User talk:Kelleher82

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Welcome!

Hello, Kelleher82!
talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Faizan (talk) 20:37, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply
]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

February 2015

talk) 05:55, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Kelleher82, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Teahouse logo

Hi Kelleher82! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Soni (I'm a Teahouse host)

talk) 16:09, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

February 2015

talk) 02:39, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Talk:Philadelphia#Semi-protected edit request on 2 February 2015

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Philadelphia#Semi-protected edit request on 2 February 2015. Thanks. Deunanknute (talk) 05:26, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notable People

I am going to remove Rizzo and Rizzo Jr., given few readers will remember the father, we have no relevant clip, there's no source, and the son has no real national presence. If you disagree strongly feel free to restore them. μηδείς (talk) 04:24, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Philadelphia. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. The edits you reverted reflect the current consensus on the article's talk page. Please discuss the issues before restoring them again. SummerPhD

v2.0 16:18, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

v2.0 20:28, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

July 2015

original research. And do not make the same mistakes repeatedly. You have been given enough warnings. Chamith (talk) 20:43, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

discussion at WikiProject Philadelphia

You've worked on articles about Philadelphia, so I'd like you to see a discussion at WikiProject Philadelphia: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject Philadelphia#IP_editors_are_erasing_neighborhoods.

It's about a spate of recent changes, largely by anonymous users, to articles about Center City Philadelphia. The changes seem misguided to me, and I'd like to hear what other people think. TypoBoy (talk) 00:24, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 22 February

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

false positive, you can report it to my operator
. Thanks,
talk) 00:24, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

March 2016

reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SummerPhDv2.0 04:09, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

ArbCom Elections 2016
: Voting now open!

Hello, Kelleher82. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections
is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Phoenixville, Pennsylvania. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Magnolia677 (talk) 20:40, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • When you copied and pasted the founding date into the infobox on so many articles today, did you think to check if the founding date mentioned in the article was sourced and correct? Magnolia677 (talk) 21:03, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Settlement / formation dates must be specific to the place and must have a source

In this edit to the article for Florence Township, New Jersey, you've added 1688 as the date that the township was formed, which is the year that Mansfield Township, Burlington County, New Jersey was created. The date that Florence Township was settled or formed is not the same as Mansfield Township or Burlington County or West Jersey or the Province of Jersey or of European settlement of North America. The 1688 date belongs in the Mansfield Township article; it doesn't belong here, nor does it belong in other such articls where the date is for the establishment of a different place. Alansohn (talk) 07:24, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 30 November

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

false positive, you can report it to my operator
. Thanks,
talk) 00:24, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

Reference errors on 14 February

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

. Thanks,
talk) 00:22, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

More here.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 21:45, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution

History of the Irish Americans in Philadelphia. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:53, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

I see you are still not adding the required attribution, as required under the terms of the CC-by-SA license. Please have a look at this edit summary as an example of how it is done. Please leave a message on my talk page if you still don't understand what to do or why we have to do it. Thanks, — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:42, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 16 February

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

false positive, you can report it to my operator
. Thanks,
talk) 00:24, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

February 2017

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at South Philadelphia. SummerPhDv2.0 15:49, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

Capitals-Flyers rivalry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wells Fargo Center. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject
.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

Capitals-Flyers rivalry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Erskine. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject
.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:12, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

1608 date for Brigantine

Per this edit for Brigantine, New Jersey, the characterization that it was "Discovered" or "First sighted" needs to account for the fact that there were Native Americans already present on the shore of present-day Brigantine who were waving to the crew on the ship passing by. Without that context, the date is misleading, at best. Alansohn (talk) 17:17, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free image use

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. We always appreciate when users upload images. However, it appears that one or more of the images you have uploaded or added to a page, specifically

Non-free image criteria. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:57, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Philadelphia Phillies

Please stop making unhelpful edits to the Phillies page. I'm sure you're doing it in good faith, but your actions are starting to feel like they're disruptive. Especially making the exact same edit after I reverted yours, and then attempting to mask it with a subsequent inconsequential edit. If you want to make those changes, please follow

WP:CYCLE and discuss those changes on the talk page. Thanks. Rockypedia (talk) 13:42, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Society Hill

I reverted a few edits you made in the

Society Hill article because it appears you replaced a photo of headhouse square with your own photo that is not related to the article. It was also geo tagged outside of Society Hill with Location: 39° 56′ 47.04″ N, 75° 9′ 27″ W
Please let me know if you have information that would correct these assumption, if I have made a mistake.

More generally, it seems that you have made several edits across a number of articles that suffer from the same type of sloppiness, specifically misrepresenting the contents of a photo. For example this edit where you replaced a photo of houses in Rittenhouse with a photo from Society Hill. Such edits are harmful because they are factually incorrect for readers and a drain for editors who would rather spend time making positive contributions rather than reverting carless editing. Please be more careful in the future that your edits are accurate. PHILA19106 (talk) 08:13, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Kelleher82. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Kelleher82. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019

welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 04:00, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:43, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply
]