User talk:Makhamakhi

প্রিয় উইকিপিডিয়ান, বিরক্ত করার জন্য প্রথমেই দুঃখিত। আপনাকে

Please, both of you, remember that this is the English Wikipedia and that conversations on talk pages should be in English so that the community can understand them. If using another language is unavoidable, try to provide a translation of the comments; see WP:SPEAKENGLISH. --David Biddulph (talk) 15:25, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry - actually he requested me to create some articles at Bangla wikipedia.

talk) 21:52, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

@David Biddulph: The guidelines you mention apply specifically to discussion pages which are used for collaboration, which includes just about all talk pages other than user talk pages. I suggest you revert or remove this message.Vinegarymass911 (talk) 08:16, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WP:SPEAKENGLISH does say "on all talk pages of English Wikipedia". The header to which you refer says "These guidelines apply specifically to discussion pages which are used for collaboration, which includes just about all talk pages other than user talk pages. The application of these guidelines to user talk pages should be governed by common sense and should not supersede guidelines and policies specific to those pages." I can't find any guidelines or policies specific to user talk pages which contradict the general guidelines (unless I've missed something), and the section on user talk pages at WP:User pages#Terminology and page locations links to Help:Talk pages. I agree that it's not disastrous to have a conversation in another language on a user talk page, but in a collaborative project it is preferable that comments be comprehensible to the community, and I ought to have used the word "preferable" rather than "should" in my message. --David Biddulph (talk) 11:24, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Swaralipi (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swaralipi (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Worldbruce (talk) 01:14, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

		Thank you for creating several articles on women and their works over the past few weeks. We have become aware of your contributions thanks to research undertaken by Bobo.03 at the University of Minnesota. We think you might be interested in becoming a member of our WikiProject Women in Red where we are actively trying to reduce Wikipedia's content gender gap. You can join by using the box at the top of the WiR page. But if you would like to receive news of our activities without becoming a member, you can simply add your name to our mailing list. In any case, thank you for actively contributing to the coverage of women (currently, 17.41% of English Wikipedia's biographies). Our priorities for February: Black women Mathematicians and statisticians Geofocus: Island women #1day1woman Global Initiative
		(To subscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list )

--Ipigott (talk) 11:33, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I see from your talk page above that you've already been warned about this before; you are clearly not following the instructions at

It looks like you may have also improperly nominated articles that were already part of another open, pending AFD, changing the notices to now point to your new nomination page while the original AFD has not yet been closed. I'm leaving this here so others may review and address as necessary as I unfortunately do not have the time right now. postdlf (talk) 16:34, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Uruguayan Grammy Award winners and nominees is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Uruguayan Grammy Award winners and nominees until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dan arndt (talk) 02:06, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Panamanian Grammy Award winners and nominees is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Panamanian Grammy Award winners and nominees until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dan arndt (talk) 02:08, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In accordance with

Please translate.Xx236 (talk) 11:42, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

:@Xx236: See Special:Permalink/819807870#Signature. Sam Sailor 11:53, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

পুরস্কার means Awards, I've recified it already, see the article. It was not intensional. I erroraneously used that bengali word. Thanks for letting me know.

There is still no account for Makhamakhi (talk · contribs) and your signature is still untranslated.--Auric talk 15:25, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It is a time taking task to sign my name by translating every time. Can I change my username to Makhamakhi?

@মাখামাখি: See Wikipedia:Changing username/Simple for how to do so. --Worldbruce (talk) 15:37, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Basu Poribar (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Basu Poribar (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Otopor Chibuker Kache Eka is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Otopor Chibuker Kache Eka until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mar11 (talk) 05:31, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tokkor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tokkor until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mar11 (talk) 05:34, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[[ File:Information.svg|30px|left]]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Urmila Srabonti Kar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Urmila Srabonti Kar until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mar11 (talk) 07:30, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[[ File:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|alt=Stop icon]]

One of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be

Also stop citing:

• sources that have nothing to do with the topic, as you did at
  Surrender
  , and others.
• links that were
  WP:SAYWHEREYOUREADIT
  .

--Worldbruce (talk) 19:25, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to

List of costume designers (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Tashan

Yasmin (given name) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver

)

added a link pointing to Farida Yasmin

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, re: these edits, please refrain from presenting opinions as facts. It's not a fact that Richa Chadha's outfit resembles one of Madhuri Dixit's. This is an opinion, and opinions should be attributed to the voice that spoke it, a la "John Doe of Hindustan Times noted a similarity between Chadha's costume in ___ song and Madhuri Dixit's outfit in ___." But without any context to explain why we're suddenly talking about someone's costume, I don't see what encyclopedic benefit this content has. In a larger section about the film's costuming or something, I could see value, but a random sentence is weird. Thank you, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:49, 11 February 2018 (UTC) Are you sure this is just an opinion? What I added is clearly written in the provided reference. The film's director himself stated that he made the actress's look similar to Madhuri Dixit. I you find this non-notable, you can revert this. Makhamakhi (talk) 18:58, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Makhamakhi: i have posted some links in Justin James talkpage Talk:Justin James (music director) please go through them and let me know what you think and please try to respond as soon as possible Frizel Francis 11:48, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You need to understand that, he is a member of just a popular band. But one of your two references are noteworthy. Moviebuff, Itunes, Mp3mad, Tamilmusic such music downloading cites with just three or four sentence mention aren't allowed in wikipedia. I think you're new. The references you provided add them in the article instead, by using {{cite web|url=|title=|accessdate=}}, I'll review. Times of India, Hindustan Times, Filmfare such popular new portals are often accepted. Makhamakhi (talk) 11:54, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Makhamakhi: .thanks for the reply i have added the references please have a look Frizel Francis 12:19, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Manoshi Nath, Makhamakhi!

Wikipedia editor TheLongTone just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Imo designers get much too little recognition for their work; they can make or break a movie.

To reply, leave a comment on TheLongTone's talk page.

Learn more about

TheLongTone (talk) 13:17, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you dear, for your reviews, but you must check Filmfare Award for Best Costume Design, she has won two times. Makhamakhi (talk) 13:21, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you create a page under wrong name, you move it, not copy/paste.Xx236 (talk) 13:24, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the {{proposed deletion/dated}} tag from John de Havilland, which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think this article should be deleted, please do not add {{proposed deletion}} back to the file. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks!
NB: an article can be PRODded only once. If your tag is removed, you must not replace it. Eustachiusz (talk) 15:57, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Eustachiusz: John de Havilland hasn't been prodded or deprodded. It hasn't even been edited since the day it was created in April 2012. This user's account has existed only since 2017. What are you talking about? Largoplazo (talk) 16:13, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

See below. Eustachiusz (talk) 16:18, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Largoplazo:

The OP presumably intended to refer to John de Havilland (pilot). --David Biddulph (talk) 19:34, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of songs about Bangalore is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of songs about Bangalore until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MT Train^Discuss 07:49, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Makhamakhi: You added Afd tag on Ninja Singer. May I know what are the requirements to prove that the person is popular. If I add ref to news site like times of India then can it be prevented from deletion. Rahulmehta942 (talk) 15:14, 14 February 2018 (UTC) Yes, if you can add news sources like Hindustan Times or Times of India, it proves his notability as a singer, I'll definitely remove Afd tag. Never mind, IMDB and fan page articles aren't credible. Makhamakhi (talk) 15:18, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Makhamakhi: I have added sources of Times of India and Daily Post India. Please check. Rahulmehta942 (talk) 17:14, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the {{proposed deletion/dated}} tag from Gurpreet Kaur Sapra, which you proposed for deletion, because its deletion has previously been contested or viewed as controversial. Proposed deletion is not for controversial deletions. For this reason, proposed deletion is disallowed on articles that have previously been de-prodded, even by the page's creator, or which have previously been listed on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{proposed deletion}} template back to the article, but feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! —KuyaBriBri^Talk 15:18, 14 February 2018 (UTC) Why? Is that kind of one-sentence article is notable? He is just a politician. Did he hold any political positions? What about his political career? pls add. Makhamakhi (talk) 15:20, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your comment indicates that you have not read my above comment, so I will not respond further. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 15:27, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Its okay, that you deprodded my prod. I've read that. Thank you. Makhamakhi (talk) 15:32, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the {{proposed deletion/dated}} tag from Idaikaadar, which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think this article should be deleted, please do not add {{proposed deletion}} back to the file. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! Rasnaboy (talk) 18:54, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Makhamakhi. Thanks for nominating. I've just added few more sources for the article Idaikaadar and have improved it a bit (given the ancientness of the topic, we need quite some more time to find more details). I've also explained my objection in the talk page. If you still feel it should be deleted, please go ahead. Will try to find more info and citations in the meantime. Thank you. Rasnaboy (talk) 18:54, 14 February 2018 (UTC) @User:Rasnaboy - Its okay that you deproded. But, I just want to know if he has written any book? or just a single verse (no. 54)? Is he really notable? Makhamakhi (talk) 04:25, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

With what I know about the

Tiruvalluva Maalai, for example, is a work that contains just 55 verses, each written by different poets. Such was the uniqueness of the Sangam era). Coming to Idaikaadar, there were at least two persons by that name, and they have written several verses (again "several" in the Sangam parlance). I'm yet to see who wrote which. One thing I know for sure is both of them were Sangam contributors. Once we segregate their contributions, we may need to create another article for the other person of his namesake. Rasnaboy (talk) 05:39, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

Hi. I'll move this discussion to the article's talk page. Let's continue any further discussion there. Rasnaboy (talk) 05:03, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of songs recorded by Shammi Akhtar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of songs recorded by Shammi Akhtar until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bou-Bibi-Begum is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bou-Bibi-Begum until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Shopno Bari. Since you had some involvement with the Shopno Bari redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. PamD 18:28, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Mon Foring. Since you had some involvement with the Mon Foring redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. PamD 18:29, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, as you know, I recently blocked you for one week with a strong warning that the next block would be indefinite if you didn't stop spamming bad articles. I just checked back and I see you've created an utterly shocking 138 articles, the overwhelming majority having very little content, sources, or regard for

A tag has been placed on Family of Upendrakishore Ray requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ☆ Bri (talk) 21:33, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Makhamakhi,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

SamHolt6 (talk) 21:42, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article CID Agent 302 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced, therefore no indication of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ☆ Bri (talk) 22:07, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Parvez family is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parvez family until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ☆ Bri (talk) 00:50, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Makhamakhi. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 04:04, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Alamgir family, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See
  section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable
  .

A tag has been placed on Haque family, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See
  section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable
  .

A tag has been placed on Zahir Raihan family, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See
  section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable
  .

A tag has been placed on Hayat family, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See
  section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable
  .

A tag has been placed on Shankar family, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See
  Wikipedia:FAQ/Business
  for more information.
• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See
  section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable
  .

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kakar sisters is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kakar sisters until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

A tag has been placed on

• disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
• disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

A tag has been placed on Kakar sisters, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See
  section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable
  .

A tag has been placed on Yasmin sisters, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See
  section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable
  .

The article Hridi Haq has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No claims to notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 22:54, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Mostafa Anwar (director) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No claims to notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 22:55, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Yeh Aag Kab Bujhegi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No claims to notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 22:55, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of songs written by Jay Sean has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Duplicates Jay Sean discography

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 22:58, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Ravi Shaw has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Jay Sean discography

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 22:59, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Chicken Kokkachi (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No claims of Notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 23:00, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of Bangladeshi criminals has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Original research with possible BLP issues. Article created by problematic user who has since been blocked

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 23:02, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Robiul Islam Jibon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No claims of Notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 23:03, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Oyshee has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No claims of Notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 23:03, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Adit Ozbert has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No claims of Notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 23:03, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Yasser Desai has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No claims of Notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 23:04, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Yash Narvekar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No claims of Notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 23:04, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Sabita Chowdhury has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No claims of Notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 23:08, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Bipasha Kabir has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No claims of Notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 23:09, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 23:11, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Diana Dumbrava has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No claims of Notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 23:13, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Deepak Qazir Kejriwal has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No claims of Notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 23:16, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 23:16, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Saheb Bhattacharya has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No claims of Notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 23:16, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I saw you had some trouble with the Hindu Nobel Laureate pages. I am interested in supporting such a page since other similar pages exist already. I see no good reason for it to not exist. Huitzilopochtli1990 (talk) 23:48, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ke Apon Ke Por (TV series) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ke Apon Ke Por (TV series) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ~ Winged Blades^Godric 09:23, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aakanksha Sharma is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aakanksha Sharma until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ~ Winged Blades^Godric 09:36, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jayed Khan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 20:41, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article CID Agent 302 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CID Agent 302 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ☆ Bri (talk) 23:50, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 10th Channel i Music Awards is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/10th Channel i Music Awards until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hagennos^Talk 00:57, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Waheed Kader is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Waheed Kader until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ~ Winged Blades^Godric 05:42, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Prochondo Boiddutik Chhutar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I don't find any news-hits in local-newspaper-archives of the time.Probably insignificant.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Winged Blades^Godric 05:42, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

		Thank you for creating several articles on women and their works over the past few weeks. We have become aware of your contributions thanks to research undertaken by Bobo.03 at the University of Minnesota. We think you might be interested in becoming a member of our WikiProject Women in Red where we are actively trying to reduce Wikipedia's content gender gap. You can join by using the box at the top of the WiR page. But if you would like to receive news of our activities without becoming a member, you can simply add your name to our mailing list. In any case, thank you for actively contributing to the coverage of women (currently, 17.49% of English Wikipedia's biographies). Our priorities for March: Women's History Month (This event is a collaboration with two other wiki organizations: our article campaign supports Art+Feiminism, while our image campaign supports Whose Knowledge?) #1day1woman Global Initiative
		To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list or Women in Red/Opt-out list . Follow us on Twitter: @wikiwomeninred

--Ipigott (talk) 08:04, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user had been blocked indefinitely and is not able to join your project.--Auric talk 14:54, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

An article you recently created,

An article you recently created,

An article you recently created,

An article you recently created,

An article you recently created,

An article you recently created,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged CJFB Performance Award for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 00:51, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shahed Sharif Khan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shahed Sharif Khan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Regards, SshibumXZ (Talk) (Contributions). 04:57, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

Category:Film scores by Bangladeshi composer, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 12:27, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:List of songs recorded by Kazi Shuvo, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at

Thank you for your attention.

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:List of songs recorded by Kanak Chapa, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at

Thank you for your attention.

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:List of songs recorded by Kona, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at

Thank you for your attention.

The article

reliable source

that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see

A tag has been placed on Himu Akram requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 20:56, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zindagi Meri Dance Dance is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zindagi Meri Dance Dance until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. - Vivvt (Talk) 20:26, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mithe Alo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. - Vivvt (Talk) 20:43, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hridi Haq is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hridi Haq until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 23:59, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Titan Chowdhury is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Titan Chowdhury (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 18:56, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Songsar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Songsar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Worldbruce (talk) 04:52, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kajal Lata until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Worldbruce (talk) 06:52, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Makhamakhi. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 02:46, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has opened an investigation into

sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Makhamakhi, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations

, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

_pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 08:44, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Makhamakhi. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (📧) 08:59, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Malek Afsari has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

not notable enough

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hafiz ansi (talk) 12:08, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hridi Haq is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hridi Haq (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rasi56 (talk) 14:59, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abujh Mon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abujh Mon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. dibbydib ^boop or _snoop 02:50, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Choli Ke Peechhe until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Signature 13:26, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zubi Zubi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Signature 13:30, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Anwara (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film with nothing to support it having its own article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 02:12, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Danpite Chhele has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film with nothing to support it having its own article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 23:46, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:11, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

]

Nomination of

Abujh Hridoy

for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

Abujh Hridoy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted

.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abujh Hridoy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Donaldd23 (talk) 13:21, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ankhi Milan

The article Ankhi Milan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This film doesn't appear notable. Only citation is about the director dying and I failed to find any in-depth reviews that it would need to pass

WP:BEFORE

. Only things that I found were directory listings and youtube videos.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 13:23, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ei Ghor Ei Songsar

The article Ei Ghor Ei Songsar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film with no independent reviews found. Only thing found in searches are database entries and youtube videos. Tagged for notability since January 2020.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 13:52, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nyay Juddho

The article Nyay Juddho has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film with no verifiable reviews found in a

WP:BEFORE

search, only things found were film database listings and youtube videos.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 13:55, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Taka Ana Pai for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Taka Ana Pai is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taka Ana Pai until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Donaldd23 (talk) 00:10, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Shopno Bari

The article Shopno Bari has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The Feb 2018 press release announcing Mamo's contract signing was widely reprinted. Shooting was scheduled to start in Aug 2018.[1] But if filming did start, or if the film was ever released, no independent, reliable sources noticed.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Worldbruce (talk) 16:56, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mastan O Police

The article Mastan O Police has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film. Nothing found in a

WP:NFILM

. Tagged for notability since 2019.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 13:22, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Thekao Mastan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thekao Mastan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thekao Mastan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Donaldd23 (talk) 19:39, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Matir Ghar

The article Matir Ghar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film, only things found in a

WP:BEFORE

were passing mentions, film databases, and interviews with the people involved. No independent reviews found. Tagged since Jan 2018.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 14:17, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Bangladesh lists of awards and nominations has been nominated for deletion

π, ν) 19:30, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Proposed deletion of Bondini (film)

The article Bondini (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No reviews found, tagged for notability since April 2019. Seems to fail

WP:NFILM

.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 22:11, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Voyonkor Sundor

The article Voyonkor Sundor has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film, nothing found in a

WP:NFILM

. Tagged for notability since January 2018.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 15:13, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Abirbhab

The article Abirbhab has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film, nothing found in a WP:BEFORE to help it pass WP:NFILM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 13:47, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Anima Roy

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard

to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Anima Roy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 42.110.149.69 (talk) 06:07, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Madhumati (2011 film)

The article Madhumati (2011 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film, appears to fail requirements in

WP:NFILM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 15:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:List of songs recorded by Sabina Yasmin

request

that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

talk) 16:03, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Proposed deletion of Kasim Uddin

The article Kasim Uddin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable singer.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sahaib (talk) 20:30, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of

Fire Eshona

for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

Fire Eshona is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted

.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fire Eshona until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Worldbruce (talk) 22:51, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sharbari Dasgupta

The article Sharbari Dasgupta has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The first source is a self-published blog, and the "award" it describes is not notable. I see no evidence that the second source has a reputation for accuracy and fact-checking either. Even if it does, it does not address the subject directly and in detail, containing only two sentences on the topic. Searches in English and Bengali found no mentions in reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Worldbruce (talk) 20:25, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]