User talk:Jd.101

Please review this post once again. You are continuing to behave in the same manner and are downgrading the Winnipeg article.

While I appreciate the improvements you've made to Winnipeg, I must again ask you to please explain what you're doing. You have shown a persistent unwillingness to explain your edits, despite being asked to repeatedly, and a tendency to edit war. You add material[1] and then immediately remove it [2]. You remove material without explanation [3][4][5]. You have continued to change the location of this picture (e.g., [6]) when the consensus on the article's talk page is to put it on the right. And all of these diffs are just from this evening; the same problem is repeated almost nightly. The habit of making a dozen edits in a row, with no edit summaries, makes it almost impossible to follow what you're doing.

You do not own the article, and you must take other editors' consideration into account, or else it is disruptive editing. This is the last time I'll ask before asking for administrator intervention. justinfr (talk/contribs) 01:13, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Please ensure that you enhance the article, not diminish it. --142.161.161.211 (talk) 11:20, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:06, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary, which wasn't included with your recent edit to Winnipeg. Thank you. -- Taroaldo 01:40, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Please use the edit summary when editing articles. None of your recent edits have included an edit summary. This makes it difficult for other editors to quickly see what kinds of changes have been made. Thank you. --- Taroaldo 03:16, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thanks for your edits to Winnipeg. When you're making changes, please be sure to include an edit summary so that other editors can quickly see what edits you've made. justinfr (talk) 19:57, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. In the editing window, there's a box that looks like this:

Please include an informative edit summary in this box when you're making changes to articles, such as you did to Winnipeg. I reverted this edit because it removed content without explaining why. Please don't do that. justinfr (talk) 02:27, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits

Hello, just a note about your edits to

Hello, Jd.101. You have new messages at Justinfr's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:04, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, History of Winnipeg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from url:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Winnipeg. As a copyright violation, History of Winnipeg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. History of Winnipeg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:History of Winnipeg and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the
  GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:History of Winnipeg
  with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the
  GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:History of Winnipeg
  .

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. HalfShadow 01:10, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You edited Minneapolis to say that Minneapolis has a USDA plant hardiness zone of 5. Are you sure about that? All of the garden centers around here say that we're in zone 4, and I checked a 1990 USDA plant hardiness zone map and it says that Minneapolis is in zone 4.

Could you recheck on this? Thanks. --Elkman ^(Elkspeak) 02:38, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I see you are keeping them on their toes.
If a fellow winnipeger can lend a hand let me know.
Though I expect to be online less, I'll check back.
GabrielVelasquez (talk) 04:10, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Neither humidex nor wind chill is is a measure of temperature, and neither is expressed in degrees Celsius. It is incorrect to apply those units and convert them to Fahrenheit degrees. —Michael Z. 2009-02-16 17:19 z

Neither humidex nor wind chill is is a measure of temperature, and neither is expressed in degrees Celsius. It is incorrect to apply those units and convert them to Fahrenheit degrees. —Michael Z. 2009-02-16 18:10 z

I love some of the pictures you have added to the article the only problem is i am trying to get the article up to

]

File permission problem with File:Whitehorse Yukon Canada Sept 22 2008.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Whitehorse Yukon Canada Sept 22 2008.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the
  CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list
  ) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter
  OTRS pending
  }} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 21:12, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Whitehorse Yukon Panorama Sept 2008.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the
  CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list
  ) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter
  OTRS pending
  }} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 21:12, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Whitehorse Yukon Panorama Sept 2008 second version.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the
  CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list
  ) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter
  OTRS pending
  }} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 21:43, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Onanole Manitoba July 25 2009 second version.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the
  CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list
  ) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter
  OTRS pending
  }} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 21:49, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered,

Hi Jd.101, I saw you cropped the pic I uploaded to the Winnipeg article. If you're looking for a strictly downtown shot, I have a better one: http://i.imgur.com/GSJj1cb.jpg

Let me know if you want to use it and I'll upload the full resolution image. Haljackey (talk) 19:42, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Picture is here http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Downtown_Winnipeg_from_above.jpg Haljackey (talk) 15:46, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your upload of File:August 15 2007 downtown 002.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:29, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

Hello, Jd.101. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]