User talk:Hellerick

Hello, Hellerick, and

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

Again, welcome!—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 17:21, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I'll take a look and see what I can fix some time next week. Thanks for bringing this to light!—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 16:50, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, should be all taken care of now. I also completely delinked

listed it for deletion. Thanks again.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 18:37, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

I have listed "Ossezia del Nord" in the template because I have seen that the English version of the template lists it among the autonomies. I think it is not wrong its location in the template, because Northern Ossetia is an autonomous republic within the Russian Federation: if you see, there are also other territories that are part of a state, but may have some difference from the national registration plate. Lulo.it (talk) 19:21, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, maybe you are right. I will remove it from the template . Lulo.it (talk) 08:18, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Shalom, Mr. Hellerick! You will find my answer to your suggestion on my talk page. Best, —IJzeren Jan _Uszkiełtu? 20:13, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your corrections here. --Bluedenim ^(talk) 13:32, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:09, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I see a lot of information in infobox are correct. If some of them are false, you can correct, but deleting of infobox is not good way. Infobox is usefull for readers. Leszek Jańczuk (talk) 11:32, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps it was written by Russians. Yes, major part of Kazachstan belongs to Siberia, but it is enough. Can you actualize infobox? Perhaps the good way is to insert {{}} with "expert" - it could be better - inside and explain on the talk page what kind of information are not correct. Leszek Jańczuk (talk) 12:40, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Silesia has specific regional character, and after encoming to EU differences between Silesia and rest of Poland grow up. Also other regions are more aware of its own specific character. Do you think I do not support membership in EU? I want even "euro" instead of "złoty". I support regionalization. It is better if article has infobox, but if it is impossible to update data of infobox... I suggest you are correct. Sorry for this event. With regards. Leszek Jańczuk (talk) 13:21, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In that case I am not sure. In publications of PWN I found: "SIberia is asiatic part of Russia". The same yoy can find here Britannica. Leszek Jańczuk (talk) 15:01, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

According to the Spanish article the first flag was the one consisting of horizontal stripes, and the nested rectangles flag was the second. In

Hi Hellerick. The inconsistency was corrected by Shadowfox in the Spanish article on March 23. The article now describes the nestled-rectangles flag as the first and the horizontal tricolor as the second. Nevertheless, I double-checked and from the Flags of the World Colombia page I was able to trace their sources. Their links are dead now, but I found the new URLs and put them as references in the English-language article. It's interesting note that the first of these flags is shared by two entities, first the independent state of Cartagena and then provisionally by the United Provinces, which Cartagena joined and supported, but I'm assuming that Cartagena also continued to use it. I'm not sure what sources the Colombian Presidency site is using to get their dates, since they are slightly different from the Spanish-language article and from the ones recorded in the Flags of the World page. Best,TriniMuñoz (talk) 19:38, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hellerick! Leave the map of Kiev Rus' on the site because is the most correct till now. --SeikoEn (talk) 15:46, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Those map you put on are simply russian propaganda and you know it! False maps of Kiev Rus!--SeikoEn (talk) 16:40, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you try to take rusification of Kyiv Rus I will have to take revision of russian history on the site! Step away from Kyiv Rus because you know that is not today Russia! I will chack you! --SeikoEn (talk) 16:43, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you undo my edit about Oscar? Emperor001 (talk) 04:41, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I can't remember the name, but it was the episode where Oskar (I know I misspelled it earlier) had to take care care of baby Oskar (or Oscar?). He knocked a woman down on the street, and the same woman said that she was knocked down by "a Czechoslovakian man." Granted she probably labeled him as such because of his accent and appearance. This is also why I said "implies", because she doesn't know him, and therefore couldn't make a totaly accurate rendering, but if the producer's statement confirms the woman's, we can change it from Eastern European to Czechoslovakian. Emperor001 (talk) 18:37, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

see here Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 15:43, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Somebody responded and added another offline-source. I'm still skeptical, but since I'm not an expert, you might want to keep an eye on it. I fully agree that sources are needed for the claim, and that the sources given are doubtful somehow. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 17:28, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Thanks for the talk entry on Czech Wikipedia concerning Chudinov. May I ask you for help? I shall need some references concerning Chudinov's pseudo-linguistics. I'd be grateful for some published criticism etc. I need to cite some sources, you know. Many thanks for any help in advance! --Pet'usek ^{[petrdothrubisatgmaildotcom]} 18:44, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Salve Hellerick, please take a look at this page (no worries, this link works ;-) It doesn't help us solve the problem if people pass by, complain and leave, never checking back. Somebody needs to tackle this issue - we can't! --Kazu89 ^ノート 18:01, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:NATO phonetic alphabet#Move?. — Joe Kress (talk) 08:32, 9 November 2010 (UTC) (Using {{Please see}})[reply]

Of course, it is not official, but it is quite acceptable, so I turn it back to the Table.62.220.33.64 (talk) 15:55, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There are tons of different Russian romanization systems, and at least a dozen were invented by me. But let's stick to the ones officially authorized by influential organizations. Hellerick (talk) 04:22, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Did you get a chance to consider my edit summary in the edit preceding this one? Thanks,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); June 16, 2011; 18:40 (UTC)

Ah, I've just realized that you uploaded the new version over the old one. My browser, however, still shows the old cached version, making it look as if your version ends up with two nearly identical flags. Please disregard my request. Sorry about the confusion.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); June 16, 2011; 18:46 (UTC)

I want to reopen the discussion Naming_conventions_(Cyrillic)#Example_convention regarding bibliographic references because I think Unicode changes the game somewhat. Since you have participated in the same talk page, I hope you will visit the discussion and give me your opinions. Thanks! LADave (talk) 23:22, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you commented on a discussion about splitting biographical data about the man involved from the article of the incident. I have been bold and made a cut at the changes required however I wanted to invite you to have a look at my edits on and

Hello, since you seem to be more active here, this is just a notice that I answered your question on the Hungarian Wikipedia. Regards, Oliv0 (talk) 06:27, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the map. Did something happen with the Brazil coordinates? They look off. This is where she first crossed the equator, so perhaps you entered the latitude as North degrees, instead of South? Hoof Hearted (talk) 20:02, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! As there is already an only proposed Wikipedia guideline on naming conventions (Cyrillic). The proposal is still in development, under discussion and needs of gathering consensus for adoption. Since I am well experienced on this subject, I would like to criticize the official transliteration of Bulgarian as it gives too many errors, which also causes some losses of sounds “ǎ (a hacek”), decentralise itself from other slavic languages (“c” and “š” voices), which is also conflicting in itself (see street signs 1 and 2). By this revision, it is away from being accurate and not able to satisfy the needs of an encyclopedia which claims to be scientifical. These are the reasons I invite you to read Scientific transliteration of Cyrillic and involve the discussion in order to contribute a possible concensus. Wish to see you here thanks Manaviko (talk) 13:28, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hellerick. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hellerick. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Since you do a good job on Malaysia locator map. I would like to ask you a favor to create a district-level map for Malaysia like File:China Prefectural-level.png. I had do the map which is File:West Malaysia location map district.png and File:East Malaysia location map district.png before but the cons are the border are thicker. (and not clear as I refer the boundary fron [this picture] and ^[1]) All in all, I hope you can create the file and there will be easier to do for Wikipedians, Regards. angys (Talk Talk) 09:54, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@*angys*:, could you provide a reliable source for the boundaries of Sarawak districts? All maps I can find seem contradicting each other. Hellerick (talk) 05:49, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Actually some of the Sarawak's district has been seperated to 2 or 3 new district under the new Sarawak Corridor of Renewable Energy (SCORE). As now, Sarawak had established 9 new district including new Serian division but the Internet seems no new district map for Sarawak but SARAWAK ELECTION MAP got. So in my opinion, the Sarawak one maybe just use the older one but including Serian Division because now Wiki already have the up-to-date Division maps, regards.

• This is the newest boundary of Kapit
• boundary for West M'sia (dotted line=new district)

angys (Talk Talk) 06:39, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@*angys*: Here is what I made so far:

If you think some boundaries are wrong, please give me a map where they are shown correctly. Hellerick (talk) 17:35, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I think OK, but for Sabah's Putatan-Penampang border needs adjust as Putatan are too small.The map can be seen here. For Sarawak as now I didn't have source for the newest district ex. Kapit. The district border for Sarawak not fully draw as Samarahan district have

And one thing, can you merge those map into Malaysia. Thank you. angys (Talk Talk) 18:03, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@*angys*: A new version:

Hellerick (talk) 16:42, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

?? At this time I didn't see West and East Malaysia map has new upload.. and you forget to add the boundary for Bukit Mabong

Serian-Kuching border need adjust Serian Division Map upper=Serian district, bottom=Tebedu district Kuching Border MPP+MBKS+DBKU=Kuchibg District.

The Mukah-Sarikei northern border need to be thicker. 

The Betong Division now have 4 district (+Kabong and Pusa)

Unfortunately only Miri Division I can't find their new district file. I hope you can add those info into the maps and thank you. Happy Christmas. angys (Talk Talk) 18:12, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@*angys*:I don't forget anything, it's just too often I don't understand you, and what the Malay maps are supposed to show.

Here are the udpated files:

If you don't see any difference from the previous versions, it's probably because you have to refresh the cache of your browser (ctrl+shift+R or something like that). Hellerick (talk) 16:35, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I think for now the maps are perfect. Thank you for your contributions..

I find a mistake that Kuala Terengganu Map was incorrect. You can refer this. angys (Talk Talk) 17:28, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Changed the border. Hellerick (talk) 15:34, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this time I want to ask you a favor to update district border for East Malaysia that last time was no boundary data for some new district and they had update it. The Northern Sarawak and Sandakan Division have new district (Telupid District) need to be adding into the map, thank you angys (Talk Talk) 14:42, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Added a border. Hellerick (talk) 13:58, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tq, but the Miri Division's (below Brunei) boundary arent update yet. angys (Talk Talk) 15:13, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Updated. What about now? Hellerick (talk) 06:02, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I think for now no boundary changes but I noticed that Selangor's Sepang District and Hulu Langat District should have boundary and not connected. angys (Talk Talk) 14:31, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hellerick. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:00, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Template:Lang-ru/sandbox/doc has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Q𝟤𝟪 21:13, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]