User talk:InarZan

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. — Timneu22 · talk 12:49, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Chithravadham, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. — Timneu22 · talk 10:49, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There were zero google hits on this topic; it appears to be

made up. — Timneu22 · talk 10:49, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

I have nominated Chithravadham, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chithravadham. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. — Timneu22 · talk 22:03, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In March of this year, you wrote

Who's this "Young" person? DS (talk) 15:37, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi InarZan, The First WikiConference India is being organized in Mumbai and will take place on 18-20 November 2011. You can see our Official website, the Facebook event and our Scholarship form. But the activities start now with the 100 day long WikiOutreach. As you are part of WikiProject India community we invite you to be there for conference and share your experience. Thank you for your contributions . We look forward to see you at Mumbai on 18-20 November 2011

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello InarZan! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only. If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

I feel that you should be made aware of the

]

The Wikipedia community has permitted discretionary sanctions on any editor who is active on any page about social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties, related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The discussion leading to the imposition of these sanctions can be read here . Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:General sanctions.

Hi. As you are the editor wanting to add material to the article Caste system in Kerala, and it has been disputed and reverted, the onus is on you to get a consensus in support of the changes you wish to make - and you must not re-add the new material unless you can get that consensus. I've protected the article for a week to give you time to discuss it and seek consensus - if you add it again without consensus, you may be blocked in accordance with the sanctions outlined above. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:56, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I notice that you have been asking various questions at

Examples of what I have found:

• Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#George Menachery
• Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#Saint Thomas Christians - Community status and cultural identity
• Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#Asiatic Journal

There may of course be others. - Sitush (talk) 16:28, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And indeed there is at least one more. This is appalling behaviour. - Sitush (talk) 08:57, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you recently deleted content at Talk:Saint Thomas Christians. I assume that this was an error and I have reverted you. Please take care. - Sitush (talk) 08:34, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Something went wrong here. Arcandam (talk) 02:00, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that was a technical error. Thanks. -InarZan Verifiable 18:57, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dear InarZan, there is an on going discussion that I need to inform you about. Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Robin klein (talk) 00:51, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, my name's Peter Coombe and I'm a Wikimedia Community Fellow working on a project to improve Wikipedia's help system. At the moment I'm trying to learn more about how people use and find the current help pages. If you could help by filling out this brief survey about your experiences, I'd be very grateful. It should take less than 10 minutes, and your responses will not be tied to your username in any way.

Thank you for your time,
the wub (talk) 17:36, 14 June 2012 (UTC) (Delivered using Global message delivery)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Can someone move

Thanks for ur suggestion at INB....VSVettakkorumakansnehi (talk) 15:25, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

We are going to have to go through either a

In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Chithravadham and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 20#Chithravadham until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 23:48, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]