User talk:Nenyedi
and use headlines when starting new topics. Thank you.
Previous Archives:
Copyright violation in Image:UnivarenaKzoo.jpg
Hello Nenyedi, and thanks for your message, however, even if it might seem that I made the changes, this is not actually so.
Instead, I only switched the word "four" into "six", as seen from here. I think I marked the edit as a "minor", to indicate a change not related to the contents.
You are probably looking for REexpert44, who included the two new flavours, as seen from here.
Thanks for your attention. ~Iceshark7 09:16, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
we run on a new register system in wendys of michigan, maybe since it is not corprate it doesnt show up on the old systems, we also use the plurr v.1.01 system of touch based register, not the old manual ones, i can get a system menu today, i go to work and can check it out...REexpert 16:12, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
Black Eyed Kids
Thanks for giving your views on this article's AfD. perfectblue has since rewritten the article - I'd be grateful if you would look at the article again and state whether your views have changed. Many thanks! Alfa 14:16, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
Another stab at adminship
Go ahead, maybe third time's the charm for me. Ten Pound Hammer • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?) 17:50, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
- Ack, you didn't do it right, it says I'm nominating myself, and it points back to my FIRST RfA. Ten Pound Hammer • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?) 18:58, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
- It's still pointing back to my first RfA. It should say "TenPoundHammer 3". Ten Pound Hammer • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?) 18:59, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Lakeview Square Mall
Contested CSD
Hallo, Nen! Glad to hear from somebody. I'm a bit puzzled. What's inappropriate about Cliff? Please explain.Anatiomaros 20:07, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
Could you explian that? He's certainly regarded as notable in Cornwall.Anatiomaros —The preceding signed but undated comment was added at 20:14:06, August 19, 2007 (UTC).
Huh?
Heh, last time I try to contribute on here! I'm confused as to how the page was inappropriate as it is similar to other pages on here (ie, Digg, Furl, Netscape, etc). Would appreciate an explanation. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bcuser (talk • contribs) 20:16:05, August 19, 2007 (UTC).
I've noted inter alia his contributions to our cultural life, the details of one of his publications, and his membership of one of our leading cultural organizations. What else would be needed in order to establish notability? Anatiomaros 20:23, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
Right ... I've cited a readily-available publication. It's by Stephens, and is readily available. What did you find unreliable in it? Anatiomaros 20:33, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
I removed the speedy delete notice you put on the article. If you actually looked at the article itself, or at the source that bot tagged it as plagiarizing, you'd see it's already tagged with a template as having been transcluded from the public domain Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology (1876). The page our article is supposedly plagiarizing also has a similar tag indicating the origin of its information. Ford MF 21:01, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
Brandon
it may be harsh, but there nothing in the rules against it.
Im also from Michigan wyoming to be more exact BrandonAngelLTD 21:36, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
I know that, but im not actually new to Wikipedia, I just recently created a new account, in my experience, most articles are vandalism, so i just put that on there as a default.
Mballoon
Sorry, all I wanted was to link to this word internally, so I could start to write a page for it. Won't happen again! ;) Petewillclarkson 21:45, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
I wish to request an undelete on this significant figure in Cornish language poetry (as can be seen from a quick Google search). I believe that the article was deleted far too quickly, especially as it was created by a new user unfamiliar with Wikipedia's policies. Other editors were unable to contribute to the development of the article, as it disappeared before it could be noticed!. Thanks, DuncanHill 01:50, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
Kalamazoo Route Map
Regarding [Image:KAZORoutemap.png]-
Just so you know, you have placed ATL in Alabama and not Georiga...I would change that ASAP if you want the article to pass GA...;) Sox23 21:16, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
Kalamazoo-Battle Creek International Airport GA review
Hello. I'm afraid I failed the review but I've left some extensive notes on the
Green box (Phreaking)
I am in the middle of creating it. You're already threatening to delete it because my fingers are not as fast as your bot. Piss off already.
Dethme0w 23:52, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
I also find your response to this condescending, and oblivious to the possibility that your bot's actions might be seen as annoying. If you want civilised discussion, practice civilised actions. Dethme0w 00:51, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
Deletion of Australian National Pigeon Association
G'day Nenyedi, I can understand your opinion on my creation of the Australian National Pigeon Association article. It has only just been created as a stub after all. It will be linked to from various pigeon related articles in due time. It also has been listed in a specific Category i.e. Category:Organisations based in Australia so ANPA is an Australian Organisation, and since Wikipedia does have the Category for this why not allow creation of the article page? I'd rather that you didn't delete it please. Like I said, the article will be expanded eventually. If not by me then some other aspiring Wikipedian can have a go at it. Cheers Sting au 23:56, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
Jr. Bacon Cheeseburger
A {{
]AfD nomination of Jr. Bacon Cheeseburger
Spam in Wendy's Kids' Meal
AfD nomination of Wendy's of Michigan
Thanks!
My RFA | ||
I thank you for participating in my successful request for adminship, which ended with 60 supports, no opposes, no neutrals, and one abstain. Edison 16:13, 7 September 2007 (UTC) |
Image source problem with Image:Ambucs logo.gif
This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Ambucs logo.gif. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on
LiveScience
Nenyedi, RE your deletion of a page I added (LiveScience), please do not threaten to block me. That is quite inappropriate, espessially given that there was no discussion before this *warning* was given. In fact, your conduct in the removal of the page itself was highly questionable given the facts about this site. Specifically, the website I refered to is quite commonly referred to and deserves some mention.
1. The site get 5 million unique visitors per month 2. there are 1,410,000 references to "livescience.com" on google. 3. More importantly, it is a publisher of content used by yahoo, msn, aol and more.
Dingfelder 00:01, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
Frosty Float
A tag has been placed on
If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}}
on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -- JediLofty User ¦ Talk 12:21, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Stanleysteemerlogo.jpg
Thanks for uploading
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 20:37, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
Re: your warning
- No offense taken. :) Just try to see if the editor's new next time before hitting them with a uw- warning. east.718 at 21:45, 10/29/2007
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Janice Brown Kzoo.png
Thanks for uploading
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:38, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
AfD nomination of List of indoor malls in Barrie
Speedy deletion of Template:Enyedi
A tag has been placed on
If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes.
Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 04:21, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
Link
Follow the interwiki link to find the Italian original. --VKokielov (talk) 20:59, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
Mr. Nenyedi, I would like to clarify about the Italian article. Ask a reliable person who knows Italian, and he will tell you that I translated faithfully from the Italian original. Salvo D'Acquisto is evidently an Italian national hero, which fact is mentioned in black on white in the carabinieri article. --VKokielov (talk) 03:24, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
Here is the passage, word for word.
- The Carabinieri are particularly proud of the memory of Brigadier Salvo D'Acquisto, who was executed by the Nazis in Palidoro, near Rome, in World War II, having exchanged his life for the lives of innocent citizens due to be executed in retaliation for the murder of a German soldier. Brigadier D'Acquisto falsely claimed responsibility and was shot for the offence.
--VKokielov (talk) 03:25, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
Hey! What's with PRODing Gene Stilp exactly one minute (!!) after I created it. It is a notable subject, so give me a second to establish that. Do a Google test to see for yourself. --CodeneBlues (talk) 21:06, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
Harcard Sussex Program
Nenyedi,
You can move forward with deleting this entry.
I was trying reference to the Harvard Sussex Program from Matthew Meselson's entry since it is not really a combination of Harvard University and University of Sussex, but a distinct collaborative program between Matthew and Julian Perry Robinson.
Thanks for your diligent monitoring to make Wikipedia a place worth visiting!
Reid Kirby —Preceding unsigned comment added by Reid Kirby (talk • contribs) 00:00, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Airzoo5.png}
Thank you for uploading Image:Airzoo5.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
- That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.
Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 18:11, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:BABBrands.png
Thanks for uploading Image:BABBrands.png. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 15:03, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
Replaceable fair use Image:FrostyFloat2.png
Thanks for uploading Image:FrostyFloat2.png. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:
- Go to di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
- On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before
Image source problem with Image:AirportBeacon.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:AirportBeacon.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on
Possibly unfree Image:Walgreensromence49024.JPG
An image that you uploaded or altered,
Proposed deletion of Janice Brown (Kalamazoo)
A
- A Youtube reference does not suffice for establishing notability per WP:N
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the
License tagging for File:HolidayInnExpressLogo-Blue-JPG.jpg
Thanks for uploading
For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 01:07, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
TfD nomination of Template:Airportpicreq
Orphaned non-free image (File:HolidayInnExpressLogo-Blue-JPG.jpg)
File source problem with File:KewpeeLima.JPG
Thank you for uploading File:KewpeeLima.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.
If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please refer to the
File source problem with File:Pp53lawsonarenaKzoo.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Pp53lawsonarenaKzoo.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.
If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please refer to the
File source problem with File:HyamesKzoo.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:HyamesKzoo.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.
If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please refer to the
Speedy deletion nomination of File:KzooPLibrary2.jpg
A tag has been placed on
- state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
- add the relevant copyright tag.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Sumanch (talk) 00:46, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
File source problem with File:AZO 1935.png
Thank you for uploading File:AZO 1935.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.
If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please refer to the
File:Wendycloseup.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered,
Which branch of BMO?
Just wondering where this is from? Thanks! -- Zanimum (talk) 17:44, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:BABBrands.png)
Thanks for uploading
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "
Orphaned non-free image File:AZO logo sm.jpg
Thanks for uploading
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 06:19, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Un hee hee hee
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read
the guide to writing your first article.to help you create articles.You may want to consider using the Article Wizard
A tag has been placed on Un hee hee hee, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 12:34, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
File:David T. Abercrombie.jpg
I believe you were the original uploader of File:David T. Abercrombie.jpg, back in 2007 (as File:Dabercrombie.png). Do you recall where you found the image? Thanks, Mackensen (talk) 11:34, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
Kitchen fresh chicken listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Kitchen fresh chicken. Since you had some involvement with the Kitchen fresh chicken redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - Champion (talk) (contribs) (Formerly TheChampionMan1234) 10:08, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
The file File:KAZORoutemap.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Orphaned map.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob13Talk 21:32, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Janice Brown (superintendent) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Janice Brown (superintendent) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 02:24, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
December 2020
Hi. I just wanted to let you know that I've moved some (or all) of your files uploaded here to Wikimedia Commons. What files are those exactly? See here. --TheImaCow (talk) 10:17, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
File source problem with File:KAOHTerminal.JPG
Thank you for uploading File:KAOHTerminal.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.
If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please refer to the
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the
"Wendy's Combos" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Wendy's Combos and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 23#Wendy's Combos until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 18:03, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Hell in the arts and popular culture for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hell in the arts and popular culture until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 15:05, 8 June 2023 (UTC)