User talk:Human Taxonomist
Welcome!
|
The reviewing process has changed and so it is difficult to do anything other than a single revert. Sorry about that, but keep it in mind and try to get discussion etc.--Andrew Lancaster (talk) 17:57, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Baseball
The thing is we already have a main article,
- The articles at Baseball and History of baseball clearly mention its first attestation in England, its links and similarities to rounders and other games in England, and its arrival in America with English settlers and colonists in the English colonies (America was founded by the English). Even if it was invented in the English colonies and not in England itself, it was still done so by Englishmen. Human Taxonomist (talk) 08:16, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
December 2019
January 2020
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at English people. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 07:38, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
Hi Human Taxonomist. I'm sure it was not your intention, but with this edit you have introduced at the very least rudeness if not a personal attack ("he is being obtuse") on another editor. Please be sure to comment on edits not editors ~ subjects not people ~ at all times, most especially when you find yourself in a dispute. I'd suggest that, to be clear that you intended nothing bad, you visit the page and strike out the unpleasantness. Happy days, LindsayHello 14:43, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
ANI
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#edit_warring_by_Human_Taxonomist_over_multiple_articles regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.
Unblock request
Human Taxonomist (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Why have I been blocked? What WP did I violate? I was trying to resolve a disagreement at ANI. Not sure why. I accidentally edited with my IP a few times before creating this account. How does this merit an indefinite block? Apparently, the reason given is "Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely to prevent abuse." What?? What "abuse" are you referring to and committed against which user? Posting on talk pages to discuss issues is "abuse"? I did not personally attack anyone. I did not violate 3RR. I am not a sockpuppet. So, I again ask what is this "abuse" you speak of? I have myself been the victim of personal attacks, ganging-up behaviour, lies and abuse by editors at
Decline reason:
The extensive edit warring while logged out leaves a fairly compelling trail of disruption. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 09:41, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Human Taxonomist (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
"the extensive edit warring while logged out leaves a fairly compelling trail of disruption." What? I edited and had a few conflicts, but nowhere violated
Decline reason:
Confirmed to Epf2018/CdnGael2018 which are Likely to Sprayitchyo per the filing at the SPI case. I also agree with NRP above...the IP socking is egregious.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 23:13, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- You are not going to waste our time with repeated unblock requests as you've done before with previous accounts. I have revoked Talk page access.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:49, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
I would've guessed this was Irvine22, tbh. GoodDay (talk) 16:20, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
- To GoodDay, and also LindsayH who mentioned Irvine22 in the thread at ANI, this editor is 2500 miles from where Irvine22 was editing and the locations are in different countries. It doesn't make it impossible but it may give you a better frame of reference. This one has edited English people before such as this series of edits. He has been in the same general area for at least five years.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 23:08, 8 January 2020 (UTC)