User talk:Jo0doe

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.


[1] Jo0doe (talk) 08:04, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

[2] Jo0doe (talk) 07:06, 31 August 2010 (UTC) --> -->

Orphaned non-free image File:1942ukrpoljudeakt.jpg

You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media
).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 03:45, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

-Missed a right section for placing a license tag - fixed. Thanks for noticeJo0doe (talk) 06:46, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:30061941modtext.jpg

You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media
).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 03:46, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

-Missed a right section for placing a license tag - fixed. Thanks for noticeJo0doe (talk) 06:46, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:30061941shept.jpg

You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media
).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 03:46, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

-Missed a right section for placing a license tag - fixed. Thanks for noticeJo0doe (talk) 06:47, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

RE

Dear Jo0doe, I will be happy to help you. --Paweł5586 (talk) 12:36, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

Hi, sorry I got now many works to do, I cant help you now:(--Paweł5586 (talk) 06:39, 15 September 2010 (UTC) Not a problem -anyway your will to help is sincere.Jo0doe (talk) 11:55, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Kuleshovka1857.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Kuleshovka1857.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to
    di-replaceable fair use disputed
    }}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 22:02, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

See here [3] an explanation:) It's 1857 year (not typing mistake). It's PD-Old Jo0doe (talk) 05:44, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:UIAanthem1943.jpg)

You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media
).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 20:22, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

“The Shukhevych Cult: Myth-making with Complications”

Where did you find this essay? --Львівське (talk) 07:48, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

Per Anders Rudling from University of Alberta send me it. Also distributed for participants at Historical Memory in Contemporary Ukraine An international conference September 23–26, 2009 Kyiv. ThanksJo0doe (talk) 08:22, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
Is it available on any journal archives or the like? Can I get a copy?--Львівське (talk) 21:27, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
According to this it is not supposed to be cited without permission from the author.Faustian (talk) 13:22, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
I've got a permission from him for wiki.Jo0doe (talk) 16:09, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
IS there a proof of that?--Galassi (talk) 16:19, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
Try to ask PerJo0doe (talk) 16:26, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
The burden of that ison YOU.--Galassi (talk) 16:46, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
Will be send at any
WP:OTRS member request, Also paper version distributed for participants at Historical Memory in Contemporary Ukraine An international conference September 23–26, 2009 Kyiv does not have such kind of restriction. Any source for Chuyev?Jo0doe (talk
) 17:44, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry
case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a

sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jo0doe for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Львівське (talk
) 19:06, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

Image tagging for File:BanderaOUNPeoplemilitiauniform1941.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:BanderaOUNPeoplemilitiauniform1941.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 11:06, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

Ukrainian People's Militia

The article

Ukrainian People's Militia has been proposed for deletion
because of the following concern:

No such unit exists; article created by known propagandist relying on obscure non-english sources

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons
.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{

the article's talk page
.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{

dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Львівське (talk
) 23:42, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect

Ukrainian People's Militia. Since you had some involvement with the Ukrainian People's Militia redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Львівське (talk
) 01:38, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of
Ukrainian People's Militia
for deletion

Ukrainian People's Militia, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy
.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ukrainian People's Militia until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Львівське (talk) 03:16, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:BanderaOUNPeoplemilitiauniform1941.jpg

You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media
).

PLEASE NOTE:


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:37, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:30061941rep-p4.jpg

File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:30061941rep-p4.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{

Wikipedia:Image copyright tags
for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on

48 hours after 19:53, 9 October 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Львівське (talk
) 19:53, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

PD-Ukraine and PD -Poland. ThanksJo0doe (talk) 11:42, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

I filed on AE on your behavior

See here: [4].Faustian (talk) 15:05, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

Email

I am not going to answer your email, because I can't do it without revealing my email address, which would reveal my real name, and I prefer not to do that. In any case, I don't see how a draft of a document would be a usable source, regardless of whether you have permission to use it. Looie496 (talk) 17:02, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

201 Schutzmannschaft Battalion

Hi. I've nominated

201 Schutzmannschaft Battalion, an article you worked on, for consideration to appear on the Main Page as part of Wikipedia:Did you know. You can see the hook for the article here, where you can improve it if you see fit. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 02:53, 22 October 2010 (UTC) on behalf of User:Piotrus

Block

proper page
. Any administrator that overturns an enforcement action outside of these circumstances shall be subject to appropriate sanctions, up to and including desysopping, at the discretion of the Committee."

And, for the reasons I have outlined in my comment at the AE thread, I have extended the block to run indefinitely as a community-based sanction. The indefinite block runs concurrently with the original 1-year AE block, which remains in effect. T. Canens (talk) 23:48, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Hmm, As far as I can understood from the text suggested – a very, very serious allegations[5] [6] (in scholar community) in the source falsifying/ misrepresenting told often enough becomes the truth. Specifically mentioned the book intended for researchers, Universities tutors and students [7]

In scholar community such allegation arisen extremely rare and only after very, very careful examinations of the issues and facts by specially appointed commissions. Since WP is not – I just would like to obtain a comments by parties which imposed sanctions So it would be nice to confirm that the text.

German Zonderkomando "4"b personnel, together with Ukrainian militia, inline to the scheme fulfilled in other cities, began to round up local Jews to the citadel. Of course, they were beaten and abused and later were murdered

-[8] at page 350 does not exist at text in Ukrainian translation of which appeared above

A text (from scholar text Summary section)

Can be stated that in shooting of the Polish professors and execution of the Lwow Jewish population in July 1941 took part Ukrainians and Ukrainian spoken Volskdeutsches the members of the Ukrainian militia.

-[9] at page 398 does not exist at text in Ukrainian translation of which appeared above

And this [10] excerpt from primary source (mentioned at scholar text [11] under 3833 – claims that were the very opposite of what the text added to article [12] was actually describing. Comments from a sanction imposed parties expected. Thank youJo0doe (talk) 11:01, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jo0doe (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

  • I’ve not involved into editing of the “all pages relating to Holodomor, broadly construed since 2008”- thus I can not physically violate the WP:DIGWUREN discretionary sanctions imposed over my account in 2008 [13]. I also strictly followed suggested policy - "to edit carefully, to adopt Wikipedia's communal approaches (including appropriate conduct, dispute resolution, neutral point of view, no original research and verifiability - [14] - [15] [16] - [17] :* Non-English source text – [18] intended for graduated in history scholars cannot be judged by the determination based on Google translation [19] . Exact citations given here [20] – please clarify does text cited contradict with [21] - given at WP:AE [22] as falsified/mistranslated example. I hope admin which review my request also can easily read typed in 1941 -1942 texts [23] [24] (which provide similar facts as in text in question]–to fairly judge my request. ThanksJo0doe (talk) 09:41, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

Decline reason:

For the first year of its duration, this is an arbitration enforcement block and can only be appealed as described at

WP:AEBLOCK.  Sandstein 
07:37, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Arbitration enforcement action appeal by <user:Jo0doe>Jo0doe (talk) 13:34, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

Procedural notes: The rules governing arbitration enforcement appeals are found in this 2010 ArbCom motion. According to that motion, a "clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors" is required to overturn an arbitration enforcement action.

To help determine any such consensus, involved editors may make brief statements in separate sections but should not edit the section for discussion among uninvolved editors. Editors are normally considered involved if they are in a current dispute with the sanctioning or sanctioned editor, or have taken part in disputes (if any) related to the contested enforcement action. Administrators having taken administrative actions are not normally considered involved for this reason alone (see

WP:UNINVOLVED
).

Appealing user
[[User:<user:Jo0doe>Jo0doe (talk) 13:34, 5 November 2010 (UTC)|<user:Jo0doe>Jo0doe (talk) 13:34, 5 November 2010 (UTC)]] ([[User talk:<user:Jo0doe>Jo0doe (talk) 13:34, 5 November 2010 (UTC)|talk]] · [[Special:Contribs/<user:Jo0doe>Jo0doe (talk) 13:34, 5 November 2010 (UTC)|contribs]] · [[Special:DeletedContributions/<user:Jo0doe>Jo0doe (talk) 13:34, 5 November 2010 (UTC)|deleted contribs]] · [[Special:Log/<user:Jo0doe>Jo0doe (talk) 13:34, 5 November 2010 (UTC)|logs]] · filter log · [[Special:Block/<user:Jo0doe>Jo0doe (talk) 13:34, 5 November 2010 (UTC)|block user]] · block log) – Jo0doe (talk) 13:34, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
Sanction being appealed
Arbitration enforcement: WP:DIGWUREN: 1 year block and concurrent indef. block [25]
Administrator imposing the sanction
[[User:<User:Looie496>|<User:Looie496>]] ([[User talk:<User:Looie496>|talk]] · [[Special:Contribs/<User:Looie496>|contribs]] · [[Special:Log/block/<User:Looie496>|blocks]] · [[Special:Log/protect/<User:Looie496>|protections]] · [[Special:Log/delete/<User:Looie496>|deletions]] · [[Special:Log/move/<User:Looie496>|page moves]] · [[Special:Log/rights/<User:Looie496>|rights]] · [[Special:PrefixIndex/Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/<User:Looie496>|RfA]])
Notification of that administrator
The appealing editor is asked to notify the administrator who made the enforcement action of this appeal, and then to replace this text with a
diff
of that notification. The appeal may not be processed otherwise. If a block is appealed, the editor moving the appeal to this board should make the notification.

Statement by <user:Jo0doe>Jo0doe (talk) 13:34, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

I’ve not involved into editing of the “all pages relating to Holodomor, broadly construed since 2008”- thus I can not physically violate the WP:DIGWUREN discretionary sanctions imposed over my account in 2008 [26]. I also strictly followed suggested policy - "to edit carefully, to adopt Wikipedia's communal approaches (including appropriate conduct, dispute resolution, neutral point of view, no original research and verifiability - [27] - [28] [29] - [30] –

  • Non-English source text – [31] intended for graduated in history scholars cannot be judged by the determination based on Google translation [32] . Exact citations given here [33] – please clarify does text cited contradict with [34] - given at WP:AE [35] as falsified/mistranslated example. I hope admin which review my request also can easily read typed in 1941 -1942 texts [36] [37] (which provide similar facts as in text in question]–to fairly judge my request.
  • If there no admin which able read Ukrainian and got a suggested by book scholar degree – I can recommend to check available English scholar works on topic –[38] - pages 292, 349-55

[39] page 59 [40] page 8 [41] which suggest similar to facts added [42] which mentioned at WP:AE as an example of the as falsified/mistranslated text.

  • I kindly ask to clarify the sanction applied – if I actually falsify/misrepresent the facts (i.e. OUN Ukrainian militia actually does not took part in round-ups of Jews for mass executions and not participate in it, not escorted Jews to their forced labor sites ... etc,) (as added to WP and suggested by sources mentioned above) – I agreed with sanction applied – If the sources support the texts added – please withdraw the sanctions applied.
  • If there were any other instances of the “falsified/mistranslated examples” which can be also arisen and need to be clarified with sources– I can provide on request a copies of books pages (if there no online book available) and also primary sources (like [43]or [44] ThanksJo0doe (talk) 13:34, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
    • Initially [45] There was a consensus about “misrepresenting sources” “that others describe as falsifying the sources”

[46] [47]

Now [48] it was a consensus about “lacking the necessary English language communication skills”

[49][50][51] – So the reason of 1 year block extended indefinite under WP:DIGWURREN remains unexplained - and I kindly ask to clarify – does the request [52] was filled /and block applied because of “lacking the necessary English language” or because diffs [53] [54] [55] were judged “misrepresenting sources” and “that others describe as falsifying the sources” (i.e. English scholar texts mentioned above and the text

In late June and July 1941 OUN militias and “Sich” organizations went on a rampage

in Galicia, Northern Bukovina, and Volhynia, killing Jews primarily, but also some Poles and communists. Sometimes these militias did not do the killing themselves,

but rounded up the victims for Germans and Romanians to execute by firing squad.

[56] is falsifying ? In other words - the someone from the participants depicted at p.307 [57] were engaged in“misrepresenting sources” “that others describe as falsifying the sources”. Clarification for the block reason would nice.Jo0doe (talk) 13:07, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

Statement by <User:Looie496>

Statement by (involved editor 1)

Statement by (involved editor 2)

Discussion among uninvolved editors about the appeal by <user:Jo0doe>Jo0doe (talk) 13:34, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

Result of the appeal by <user:Jo0doe>Jo0doe (talk) 13:34, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

This section is to be edited only by uninvolved administrators. Comments by others will be moved to the sections above.
I have moved this request to
WP:AE#Arbitration enforcement action appeal by Jo0doe. T. Canens (talk
) 22:11, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
Thank you - could you kindly clarify - per this statement [58] - "the issue" with " tendentious editing based on interpretations of Ukrainian sources that other Ukrainian speakers say are incorrect" - does it mean that the issue actually exist i.e. available English scholar works (text)on topic –[59] - pages 292, 349-55

[60] page 59 [61] page 8 and [62] page 8 (bottom) - 9 top are incorrect and tendentious - and imposed sanctions party carefully check it and "Ukrainian sources" and found "other Ukrainian speakers" supposition as correct? Does "other Ukrainian speakers" - only those 3 editors which refuse to explain and provide a source here [63] - Note: This file [64]? Thank youJo0doe (talk) 10:09, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

DYK for 201 Schutzmannschaft Battalion