User talk:Lancevortex

Nice additions to the soccer section on full back - thanks. I dabbed that in very quickly because someone had written a page that was exclusively about American football, which was obviously intolerable - but my knowledge of the modern game is about zero. It's now rather a nice page, and it would be good if we had similar comparative pages on other positions that exist in the different codes. seglea 18:48, 28 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers seglea. I agree it would be nice to have pages for the other positions. And there are a lot of sport-based pages that are very U.S.-centric; I've also been trying to broaden the scope of a few of them. --Lancevortex 12:22, 6 Jun 2004 (UTC)

---

I've deleted the erroneous category, by the way.

13:18, 15 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Cheers

Dysprosia! --Lancevortex

13:58, 15 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Michael Johnson (athlete)

Hi! In my opinion, the shorter versions (that is without minute and second tags) look better and are more encyclopaedian-like. If You want to revert it, then please do it. -- Gh

Hi! I keep this in mind in the future articles, but right now almost all the articles in

Olympic medalists in athletics (women) have the shorter versons. Anyway, this is probalbly one of the discussion point to decide the standard layout of times, results etc. and we should catch some more contributors of sport articles to this. -- Gh

Many thanks for catching my spelling error so quickly! I'm in the process of subcategorizing Category:English language, and I would've felt twelve kinds of stupid if I'd misspelled the category name for all the articles that will go inside it. :-) • Benc • 10:08, 15 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Hey, nice work in cleaning up the Football managers' categories.

Hi. You've helped with the

Article Licensing

Hi, I've

Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:

• Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
• Multi-Licensing Guide
• Free the Rambot Articles Project

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at

. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:

Option 1

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}

OR

Option 2

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:

{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the

Quoth: I am happy for my work (mostly spelling corrections anyway) to be used by anyone. Does using one of the templates suggested cover this?

Spelling corrections *may* not be considered to be copyrightable under U.S. law because they may be considered to be too trivial, but let's just assume that they are. Since spelling corrections are minor (not in terms of importance!), I would recommend just releasing them into the public domain, then they will be unrestricted and useable by anyone. The "{{MultiLicensePD}}" template does this. If this is not good enough for you let me know and I can suggest something else. Using one of the other templates will just restrict your contributions to two licenses instead of one license. – Ram-Man ^{(comment) (talk)}[[]] 13:53, Dec 15, 2004 (UTC)

Hi Angr, just noticed that you changed the SAMPA pronunciations on List of names in English with non-intuitive pronunciations to IPA, citing Wikipedia preferences as your rationale. Could you point me in the direction of the page where this policy is outlined? I'm personally very much against this change (largely because it's a total pain to edit) and would like to argue against it -- only problem is, I can't find where the policy is defined! Thanks, Lancevortex 10:11, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)

• Hi Lancevortex, the policy is stated at
  Angr
  10:50, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Exactly why are you giving so much prominence to the IPA notice - e.g. on Motörhead? Is not the (IPA) link immediately preceeding / 'məʊtəhɛd/ enough? IMO, the notice is way over the top, a completely unnecessary conceit. YMMV, of course. --Tagishsimon (talk)

Hi. You write:

Hi Chris, the last couple of times you've edited the Reading, Berkshire article, you've managed to introduce duplication of entire sections. I've undone this, but you may wish to check a) that your intended edits are still there and b) what's going on to make the duplication happen. --Lancevortex 10:09, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Many thamks for undoing the damage. I'm mystified as to how it happened, although in both cases I got an edit conflict dialog even though there was no sign of anyone else editing the article. I was editing a section, but the upper box that you are supposed to edit displayed the whole article. It looks as if it then inserted the content of that box into the article as if it were just a section. Hence everything but the section being edited got duplicated. I guess I'll just have to stop editing at section level. -- Chris j wood 22:46, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for the proofing of History - I was a little tired when I typed it. Oldfarm 12:25, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)

I was in Tadley in 2000 for the Baughurst School reunion [1]. I am also a member of TADS. Oldfarm 18:59, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)

These pages sure could use some help, perhaps you're interested?

Wikiproject Years Survey

Hi. To get everybody thinking, I've created a survey about Year pages

here

. I'm telling all the participants of WikiProject Years and everyone else who has shown an interest in year pages or participated in the discussion. If you could check it out it would be appreciated, and tell anyone you think may be interested. ]

Help

Shot in the dark, noticed your edit on Motorhead - two Motorhead singles I fully believe deserve their own places are up for VfD (after I undid redirects from live singles to album singles, the author of the redirects immediately put both up for VfD), it'll ruin the timeline and incomplete the discography, would you help by voting to keep if you feel so inlclined.

]

D'oh, must check my copy paste edits better, thanks for spotting that bad DVD title. Alf 19:49, 31 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, no worries over the umlaut then, I thought I'd lost it due to my shoddy workmanship, you're right, 'tis covered enough already. Alf 09:38, 1 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lance,

Thanks for your comments on my talk page. I've got a thing at the moment about the massive American bias in Wikipedia, so I keep trying to redress the balance all over the place; making it more international. Arcturus 18:54, 24 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I noticed you created

]

Survey Invitation

Hi there, I am a research student from the National University of Singapore and I wish to invite you to do an online survey about Wikipedia. To compensate you for your time, I am offering a reward of USD$10, either to you or as a donation to the Wikimedia Foundation. For more information, please go to the research home page. Thank you. --WikiInquirer 03:44, 17 March 2007 (UTC)^{talk to me}[reply]

I noticed that you are the one who started the article on the

, and I definitely need your help in making it this good. I fear that my edits may have deadened the prose somewhat, and given that you have a background with the M11 protest movement, I think that you may have a lot of useful sourceable information that could make this article as great at it deserves to be. Yours, Lewis Collard! (natter) 20:46, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(BTW, I was way too young to be involved in the movement when I was in that area. I lived in

conservative (and, oddly, very sympathetic to the strong, intimate communities that I have read about in my research about Claremont Road, and think that in the truly radical left there's a conservativism waiting to get out, but that is a whole 'nother political-philosophical story...) so maybe our POVs will balance each others out a bit. :)

Hi Collard. Nice work on the article. I'm not sure how much I'm able to help. I don't have sources for what I wrote beyond my memory, and probably a lot of the stuff I put in should strictly speaking be removed as unverified. The article's still on my watchlist, and I'll continue to glance at it from time to time to check for any outrageous edits! --Lancevortex 11:18, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Delayed reply: Thanks for the compliment. If there's not a lot more you think you can do, then so be it (though your prose is still somewhat better than mine). Though I'm glad that, as original author, you approve of the latest batch of changes. :D Lewis Collard! (natter) 07:12, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am puzzled as to why you would nominate my article for speedy deletion. I have followed underground British hip-hop and grime for the last 10 years, and any artist who has won Kennet Awards, usually has huge success (eg. The Streets & Dizzee Rascal). G-Star has released 2 mixtapes (available at some HMV stores) and is shortly releasing his debut album. His 1st single went in at #49 in the UK Charts, and was considered for the Need For Speed soundtrack. What else does it take to show that this artist is famous enough to stay on Wiki? I'm unsure whether it was you or not, but the article "G-Star" has been deleted, and the last name on the log was yours.

I'd appreciate your help with this. Please reply to my talk page

GR55TAY

Hi there. I've replied to your post on my talk page... :) --Kurt Shaped Box 20:28, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Lence, thanks for fixing that typo I have made. I don't know what I was thinking that day to go base instead of bass. Thanks a lot, man :) MarkMarek 17:16, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. I won't point out that the name is Lance ;). Nice pics on the Motorhead page, by the way. Lancevortex (talk) 18:39, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh my goodness, haha. That's embarrassing. Sorry about that one. PS – this time around I spell checked the “embarrassing” just in case. Glad you liked the pics. Thanks a lot :o) MarkMarek 18:50, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Music and politics during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ridernyc 03:26, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs Liskeard Athletic F.C. Larzac Henry Creamer Yellow River Arabian Plate Ahmad Shah Qajar Vātsyāyana Harry Williams Abbey Hey F.C. Ubii Waltham Forest parks and open spaces Pelvoux Saltash United F.C. Aragonese language Alresford Town F.C. WCWM Arromanches-les-Bains Oolite Reading R.F.C.

Cleanup Closed list Stocksbridge Park Steels F.C. Evesham United F.C. Merge Scottish Football League Premier Division Bluebottle (character) San José, Costa Rica Add Sources 2010s Battle of Worringen Fleetwood Town F.C. Wikify Tabriz Sphynx (cat) Reading Town F.C. Expand Peace camp Eugene R. Black Don Juan Matus

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 22:56, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of names in English with counterintuitive pronunciations

is being considered for deletion

Since you started the list, you may be interested in joining the discussion. Thanks. Afasmit (talk) 02:58, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Diseases

Category:Diseases, which you created, has been nominated for merging into Category:Diseases and disorders. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Cgingold (talk) 14:45, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

unreferencedBLP

}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Sepp Maier - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:42, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Apparent polar wander

Hi, I've finished the plate reconstruction article, comments and amendments welcome. Regarding the apparent polar wander article, I rediscovered this excellent online text book by Butler, Chapter 10 has quite a bit on APW, if you feel like expanding what you started. Mikenorton (talk) 23:49, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I will give it a go. Lancevortex (talk) 10:48, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

List of names in English with counterintuitive pronunciations

List of names in English with counterintuitive pronunciations, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of names in English with counterintuitive pronunciations (3rd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:32, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

Uruguay and the FIFA world cup finals

Regarding this edit: Uruguay and Forlan no longer in tournament. They will be playing in Match 63 on Saturday. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 22:11, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake - of course they will. Thanks for spotting it. Lancevortex (talk) 22:26, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of British regional nicknames for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article List of British regional nicknames, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of British regional nicknames until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Tagishsimon (talk) 00:37, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion

Hello! I noticed you contributed to Middlesex University entry on Wikipedia. If you studied at that University, please consider including this userbox on your userpage. Simply paste {{User:Invest in knowledge/mdx}} to your userpage. Thank you. Invest in knowledge (talk) 18:10, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Epping Forest

The simplest solution would seem to be create a new category Category:Epiing Forest with articles related to only to the woodland and leaving the articles about the council elections etc in the district category. Tim! (talk) 06:58, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Tintin

Category:Tintin, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 16:22, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

M11 link road protest

You might be interested to know that this article you created is currently being

good article reviewed. I've had a look back through the original article you created way back in April 2004, and aside from a lack of references (which wasn't as important then as now), it's actually a pretty good read. It certainly looks a lot more neutral than the versions I've read over the last few years. Anyway, you might be interested to see the article as it is now. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 20:55, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar

Hey, I'd like to use your photo of the "Garden of Fugitives" from Pompeii for a kids book and need to verify you to my publisher. You do have a GNU tag on your creation, but I wanted to verify it before I took the image to them. Also, if you have anything with a higher resolution (150 dpi min) it would be better for printing. Finally, how would you like to be credited? Thanks, Graeme. www.graemestone.com Graemestone (talk) 03:30, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of

List of names in English with counterintuitive pronunciations

for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

List of names in English with counterintuitive pronunciations is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted

.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of names in English with counterintuitive pronunciations (4th nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:09, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of

List of names in English with counterintuitive pronunciations

for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

List of names in English with counterintuitive pronunciations is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted

.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of names in English with counterintuitive pronunciations (5th nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:35, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016

: Voting now open!

Hello, Lancevortex. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page.

ArbCom Elections 2016

: Voting now open!

Hello, Lancevortex. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Lancevortex. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Lancevortex. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"

European footballer of the year" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect European footballer of the year has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 23 § European footballer of the year until a consensus is reached. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 10:32, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Lancevortex&oldid=1220367532"