User talk:Hameltion/Archive 2

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 20:48, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:16, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Medvedev–Tsitsipas rivalry has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per tennis project and Wikipedia guidelines, I don't think this is a legitimate article-worthy rivalry. If it's a rivalry : According to WP:NRIVALRY, rivalries are not inherently notable. "We can only have articles about tennis rivalries if there is significant media coverage about the rivalry. For example, great rivalries like Agassi–Sampras or Federer–Nadal warrant an article, but articles about rivalries like Agassi–Rafter and Federer–Hewitt have been deleted by the community. If in doubt, consult WP:TENNIS before creating a new rivalry article."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fyunck(click) (talk) 08:11, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Medvedev–Tsitsipas rivalry is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Medvedev–Tsitsipas rivalry until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fyunck(click) (talk) 20:06, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

mostly articles

Thank you for quality articles about, such as Martha Isabel Ruiz Corzo, David S. Pumpkins (2017), Chang and Eng Bunker (2018 expansion), Maranda Curtis (2019) and Amos Singletary, for presenting mostly creations on your user page, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

You are recipient no.

I'm touched, thank you Gerda. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 17:47, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Hameltion So I have to ask because I find it curious. I started the BLP article on Sue Galloway Sandbox: Sue Galloway on February 28 and was going to move it to the mainspace on March 6th. To my surprise you published one on the very same day. The BLP has been in show business for over 20 years and never had an article here at WP. Is it just a coincidence that at the very same time - down to the day - that while I was writing my article on Galloway, you were also? It is odd because not only are the references exactly the same as mine (in the same exact order, no less) - even used the exact same amount of times inline; but the categories are also exactly the same - in the same order. It took me numerous days and countless hours to compile all this information on a subject that is not very well represented online and yet you seem to have created an article in one day without a draft. Is this correct? Maineartists (talk) 22:27, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Maineartists: Wow, yeah that is a strange coincidence. Didn't know your draft existed, didn't realize I was scooping someone - sorry! I recognized her in a movie on TV and was surprised she didn't have an article so I got to it. As you alluded to there aren't that many sources out there, so makes sense there would be overlap in them. I missed a few details (education, etc.) I see now in your draft that I'll probably add to the live article unless you get there first. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 00:28, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So you are seriously saying that you constructed a full BLP article with sparse online sources in exact order and precise numerical sequence inline citations along with categorical linkage also in exact sequence on the very same day that I was going to publish with the same layout and no draft history to show in a sandbox history construct that all of this was mere coincidence? Errors in your article would prove haste and not careful research. Maineartists (talk) 00:41, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it definitely seems strange, but just want to make totally clear I did not scavenge your draft to scoop you. Re the similarities, the sourcing overlap seems to be just four refs (Serial Optimist, Fast Company, Culture Map, CBS News) which come up fairly high on google, and though the categories are basically identical that seems to mean we were both just diligent. What are you referring to in the last sentence about errors? Again I am sorry this looks thievish and mean of me, but honestly I didn't know your draft existed until three hours ago. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 01:57, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Hameltion:Actually, the sources referenced are eight in total, not four. Please compare the article and my sandbox: 8. Not to mention each inline citation usage for each reference: exact same number. This is not coincidental. 1. Berkowitz, Joe a b c d e 2. UCB and TGS 2 ab 3. ABOUT a b c 4. Thomasian, Deborah a b c d 5. Bumgardner, John 6. Demko, Mark 7. The Coolest Part 8. Lutz, John. Not to mention the categories: 11 in total in exact same order. This is not coincidental. Where is your sandbox draft for this article? Errors: i.e. "Years active 2005-present." Galloway started in 2002 as your article states. Maineartists (talk) 03:03, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not following now - sources 2, 3, 6, and 8 don't seem to be in your sandbox page, and the sets of categories (though very close) aren't the "exact" same. But regardless, any patterns here genuinely are coincidences. Please stop accusing me of stealing from your sandbox; the simultaneity is surprising to you and to me. To your other points, I keep most of my drafts as text files, but I didn't use one for this article since I published it the day I started it. The 2005 in infobox is probably a typo. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 03:54, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

	The Copyeditor's Barnstar
	for your extensive copy editing of the Mafeje affair FuzzyMagma (talk) 12:52, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I wonder if I can stretch your kindness to

Mafeje article himself. I dared to try an promoted to GA status and an editor (rightly) ripped me a new one. I amended all of these comments and almost doubled the text since then but it will be great to have someone to copy-edit (again, as I did copy edited just few minutes before posting this) FuzzyMagma (talk) 14:07, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

@FuzzyMagma: Thanks, yes I can look it over later today. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 15:54, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@

WP:SUMMARY style in the spun-off section is quite well done. The section with research and ideology is pretty long, and kind of scattershot/repetitive (and maybe relies too much on primary sources), but reads fairly well. The article overall is probably still a ways away from GA, but great resource nonetheless. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 21:02, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

@Hameltion many thanks, I truly appreciate you efforts .. I will comb through your comments and edits, and try to learn something or two. I will try to make the research and ideology section more succinct. I might over did tbh!

again, many thanks FuzzyMagma (talk) 21:26, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Robert McClenon and Izno: I see that the history merge has already been performed, but I might suggest that it be undone because the two pages don't actually share any history. I did know about the draftspace page while writing my first draft (unlike the strangely similar coincidence in Sue Galloway above) but didn't take anything from it except the image and one new-to-me ref. Didn't know whether or how to mark someone else's old draft when superseding it (it still doesn't redirect if that's the ideal thing). Hameltion (talk | contribs) 14:54, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The one time I pause before history merging and then do it anyway. Sigh.

I am pretty sure I agree with Hameltion here. @Robert McClenon Izno (talk) 21:59, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

See Office Assistant; it was never named "Clippy". jp×g 22:38, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@JPxG: Hm, didn't know that. Could be rephrased to reflect the common name ("known as Clippy"). Hameltion (talk | contribs) 00:24, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what happened here, I did not intend to revert your entire edit! Please accept my apologies. jp×g 09:37, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@JPxG: No worries, it definitely seemed accidental! Hameltion (talk | contribs) 13:51, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As for the Saint Omer hook, French cinema is one of the very neglected topics here on the English Wikipedia. Merci! BorgQueen (talk) 16:10, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Hameltion:, could you please create an article for American actress and comedian Dana Powell, who appeared credited in more than 55 film and television projects and is best known for appearing as recurring character Pam Tucker on the TV sitcom Modern Family? Votbek (talk) 20:57, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @

WP:GNG: profile, shorter but still substantive profile, and video profile. Do you know of any other good sources I should use to start? I'll work on posting a first draft shortly while watching Game 7. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 21:36, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Hi again @Hameltion:, thank you for help me create an article for actress Dana Powell, now could you please help me again to redo the article for American actor Tom Nowicki?, I know that this article got deleted at AfD just a few years ago, which I would like need some help to find better sources of notability for the article. Votbek (talk) 04:05, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey again @

WP:NACTOR, his biggest role seems to be on a forgotten show about roller derby. Let me know if you turn up any more sources, but the AfD result seems to be justified. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 04:54, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Hi again, so for the moment I found this one that contain some information but it's possible that this same information is more complete on another source. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Votbek (talk • contribs) 05:51, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, that's a dupe of his

WP:Reliable source nor contribute to notability. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 14:52, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

But, it would be possible to redo the article? Votbek (talk) 17:25, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Votbek: I'm not too eager myself with only two good sources, but you could start writing a draft if you think it's possible to find more of quality. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 17:39, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I already started a draft here, you can put the sources, information and filmography you already have and that we can find later for to be summited, also it would be of great help you can find a image for the draft Votbek (talk) 18:10, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I found this video on YouTube of the actor, it is possible to do a screenshot? Votbek (talk) 22:08, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Votbek: No, it's not appropriately licensed for use on Wikipedia. See c:Commons:YouTube files for more info. I looked earlier and didn't find any Creative Commons images of Nowicki. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 22:14, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Hameltion: are any of tese two videos [1] [2] are appropriately licensed for use on Wikipedia by c:Commons:YouTube files for a screenshot for actor Gerrit Graham? Votbek (talk) 15:20, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Votbek: No, they're not. Note on the Dana Powell video below the description where it says Creative Commons Attribution license (reuse allowed) And when searching on YouTube, you can narrow the results with Filters → Features → Creative Commons Hameltion (talk | contribs) 17:18, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thank you, but how about these two [3] [4] I found on Flickr?, they show to have similar licenses to this one [5] and this one [6] that are on Commons.Votbek (talk) 18:20, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, see c:Commons:Flickr files for what's acceptable from flickr (and note the comment about "revoking licensing" at File:Simon Rex 1.jpg). Suggest you read Wikipedia:Finding images tutorial and c:Commons:Licensing as a primer. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 18:45, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry; correction, It's seems that only this one [7] can go to Commons by {{cc-by-2.0}} as it seems to have similar license to this one [8] that is now in Commons. Votbek (talk) 18:49, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Votbek: I'm not an expert, but I don't think so. See the difference at c:Commons:Flickr files between Attribution and Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licenses. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 18:54, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Finally, I don't know if any of this images here [9] from page 1 to 5 have the license to go Commons, if doesn't please tell me were I could find one cause I'm a big fan of his. Votbek (talk) 19:11, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Votbek: Nope, looks like no free images on Getty. And don't see any online with a quick search, but you could always try to produce an illustration or ask for permission from an existing copyright holder if possible. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 19:36, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Well thank You, at least could you please help me complete this Wikidata Infobox I am working in? Votbek (talk) 21:31, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Votbek: I'll let you get that started, just try to emulate the Wikidata of similar topics, and leave blank any fields you don't have a source for. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 21:55, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again, @

I already found this [10] and [11] Votbek (talk) 13:23, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Votbek. Doesn't seem to pass NACTOR by the letter (just one significant role instead of multiple), but with this profile and some interviews there may be enough sources. Feel free to get a draft started (hopefully with a bit more content than last time). The first link you gave is not usable, it's just a cookie cutter air time listing.

Also, I looked at the page history for the item you mentioned on Wikidata, are you using this account to edit Wikidata and Commons? Hameltion (talk | contribs) 13:49, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nop, it's a friend of mine, I asked him to help me. Votbek (talk) 14:23, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, no worries then. His history on this wiki just struck me. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 14:49, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Meanwhile, could you please help me to find a photo or a screenshot of her to Commons? Votbek (talk) 01:25, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not finding anything, sorry. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 02:26, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there, I'm just getting the hang of Wikipedia and have never edited so I thought I'd reach out. I think you created the page for You Suck at Cooking. I noticed something that is incorrect.

"You Suck at Cooking parodies the cooking tutorial genre of videos such as BuzzFeed's Tasty web series"

This article points out that YSAC started the channel six months before Tasty existed (and implies he may have started the genre of hands only food videos).

https://www.washingtonpost.com/arts-entertainment/2019/03/12/this-lo-fi-cooking-youtube-channel-is-antidote-hyper-stylized-food-instagram/

It seems more likely that Tasty based their style off of his videos as there are quite a few similarities and he had millions of views before they began. Slowpotato (talk) 16:22, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Slowpotato: Welcome to Wikipedia and thanks for the correction. You're right about the chronology. I think I had wanted to mention Tasty as an example of the genre rather than as an inspiration, but I've made an edit to try to avoid getting too into the weeds there. Of course feel free to edit the page yourself too. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 17:05, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Patricia A. Goldman, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

S0091 (talk) 13:39, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On 29 July 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Patricia A. Goldman, which you created and nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 13:15, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive: On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here .
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. (t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I did look at the diff, but only noticed the short description part of it. So, actually, thanks for being the person to finally provide a source. Largoplazo (talk) 21:29, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Largoplazo: Hameltion (talk | contribs) 21:48, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 20: Annual Election & Members Meeting

You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our Annual Election & Members Meeting, with in-person at Prime Produce in Hell's Kitchen, Manhattan, as well as an online-based participation option. The Members' Meeting is similar to other WikiWednesday meetups, except that its primary function is to elect a new Board of Directors. We will elect five board seats. After being elected, those elected can potentially appoint more seats. We will also have a fun WikiWednesday! Election info: To run for election or to vote, you must be a dues-paying member of Wikimedia New York City, having renewed in the past 12 months. Voting will be both online, via emailed ballots from the ElectionBuddy service, and in-person. The poll will be open for the 48 hours between 8pm EDT on September 18 and 8pm EDT on September 20. For additional information, please consult the Election FAQ. Meeting info: Wednesday, September 20 Annual Election & Members Meeting (optional RSVP on-wiki). 6:00 pm – 7:00 pm (Open Hour) 7:00 pm – 9:00 pm (Wiki Salon) (Prime Produce, Hell's Kitchen, Manhattan) Also online via Zoom All attendees are subject to Wikimedia NYC's Code of Conduct. In addition, to participate in person, you should be vaccinated and also be sure to respect others' personal space, and we may limit overall attendance size if appropriate.

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:03, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey,

I generally don't mind the edits people make overriding mine, but the image caption edit you made on the Zach Bryan article didn't make sense, so I reversed it. You are welcome to change the image and caption again, it's just easier for me to undo it rather than edit it back to the original. Akyyka (talk) 19:59, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Akyyka: Looks like I missed the word at; restored. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 20:02, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for pointing out that the date of birth is in the cited source. For some reason I did not see it there. I appreciate your correction. I still don't see the birth name in the cited source, though, so I am going to add a "Citation needed" tag for it. Eddie Blick (talk) 00:46, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

All your proposed RMs are heading for mass opposition and rejection. I advise you to refrain from any further to save everybody further wasted time. GiantSnowman 15:19, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@

WP:NCSP#Association football (soccer) could explain the consensus more clearly.) I'll admit to ignorance re Talk:Eric García (footballer, born 2001), where the positions are quite overlapping, but I disagree that "deep ignorance" is a fair charge at the other three, where there's room for good faith other interpretations. I hope you'll take another look at Talk:Paul Mullin (footballer, born 1994) in particular. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 17:11, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Looks like you got lucky! Not the picture hook, but it did get moved into Q5. When you look at the Weenink DYK, it may look a bit daunting. Reach out if you wish; I'm happy to walk you through. Here's good; I'm temporarily watching your page. Schwede66 01:05, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, glad it worked out. I should avoid using the icon that moves the template to DYKNA, yeah? Will get to tomorrow. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 04:47, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for creating the above article. What does 'According to a former hungry i bouncer' mean? Regards, JACKINTHEBOX • ^TALK 01:03, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@

hungry i is the club where the song was first recorded. A bouncer works club security. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 01:39, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Thanks, I should have read the sentence before that one JACKINTHEBOX • ^TALK 00:49, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, Hameltion, and thank you for increasingly devoting your editing time to creating women's biographies, many of which are detailed enough to deserve a B-class rating. It seems to me you would be a useful member of

Thanks Ipigott, I've used WiR lists for ideas before (Katka Zupančič, Sofie Dossi, etc.). Just watchlisted Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Events. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 17:08, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

~ ~ ~ Merry Christmas! ~ ~ ~

Hello Hameltion: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, --Dustfreeworld (talk) 15:07, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]