User talk:Mporter
Hello,
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Manual of Style
If you have any questions, see the
Tip: you can sign your name with ~~~~
snoyes 15:02, 23 Jan 2004 (UTC)
- Hi, Mporter. In answer to your question about the "Technological Singularity" deletion on the Disinfopedia, I've posted an explanation. --Sheldon Rampton 01:00, 13 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Movement of Spiritual Inner Awareness
I've restored this previously deleted page in order to give you the chance to improve the article and prove the notability of this sect (or cult ?). I don't want to be involved in any religious discussions. It's now up to you to prove your point in a NPOV article with the pros and the cons, otherwise the article will be referred to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Success ! JoJan 12:37, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
Economic crisis of 2008
Good work on the updates. Bearian (talk) 20:19, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Obama stimulus plan
A
- WP:CRYSTAL. At this point the plan has been suggested, but until it happens—until the man is even president—there is no way now to know that this will happen.
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the
Contribution to global warming by Australia
Hi, Mporter. Nice to see your
Not thwaites toungue
I'll sort this out. They mean Smith glacier as the third but I'll have to double check the references. Thanks for the question
Thanks for that message. Yes in the diagram on that page the third glacier is Smith Glacier. I will add it in but a better reference than an interview with Chris Rapley is needed, one that actually lists the three glaciers. Probably one of the Eric Rignot papers I think Geophys. Res. Lett. 2008
Survey vote request
Please vote in survey over whether to include text in History of the the Islamic Republic of Iran
Text and dispute is at http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=History_of_the_Islamic_Republic_of_Iran&diff=274961453&oldid=274952179
Arguements
found in edit summary and at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:History_of_the_Islamic_Republic_of_Iran#Deletion_by_KneeJuan
Thank you --
Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Marta Harnecker. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:11, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
in this interesting article, you write:
- Nonetheless, theories with more than one dimension of time have sometimes been advanced in physics, whether as a serious description of reality or just as a curious possibility.
Do you know any serious research (physical or philosophical) on the hypothesis of a three-dimensional reality, which can either be described in means of matter in a three-dimensional space or of matter in a three-dimensional time - i.e. space and time are just different aspects of the same three-dimensional thing (and the human concept of four-dimensional spacetime is just a perceptive illusion, which is reflected by our current level of mainstream physics)?
Any hints will be appreciated!
Peter --217.87.128.221 (talk) 11:18, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
- No. I do not think the idea makes sense. However, see "Nige" on D R (Danny) Lunsford here. Mporter (talk) 03:43, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
- I will try to be more specific. Various people have said that subjective time is three-dimensional (example). Various people have also said that only space exists (example). Various people have also tried to reduce space dimensions to subjective metaphysics (example). So maybe you can combine such perspectives, perhaps in a monadic framework. Probably what you say has already been attempted or asserted by someone somewhere. But it sounds somewhat artificial and contrived to me. Mporter (talk) 04:10, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
- So maybe you can combine such perspectives, perhaps in a monadic framework. Yes, I think that is what I am looking for. I was not speaking of "dimensions" in terms of human space-time-perception, but as of properties of the underlying framework (an utterly strange thing, which probably exists, as Kant noted in his Critique of Pure Reason: If there is a perception, then there must be something which is percepted and which can be thought [in terms of its properties]). Maybe it is misleading to call these properties "dimensions", and new terms have to be found.
- Thanks for your thoughts. The Teruaki Nakagomi models look very interesting to me. If you encounter anything more which sounds like what I described above, I would appreciate if you could leave me a note here! -- Peter --217.87.170.183 (talk) 11:36, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
Unreferenced BLPs
- Marta Harnecker - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 07:31, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
Welcome
Welcome!
Hello, Mporter, and
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizardif you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
{{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome! --Its snowing in East Asia (talk) 18:12, 1 July 2010 (UTC)Speedy deletion nomination of 2000s commodities boom
A tag has been placed on 2000s commodities boom, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the
Article Wizard.
Thank you.
Under the
{{hangon}}
on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk pageFor guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria
The article Lorraine Lisiecki has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Non-notable
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{
Nomination of Alternative theories of Al-Qaeda for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alternative theories of Al-Qaeda until a concensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.
The article
If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see
Template:N-dimensional space
You Were Right About Saddam's Alleged 1967 Visit
Saddam was imprisoned in 1964. According to his official biography, he escaped in 1967. There's no way that he was made an army officer in that time. Thus, Livingstone's claim is highly dubious, and I removed it.TheTimesAreAChanging (talk) 05:41, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi - you may be interested in this AFD. Feel free to comment. Thanks, Maschen (talk) 08:45, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
FA review?
Hello,
I noticed that you occasionally edit articles on string theory. Right now, I'm working to bring the article AdS/CFT correspondence to FA status, but I'm having trouble finding people to review the article. I was wondering if you'd be willing to take a look at it and tell us your thoughts at this page. Let me know what you think. Thanks. Polytope24 (talk) 15:22, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
The article Postmodernism Generator has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Non-notable web service. Unlike snarXiv, which is completely non-notable, PMG has at least a minute claim to it, so I've put it up for PROD instead of CSD.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Inanygivenhole (talk) 23:47, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Mikhail Khazin
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read
the guide to writing your first article.to help you create articles.You may want to consider using the Article Wizard
A tag has been placed on Mikhail Khazin, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
- It appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
- It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by
]ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Mporter. Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page.
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Mporter. Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Belt and Road Initiative
The China Star | ||
Thank you for creating the Belt and Road Initiative article, it will become important in the future. | ||
this WikiAward was given to Mporter by BeltedWuhan (talk) on 17:31, 3 June 2017 (UTC) |
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Mporter. Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
March 2018
Nomination of 2018 Russian nuclear weapons declaration for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2018 Russian nuclear weapons declaration is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2018 Russian nuclear weapons declaration until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Newroderick895 14:09, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Mporter. Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Water town (China) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created,
Draft:Water town (China) has a new comment
Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model moved to draftspace
An article you recently created,
Your submission at Articles for creation: Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model (August 1)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hello, Mporter!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 22:41, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
|
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
Draft:Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at
Thank you for your attention.
Your draft article, Draft:Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model
Hello, Mporter. It has been over six months since you last edited the
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
{{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 14:13, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
New IP moved to draftspace
An article you recently created,
Concern regarding Draft:New IP
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.
Disambiguation link notification for April 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:New IP
Hello, Mporter. It has been over six months since you last edited the
".In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:03, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 25
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited James Philip Elliott, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Harwell and Shell model.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
The article Mediastan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Appears to fail
WP:NFILM
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 18:07, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Mediastan for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mediastan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
DonaldD23 talk to me 03:00, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Celia Green for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Celia Green until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
- car chasm (talk) 18:02, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Mporter. Thank you for your work on
Thank you for writing the article on Wikipedia! I genuinely appreciate your efforts in creating the article on Wikipedia and expanding the sum of human knowledge in Wikipedia. Wishing you and your family a great day!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:37, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks! The real work was done by de:Benutzer:Tensorproduct. I just translated it to English! Mporter (talk) 03:58, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Mporter. Thank you for your work on
I am not convinced this should be a standalone article. Would you be opposed to merging it into Symmetry (physics)?
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Acebulf}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Acebulf (talk | contribs) 21:32, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Will add a bit of justification here. I agree that the topic is notable, but I am concerned that the article will never reach critical mass as-is. By merging into a larger article, (e.g. Symmetry (physics)) we get 30x the amount of page views, or 30x the likelihood that someone actually fleshes out the section, which we can then split out into its own article. Those numbers are accurate to the Summary (physics) page. What do you think? Acebulf (talk | contribs) 23:31, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- @]