User talk:MaybeMaybeMaybe/2012

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Nymf _hideliho! 07:03, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

• Category:Bisexual models
  • And its even more specific subcategories Category:Bisexual male models, Category:Bisexual female models, Category:Bisexual male adult models
• Category:Fictional atheists
• Category:LGBT atheists, Category:LGBT agnostics
  • And their even more specific subcategories Category:Gay atheists, Category:Gay agnostics
• Category:Gay dancers
• Category:Gay Jews
  • And its even more specific subcategory Category:Gay orthodox Jews

All of these categories have two things in common. Firstly, the community has previously decided at

A page with this title has previously been deleted.

If you are creating a new page with different content, please continue. If you are recreating a page similar to the previously deleted page, or are unsure, please first contact the deleting administrator using the information provided below.

I cannot see anywhere that you have contacted the deleting adminstrator, let alone challenged the consensus at

Repeatedly recreating previously deleted material is grounds for blocking. Please do not do it again.

My apologies I am still learning the dos and don'ts on here. I will avoid recreating such deleted categories in future.MaybeMaybeMaybe (talk) 20:51, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

All the images on commons are from a posed photoshoot. One of them is sufficient for illustrating what he looks like. The image of him with the guitar prop in that photoshoot is pretty marginal to use as an image in the discography section. A much better image for this section would be a candid of him performing, not just posing. Geraldo Perez (talk) 20:00, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Nymf _hideliho! 09:05, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

I have reverted this edit which removed sourced content without edit summary or explanation. Such sourced content should not be removed without talk page agreement.

Try looking at the following edit. the school was moved to its own article per other scottish primary schools.MaybeMaybeMaybe (talk)

My apologies; I missed the link. However, I created the content in this location because primary schools rarely survive deletion discussions, but we will see how it runs.

talk

) 01:14, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

I think it shpuld be ok as it has non affiliated sources and the scottish primary schools category is getting quite big now. MaybeMaybeMaybe (talk) 01:16, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Around the World Hit Singles: The Journey So Far (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Deep, Around The World, House Of Love, It's Alright and Let It Rain

East 17: The Platinum Collection (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver

)

added links pointing to Deep, Around The World, House Of Love, It's Alright and Let It Rain

Conspiracy of Silence (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Niall O'Brien, Jim Norton, Kevin McMahon and Catherine Walker

The Very Best of East Seventeen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Deep, Around The World, It's Alright and Let It Rain

Worlds Apart (boyband) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver

)

added links pointing to Together, The Brotherhood, Everybody and Here and Now

Déjà Q (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver

)

added links pointing to Enterprise and Shuttlecraft

Qpid (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Vash and Riker

True Q (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Enterprise and Riker

A Present for Everyone (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to 3AM

Death Wish (Star Trek: Voyager) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Asylum

Evan Morgan, 2nd Viscount Tredegar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Honey bear

Q Who (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Phaser

Ross Lynch (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to R5

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:41, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

Please stop recreating articles as you did at

Hi can you take a look at it now as a managed to locate 3 sources? Thanks.MaybeMaybeMaybe (talk) 01:26, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

It would be preferable to not add Horse breeds originating in (fill in nation) categories to the horse breed articles, for a number of reasons: First, history changes boundaries, as an example, the Lipizzaner originated within the Austria-Hungarian empire and now five different nations house the stud farms that provided the foundation stock. Second, there are nationalist issues, the Karabakh horse, for example, and the Azerbaijani horse -- get the "origins" wrong and we have edit wars. While a few people have just had an obsession with national tagging (for USA or France or Italy, or the UK, for example) and we sort of let them have their way, there is no real need to tag breeds with national origins absent some pressing faction demanding it, and if you get the nation wrong, it causes drama. So can you just not create new categories absent a clamor and demand from some specific nationalistic bunch that insists upon it? I'm not going to nom the cats fro deletion, but please don't waste your time trying to do all 350 breeds. Thanks. Montanabw^(talk) 17:39, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Would you PLEASE explain to me why you insist on adding unneeded (and sometimes incorrect) nation of origin tags to all the horse and donkey breed articles? It appears to be over-categorization in many, many cases (Latvia? Really?). I would like to engage in discussion with you as to why you think this is necessary because it appears to serve no logical purpose whatsoever. But, I actually AM open to hearing if there is a logical argument and discussing the issue. Montanabw^(talk) 22:11, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

If you disagree with categories please nominate them for cfd rather than simply emptying them.MaybeMaybeMaybe (talk) 23:57, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

I DO like that you created Category:Donkey breeds. Perhaps that will solve the Donkey articles problem. On the rest, I would prefer to work this issue out with you without resorting to the dramah boards which will be long, rancorous, and generally a tendentious waste of time; an empty category is automatically deleted by bot if it stays empty long enough. If you have a good case to make for what you are doing, make it. Otherwise, I'll simply revert and only resort to CfD if you insist on not communicating about the issue. Montanabw^(talk) 00:03, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

MaybeMaybeMaybe, you have been editing for a comparatively short time and already received many complaints about your category-related edits. Far too many of your category creations are getting nominated for merging back into their original categories or for outright deletion; I've already had to warn you about recreating previously deleted categories when you've just ignored the previous discussion. Even when respected and knowledgeable editors like Montanabw ask you to explain and discuss, you seem to prefer to ignore them and carry on regardless. I think it's getting very close to the time when the community will need to discuss imposing involuntary restrictions on your editing, either in the form of a topic ban from categories or something even more severe, unless you learn from your mistakes and stop creating so many unnecessary categories.

Thank you for adding a picture on Nico Mirallegro which better reflects his current appearance (rather than the one that is out of date, taken when he was 17, with a fan beside him). I realise now that you originally uploaded that older photo, which is why you wished to re-add it; I understand because I have uploaded photographs myself, only to have them deleted; even when written permission had been obtained for their use. A really good further refinement now, would be to ask the owner of one of the two recent football photos of Nico Mirallegro (on Wikimedia Commons page) if a cropped version could be used, showing mainly his head and shoulders. As he is an actor rather than a footballer, this would provide an image which, while not being a professional actor photograph, would not distract from his current career of being an actor. This would suffice as a good image for Nico Mirallegro until permission for use of TV and film images can be obtained. I think most photos on Wikimedia Commons can be adapted and cropped - with permission obtained from owner - if they are not overwritten but saved as a new image.

Kind regards, pinkyandrexa Pinkyandrexa (talk) 11:08, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

I see you have engaged in an edit war on Quagmire's Dad for several days now, and numerous other related articles. Please don't, and use the talk page as appropriate. Nymf _hideliho! 08:20, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's

Hi, just wondered if you think this category was really worth creating since it only contains redirects that all point to the same article. –anemoneprojectors– 13:30, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

I think it is worth it for now at least as some have songwriting credits or significant coverage in their own right and I was going to ask about splitting some out.MaybeMaybeMaybe (talk) 13:39, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

I'm not sure about this category, just wondered on your thoughts. I won't AFD it! I don't think it's worth splitting any of them out though. –anemoneprojectors– 14:38, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

It's been AFD'd now - note that at Category:Musicians by band it requests that categories are only made if at least two members have articles. –anemoneprojectors– 20:39, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

Category:Female actors in BDSM pornographic films, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Nymf _hideliho! 13:50, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

A Time to Stand (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Damar, Garak and Nog

The Honking (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Fry, Bender and Leela

Empok Nor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Garak and Nog

Call to Arms (Star Trek: Deep Space Nine) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Dukat

In the Cards (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Nog

Soldiers of the Empire (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Nog

Triple 8 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to David Wilcox

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:49, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Hello! I just posted a deletion notice here. The artwork belonging to companies is under restricted copyright licensing unless they explicitly say otherwise. You linked a Wikipedia article to a Commons category for this. I appreciate the intent, but Wikimedia projects do not host non-free work. Blue Rasberry (talk) 14:20, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:41, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Category:Avenue (band), which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 21:25, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Category:911 (band), which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 21:25, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

I have nominated the above category for deletion and as per precedent. I also note you have created a couple of categories where there is no corresponding main article which I shall also nominate for deletion in due course - unless the relevant article appears. Cheers. --Richhoncho (talk) 09:07, 2 December 2012 (UTC)