User talk:Keenan202
Welcome!
Hello, Keenan202, and
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called
- Starting an article
- Your first article
- Biographies of living persons
- How to write a great article
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Help pages
- Tutorial
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Angelo Michael (talk) 00:49, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Colin Dimmick
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read
the guide to writing your first article.to help you create articles.You may want to consider using the Article Wizard
A tag has been placed on
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by
Speedy deletion nomination of Viegas Architecture Ltd
You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the
Article Wizard.
Thank you.
A tag has been placed on
If you can indicate why the subject of this page is not blatant advertising,
January 2014
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to List of Liv and Maddie episodes, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 15:14, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
Hello Keenan202, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your addition to List of Good Luck Charlie episodes has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.
- You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and a cited source. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
- Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
- Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
- If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
- In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
- Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied without attribution. If you want to copy from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. AussieLegend (✉) 18:53, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Good Luck Jessie: NYC Christmas (January 22)
February 2014
International release/broadcast sections
Please note, per
- MOS:TV#Broadcast, but also for not being sourced. :( If there's any way you can bolster these tables with references, that would be helpful. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:48, 23 February 2014 (UTC)]
List of Sanjay and Craig broadcasters and List of Sam & Cat broadcasters
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television#List of ... broadcasters
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television#List of ... broadcasters. Geraldo Perez (talk) 03:08, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
March 2014
If you believe the linked site is not violating copyright with respect to the material, then you should do one of the following:
- If the linked site is the copyright holder, leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page;
- If a note on the linked site credibly claims permission to host the material, or a note on the copyright holder's site grants such permission, leave a note on the article Talk pagewith a link to where we can find that note;
- If you are the copyright holder or the external site administrator, adjust the linked site to indicate permission as above and leave a note on the article Talk page;
- If the linked site is the copyright holder, leave a message explaining the details on the article
If the material is available on a different site that satisfies one of the above conditions, link to that site instead. AussieLegend (✉) 03:25, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
- Apparently you misunderstood the above.[1] The YouTube links are LINKVIOS. JesúsAntonio803 appears to be somebody who has uploaded the videos to YouTube and in doing so has violated copyright. Those videos cannot be liked to. --AussieLegend (✉) 03:38, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- <ref>http://www.toonzone.net/2013/04/nickelodeon-masters-the-elements-with-the-legend-korra/</ref>)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow
FX Australia Move
Hello Keenan202,
I see that you have moved
Thanks,
Forbesy 777 (talk) 01:49, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
March 2014
PAGE) 16:14, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Do not repost material which has been deleted at a deletion discussion as you did at
Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts
Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into
buffbills7701 19:54, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text ]{{unblock|Your reason here. ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. De728631 (talk) 17:43, 16 March 2014 (UTC) |
Keenan202 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am sorry. I thought that using multiple accounts was a good idea. I thought that no one would notice. I am sorry. I have read sock puppet policies. If you unblock me, I will become a good editor. I will revert and warn vandals, create pages, upload files, participate in discussions, add sources to unsourced info. Maybe I can get a mentor. Can all my other accounts be disabled. Please unblock me. I will use an edit summary for all my edits. At first I was unfamiliar with wikis but now I am. Please. Call me Keenan (talk) 21:04, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I find it hard to believe that you didn't realise creating a number of accounts was not a good idea, but I'll assume good faith on that issue. Some of your other accounts (eg Hallovan & So he took a ****) engaged in blatant vandalism and disruption. The editing from this account wasn't entirely constructive either. So I think the only way to move forward with unblocking your account will be via Template:2nd chance. If you'd like to go through with the second chance procedure please let us know on this talk page (I'll watch it) and we can discuss other conditions and if it would be good if you spent some time away from Wikipedia before going through the second chance procedure. FYI De728631. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:33, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Keenan202 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Second chance. Call me Keenan (talk) 10:20, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You created eight sockpuppets and this was discovered within the past two weeks. This is too deep a hole for you to get out of quickly. I suggest waiting six months during which you stay completely away from Wikipedia and do not edit under any account. After six months you could make a new request for unblock, under the provsions of
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- While making an unblock notice, you decided to host an article draft on this page in addition to your request. Do you even understand why you were blocked at all? chatter) 21:53, 23 March 2014 (UTC)]
- And now you've done it a second time. Please stop or getting unblocked is going to be more complicated when talk access is turned off and you have to email your reasons to be unblocked, and those admins aren't going to be happy to see an article draft in a message. The 2nd chance template must be posted alone. No article drafts, and do not redact my notices to you. chatter) 23:17, 23 March 2014 (UTC)]
- User:Nate, the article draft was suggested by the provisions of {{2nd chance}} and was allowed by the rules. But now that the unblock has been declined I recommend that Keenan202 not continue with that. EdJohnston (talk) 17:02, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
- And now you've done it a second time. Please stop or getting unblocked is going to be more complicated when talk access is turned off and you have to email your reasons to be unblocked, and those admins aren't going to be happy to see an article draft in a message. The 2nd chance template must be posted alone. No article drafts, and do not redact my notices to you.
Your GA nomination of Phineas and Ferb
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Your GA nomination of Phineas and Ferb
The article Phineas and Ferb you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Phineas and Ferb for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zanimum -- Zanimum (talk) 01:51, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
Your draft article, Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Good Luck Jessie: NYC Christmas
Hello Keenan202. It has been over six months since you last edited your
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply {{db-afc}}
or {{db-g13}}
code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Good Luck Jessie: NYC Christmas}}
, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 00:51, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
MfD nomination of User:Keenan202/sandbox2
Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Since you had some involvement with the Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. John Vandenberg (chat) 05:11, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
"TV5 (Philippines" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect TV5 (Philippines has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 13 § TV5 (Philippines until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 23:49, 13 February 2024 (UTC)