User talk:Hmich176/Archive 2

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the

I ran the script again and pasted it into the talk page. I would make it clearer in the first sentence that it is entirely in Dauphin Co, PA, USA. Hope this helps and keep up the good work, Ruhrfisch 23:17, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm pretty sure that anon that voted on the State Route 1002 (Lehigh County, Pennsylvania) FAC is NE2. NE2 really wanted the article to renamed and I don't even think anons are allowed to vote on FACs. Reply at my talk. -- JA10 ^{T · C} 20:35, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Forget it that was NORTH. But I still didn't like the way he opposited it like that after NE2 asked him to. -- JA10 ^{T · C} 00:14, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the

]

USRD

Newsletter - Issue 8

The U.S. Roads WikiProject Newsletter
Volume 1, Issue 8	19 May 2007	About the Newsletter
Departments: Features: State updates Project news USRD members assist Canada project California Deletion debates Two debates at USRD Illinois Featured member A new GA Oklahoma From the editors Pennsylvania From the editors Washington
Archives  |  Newsroom   WP:USRD/NEWS

Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? –

t • c) 19:01, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Welcome, Hmich176, to the

• The project's Navigation box points to most of the pages in the project that might be of use to you.
• Most of the important discussions related to the project take place on the project's main talk page; you may find it useful to watchlist it.
• If you wish to use the template {{
  Infobox Former Country}}, please read the instructions before you get started
• There are three other projects that this project is heavily involved with. You are welcome to join them as well:
  • Holy Roman Empire
  • Extraordinary governments
  • Prussia

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask me or any of the more experienced members of the project, and we'll be very happy to help you. Again, welcome, and thank you for joining this project! 52 Pickup 17:12, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Hmich176/Archive 2,

I would like to thank you for joining WikiProject Malta, a collaborative effort that aims to improve, write, expand and organise material related to the island nation of Malta. We currently need as many members as we can get, and you are a valued addition to the list of members. Please see our To-Do list if you would like to further contribute to the project, or help construct our project page.

Thank you,

The WikiProject Malta Team

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the

WITHOUT QUESTION, THE ORIGINAL STAR TREK MOVIE. IT IS A BLESSED MIRACLE THAT ANY MORE WERE EVR MADE AFTER THAT ONE. I BOUGHT IT JUST TO COMPLETE THE SET, AND STILL MARVEL AT ITS ATROCITY. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.229.229.203 (talk • contribs) 21:22, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Biden did not announce that he is running, he announced that he would run. There's a big difference. For example, CNN would have sent me an e-mail if he announced that he was running. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 12.217.121.245 (talk • contribs) 01:33, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

do not change that edit again, i am a member to, and the information that i put down is true, any way what happend to the layout on this site. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jkress613 (talk • contribs) 19:19, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

it is the real brent spiner go to the web site look at his page its realy him he keeps saying he going to star in it, and that its about tos,tng,enterprise in the film,

thank you

any way what happend to the layout of this site? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jkress613 (talk • contribs) 20:07, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pluto is a planet and always will be, even if the pussies at the

Ok.. I will hold. Sorry, I didn't know someone may be looking at it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.236.16.122 (talk • contribs) 03:48, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe you can help me put a hide/show button on the box... what do you think? I think there are examples with the TV user boxes. (See

]

WP:NJSCR

Newsletter 2

The New Jersey State and County Route Newsletter Issue 2 – February 2007

Issue #2 The second issue of the WP:NJSCR newsletter celebrates the promotion of good article status , as well as changes to the project on the county routes side.

Project News WT:IH and elsewhere. EaglesFanInTampa have undertaken a project to put infoboxes on all NJSCR articles. In addition, the County routes in New Jersey article has been split into lists by county, and the infobox format for county routes has changed slightly. For all non-500-series county routes, the state is NJ County_name, and the type is blank. Infoboxes are set up for the following counties: Sussex, Ocean, Mercer, Cumberland, Bergen, Middlesex, Atlantic, and Monmouth. The following counties have a full set of shield SVGs: Middlesex, Monmouth, Ocean, and Sussex If you need help -- such as an infobox for another county, or more shield images -- don't hesitate to let Northenglish know. If you create an infobox that doesn't work properly (lots of redlinks), enclose it in an HTML comment (<!-- -->), and we'll get it working ASAP. Member of the Month The member of the month is EaglesFanInTampa , for his tireless work adding infoboxes to the 500-series county routes.

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Northenglish (talk • contribs) 05:05, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up. I'm not surprised that there's no consensus. RyanGerbil10(Don't ask 'bout Camden) 16:07, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

--TMF ^{Let's Go Mets - Stats} 16:27, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the

I've published a proposal to gauge the level of interest in setting up a micronation Wikiproject, which I thought might be of interest to you based on your past contributions. Comments and suggestions are welcome: Wikipedia:WikiProject_Council/Proposals#Micronations --Gene_poole 02:08, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your interest. The project proposal above has been successful, so I would like to invite you to add your name to the new project page: Wikipedia:WikiProject_Micronations. --Gene_poole 00:30, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I redirected the NHL Network page b/c the Canadian NHL Network was on air first and that is the name of the channel and the US version is not on air and it is unsure if that network will ever go to air. And also when NHL Network was redirected to NHL Network (Canada), the article used for the US NHL Network was used as "NHL Network". The Canadian version was on air first and is the original channel and just b/c its American doesn'rt mean that it gets first dibs on the name, if any network uses the :NHL Network" name then its the Canadian channel, and the American channel should use "NHL Network (U.S.)" MusiMax 22:46, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Then why should the US get the disambig page for the article which was originally there and why I moved the articles back? Just because its american doesn't mean it gets an overriding right over other countires. MusiMax 23:58, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I know there is an article for the US channel called "NHL Network (United States)". This is fine to me. But what I had an objection to was, when User:AlexRampaul first redirected all the pages, he changed the name of the Canadian article to "NHL Network (Canada)" and thne changed the name of the US channel to simply "NHL Network" which was formally used by the Canadian article. Then I redirected the pages back to the way they were being Canadian = "NHL Network" and US = "NHL Netwokr (U.S.)". And then u made ur changes which are what they are now currently titled.

My objection to all this was being that the American article was taking over the name of the Canadian article while the Canadian artile had to have (Canada) in brackets. I felt this was unfair for several reasons; 1. The US channel is not even up and running 2. the Canadian channel was on air first 2. and most importantly, I don't see it being fair that just because it's american, it gets first rights over the article names, to put it simpler, the Canadian article which used NHL Network as its title was being "downgraded" to having to put Canada in brackets while the American channel gets t take over the artile name to simply "NHL Network" without specifying that its American in the title. This happens alot on Wiklipedia and I don't think it's fair that just beacuse its american that this should happen. So I hope all of this has straightened this matter out and you understand where I was coming from with the redirecting in this matter. MusiMax 01:16, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As well I'm not trying to violate

assume good faith either, but I have to agree with you MusiMax 13:59, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Signpost updated for June 4th, 2007.

Weekly Delivery

Volume 3, Issue 23	4 June 2007	About the Signpost

From the editor
Sockpuppeting administrator desysopped, banned	Admin restored after desysopping; dispute centers on suitability of certain biographies
Controversial RFA suspended, results pending	Dutch government provides freely licensed photos
WikiWorld comic: "John Hodgman"	News and notes: Another Wikipedian dies, brand survey, milestones
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Single-Page View	WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the

I got rid of information that was unencyclopedic a consensus doesn't matter at allMarioman12 22:50, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I give up! put your useless information in the article. Though, saying the director of sonic and the secret rings would like sonic in the game but it's not up to him is like me saying I would like Sonic in the game but its not up to me.Marioman12 18:26, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

]

USRD

Newsletter - Issue 9

The U.S. Roads WikiProject Newsletter
Volume 1, Issue 9	9 June 2007	About the Newsletter
Departments: Features: State updates Project news Highways notability guideline? California Deletion debates Portal debate Maryland Featured member Three new GAs From the editors Exit list debates
Archives  |  Newsroom   WP:USRD/NEWS

Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? –

t • c) 16:40, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Signpost updated for June 11th, 2007.

Weekly Delivery

Volume 3, Issue 24	11 June 2007	About the Signpost

From the editor
Privacy report lists Wikipedia among best sites, but needing improvement	Board candidacies open, elections planned
WikiWorld comic: "Why did Mike the Headless Chicken cross the road?"	News and notes: Ontario error, no consensus RFA, milestones
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Single-Page View	WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the

]

PASH newsletter - Issue 001

The Pennsylvania State Highways Newsletter Issue 1 – June 16, 2007

Issue #1 The first issue of the WP:PASH newsletter recognizes all of the good articles the project has produced.

Project News After State Route 1002 (Lehigh County, Pennsylvania) was selected as the project featured article for June, it was listed as a Good Article. Thanks to everyone who helped the article. SR 1002 is the first quadrant route to reach GA status and the sixth article from PASH, with Interstate 95 in Pennsylvania, Schuylkill Expressway, Interstate 476, Pennsylvania Route 39, and Pennsylvania Route 145 being the other five. featured article candidate . Feedback and ideas to improve the article are needed. Nominations for next month's featured article are needed. To-do list See User:Myselfalso/PA Routes for the status of PA Routes 1 to 100. Create articles for all routes and expand existing articles.

Featured Member The featured member of the month is Vishwin60. He has been an important member of the project for a long time and has writen the Pennsylvania Route 31 article. Thank you Vishwin, for helping out WP:PASH.

Want to help on the next newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it transcluded next time? –

It's all here.JA10Talk • Contribs 19:32, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Signpost updated for June 18th, 2007.

Weekly Delivery

Volume 3, Issue 25	18 June 2007	About the Signpost

From the editor
Wikipedia critic's article merged	Board election series: Election information
Admin account apparently compromised, blocked	Controversial RfA withdrawn, bureaucrats fail to clarify consensus
WikiWorld comic: "They Might Be Giants"	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News	The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Single-Page View	WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the

Okay, thanks. --myselfalso 16:11, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See my talk page. Also, I've conversed with other people on #wikipedia-en, and they see the big space too. One has started a thread on

I have created the follwing articles so far:

• Pennsylvania Route 213
• Pennsylvania Route 261
• Pennsylvania Route 282
• Pennsylvania Route 332
• Pennsylvania Route 345
• Pennsylvania Route 420
• Pennsylvania Route 452
• Pennsylvania Route 491
• Pennsylvania Route 513
• Pennsylvania Route 563
• Pennsylvania Route 796
• Pennsylvania Route 841
• Pennsylvania Route 842

I will be creating more articles in the upcoming days. Dough4872 03:05, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered,

You are receiving this message because you are a member of the WikiProject Pittsburgh. In the past we have discussed a meetup idea - let's see if we can make it a reality during the summer. Please see this thread for more information.-- _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk}  23:22, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the

look here to see if PA 39 has earlier routings as a Legislative Route. I can't see it because I have dial-up, but when you see if PA 39 was signed as a LR route, contact me b-fore someone else comments on the FAC. -- JA10 Talk • Contribs 01:05, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't have to be LR 39, heh PA 222 was LR 157. If a part of today's route was a LR route, it should be mentioned first in the history. And by the way, you need a source to state when PA 39 was established, but don't worry, I'm currently working on that. -- JA10 Talk • Contribs 04:31, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, mention the LR 39 numbering in the article. "The number was used between Bedford and ect. as a LR". -- JA10 Talk • Contribs 04:44, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The U.S. Roads WikiProject Newsletter
Volume 1, Issue 10	7 July 2007	About the Newsletter
Departments: Features: State updates Project news Kentucky subproject promoted California Deletion debates AID restructuring Maryland Featured member GA status Pennsylvania From the editors Notability discussion currently collecting dust
Archives  |  Newsroom   WP:USRD/NEWS

Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? –

t • c) 04:02, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

]

US Roads will thank you - and so do I

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		I, Master son give you this TC barnstar for your hard work in maintaining and expanding WP:USRD and putting up with all the fun that goes along with it - staying strong through the best - and worst - of times

master son^{T - C} 02:56, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Have done most of the references, but the last 2 appear to be impossible Chaza93 19:21, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Finished - Rereview please, thanks, your pal Chaza93 20:00, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up -- I'm out of pocket on vacation until the first of the week, so my presence is very limited, but I'll holler at you when I get home. --Mhking 13:59, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for adopting I-91. Someone needs to keep it up. There's a pothole just south of mile marker....  :) Actually I was wondering what the phrase "child project standards" means. I may be taking it out of context, but it appeared on the template recognizing your adopting the highway. I looked it up on Wikipedia without success and got no hits on it outside either (with quotes). Thanks. Student7 15:09, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dear member of WikiProject Malta, I'd like to invite you to participate in an ongoing Article for Deletion debate about St John's Square in the capital of Malta. We'd like your input about whether the article should stay and go (and if you want to expand the stub, that would be great too!) All the best, Eliz81^{(talk)(contribs)} 21:23, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please comment on my proposal to move it to

I have told you several times not to strike out my objections. Please stop. --NE2 22:55, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please

Assume Good Faith, I see nothing wrong with striking the text, it simply means that he has fixed what you told him to fix for the article. -- JA10 Talk • Contribs 01:18, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

But he hadn't fixed it! --NE2 01:31, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Pennsylvania Route 39. -- JA10 Talk • Contribs 01:39, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've nominated

I reverted your tagging of this page for speedy deletion as a repost (g4), because I couldn't find anything indicating that the template has been deleted before. Also, tagging this template for speedy deletion moves everything in it onto the speedy deletions page, including pages such as Pikachu. NawlinWiki 21:19, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

When I started making the pages for the PA routes (im gonna try and get all the PA routes), I noticed on (

junction: Any major junctions - junctions with limited-access highways, Interstates and U.S. highways - along the route should be listed here. If more than one is listed, use a
to break the lines

I thought that ment that unless the PA route was a limited-access highway, it cant be listed in the junctions.

If what you had said is that all PA routes can be used, let me know. Ill revert the other edits you didnt catch where I did such, thanks :) Whammies Were Here (PYLrulz) 10:34, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There are two possibilities: rest stops and toll barriers are important, and thus we should include them, and the link doesn't belong, or they're not, and thus the link doesn't belong. The inclusion of these features, if we decide they're too minor to cover on Wikipedia, does not make the external link useful. --NE2 02:37, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

But that argument can be used for anything, like a site that lists the businesses at each exit or the potholes on the road. I will ask at Wikipedia talk:External links for another opinion. --NE2 02:45, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm... does this mean you support the deletion of WikiLove-related templates? Not that you're wrong, it's just that I hit this huge editorial wall and didn't know where to edit without making the whole article messier. I just found a way to help using WikiLove. But, as they had said, Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia, not a social networking site. Connell66 02:54, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good evening. An arbitration request has been opened for NE2. I have placed you as an involved party as you have recently been involved in NE2's past RFCs. You are therefore invited to take part in the discussion at

All of the USRD Clean-up Templates have been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. master son^{T - C} 16:44, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dear roads editor,

You may have noticed some changes at

This has become evidenced by the departure of a few prominent editors at USRD, a few RFC's, and much fighting among USRD editors.

After the second RFC, many of us found the opportunity to take a step away from Wikipedia for a while--as a self-imposed wikibreak, or possibly on vacation.

The result of such introspection was that many of us were placing ourselves in a "walled garden" and on a self-imposed pedestal of authority over the roads department. Also, we were being hostile to a few users who were not agreeing with us.

In fact, IRC has been the main incarnation of this "walled garden." Decisions have been made there to conduct grudges and prejudices against a few valued USRD users with poor justification.

For this, we have come to apologize. We have come to ask your forgiveness.

In addition to this, we hope to work as one USRD team from now on and to encourage cooperation instead of the promotion of interests.

All users are welcome to collaborate on IRC, the newsletter, or anywhere else at USRD.

In the future, please feel free to approach us about any issues you may have.

Regards,

• Rschen7754 (talk - contribs)
• TMF ^{Let's Go Mets - Stats}
• master son^{T - C}
• Talk
• (→O - RLY?)

16:50, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

Hello. I suppose the template will have to be re-worded or perhaps another made. I just figured if someone had an interest in that article about SK and had a peek at the talk page, they would themselves feel welcomed to the SK wikiproject, so hence, my reasoning for adding the template. SriMesh | talk 05:16, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I see you're a member of the European Microstates project. I was wondering if you would be interested in participating in a new "WikiProject:Europe"? It would cover non-EU pan European elements and more national elements where there isn't a project to cover it (e.g. there is no project for Slovenia). Microstates might also want to become a taskforce of the project to keep down overheads etc as there are just a few members. I am just trying to get an idea of numbers before I propose it but if you have comments on the idea please see the Discussion on WPEU. Thanks for your time! - J Logan ^t: 08:43, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your support! The project has now been set up here. - J Logan ^t: 14:37, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The U.S. Roads WikiProject Newsletter
Volume 1, Issue 11	18 August 2007	About the Newsletter
Departments: Features: State and national updates Project news Cleanup system revamped Assessment Deletion debates Stubs renamed New York Featured member IRC channel goes global From the editors Minnesota bridge collapses One year after SRNC: A reflection
Archives  |  Newsroom   WP:USRD/NEWS

Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here. —Rschen7754bot 21:57, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, they don't. Then again, neither does Pokemon Trainer. He does not use the random-attack Pokemon from the Pokeball item. Rather, a player that uses Red uses a set of three playable characters that can swap at will, much like a player who uses Zelda uses a set of two playable characters that can swap at will.

It's not like Red picks up a Pokeball item and makes the creatures move. Basically, the player plays as a Zelda/Shiek character with one extra form with a little extra stuff going on in the background. Hence, Pokemon Trainer does not do anything that Zelda/Shiek did not introduce in Melee.

Hey, thanks for sticking up for the Maine Diner. As creator, I agree that it easily fulfills notability standards. Ben 01:37, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The U.S. Roads WikiProject Newsletter
Volume 1, Issue 12 • September 1, 2007 • About the Newsletter
Departments Project news Deletion debates Featured member From the editors	Features WikiProject template system revamped Inactivity report Stub template changes continue	State and national updates Missouri New Jersey New York Wisconsin
WP:USRD/NEWS

Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here. —Rschen7754bot 22:24, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, just to let you know that

]

USRD

Newsletter - Issue 13

The U.S. Roads WikiProject Newsletter
Volume 1, Issue 13 • September 15, 2007 • About the Newsletter
Departments Project news Deletion debates Featured member From the editors	Features U.S. road editors attempt to achieve the two millionth Wikipedia article WikiProject page revamped Bannered U.S. Routes merged Quality first: WikiWork, stubs, and improvement of the project	State and national updates New York
WP:USRD/NEWS

Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here. —Rschen7754bot 19:25, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Son. We had a few urgent matters to communicate to you:

1. Please update your information at Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Roads/Participants, our new centralized participant list. Those who have not done so by October 20th will be removed.
2. There are important discussions taking place at
   WP:HWY
   , or the state projects should hold the "power" in the roads projects.

Regards, Rschen7754 (T C) 23:34, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]