User talk:Mar11

I would like to know why are you removing the survey results? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Murtuzi (talk • contribs) 15:27, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello friend,

You removed a survey result from the UpWork page, I have restored it,

I'm a UpWork freelancer and I think it is really helpful for UpWork users to be able to read / see the survey.

I have restored it, if you wish to remove it, please talk to me first. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Murtuzi (talk • contribs) 19:17, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Murtuzi: Explained on Talk:Upwork#Survey_from_murtazaamin. - Mar11 (talk) 16:32, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for looking carefully to my edits. :) --94.15.107.153 (talk) 18:15, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for looking to my edits and updates. But please allow me to add some social links and Awards category in Rudralife Wikipedia Page. There is no legal issues will be arise for the data. Its genuine data. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.58.3.222 (talk) 05:56, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for looking to my edits and updates. But please allow me to add some social links and Awards category in Rudralife Wikipedia Page. There is no legal issues will be arise for the data. Its genuine data. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sudarshanthatypally (talk • contribs) 05:58, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mar 11. This is to let you know that I undid your edit on the electric car article because you ignored the hidden message about seeking consensus before changing the current image (check the threads on the talk history page to see the long discussions we had had to choose the current image). In addition, as per the Wikipedia:Manual of Style, the lead should only have one illustrating image. Nevertheless, I believe the picture you brought is a very good candidate for the lead, screaming "electric car," so I opened a discussion in the talk to seek consensus. If you wish, please drop by. Cheers.--Mariordo (talk) 02:47, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mar11, I reverted your move of

Hello, I was wondering how the GA review of Kazi Nazrul Islam is going. Thank you.Vinegarymass911 (talk) 23:54, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi@Vinegarymass911:, I have read and verified almost one third of the article. But I was wondering how to verify the contents which are taken from books that are not available online. I am new to Wikipedia, and it is my first GA review. - Mar11 (talk) 17:24, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On 8 July 2016, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2016 Saudi Arabia bombings, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. The Rambling Man (talk) 18:07, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that this was a candidate for speedy (and it has now been speedied since the author blanked it), but your G1 request was not valid. Perhaps you meant A1? Meters (talk) 18:12, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Meters: Sorry man, my mistake. It should be A1. - Mar11 (talk)

The image of Ramna Kali Mandir that you uploaded in Commons has an improper licensing information. This photograph falls under the category of artistic work and its creator is also known. Therefore this work can be in public domain only after "60 years have passed since the year of death of the author" (the fourth criteria in the licensing box), which mathematically impossible as of 2016. So the image can be nominated for deletion any moment. Therefore I'm restoring the previous image of Ramna Kali Mandir in the article. The previous image is uploaded under a fair use criteria of historic non-free image. BengaliHindu (talk) 14:31, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just an FYI. 72.188.100.187 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Your ES said Unexplained removal. The IP did give a fairly lengthy ES. I just reverted the IP's second removal. I don't think the IP read the source, probably a "didn't like". Denial is the easy way out... Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 06:44, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, don't know why I missed his ES. - Mar11 (talk) 06:55, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have restored and moved it to User:Mar11/Brian Tracy International where you can work on it. As it currently is it would not survive as an article. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:31, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! Thanks for joining

1. Please submit your articles via this tool. Click 'log in' at the top-right and OAuth will take care the rest. You can also change the interface language at the top-right.
2. Once you submit an article, the tool will add a template to the article and mark it as needing review by an organizer. You can check your progress using the tool, which includes how many accepted articles you have.
3. Participants who achieve 4 accepted articles will receive a Wikipedia Asian Month postcard. You will receive another special postcard if you achieve 15 accepted articles. The Wikipedian with the highest number of accepted articles on the English Wikipedia will be honored as a "Wikipedia Asian Ambassador", and will receive a signed certificate and additional postcard.
4. If you have any problems accessing or using the tool, you can submit your articles at this page next to your username.
5. Wikipedia Asian Month is also held in other language Wikipedia and count independently. Check for language editions.
6. If you have any question, you can take a look at our Q&A or post on the WAM talk page.

Best Wishes,--AddisWang (talk) 15:28, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thank you for reverting all those spam links. The spammer has been blocked indefinitely for his actions, something that might have happened sooner if you had issued formal warnings on his talk page. Something to bear in mind if you ever see such a thing again... All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:17, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mar11. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mar11. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group, allowing you to review new pages and mark them as

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In case of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, the right can be revoked at any time by an administrator. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 09:12, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for providing me this tool. - Mar11 (talk) 11:57, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mar11,

Breaking the back of the backlog

We now have 811 New Page Reviewers! Most of you requested the user right to be able to do something about the huge backlog. Now it's time for action.

If each reviewer does only 10 reviews a day over five days, the backlog will be down to zero and the daily input can then be processed by each reviewer doing only 2 or 3 reviews a day - that's about 5 minutes work!
Let's get that over and done with in time to relax for the holidays.

Second set of eyes

Not only are New Page Reviewers the guardians of quality of new articles, they are also in a position to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged for deletion and maintenance and that new authors are not being bitten. This is an important feature of your work. Read about it at the new

Monitoring the system

section in the tutorial.

Getting the tools we need - 2016 WMF Wishlist Survey: Please vote

With some tweaks to their look, and some additional features, Page Curation and New Pages Feed could easily be the best tools for patrollers and reviewers. We've listed most of what what we need at the 2016 WMF Wishlist Survey. Voting starts on 28 November - please turn out to make our bid the Foundation's top priority. Please help also by improving or commenting on our Wishlist entry at the Community Wishlist Survey. Many other important user suggestions are listed at at Page Curation.

---

Sent to all New Page Reviewers. Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:16, 26 November 2016 (UTC) .[reply]

Hi Mar11. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing
  Twinkle
  .
• Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of
  good faith edits
  .
• Rollback should never be used to
  edit war
  .
• If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
• Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see

Thank you very much. - Mar11 (talk) 06:55, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators. Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 18:33, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the tool. - Mar11 (talk) 05:15, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain why you unreviewed the article Andrej Kedveš which I had reviewed.Peter Rehse (talk) 22:18, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@PRehse: Unintentional . Sorry for that. - Mar11 (talk) 07:52, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Do the same sometimes,Peter Rehse (talk) 08:59, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unusually good eye, especially on CNN Greece vs Huffington Post and the concept that this was based off a press release. See my Keep changed to comment. I moved the content to the draft. And are you interested in this subject? I'll run it by you. I anticipate that at 15m views/mo TGF will probably get some more coverage from US-based publications, no?JanisWilloughby (talk) 16:02, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Reviewers are asked to be especially on the look out 08:00-20:00 UTC (that's local London time - check your USA and AUS times) on Thursday 8 December for new pages. The BBC together with Wikimedia UK is holding a large 12-hour editathon. Many new articles and drafts are expected. See BBC 100 Women 2016: How to join our edit-a-thon. Follow also on #100womenwiki, and please, don't bite the newbies :) (

Hello Mar11,

Please help reduce the New Page backlog

This is our second request. The backlog is still growing. Your help is needed now - just a few minutes each day.

Getting the tools we need

ONLY TWO DAYS LEFT TO VOTE

• Improve the tools: Vote here.
• Reduce your review load: Vote here

---

Sent to all New Page Reviewers. Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:54, 11 December 2016 (UTC) .[reply]

This photo i am user user at photograph Ashraful Hossen Saeed.jpg please resolve the issue — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ismailim (talk • contribs) 05:34, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

]

Mangal Shobhajatra

Hello, Mar11. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Mangal Shobhajatra at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome!  – Corinne (talk) 19:03, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Mangal Shobhajatra

On 24 January 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mangal Shobhajatra, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Mangal Shobhajatra (pictured) has been declared an intangible cultural heritage by UNESCO? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mangal Shobhajatra. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Mangal Shobhajatra), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Schwede66 12:01, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mar11,

A HUGE backlog

We now have 811 New Page Reviewers!
Most of us requested the user right at

PERM

, expressing a wish to be able to do something about the huge backlog, but the chart on the right does not demonstrate any changes to the pre-user-right levels of October.

The backlog is still steadily growing at a rate of 150 a day or 4,650 a month. Only 20 reviews a day by each reviewer over the next few days would bring the backlog down to a managable level and the daily input can then be processed by each reviewer doing only 2 or 3 reviews a day - that's about 5 minutes work!
It didn't work in time to relax for the Xmas/New Year holidays. Let's see if we can achieve our goal before Easter, otherwise by Thanksgiving it will be closer to 70,000.

Second set of eyes

Remember that we are the only guardians of quality of new articles, we alone have to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged by non-Reviewer patrollers and that new authors are not being bitten.

Abuse

This is even more important and extra vigilance is required considering

Orangemoody

, and

1. this very recent case of paid advertising by a Reviewer resulting in a community
   ban
   .
2. this case in January of paid advertising by a Reviewer, also resulting in a community
   ban
   .
3. This Reviewer is indefinitely blocked for sockpuppetry.

Coordinator election

Kudpung is stepping down after 6 years as unofficial coordinator of New Page Patrolling/Reviewing. There is enough work for two people and two coords are now required. Details are at NPR Coordinators; nominate someone or nominate yourself. Date for the actual suffrage will be published later.

---

Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:11, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for having a look at this article, but a one-paragraph article does not need to be divided into sections, so I suggest that it wasn't helpful to add that tag. On the other hand you could usefully have tagged it with {{

Thanks for the suggestions. - Mar11 (talk) 07:25, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

About nine months ago you tagged Freedom of religion in Bangladesh to be merged into Secularism in Bangladesh. Since then the former has changed considerably. You didn't lay out at the time why you thought merging would be a good idea. Could you take another look at the articles as they stand today, see if you still feel a merge is the best approach, and if so either complete the merger or briefly sketch out on the discussion page what you'd like to see accomplished in a merger? --Worldbruce (talk) 22:13, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your last chance to nominate yourself or any New Page Reviewer, See Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Coordination. Elections begin Monday 20 February 23:59 UTC. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:17, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mar11,

Voting for coordinators has now begun HERE and will continue through/to 23:59 UTC Monday 06 March. Please be sure to vote. Any registered, confirmed editor can vote. Nominations are now closed.

Still a MASSIVE backlog

We now have 811 New Page Reviewers but despite numerous appeals for help, the backlog has NOT been significantly reduced.
If you asked for the New Page Reviewer right, please consider investing a bit of time - every little helps preventing spam and trash entering the mainspace and Google when the 'NO_INDEX' tags expire.

---

Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:35, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 21 February 2017 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.44.251.34 (talk) 13:39, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mar11, I noticed you removed my addition to the Nokia 3310 (2017). I feel it was a mistake and I think you should revisit it again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by David.Nwachukwu (talk • contribs) 17:27, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @

talk) 18:08, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Are you familiar with the concept of dark energy? Seems that antigravity is indeed possible and I have experimental proof. Releasing a paper very soon which could earn me a Nobel one day, if my analysis is indeed later found to be correct and could be a giant step towards a ToE. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.3.100.46 (talk) 02:58, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I do believe this info is accurate & relevant. Have added it to the Talk Page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 113.255.66.236 (talk) 19:33, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in

notable

and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Anjhula Mya Singh Bais and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 04:50, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@SwisterTwister: Hi have you checked the references I added in the article? Searched in google news? I think the issue is not about reliable sources. The subject got enough coverage to pass notability. The issue here was notability claim. We discussed this issue Here and I re-wrote the article and claimed notability as an international refugee psychologist. What's your thought? Why did you declined it for insignificance coverage? - Mar11 (talk) 05:33, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Evaluating its weight shows it would simply not be enough for notability hence not significant enough. SwisterTwister talk 05:45, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you tagged StargateARMAserver with G5 but left out the blocked user. I can't find any obvious signs but what is the account? (I'm just curious) CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 12:03, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Chrissymad: I don't know why the user was not notified. I used twinkle to tag the article. May be the problem is in Twinkle. - Mar11 (talk) 12:09, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mar11 Twinkle doesn't notify for G5 - it's one of the few exceptions but it's not the issue of notifying the user. Who is the blocked user you suspect created it in violation of their ban/block? CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 12:10, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Chrissymad: I don't even remember tagging the article with G5. As far I can remember, I tagged it with G11+A7. This is the user I think. - Mar11 (talk) 12:16, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mar11. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Archana Akhil Kumar, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Article claims importance/significance of the subject. Thank you. SoWhy 13:35, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

And I've just declined it again. The article clearly makes a

credible claim of significance. Please stop tagging it for CSD - this is at least the third time it's been nominated and declined, and repeatedly doing so could be considered disruptive and lead to sanctions. GoldenRing (talk) 12:14, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

@GoldenRing: I think you are talking about VideoBlocks, not Archana Akhil Kumar. - Mar11 (talk) 18:34, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bah, sorry, you are quite right. Nonetheless, it's survived speedy three (four?) times now. It's not going to be deleted. If you're still convinced it's not notable,

WP:AfD is thataway. GoldenRing (talk) 18:39, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

On 17 May 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Socialism in Bangladesh, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Socialism in Bangladesh. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Socialism in Bangladesh), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—

Hello Mar11,

Since rolling out the right in November, just 6 months ago, we now have 811 reviewers, but the backlog is still mysteriously growing fast. If every reviewer did just 55 reviews, the 22,000 backlog would be gone, in a flash, schwoop, just like that!

But do remember: Rather than speed, quality and depth of patrolling and the use of correct CSD criteria are essential to good reviewing. Do not over-tag. Make use of the message feature to let the creator know about your maintenance tags. See the tutorial again

HERE

.

Stay up to date with recent new page developments and have your say, read

THIS PAGE

.

---

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:43, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain why you restored a link I removed with the edit summary "Rv blank" as if you were reverting a common vandal. I explained in my edit summary that I considered the link to be spam masquarading as a reference. I think I deserve a better explanation than "rv blank". Printed circuit boards, as the platform for 90% of modern electronics, hardly needs a reference in a list of electronic components. Even if it did, a page that does not confirm that they are an electronic component, or even hardly mention them, is not an appropriate reference. The site belongs to a manufacturer selling pcbs, which is the likely reason for its insertion rather than to verify any actual fact in the article. SpinningSpark 16:31, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Spinningspark: Sorry....My mistake. I was about to revert the blanking previously done by a vandal. But somehow reverted your edit. That was silly, restored a spam while reverting a section blanking. - Mar11 (talk) 03:30, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheSandDoctor was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in

notable

and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Please add additional references.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Anjhula Mya Singh Bais and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheSandDoctor (talk) 19:18, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Mar11, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! TheSandDoctor (talk) 19:18, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mar11, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

• The new page backlog is currently at 18,511 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a a day.
• Some editors are committing to work specifically on patrolling new pages on 15 July. If you have not reviewed new pages in a while, this might be a good time to be involved. Please remember that quality of patrolling is more important than quantity, that the speedy deletion criteria should be followed strictly, and that ovetagging for minor issues should be avoided.

Technology update:

• Several requests have been put into Phabractor to increase usability of the New Pages Feed and the Page Curation toolbar. For more details or to suggest improvements go to Wikipedia:Page Curation/Suggested improvements
• The
  tutorial
  has been updated to include links to the following useful userscripts. If you were not aware of them, they could be useful in your efforts reviewing new pages:
  • User:Lourdes/PageCuration.js adds a link to the new pages feed and page curation toolbar to your top toolbar on Wikipedia
  • User:The Earwig/copyvios.js adds a link in your side toolbox that will run the current page through

General project update:

• Following discussion at Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers, Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Noticeboard has been marked as historical. Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers is currently the most active central discussion forum for the New Page Patrol project. To keep up to date on the most recent discussions you can add it to your watchlist or visit it periodically.

---

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:48, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mar11, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

• The new page backlog is currently at 16,991 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a a day.

Technology update:

• Rentier has created a NPP browser in WMF Labs that allows you to search new unreviewed pages using keywords and categories.

General project update:

• The Wikimedia Foundation Community Tech team is working with the community to implement the autoconfirmed article creation trial. The trial is currently set to start on 7 September 2017, pending final approval of the technical features.
• Please remember to focus on the quality of review: correct tagging of articles and not
  tagbombing are important. Searching for potential copyright violations is also important, and it can be aided by Earwig's Copyvio Detector, which can be added to your toolbar for ease of use with this user script
  .
• To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

---

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:33, 24 August 2017 (UTC) [reply]

Please don't use the {{

Hello Mar11, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

• The new page backlog is currently at 14304 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a day.
• Currently there are
  WP:ACTRIAL
  . The NPP project is undertaking a drive to clear these pages from the backlog before they hit the 90 day Google index point. Please consider reviewing a few today!

Technology update:

• The Wikimedia Foundation is currently working on creating a new filter for page curation that will allow new page patrollers to filter by extended confirmed status. For more information see: T175225

General project update:

• On 14 September 2017 the English Wikipedia began
  autoconfirmed status. New users who attempt article creation will now be redirected to a newly designed landing page
  .
• Before clicking on a reference or external link while reviewing a page, please be careful that the site looks trustworthy. If you have a question about the safety of clicking on a link, it is better not to click on it.
• To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

---

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:16, 19 September 2017 (UTC) [reply]

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello Mar11, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

• The new page backlog is currently at 12,878 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a day.
• We have successfully cleared the backlog of pages created by non-confirmed accounts before ACTRIAL. Thank you to everyone who participated in that drive.

Technology update:

• Primefac has created a script that will assist in requesting revision deletion for copyright violations that are often found in new pages. For more information see
  User:Primefac/revdel
  .

General project update:

• The Article Wizard has been updated and simplified to match the layout style of the new user landing page. If you have not yet seen it, take a look.
• To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

---

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:47, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Asian Month 2017: Invitation to Participate

Hello! Last year, you signed up to participate in Wikipedia Asian Month (WAM) 2016 on the English Wikipedia. The event was an international success, with hundreds of editors creating thousands of articles on Asian topics across dozens of different language versions of Wikipedia.

I'd like to invite you to join us for

Wikipedia Asian Month 2017

, which once again lasts through the month of November. The goal is for users to create new articles on Asian-related content, each at least 3,000 bytes and 300 words in length. Editors who create at least four articles will receive a Wikipedia Asian Month postcard!

Also be sure to check out the Wikipedia Asian Art Month affiliate event - creating articles on Asian art topics can get you a Metropolitan Museum of Art postcard!

If you're interested, please

our talk page

.

Thank you!

-

The English Wikipedia WAM Team

This will be the last message you receive from the English Wikipedia WAM team for being a 2016 participant. If you sign up for WAM 2017, you will continue receiving periodic updates on the 2017 event.

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Mar11. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Shohortoli

Hello Mar11. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of

WP:CCSI#BAND). Thank you. SoWhy 14:59, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Clarify

Explain your AFC accept at

Draft:MagForce AG and your NPP review at HYPR.Regards:)Winged Blades ^Godric 08:15, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Dear Mar11,
You have "released" article

Draft:MagForce AG a month ago. Your decision has been overruled by another user. Winged Blades asked you (in a harsh tone) to explain your release. Do you like to do that? The article, which of course I think is good, is pending for weeks…
Atomiccocktail (talk) 11:08, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

The company clearly passes notability, a google news search (MagForce Nanotechnologies/MagForce AG) will show that. Most of the information in the draft are cited with secondary sources and some with primary sources (information about them). The article seemed non-promotional to me (that varies from person to person I think) and the creator didn't violate policy of

WP:PAID (disclosed affiliation and didn't publish the article themselves). I think we should appreciate the editors who disclose COI/PAID. Otherwise they will try to publish articles incognito. - Mar11 (talk) 06:26, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

Dear Mar11,
Thank you for your statement. I will inform Winged Blades and ask him to reverse his decision.
To whom it may concern: I have written this article for the company respectively its PR agency. I have completely disclosed that. See the talk page. Atomiccocktail (talk) 17:39, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Anshul Pandey

Hello Mar11. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Anshul Pandey, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: playing non-extra roles on multiple notable shows indicates significance. Thank you. SoWhy 08:20, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello Mar11, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

• The new page backlog is currently at 12713 pages. Please consider reviewing even just a few pages each day! If everyone helps out, it will really put a dent in the backlog.
• Currently the backlog stretches back to March and some pages in the backlog have passed the 90 day Google index point. Please consider reviewing some of them!

Outreach and Invitations:

• If you know other editors with a good understanding of Wikipedia policy, invite them to join NPP by dropping the invitation template on their talk page with: {{subst:NPR invite}}. Adding more qualified reviewers will help with keeping the backlog manageable.

New Year New Page Review Drive

• A backlog drive is planned for the start of the year, beginning on January 1st and running until the end of the month. Unique prizes will be given in tiers for both the total number of reviews made, as well as the longest 'streak' maintained.
• Note: quality reviewing is extremely important, please do not sacrifice quality for quantity.

General project update:

• BLPPROD
  candidates in the new page feed. However, the majority of the backlog still dates back to before ACTRIAL started, so consider reviewing articles from the middle or back of the backlog.
• The NPP Browser can help you quickly find articles with topics that you prefer to review from within the backlog.
• To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

---

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. — TonyBallioni (talk) 20:27, 12 December 2017 (UTC) [reply]

You removed informations from Mehazabien Chowdhury's Page

I would like to know why are you removing birth date, other names, notable works informations from Mehazabien Chowdhury's page? All the information have been given by herself in interviews and social media. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joybiswas391 (talk • contribs) 07:10, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@

WP:BLP must be removed. Personal website and social media are not regarded as reliable sources in Wikipedia. Information heard from someone is not reliable source either. - Mar11 (talk) 17:23, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

@Mar11: so how we would I prove them? All the information are given by Mehazabien Chowdhury herself. So how would I prove those statements?

I'm connected with her. Other actors like Ziaul Faruk Apurba, Farhan Ahmed Jovan don't have source from verified sources. Unlike other actors and celebrities I want Mehazabien Chowdhury's wiki page clean and clear but you are continuously removing those information. I don't get it. :(

@

point of view. A general reader will understand how much promotional you have made this article. However, You can suggest information with published, secondary reliable sources on the talk page of the article. - Mar11 (talk) 17:46, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

And also, don't upload images downloaded from Facebook. The copyright terms of Facebook and Wikipedia do not match. If you have any image that you captured yourself, you can upload them without hesitation. There must be exif information with the image. Thanks. - Mar11 (talk) 17:55, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Mar11: I am editing the article from neutral point of view. I get connected with her to verify the information. That's it. Anyway I give up :)

I'm not contributing anymore no matter how many times I edit,add things there's someone else who asks for the verification! How can a person prove each and every words!

@Joybiswas391: That's how Wikipedia works. Anyway thanks for your efforts. You should not give up. Suggest your changes in talk page. Edit and improve other articles to which you don't have any conflict of interest. - Mar11 (talk) 18:25, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Years new page backlog drive

Hello Mar11, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Announcing the NPP New Year Backlog Drive!

We have done amazing work so far in December to reduce the New Pages Feed backlog by over 3000 articles! Now is the time to capitalise on our momentum and help eliminate the backlog!

The backlog drive will begin on January 1^st and run until January 29^th. Prize tiers and other info can be found

HERE

.

Awards will be given in tiers in two categories:

• The total number of reviews completed for the month.
• The minimum weekly total maintained for all four weeks of the backlog drive.

NOTE: It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing. Despite our goal of reducing the backlog as much as possible, please do not rush while reviewing.

---

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. — TonyBallioni (talk) 20:24, 30 December 2017 (UTC) [reply]

Your expert advice needed

Hi. I noticed that you are interested in law. Can you please take a look at this discussion about

Reid Collins & Tsai article? I would appreciate your expert advice on the subject. -- Bbarmadillo

Corybas walliae

Hello Mar11,

Thanks for your work. It is pretty clear to me that CarlosL is trying to write a page about Corybas walliae and has tried to upload an image to illustrate that species of orchid. Please hold off with the deletion while I try to help him. Thanks. Gderrin (talk) 05:16, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Gderrin: Appreciated. -Mar11 (talk) Sorted. Thanks for your patience. Gderrin (talk) 05:43, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Michał Frąckowiak

Hello Mar11. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of

WP:CCSI#BIZBIO). Thank you. SoWhy 10:07, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

Supply Chain

Hi

Wikipedia has separate contents for supply chain and supply chain management. There is an overlap of supply chain management in the supply chain page. The supply chain content is not neutral.

Consider my editing on the supply chain page as essential, although I just started to contribute to wikipedia pages.

Sukumaran s (talk) 21:56, 30 January 2018 (UTC) Sukumaran[reply]

@

WP:LEAD. Changes in the lead section should be upon consensus among the editors. You can propose your changes on the talk page of the article and ask for suggestion and seek consensus from other editors. - Mar11 (talk) 04:19, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

Move discussion for

Internal conflict in Bangladesh

An article that you have been involved in editing—

Internal conflict in Bangladesh —has been proposed to be renamed and moved. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you.Vinegarymass911 (talk) 16:37, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

WPUNDUE listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect

talk, contribs) 08:34, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello Mar11, thank you for your efforts in reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

• The new page backlog is currently at 3819 unreviewed articles, with a further 6660 unreviewed redirects.
• We are very close to eliminating the backlog completely; please help by reviewing a few extra articles each day!

New Year Backlog Drive results:

• We made massive progress during the recent four weeks of the NPP Backlog Drive, during which the backlog reduced by nearly six thousand articles and the length of the backlog by almost 3 months!

General project update:

• ACTRIAL
  will end it's initial phase on the 14th of March. Our goal is to reduce the backlog significantly below the 90 day index point by the 14th of March. Please consider helping with this goal by reviewing a few additional pages a day.
• Reviewing redirects is an important and necessary part of New Page Patrol. Please read the
  RfD
  .

---

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. 20:32, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: DJ KGB

Hello Mar11. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of DJ KGB, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: producing albums for notable artists is a claim of significance. Try PROD or AFD instead. Thank you. SoWhy 09:17, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about carswitch

Hello Mar11

This is with regards to my editing issue. I have given my contribution without any sort of payment and to help grow more information of the present world by building and editing articles from the information derived from the global news sites. With no motive of income, these edits are absolutely free and have been made during the free and pass time as an interest in writing and editing. Please consider the request for letting me help to build new informative and present company, popular icons, and upcoming innovators who shape are shaping the world and bringing change. Strictly following the interest and laws of Wikipedia, I swear to continue to do free edits and creation of pages.

Thank You! — Preceding unsigned comment added by StrRdYUUdK (talk • contribs) 19:38, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.

Thank you!

WMF Surveys, 18:25, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey

Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 29% of Wikimedia contributors. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.

If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have design the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks!

WMF Surveys, 01:24, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: NordVPN (software)

Hello Mar11. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of NordVPN (software), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A7 cannot be applied to software. Thank you. SoWhy 11:49, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 23 April, 2018 (07:00 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We will not bother you again. We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. To opt-out of future surveys, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement.

WMF Surveys, 00:33, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Speedy deletion nomination of Tapps Games

I clearly mentioned that it's a company that develops mobile games for iOS and Android devices. I added its history, its growth and its impact on the mobile gaming industry. I also added the necessary categories and references. It is short because there aren't many reliable sources, but I am still adding more sources and information. Perhaps just give it time? Undead Organism (talk) 04:58, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Undead Organism: Moved it to draftspace. Submit it for review when you think it's complete. - Mar11 (talk) 05:03, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Mar11: I have emphasized the significance of the article and added the logo. What are your thoughts? Undraftify? - Undead Organism (talk) 05:26, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@

WP:GNG. Please read the Notability criterion of Wikipedia before submitting any article for review. - Mar11 (talk) 10:28, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

Thanks

Thanks for your warm welcome message. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Russ manzil (talk • contribs) 03:27, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can you review this submission?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Application_strings_manager — Preceding unsigned comment added by Russ manzil (talk • contribs) 03:33, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

RAW Pressery Deletion

Hello Mar11, Regarding your reason for deletion of the page, I have removed the information about the fundraising by the company and its connected sources. Some of the other sources that have been used for citation include https://www.thehindubusinessline.com - A very independent and noteworthy newspaper website of the country, https://www.crunchbase.com/ - an independent, reliable website that tracks information about all companies using their own sources, http://bwdisrupt.businessworld.in - an independent business Magazine's website, https://economictimes.indiatimes.com - (used in multiple citations)Economic Times is a section of the noteworthy and independent newspaper of the country The Times of India.

Raw Pressery is trying hard to educate the people of India about the concept of Cold-pressed juice. Cold pressed juice being free of preservatives, artificial flavours and chemicals is a very healthy (and a much needed) alternative to the other tasty but non cold-pressed juices available in the market. I have also observed that Raw pressery promotes a healthy lifestyle among the masses through their Yoga/exercise related events/workshops etc. and they not only care about the health of the people but also that of the environment, through their initiative called RAWcycle, which is about creating polymer based tshirts/clothes by recycling the plastic (their plastic bottles). I have not added this information in the article because of lack of better and noteworthy sources. All of these facts about the brand and it's growing popularity among the masses inspired me to do some research and write this article. When @MatthewVanitas approved the afc submission of this article, it was graded as StartClass and this article can have a better future if you do not delete it, as our Wiki community will add more on the page. In fact, given your expertise on Wikipedia, you can guide me into making relevant changes to the article if needed instead of deleting it. Rest is up to you. Thank you for your time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Akash1221 (talk • contribs) 07:59, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

My Girls (film)

I'm curious as to why you marked the above article as patrolled minutes after I had prodded it while patrolling. Articles that are marked up for deletion shouldn't be marked as patrolled. Why? If the prod is removed or a speedy declined, it will remain marked as patrolled. Pretty obviously, if one editor thinks it deficient enough to warrant immediate deletion, and a second editor disagrees, shouldn't a third editor be looking at it? Also, mechanically speaking, marking an article patrolled removes the NOINDEX attribute from it. We don't really want new articles that are up for deletion showing up in a Google search, do we? John from Idegon (talk) 04:15, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@John from Idegon: I was also trying to add a speedy tag to the article but due to the edit conflict with you i had canceled it. Don't know how it was marked patrolled in this time. - Mar11 (talk) 04:20, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's a bug in the script. If you use the sidebar to access a deletion process, it will mark the page as patrolled. If just use Twinkle, it won't. Out of curiosity, what criteria were you going to use for speedy? That always baffles me for films. John from Idegon (talk) 04:29, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for clarification. I was trying to add A11, as there is no source in the article and nothing appears on google search. - Mar11 (talk) 04:38, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You sure wouldn't be stepping on my toes if you went ahead and did that. I agree it's junk and could even be a hoax. John from Idegon (talk) 04:59, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

New page reviewer revoked

Hi. I have revoked your ability to review new pages as from a review of your recent reviews (and even stretching back to 2017) you have reviewed numerous articles that appear to be

undisclosed paid editing

. Some examples are below:

• CALinnovates (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
• ControlUp (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
• Leadfeeder (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
• Le_Tote (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
• The_NAGA_Group_AG (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
• KMS_Lighthouse (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
• Strategic_Vision_(company) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
• 6_River_Systems (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
• Booksy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
• Payment21 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
• Care_Sourcer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

While it's obviously impossible for me to know whether this is due to malice or incompetence you obviously cannot be trusted to review pages. SmartSE (talk) 22:51, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#Mar11_reviews. SmartSE (talk) 23:14, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Thanks for reviewing The NAGA Group AG, Mar11.

Unfortunately SamHolt6 has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:

Unreviewed, review has been stripped of their new page reviewer rights per a COIN discussion

To reply, leave a comment on SamHolt6's talk page.

SamHolt6 (talk) 00:24, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm SamHolt6. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Dr. Cleaner, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

SamHolt6 (talk) 02:44, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm SamHolt6. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, CALinnovates, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

SamHolt6 (talk) 04:33, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

undisclosed paid editing.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  SmartSE (talk) 15:56, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply

]