User talk:Ikara
Read · Post | Home | Contributions | Summary |
This is a Wikipedia user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Ikara. |
|
Welcome!
Hello, Ryu Ike, and
{{helpme}}
and your question on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. If you have any questrions about using Wikipedia, please feel free to ask at the help desk- The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Editing tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Manual of Style
- Help desk
If you think you need a tutor, you should consider
Date autoformatting
Please note that it's no longer encouraged; see MOSNUM. TONY (talk) 08:37, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
Oxford Wikimania 2010 and Wikimedia UK v2.0 Notice
Hi,
As a regularly contributing UK Wikipedian, we were wondering if you wanted to contribute to the Oxford bid to host the 2010 Wikimania conference. Please see here for details of how to get involved, we need all the help we can get if we are to put in a compelling bid.
We are also in the process of forming a new UK Wikimedia chapter to replace the soon to be folded old one. If you are interested in helping shape our plans, showing your support or becoming a future member or board member, please head over to the Wikimedia UK v2.0 page and let us know. We plan on holding an election in the next month to find the initial board, who will oversee the process of founding the company and accepting membership applications. They will then call an AGM to formally elect a new board who after obtaining charitable status will start the fund raising, promotion and active support for the UK Wikimedian community for which the chapter is being founded.
You may also wish to attend the next London meet-up at which both of these issues will be discussed. If you can't attend this meetup, you may want to watch Wikipedia:Meetup, for updates on future meets.
We look forward to hearing from you soon, and we send our apologies for this automated intrusion onto your talk page!
as ofs
I agree that they should be kept until emptied, but adding 2010-2012 will only encourage people to use them (and conversely keeping years like 1910 active). If [[As of 2012]] produces a red link, people know not to use them, otherwise we'll be fighting an uphill battle... Paulbrock (talk) 18:19, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
- While the old "as of" links should be removed, delisting them from WP:As of does not stop people using them, and means we can't track them as easily. However, once the pages such as [[as of 2012]] have been deleted, then by all means remove them from WP:As of, as they are no longer in use. When I reverted your edits, the pages still existed and needed watching. – Ikara talk → 18:25, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
- Agreed, we need to delete [[As of x]] as well as delist them; I've left 1990,1992 and 2009 for now in case people spot a gap in the sequence and wonder where they are... Decade barriers seem a sensible cut-off, so I'll try and do the same again once 1990-99 are clear. Paulbrock (talk) 18:31, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
DYK congratulations!
-- Congrats on the article! Alansohn (talk) 07:37, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
Pendulum
I'm assuming you're heavily involved with a lot of
You're specific request was for personnel on "
"Another Planet / Voyager" reassessment
Per your request for reassessment: I will do so, but remember that you can self-assess up to and including B-class: so you get to assess the rest of the Pendulum articles, in that you are far more expert in their content than I am. If you think an article is good enough you can propose it for
I have self-assessed a number of my own edits (up to and including B-class) and usually leave a comment indicating self-assessment in the relevant place as well as in the edit summary.
Other editors can change your assessment if they disagree but they should leave comments to justify their changes.
The assessment grid I use has been adapted from an album assessment grid I'd seen in one of my edit's talkpage and is NOT a compulsory grid: i.e. you don't have to use it if you don't want to. I find it helps editors of an article see where they can improve (including myself).
You've seen the singles/song grid that I use but the base grid for albums looks like (for a C-class album that needs more work in readability to become B-class):
Start class:
- A reasonably complete infobox
- A lead section giving an overview of the album
- A track listing
- Reference to at least primary personnel by name (must specify performers on the current album; a band navbox is insufficient)
- Categorisation at least by artist and year
C class:
- All the start class criteria
- A reasonably complete infobox, including cover art
- At least one other section of prose (in addition to the lead section)
- A track listing containing track lengths and authors for all songs
- A "personnel" section listing performers, including guest musicians.
- Independent in-line references supporting major/controversial claims
B class:
- All the C class criteria
- A completed infobox, including cover art and most technical details
- A full list of personnel, including technical personnel and guest musicians
- No obvious issues with sourcing, including the use of blatantly improper sources.
- No significant issues exist to hamper readability, although it may not rigorously follow WP:MOS;
Note: some Pendulum articles may fail at Start class (second point) due to a poor Lead section: little content and/or doesn't summarise entire article. Hence they would be Stub class for some editors.Shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 21:15, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
Hesitant to self-assess?
I know the feeling, but you could start with assessing others as a good way to learn about writing better articles yourself, eventually you get less biased at self-assessment (at least, I hope I have). Also assessing gives back to wikipedia by providing editors some advice.
If interested in Australian music you could check
If wishing to assess articles then hop into whichever level you like: I started with unassessed ones (where I met some Pendulum stuff) but there's only three or four left there now. So I've moved on to unknown-importance with over 4500 articles. That should keep me busy for the next few years (decades?) I picked these Categories so that I would come across lots of different styles and class levels, very few had comments added. They tend to be done by starting editors or are old articles.
However, I prefer to remain an editor primarily and only do limited numbers of assessments (up to B-class): that's why I'm happy to pass all the rest of the Pendulum works over to you.Shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 23:08, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
Another Planet / Voyager
--BorgQueen (talk) 09:42, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
As of discussions
I'm sure you have the talk pages watchlisted, but wanted to make sure you were aware of the posts I made here and here, which have further links to the comments I made here, here and here. I think you are the (or one of the) maintainers of the (relatively new) "As of" template (previously deleted in 2006), so that's why I'm leaving the note for you. Thanks. Carcharoth (talk) 09:20, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you for bringing that discussion to my attention. I've left replies at the latter three locations you link to which should make things completely clear. From what I can see though you are perfectly correct in those replies, the links are deprecated and should be replaced with the template, but not outright removed. The present incarnation of the
{{As of}}
template actually only dates back to July 2008 when I update an older template that output wikilinks. All the best – Ikara talk → 16:47, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
- Some how missed this discussion. I've said something there and said I'd tell you about it. I'm getting a bit confused with all the templates and guidelines around. Maybe you could explain the history of all this in that thread? Carcharoth (talk) 20:31, 5 October 2008 (UTC)]
- Some how missed
- I have left a reply at the discussion supporting the merge (with a suggestion for a new target). With regards to ]
DYK for Back 2 You / Still Grey
Keep up the good work! ~
DYK for Still Alive - the Remixes
~
Revert and warn
When you revert vandalism, such as you have today on
- Thanks for the heads-up. I was in a hurry and forgot to warn the vandal, but I'll try to remember in future – Ikara talk → 16:37, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
Replaceable fair use Image:Deitophobia.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Deitophobia.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:
- Go to di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
- On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before
If Pendulum's Hold Your Colour sold 225,000 units in the UK (according to this Reuters article]) then it must be 2x gold? I'm guessing that In Silico must be getting closer as well. Dan arndt (talk) 03:44, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
I'm not too sure about the reliability of that article, especially asThe article seems reliable, although the BPI website does not show any records of certifications for Hold Your Colour. However I am aware that the album is commonly held to be gold certified, and that reference is the best we have to go on at present. In Silico should show up on the BPI site when it hits Platinum as it has for Silver and Gold, we just have to watch for it. Thanks for the heads up – Ikara talk → 14:22, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Showdown (Pendulum song)
Gatoclass 03:09, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Paul Kodish
--Dravecky (talk) 20:21, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Booming Back at You
Hi, thanks for the "Booming Back at You" contribution Victuallers (talk) 21:16, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
GAC for "Showdown" (Pendulum song)
Songwriting ref at "Showdown" goes to generic search engine, user then required to input song title (you didn't provide such a note). I've often had to do the same for albums or band articles but some reviewers want direct specific link with no user input required. In that case, try a specific address e.g. <ref name="APRA Showdown">{{cite web|publisher=[[Australasian Performing Right Association]] (APRA)|title="Showdown" at APRA search engine|url=http://www.apra-amcos.com.au/worksearch.axd?q=Showdown|accessdate=6 May 2009}}</ref> For future information the important part is in the url after the q= If the song title has more than one word then each space between words is filled with %20. Can also be used to give full name of songwriter in biography article e.g. Thompson Robert Swire. Hope this helps.Shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 00:30, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
- I've been trying to work that one out for some time. It is a somewhat annoying search engine (I can't even get results for some songs due to the 250 result limit). At least that's one less problem to worry about. Thanks – Ikara talk → 01:34, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
According to my assessment this article is now GA. Congratulations and please consider reviewing GAC articles yourself.Shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 02:26, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Lisa Miskovsky - Still Alive - the Remixes.jpg
Orphaned non-free image File:Pendulum - Propane Nightmares.ogg
Thanks for uploading
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:36, 5 December 2018 (UTC)