User talk:Lucky 6.9/Archive1

Hail!Thankyou Comrade! In spreading word of the impending revolution you have served the cause in the most magnificent of manners.

The time is drawing near. The worker is becoming restless. As one of the last living Neoplatonists I feel that it is my duty to ensure the downfall of capitalism. Comrade Adam Daly will not have perished in vain.

As for the christmas matter. Frankly comrade, i am disappointed. As the great Karl Marx once said "religon is the opiet of the masses.

Copies of the holy book must be obtained and distributed. The communist manifesto must be handed out to fellow comrades and bourgeois. This is essential if we are to bring down the filthy capitalist pigs.

From now on I will be referred to as Comrade Tsan Tzu.

HAIl LENIN

--Comrade Tzan-tsu 00:22, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Crumpets and MarmiteComrades!

I must log out. Crumpets and marmite await.

I require sustenance.

HAIL LENIN

--Comrade Tzan-tsu 00:25, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Help me

Could you please explain what I did wrong? =(

I'm really new to this. I thought I was helping because I saw a red link so I created an article hoping someone else would come and expand on it (isn't that the whole idea behind the Wikipedia?)

User:AndorisG'day Lucky,

I'm not sure I'd count "I'm going to leave this site!" as a "threat against users", per se. I'm not sure if he's worth unblocking, though. fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 08:14, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

For Ralph And so happy Christmas... Best wishes from Heidi and Joe

Independantedge blocking

Have a read of the

Counter vandalism page, all the info you need is there. And you certainly can borrow any of my templates, though I must say I don't know which template you are referring to :-). - Akamad ^{Merry Christmas to all!} 00:23, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply

]

Merry Christmas

Thanks!

Thanks for notifying me that my articles were a bit too short. But, how do I put in dinosaur stub notifycations? Grand Moff Brian

blocksHi Lucky 6.9,

I noticed you've been carrying out quite a few indefinite blocks for user names that have few edits, none of them productive. Is that appropriate? Looking at

WP:BITE a newbie? —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 04:30, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply

]

I hear you. NP patrol is a scary scary place. But I think it's worth it to always make the attempt to engage in dialog before blocking - at least to distinguish the clueless from the malicious. (Some editors, of course, make their maliciousness clear to begin with; I have no issue with blocking those accounts.) It might also be helpful if you left some pointers on the user's page to what now-deleted pages the user edited; since Special/contributions doesn't show edits to now-deleted pages, it can be hard for someone like me who comes along later to see *what* went on. Finally, I don't think there needs to be a rush to indefinitely block even kinda-bad new accounts: the really bad ones will just quickly create a new account anyway, so the benefits don't outweigh the harm to newbies caught up in the crossfire.—Bunchofgrapes (talk) 04:55, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

recent issue

Sorry for my recent topics. I didn't realize that making topics about myself wasn't allowed and I thought that my pages were being removed by accident. :(

DoosanHi,We are Public Relation Team of Doosan group.

Our Group is located in south korea.

When we upload our contents(doosan, doosan gruop, doosan infracore so on)to your Wikipedia, deleted such pages and prohibit our IP.

We are think that is copyright.

So we insist that we have been owned copyright of those contents about "Doosan, Doosan Group, Infracore so on".

Therefore We have no problem to register contents.

Also, Our Wiki ID which is need to uploading contents is going to limit a "doosan" and we are going to enrollement contents.

Please, Restore a page relation to Doosan, Doosan Group so on.

In addition to Set free a protected pages that is "Doosan Group" ASAP

Thank you.

Have a nice day!~

Bye

Sincercely — Preceding unsigned comment added by Doosan (talk • contribs)

I have asked User:BorgQueen to attempt to engage this user. Gazpacho 06:52, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Dibatag

ah -- I see he's now included the line "ff. full text available © pjb 2005 (free for wikipedia, fair use)", at the bottom of the page. I've tried to explain the GFDL, but perhaps you can chime in if you have a moment. bikeable (talk) 20:31, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

ThanksThanks for the polite messages on my talk page, I really wasn't expecting that.

I was expecting some wiki-censor admin to be behind it all, had no idea who it was even.

When Bloodfetish.com was deleted, there wasn't even any edit history or the usual "view deleted edits" link that lets you know it's been deleted. Very odd. Maybe that's the norm for new articles but I have seen at other deletions it usually says "View deleted edits" at the top even if you can't see what's at the link.

O_o

Anyway as per what I said in the edit summary, gonna work on both. As you can see from google there's a lot of communites and stuff based around it but most of it's pretty covert. And some are complete wackos. Making a NPOV article could help a lot. There's even wacko nuts (mostly American I must add) who think they're vampires. --Mistress Selina Kyle ^{(Α⇔Ω ¦ ⇒✉)} 02:52, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

User groupsHi, im a newcomer and i wanted to know how to edit the userbox. Thanks

Baxdogg 04:20, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Re: User:Roman Soldier

Your patience and tolerance are a credit. I am still hoping that he will be able to move on from this incident and concentrate on productive edits, although his recent comments are disappointing. — Knowledge Seeker দ 02:57, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Dont Redirect

Dont redirect The Musik to ARY.

Why redirect Elysium Planitia to the planet mars? If a person looks that up what is wrong with an article on the subject which refers to Mars? WilliamKF

Whoa - Phil Hendrie Show deletion

Redirect

Maoririder has moved

possible Maoririder sockpuppetI'm not sure where to bring this up, but I know you've been involved in this...

User:Jingofetts has strong resemblance to blocked User:Maoririder. Actually, this user is more like the early Maoririder, rather than the later spastic Maoririder. (medication change??)

Evidence:

• Extensive use of tags, such as cleanup
• An interest in the Arthur TV show
• An interest in topics relating to Portland, Maine

Anyway, I'll keep my eye on this to the extent that I can, but I am hoping to get you or someone else to join the posse. ike9898 19:33, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ike and Lucky and all please dont start the hounding as tony sidaway said i made scimitar go away i'am deeply sorry if i did but please dont take out anymore on me iam done with the passed... you bash me to much and lucky i know you have been through alot so sorry man. and ike i got something to say to you sorry man.

pablo blocked me and my maoririder acount i lost my password?

Old talk

Yes, I know I can look at the history -- but I notice for your talk page (this page) the history only goes back to 15 dec. Why is that? novacatz 02:06, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Somehow I happened upon the page where some group released a press release about pedophiles and WP. I was looking over Linuxbeak's response to it but it seems the conversation was scattered over some talk pages so I can't really tell what was going on and how the discussion evolved. I would like to read that if at all possible. novacatz 05:26, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

that sounds fine novacatz 05:53, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

10% plan

Kudos

Thanks

Hello Lucky 6.9/Archive1,

I wish to thank you for your AFTER THE NOMINATION ENDED vote on my RfA. It has passed with a final tally of 59/0/0 (60/0/0). If I can ever help with anything or if you have any comments about my actions as an admin, please let me know! KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 08:29, 31 December 2005 (UTC) :-D [reply]

---

Hey man whats up I jusst wanted to say thanks for your help and hello and happy new years this is my first post after my block espired last night so whats up !! I'll probabl y be back in a couple days or so good morning!Wiki_brah 18:50, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Maria Milito

Roman SoldierHappy new year to you too! Having had a look at this, I think you've done exactly the right thing. He certainly does seem to have been more trouble than he was worth, even if he had a handful of legitimate contributions. Furthermore, giving him the offer of unblocking if he said he'd behave himself was a good call, and I think his rude refusal says a load about his usefulness to the project.

How've things been going, anyway? I was just thinking that I hadn't seen a featured article nomination from you in a while. :) Ambi 07:49, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Great job with

Cynna Neele, even if it is kind of stalled on peer review at the moment. Ambi 00:13, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

Stationary engineerYou have a reason for deleting this without comment?

I was going to use this as a reference from "Automation."

normxxx 21:28, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry; I am still very new to Wikepedia (less than a month) and I haven't yet gotten around to finding out how you want to handle external references to articles, especially uncopyrighted articles, that provide more detail than a Wikopedia article could ever hope to add to. normxxx 21:43, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You should have a boilerplate explanation (with references) which you could provide to newbys on "speedy deletions."

New years

Deletions

I like it! How do I use it? Anything that will help stem the tide of nonsense would be welcome. - Lucky 6.9 05:07, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have added it to your monobook.js. If you use a different theme, you will need to move the contents of User:Lucky 6.9/monobook.js to a different page (e.g. User:Lucky 6.9/cologneblue.js).

Press Ctrl+Refresh first to load the code into your browser. You should see a "Speedy" link appear at the bottom of your toolbox just as the page finishes loading. (The shortcut for it is alt-backtick, backtick being next to 1 on most keyboard). So for example:

1. You follow a link to a bad article.
2. Press alt-h, confirm no good version ever existed.
3. Go to delete talk page if necessary (alt-t, alt-d, delete)
4. Press alt-j, confirm no inwards links were created.
5. Press alt-backtick, and click on the cell with the right criterion (e.g. "A7 Unremarkable people")
   • You should know them well - the descriptions are only reminders
   • The bottom-right cell sends you to
     CAT:CSD
   • You can do this on the article page, the talk page, the history page, the whatlinkshere page, even the edit page
   • Obviously, the cells are coloured with all the category reasons yellow, all the article reasons green, etc. I've used it for a day or two and the muscle memory, well, speeds things up a LOT.
6. Wait until you are sent to
   CAT:CSD

Tadam! Try it! r3m0t ^talk 05:18, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

PS If you visit

CAT:CSD often, check the bottom of the talk page for instructions on removing the annoying notices that make you scroll down to see the article list. r3m0t ^talk 05:20, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

This is the Ghost of Roman SoldierBecause of technical problems and bounty-hunting admins watching every new member who joins I choose this name.

When we first met, I was trying to work on an article by writing it and then saving it. This is the way any thinking person would write a paper. Start it, save it, work on it, save it. Forgive me for bringing this to Wikipedia.

As I worked on the article, you deleted it. I thought it was a mistake, so I tried working on it some more, and you deleted it. I can't believe this is Wikipedia policy to delete new articles on sight. I hope that this policy will one day be removed and welcomed by a policy allowing both new articles and saving. Remember that even the most brilliant featured articles were once stubs.

Alas, I just hope you understand why I and so many others have a problem with the way you administrate.

This is the very last you will be hearing from me in any way. In less than one week I will have much better things to do than play around on Wikipedia. I hope that you and everyone else will appriciate the good I brought Wikipedia. I hope Wikipedia will become a better place no matter who they choose as administrators. Ghost of Garden State 06:55, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Roman Soldier, if you can maintain this attitude of civility and courtesy, I think that you would be welcome to continue your work here. It's all right to offer comments or constructive criticism—I've let other administrators know when I disapproved of their actions, and I have pushed for a couple to lose their administrative privileges. It was the hostility, the grudge, the vandalism that we had issues with, not your dissatisfaction. — Knowledge Seeker দ 08:25, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Marc AlvaradoYou said "... guy Googles out pretty good." I found this 43-year-old's "lifetime of inspiration" to have led, in his poetizing since age 12, to one self-published & IMO blatantly self-indulgent volume of 162 pages carried by one (count them) E-tailer who is also a vanity publisher. If you really think yr search was more valid than mine on

"Marc Alvarado" "Eternal Myth" OR maui

please drop me a msg with your search terms and at least 5 URLs that suggest more notability than my 5 hits, before you remove the speedy tag from his bio.
--Jerzy•t 10:57, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Tnx. These things happen, don't they? [smile]
--Jerzy•t 16:54, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You're the only judge of that, but take it easy on yrslf, whether that means that you've earned a vacation or that you don't need to put up with one. When i realized how long i've been seeing yr sig & checked to see if you might be an admin, i also noticed how much slop you do delete! So my part in this was the kind of routine remedy (more eyeballs) that the WP method relies upon. And don't take my excessively voluminous comment as implicit criticism; i'm really, really compulsive, and gave this matter far more attention than it deserved for the sake of the project, for my own stupid reasons i guess. Tnx again.
--Jerzy•t 17:24, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Riaa safe

Hi, any reason why you deleted Lenny Tatara ...

Well, I can't say I'd prefer the deletion process speeded up even further, but all this will surely have been discussed somewhere? I'm still concerned about newbies, who I think shouldn't be frightened off after their first edit.I was just googling "Lenny Tatara" and was going to add an external link (which includes some of his pictures), remove the interview and wikify the rest when I realized that the article had gone. No need to speed up anything really as far as I'm concerned. All the best, <KF> 02:32, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tram stops

No more Wikipedia:Articles for deletion?

Ummm, hi. We haven't interacted much, but I've often followed your exploits. I have to admit, the thought of things getting deleted faster makes me intensly uncomfortable. To be frank (while hopefully causing no offense) you have been known to push the edge of acceptable speedies a bit in the past, no?

Please take into account this is coming from someone who regularly follows up on and AfDs when things are restored as "bad speedy" by, err, whomever. Of course, also bear in mind that I've not seen anything that looked wrong, it's just the thought that bothers me.

Hope that this has all been recieved in the spirit with which it was intended,

brenneman^(t)(c) 03:14, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lucky 6.9, a cursory look at deletion logs shows that you have deleted a little over 100 articles in about 9 hours, all with a reason of "null" and done with my delaid script. Using my delaid script, you can actually see "A7 || " added to the deletion summary before it presses the button, and instead "null || " was added. This is clearly a problem of delaid not working properly with IE/Opera/Safari/whatever, but the point is - are we to believe that you didn't notice this 100 times? I cannot see any particular suspicious deletions, but please refrain from using delaid until I fix the problem. Also, tell me what browser you are using, and try adding en.wikipedia.org to your "list of trusted sites" (if your browser has one). Then, delete one (deserving!) article and check the logs. r3m0t ^talk 04:47, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

We're losing all the reasonable people

Re: More Roman Solidier

You're welcome. I think we both agree that words are more powerful and more productive than blocks. — Knowledge Seeker দ 02:46, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delaid update

Strong Articles

Wiki brahLucky-

It occurred to me just now as I was catching up on the AN stuff that my comment about well meaning administrators may have looked like it was directed at you; I just wanted you to know that I wasn't actually thinking of you, but rather of a very long discussion of the subject that was held on the mailing list. I didn't want you to get the wrong idea. :-) -- Essjay · Talk 11:26, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

West Virginia vandal

Hi Lucky, and I hope you enjoy your wikibreak!

This kid that's been bothering you is the "North Carolina vandal" (see Wikipedia:Long term abuse/North Carolina vandal for a writeup). Anything referencing "Carlow Crab" is distinctive, and him for sure. I've been tracking him for about seven months now. He edits from an IP range of 63.19.128.0/17, which both Curps and I block regularly. Cheers! Antandrus (talk) 03:38, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

When you come back

I hope you can help me out! it mean alot to me!

Tagore subramaniam

Lucky 6.9, a cursory look at deletion logs shows that you have deleted a little over 100 articles in about 9 hours, all with a reason of "null" and done with my delaid script. Using my delaid script, you can actually see "A7 || " added to the deletion summary before it presses the button, and instead "null || " was added. This is clearly a problem of delaid not working properly with IE/Opera/Safari/whatever, but the point is - are we to believe that you didn't notice this 100 times? I cannot see any particular suspicious deletions, but please refrain from using delaid until I fix the problem. Also, tell me what browser you are using, and try adding en.wikipedia.org to your "list of trusted sites" (if your browser has one). Then, delete one (deserving!) article and check the logs. r3m0t ^talk 04:47, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You still haven't stopped. >:(

r3m0t ^talk 00:03, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Puerto Rico

Hola Lucky. How's it going? I wanted to invite you to become a member of the new project about my pais. If you want to, just click there and list your name where it has the list of writers on the project. As you can see, the page is poorly formatted. I don't know how to build a country-box, but we'll work on it :) It would be a great honor to have you helping us as a member.

I hope I can see your name there soon! Thanks and God bless you!

Your wikifriend,

Antonio Burger King-not anymore!! Martin

Barney & Friends

The Suite Life

In reply to your post on my userpage, I still don't understand why you deleted the article in the first place. As far as I know, when you deleted it, it had a summary written by myself, not one copied from tv.com. I'm pretty sure that I was the last one that had edited it. If someone edited it and put in copyright information, why didn't you just revert/change the article? Sorry, I'm just a little confused about the whole thing. - Nights Not End 18:39, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Alt.tv.real-worldI talked to Zoe, and he said you deleted alt.tv.real-world? Why?

As I said to Zoe, I understand very well that the first user put up a joke article, but I was working on changing it. I was editing and saving as I was going, so the new changes should have been visable. Clearly, this article was not "vandalism" or "nonsense." Also, the changes being made after after I initially changed the first user's entry were minor spelling fixes. You said the only changes were "retyping the slogan." What does that even mean??? If you want a full article, I can wait until I'm completely finished before submitting it, but you shouldn't delete just it.

This article should be allowed resubmitted properly, as it is not non-notable. Alt.tv.simpsons and alt.romath have their own articles. If they have articles about their newsgroups, alt.tv.real-world should have one as well. Let alone the fact that alt.tv.real-world is one of the most notable newsgroups in Usenet history (as my article was going to point out), it is certainly more noteworthy than alt.tv.simpsons (which could be covered article about "The Simpsons," btw). I don't like how you just shoved it off as nonsense, but that's pretty discriminating.

I am still editing my article, (as it was on my screen when I left, and when I came back I found the saved version was deleted), and I plan on resubmitting it. Only this time I'll wait until I have the full article before saving it. If you still have a problem with it, it is clear you're discriminating.

I'm not sure which way to get this to you, so I am trying both. Apologies if you keep reading the same things from me. Also, I apologize if I am coming off gruff, but it was a shock to me that the article was deleted (before even being discussed!) in the first place...

No intentions on flaming you, I just felt it was unfair to delete my article. I understand you get bombarded with silly articles about web forums and discussion boards, which are like vanity articles on someone's little "hole in the corner of the web." However, I really felt alt.tv.real-world is more noteworthy (along the lines of the infamy of the alt.fan.karl-malden.nose group, [which has a Wikipedia entry, mind you] as we associate, but are not affiliated with them) due to its history and widespread fanbase. Wikipedia has several articles on Usenet, flamewars, and trolls, etc, and I thought a few articles (like mine) that actually provide examples would help fill in those topics a little better. Wavy G 06:23, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have no problem with deleting it, after all, I did list it for AfD, and it was pretty much nothing but forum posters' screen names, which is a pretty good argument for deletion in most cases. User:Zoe|^(talk) 16:28, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Spam?

I looked up the Social Bookmarking page, and there is a list of bookmarking sites such as Digg and delicious. Some have a long page of their own, such as: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digg

Some have no page. I started a page for one site and you immediately deleted it as spam. How is a page about one company spam while a page about another company not spam?

In writing the article, I tried to follow the same form as the article on delicious. I will try again after I read the manual of style.

Thanks

---

---

Redirect

Article

I started an article (Flipsyde) and you deleated/protected it. I would like to know how I can get this article back up and running. I added some things on the talk page, any help getting the article back would be great.

Blocking IP ranges

Awwwww. That's very sweet! :) Btw, another idea is that if you use IRC, Kelly Martin (who goes by the name of karynn on IRC) is usually in the #wikipedia room. She has checkuser access. She might be able to help out. --Woohookitty^{(cat scratches)} 03:31, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have Sassy. Last cat was Magician. I usually like unique names but Sassy is well.......Sassy. :) --Woohookitty^{(cat scratches)} 04:02, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism?You sent me a message about vandalism - I wasn't doing anything of the sort and I don't understand what you are talking about. I'm making a template for which the words need to appear as a railway line name.

Examples are here:

Eastwood railway station, Sydney

Look at the second bottom box which contains "Northern Line" and the stations on that line. To do this requires a template of such a sort:

{{CityRailSydney/Northern Line}}

this puts the header in the box. The content is the same as the title, but it is necessary to distinguish. I didn't write this, I copied it and improved on it from someone else...

Please let me know if that's not right.

(

JROBBO 07:08, 17 January 2006 (UTC))[reply

]

Irish Kennel Club

Page Improvement Requests

Some people are complaining that pages are too technical but I don't think they should be dumbed down. How do I have my say? (there's too much to ever hope to learn about the proper way to do things at wikipedia... who has the time?!)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Pages_needing_attention/Mathematical_and_Natural_Sciences#Genetics

Piranha (1995)

Sorry...

It's not A personal attackHow is it a personal attack, the person in question has read it and is in favour of it.

ok, point taken.

Lucky how are you? --MaoJin 19:47, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

==Sorry--Re: Molly Spooner--She accessed my account, planning to change it immediately back after she showed me what she did. i aplogize.

Renaming help

Hi, I can't do the renaming myself because the new name is already occupied (by the content created by this user). The new name is the proper name in Vietnamese, but I'm not sure whether it should be used in the English version of Wikipedia. The beef I have with it right now is the user improperly performed an article renaming (i.e. create a new article with content copied from the old name, losing the edit history). DHN 07:41, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think you understand what I meant to say: At the beginning, there was an article named "Cao Dai" [1] that has an extensive edit history. Someone comes along and create a wholly new article named "

Cao Đài and 2. Rename "Cao Dai" to "Cao Đài" to preserve the edit history yet producing the same effect that the user wanted. Thanks. DHN 07:53, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

Thanks a lot! G'nite. DHN 07:58, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Lucky thanks for the message good to see you back! MAORI!

Glossary of confusing psychiatric terms

No idea! If you find one, please let me know... I patrol Newpages too much too! -- gtdp ^[T]/_[C] 17:40, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Akkalkot Niwasi Swami Samartha (Samarth)

ArbCom election

Jackarandah Productions

Speedily deleting copyvios

Experiment

See the deletion log for said page, as well as the last entry in

Wikipedia:WikiProject_User_scripts#Requests

Copyrights

Since I forgot, I should say that I took the info from NBC.com, so if any other pages are using the info, then it must not be copyvio. JQF 02:48, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

How did my articles disappear?

Deletions

I do know we get a steady stream of garbage for sure, but the trick is to pick out the ones that don't fall under CSD....throw a stub tag on them, tell the editor that he should be adding more to his additions or pass them to AFD. But it doesn't do anyone any good to delete something that someone added in good faith and have it disappear on them with no explanation. I'm not talking about junk someone adds just to be funny or as a test....but things that for whatever reason, someone (probably new) thought fit in. Those film stubs for example. Anyway....sometimes it's just too quick and someone's good faith edits get deleted, I think we should respect them enough to at least drop a note on a user talk page about it. Ok, I've gone on long enough! No hard feelings I hope!

Rx StrangeLove 07:58, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

• Are you really speedying short articles which include pictures too? Please remember that limited content is not a reason for speedy deletion, only "no content": "Limited content is not in itself a reason to delete if there is enough context to allow expansion."
  Kappa 08:51, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Hello!

Mmounties

hey, Lucky. My son forwarded me your comments. Thanks for the kind words. --Mmounties 06:49, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, yes

You deleted a page of accurate information

I enclosed details on myself (User Gwarwick) The information I posted is correct - The facts were checkable on the link I posted or on the Australian Stock Exchange site - both sites are regulated and the posting of inaccurate information theron is unlawful.

It may simply be you don't want factual information self posted - I will admit to not being completely familar with your rules.

Wik-alert

He displays many classic symptoms of psychotic behaviour. Lord help whoever has to deal with him in the real world! --Gene_poole 05:34, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'd be honoured to be nominated for admin. --Gene_poole 01:05, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ARGHH! I just spent an hour responding to the nomination and then lost it all due to a Wikipedia system error! Thanks for the enthusiastic nomination. --Gene_poole 22:48, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK - I've got it all back up there again. Any idea why it's not showing up on the nominations page ? --Gene_poole 23:47, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Commons

Lucky hello again sorry to disturb you look at my watchlist for more... thanks MaoJin 17:57, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion

An article about religion was recently deleted, with the message "you've had your fun, now please stop". I would like to refer you to the many page about religions, and would like to know the reason for the deletion.

Image:Kombi.jpg listed for deletion An image or media file that you uploaded,

Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

dbenbenn | talk

23:06, 30 January 2006 (UTC) [reply]

Trilogy of Terror

That scene, and the final, with her stabbing the floor, waiting for mom. That did it for me. I didn't sleep without an eye open for months. -- Longhair 01:32, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Gene Poole

What do you like about the republican party? --MaoJin 13:11, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Verdiculous

You removed the word Verdiculous... I just wanted you to know that (YOU ARE WRONG). So if you want to remove it because you don't agree, thats fine but please remember this Adolf just cause you don't know about it does not mean that it is not out there.

James Kilkenny

Question about Copyright

You told me that I cannot copy text from a website. What if I know the owners of the website? Do i need them to release it somehow? What do i do? I'm posting with their cooperation. --Quickstar

Image:1979 450SEL 6.9.jpg listed for deletion An image or media file that you uploaded,

talk

21:37, 2 February 2006 (UTC) [reply]

Thanks

lucy why did you delete my categorye bulgarian patriots?

Effinhot

Why did u keep on deleting that article???

trigger happiness

Image copyright problem with Image:Whitefront.jpgThanks for uploading

Copyright policy

).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are

Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from

Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. -- Carnildo 08:14, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

Lucky a supporter of Bush huh? i won't say any more lol Mao

Greetings

==Chisato Amate==

critera for speedy deletion of articlesVery short articles providing little or no context (e.g., "He is a funny man that has created Factory and the Hacienda. And, by the way, his wife is great."). Limited content is not in itself a reason to delete if there is enough context to allow expansion. A search engine may help in determining context and allow for the article's expansion.

little context, not none

1. Foreign language articles that exist on another Wikimedia project. If the article in question does not exist on another project, the template {{notenglish}} should be used instead.

not on jp.wikipedia.org

1. No content whatsoever. Any article whose contents consist only of links elsewhere (including hyperlinks, category tags and "see also" sections), a rephrasing of the title, and/or attempts to correspond with the person or group named by its title.

filmography is content

1. (merged into 3)
2. Transwikied articles. Any article that has been discussed at Articles for Deletion (et al), where the outcome was to transwiki, and where the transwikification has been properly performed and the author information recorded.

no

1. Attack pages. Articles which serve no purpose but to disparage their subject (e.g., "John Citizen is a moron").
2. Unremarkable people or groups. An article about a real person, group of people, band or club that does not assert the importance or significance of its subject. If the assertion is disputed or controversial, it should be taken to AFD instead.

1. An article that is a blatant copyright infringement and meets these parameters:

no

When tagging a page for deletion under this criterion, a user should notify the page's creator using wording similar to {{Nothanks-sd}} or an equivalent message. Before deleting any page under this criterion, an admin should verify that the page creator has been notified — if not, the admin should do so. If the deleting administrator is notified of an error, and finds the claim of error plausible, he should restore the content immediately and, if a confirmation email has not been received, follow the Wikipedia:Copyright problems procedure, blanking the article with the {{copyvio}} template in the process.

reading up on notability criteria now. Nateji77 09:38, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Correct mistakes?

The repeated deletion without warning of my in-progress article stub was destructive to the Wikipedia community spirit, and I'm glad that the perpetrator decided on further reflection to insert a warning of possible deletion instead. The deleter made mistakes; corrected the mistakes; life goes on. However, the demeaning tone used, and threats to blocking the contributor, live on. When will that mistake be corrected? I suggest an apology.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Lucky_6.9/Archive1&oldid=1080318926"