote a article about a different person over a good redirect. scope_creepTalk
- Sure, I see that you did. What/where is this "NPP reviewed"? Could you provide a link? Your message is meaningless without any further information, so I have restored the new page. I provided a hatnote in the new article to preserve the redirection and checked with "What Links Here" that there were no pages in wikipedia that linked to the redirect. So what's the problem? If you would prefer to have a disambiguation page called "Robert Salisbury", then please say so. Or if you want to move it to, say, Robert Salisbury, Educationalist then please say so. Regards Hallucegenia (talk) 17:44, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
- And then, ScopeCreep, you deleted the new article a second time, quoting a different criterion "Non-notable as it stands". Make up your mind: this sort of inconsistency is most unhelpful. Hallucegenia (talk) 08:14, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
Iron Bridge GA
Hi, hope you're well! Would you be interested in helping get The Iron Bridge to GA status? I did some work on it in October 2014 but left to go to university before a GA review finished so it was abandoned. I don't think it's too far away, and would be nice to see it finished! Best, Ostrichyearning3 (talk) 21:34, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
- Yeah. Good idea. I'll put a note on the talk page.Hallucegenia (talk) 09:10, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
- Hey hope you're doing ok! Iron Bridge is now under review, I'm going to try and fix the points raised today but thought you might want to have a look as well! best, Ostrichyearning3 (talk) 11:18, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Ostrichyearning3:I'm sorry I didn't have time during that week to help out, but you did a great piece of work getting the article to GA status. Thanks a lot! Hallucegenia (talk) 06:06, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks! To be honest there wasn't much left to do - it had been left in pretty good shape! best, Ostrichyearning3 (talk) 10:04, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
- Hey hope you're doing ok! Iron Bridge is now under review, I'm going to try and fix the points raised today but thought you might want to have a look as well! best, Ostrichyearning3 (talk) 11:18, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
A brownie for you!
Thanks for your work on ] |
- Feel free! What sort of tag line did you have in mind? Hallucegenia (talk) 18:19, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
- Actually it doesn't quite qualify yet. It needs 1500 characters of new prose and all the content I added came almost directly from Wearmouth Bridge and Sunderland so it doesn't count! Anyway thanks again. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 19:55, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 8
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cryogenic energy storage, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CAES.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
Aha
So that's where that spike came from. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 14:37, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
Copying licensed material requires attribution
Hi. I see in a recent addition to
- Hi @Diannaa:, thank you for the input, and thanks also for correcting the text yourself. Though please note in fact I copied it from the image description of the image at wikimedia commons, here. That text entry was indeed copied from the original image caption, and I assumed that the image description on Commons was also covered by the attribution within Commons. If not, can you please advise how I should correct the attribution on Wikimedia Commons? Thanks, Hallucegenia (talk) 15:32, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
Notice
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review