User talk:Nnadigoodluck/archives/10

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article

criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of F5pillar -- F5pillar (talk) 13:42, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply

Nigeria

Thank you for quality articles around Nigeria and beyond, such as Patrick Chuka, 15th Africa Movie Academy Awards, Wishes and Butterflies, COVID-19 pandemic in Nigeria and Rosaline Meurer, for dealing with articles for creation, for good wishes, - Nnadi, comrade, you are an awesome Wikipedian!

You are recipient no.

• Gerda Arendt I didn't see this coming. Honoured to receive this. —Nnadigoodluck███ 16:04, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the promising draft notice rules out G13 and should not be removed without discussion with the editor who placed it, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 00:43, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Atlantic306, oh, really had no idea about this. Thanks for the heads-up. Best, —Nnadigoodluck███ 00:45, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 01:42, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello - would you please revert your move of this page? There was a previous RM which reached a different result, and that result should hold in the absence of a new one. Thanks! Dohn joe (talk) 16:03, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dohn joe,  Done —Nnadigoodluck███ 16:21, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi when you have a moment would you mind moving this unsourced BLP to draft? Thank you. Mccapra (talk) 20:53, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mccapra,  Done —Nnadigoodluck███ 22:21, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A couple more if you would be so kind: Enough (EP) and Mutthi Bhar Sapne. Many thanks. Mccapra (talk) 13:14, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mccapra,  Done —Nnadigoodluck███ 13:24, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mccapra (talk • contribs) 13:25, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You moved this article back to draft space. It has already been in draft space and was accepted by MapleSoy. If you don't think this should be in mainspace, you should propose it be deleted. Can you please revert your move to draft space? ~Kvng (talk) 17:24, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kvng,  Done —Nnadigoodluck███ 17:32, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi a couple more for moving to draft when you have a mo. Many thanks The Wonder Woman and Awesome TV. Obliged as always. Mccapra (talk) 11:37, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mccapra  Done —Nnadigoodluck███ 12:20, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The 2020 WikiCup has come to an end, with the final round going down to the wire. Our new Champion is Lee Vilenski (submissions), the runner-up last year, who was closely followed by Gog the Mild (submissions). In the final round, Lee achieved 4 FAs and 30 GAs, mostly on cue sport topics, while Gog achieved 3 FAs and 15 GAs, mostly on important battles and wars, which earned him a high number of bonus points. The Rambling Man (submissions) was in third place with 4 FAs and 8 GAs on football topics, with Epicgenius (submissions) close behind with 19 GAs and 16 DYK's, his interest being the buildings of New York.

The other finalists were Hog Farm (submissions), HaEr48 (submissions), Harrias (submissions) and Bloom6132 (submissions). The final round was very productive, and besides 15 FAs, contestants achieved 75 FAC reviews, 88 GAs and 108 GAN reviews. Altogether, Wikipedia has benefited greatly from the activities of WikiCup competitors all through the contest. Well done everyone!

All those who reached the final will receive awards and the following special awards will be made, based on high performance in particular areas of content creation. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, these prizes are awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round, or in the event of a tie, to the overall leader in this field.

• Gog the Mild (submissions) wins the featured article prize, for a total of 14 FAs during the course of the competition.
• Bloom6132 (submissions) win the featured list prize, for 5 FLs in round 4.
• Rhododendrites (submissions) wins the featured picture prize, for 3 FPs in round 3 and 5 overall.
• Lee Vilenski (submissions) wins the featured article reviewer prize, for 23 FAC reviews in round 5.
• Epicgenius (submissions) wins the good article prize, for 45 GAs in round 2 and 113 overall.
• MPJ-DK (submissions) wins the topic prize, for 33 articles in good topics in round 2.
• The Rambling Man (submissions) wins the good article reviewer prize, for 100 good article reviews in round 2.
• Epicgenius (submissions) wins the DYK prize, for 22 Did you know articles in round 4 and 94 overall.
• Bloom6132 (submissions) wins the ITN prize, for 63 In the news articles in round 4 and 136 overall.

Next year's competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2021 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66, Vanamonde and Cwmhiraeth MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:38, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi you once described for me the process of dealing with deleting a draft so that a new page can be moved out of mainspace into the draft space for the same name. I didn’t really understand it at the time. Today I wanted to reread your explanation but can’t find it anywhere. Is there a set of instructions somewhere I can read (I can’t find it on the NPP Resources page) or would you mind explaining it again for me? Many thanks Mccapra (talk) 19:38, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mccapra, in dealing with situations like this, you'll need to move the mainspace page to the userspace of the creator of the page. Eg. If the username of the creator is Jakanna and page title is The fundamentals, during moving of the page, you'll need to select New title: as User and name page title as Jakanna/The fundamentals, add your reason and uncheck Leave a redirect behind. Sorry for the late reply, I've been away for a while. Best, —Nnadigoodluck███ 15:26, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No worries at all and thanks for your help. I realised you weren’t around for a while and I hope everything is ok. All the best. Mccapra (talk) 16:04, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings,

Thank you very much for participating in the Months of African Cinema global contest/edit-a-thon, and thank you for your contributions so far.

It is already the middle of the contest and a lot have been achieved already! We have been able to get over 1,500 articles created in over fifteen (15) languages! This would not have been possible without your support and we want to thank you. If you have not yet listed your name as a participant in the contest page please do so.

Please make sure to list the articles you have created or improved in the article achievements' section of the contest page, so that they can be easily tracked. To be able to claim prizes, please also ensure to list your articles on the users by articles page. We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:

• Overall winner
  • 1st - $500
  • 2nd - $200
  • 3rd - $100
• Diversity winner - $100
• Gender-gap filler - $100
• Language Winners - up to $100*

We are very excited about what has been achieved so far, but your contributions are still needed to further exceed all expectations! Let’s create more articles before the end of this contest, which is this November!!!

Thank you once again for being part of this global event! --Jamie Tubers (talk) 10:30, 06 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

Hi and thanks a lot for maintaining

LSGH,  Done. Best, —Nnadigoodluck███ 15:30, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Hi Nnadigoodluck, regarding your close on at Talk:First Nagorno-Karabakh War, would you mind expanding on the reasoning behind your determination of the consensus? Best, CMD (talk) 16:19, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Also, there were opposed votes, but they were challenged and countered constructively with policy based statements and I saw no other reason not to move it to the proposed title. Best, —Nnadigoodluck███ 17:41, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Ah thank you, great response.

WP:QUALIFIER is what I needed. Appreciated, CMD (talk) 02:40, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Were you aware of the related

recent discussion at 2020 Nagorno Karabakh war before making the close? _signed, Rosguill ^talk 04:25, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Rosguill not at all, I wasn't aware that the discussion ever happened. Best, —Nnadigoodluck███ 06:43, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Would you be willing to review said discussion and reconsider whether your close was appropriate? I think that the current situation is defensible, but given the additional information you may find yourself of a different opinion than when you were performing the close. If nothing else, I would argue that "war" should not be capitalized until we see wider use as a proper noun. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:49, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ATDAB. IMHO, I think this should be discussed in a fresh discussion at a later date. Best, —Nnadigoodluck███

I agree that unilaterally making that change now would not be appropriate; I think that if the additional information makes you think that the close was improper, then the courses of action would be to either reclose with a new rationale that you think is more appropriate or to revert the close and leave it for another editor. If you think that the close can stand, then there's no action needed. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:19, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Nnadigoodluck/archives,

Year in review

It has been a productive year for New Page Patrol as we've roughly cut the size of the New Page Patrol queue in half this year. We have been fortunate to have a lot of great work done by Rosguill who was the reviewer of the most pages and redirects this past year. Thanks and credit go to JTtheOG and Onel5969 who join Rosguill in repeating in the top 10 from last year. Thanks to John B123, Hughesdarren, and Mccapra who all got the NPR permission this year and joined the top 10. Also new to the top ten is DannyS712 bot III, programmed by DannyS712 which has helped to dramatically reduce the number of redirects that have needed human patrolling by patrolling certain types of redirects (e.g. for differences in accents) and by also patrolling editors who are on on the

redirect whitelist

.

Rank	Username	Num reviews	Log
1	talk )	67,552	Patrol Page Curation
2	Rosguill (talk)	63,821	Patrol Page Curation
3	John B123 (talk)	21,697	Patrol Page Curation
4	Onel5969 (talk)	19,879	Patrol Page Curation
5	JTtheOG (talk)	12,901	Patrol Page Curation
6	Mcampany (talk)	9,103	Patrol Page Curation
7	DragonflySixtyseven (talk)	6,401	Patrol Page Curation
8	Mccapra (talk)	4,918	Patrol Page Curation
9	Hughesdarren (talk)	4,520	Patrol Page Curation
10	Utopes (talk)	3,958	Patrol Page Curation

Reviewer of the Year

John B123 has been named reviewer of the year for 2020. John has held the permission for just over 6 months and in that time has helped cut into the queue by reviewing more than 18,000 articles. His talk page shows his efforts to communicate with users, upholding NPP's goal of nurturing new users and quality over quantity.

NPP Technical Achievement Award

As a special recognition and thank you DannyS712 has been awarded the first NPP Technical Achievement Award. His work programming the bot has helped us patrol redirects tremendously - more than 60,000 redirects this past year. This has been a large contribution to New Page Patrol and definitely is worthy of recognition.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 2262 Low – 2232 High – 10271

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here

18:16, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

so i went through your message and guidelines, I already updated the content and also updated the source link, please if there is anything I need to change anything let me know, and the information I added was about his siblings and their names. which was not provided here before. Looking forward to your response. Best regards, mideh — Preceding unsigned comment added by Olumideh (talk • contribs) 21:39, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WP:RS thoroughly. Best, —Nnadigoodluck███ 21:47, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Abishe (talk) — is wishing you a Happy New Year! It's the last day of 2024 and tomorrow will be 2025. Hope the coming year brings pleasures for you. Have a prosperous, enjoyable and a productive 2025. This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the New Year cheer by adding {{subst:New Year 2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The competition begins today and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page. Any questions on the rules or on anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. We thank Vanamonde93 and Godot13, who have retired as judges, and we thank them for their past dedication. The judges for the WikiCup this year are Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:11, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure you should have moved the championships article to Wimbledon, firstly I'm not sure that there was a consensus for it to be the primary topic for "Wimbledon" since as noted the district might qualify, secondly the championships article wasn't notified of the move and while such moves may be fine if it involves moveing a DAB (or other page) to the unqualified name that wasn't notified even though the move benefited the championships article in a way some may object to the name change even if they agree its the primary topic see Wikipedia:Requested moves/Closing instructions#Moves of other pages. Crouch, Swale (talk) 21:33, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Crouch, Swale, you're right, the notification only happened when the move has already been performed. Best, —Nnadigoodluck███ 21:39, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I also oppose this move to Wimbledon. It's possible it could be the correct move, but no one in the tennis project would have seen it to comment since it was just added to the talk page today. Please reopen or at least stop the move of The Championships, Wimbledon to Wimbledon. Fyunck(click) (talk) 07:26, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fyunck(click), I'm going to revert the move, notify the appropriate channels and re-open the RM. Best, —Nnadigoodluck███ 07:29, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou for reverting the championships move but you should probably just close the current request at

Talk:The Championships, Wimbledon if its desired to move the championships to the base name. The current request still has the proposal to move the suburb to the base name (even though you've now notified the championships) which I weakly supported but consensus was against that. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:12, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Crouch, Swale, at this time, I should probably leave the closure to another uninvolved editor. Best, —Nnadigoodluck███ 17:20, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello thank you for your response, if you read through the content, you did find that more information on laycon person life was mentioned on the content which has to do with his biography, so even if i cant added information, you can go ahead and add or just add a reference link to it. at least read through the content before judging it and am not promoting, I came across while reading about laycon — Preceding unsigned comment added by Olumideh (talk • contribs) 12:40, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nnadigoodluck, since you originally nominated the article, were you planning to address any of the recent issues raised in additional opinions added to the GA review, which have been presented over the past couple of weeks? Please stop by as soon as possible to let us know your plans. Thank you very much. BlueMoonset (talk) 06:18, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Nnadigoodluck. Trust you are doing great today. I'd like to request a favor from you.

I recently created a draft at Draft:Dremo, but a higher authority user accuses me of creating a Sock Puppet account and declines all of my works. They did this twice.

Honestly, I feel they are being biased. Can you have a look at the draft and let me know whether or not, it provides notability of the subject?

I looked at several other articles such as Mayorkun, Rema, and Chinko Ekun, and made sure I followed similar patterns.

I strongly believe if articles such as

I appreciate your time and I hope you look into this. Thanks in advance. Mondayudowong (talk) 13:03, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Round 1 of the competition has finished; it was a high-scoring round with 21 contestants scoring more than 100 points. Everyone with a positive score moves on to Round 2, with 55 contestants qualifying. You will need to finish among the top thirty-two contestants in Round 2 if you are to qualify for Round 3. Our top scorers in Round 1 were:

• Epicgenius led the field with a featured article, nine good articles and an assortment of other submissions, specialising on buildings and locations in New York, for a total of 945 points.
• Bloom6132 was close behind with 896 points, largely gained from 71 "In the news" items, mostly recent deaths.
• ImaginesTigers, who has been editing Wikipedia for less than a year, was in third place with 711 points, much helped by bringing League of Legends to featured article status, exemplifying how bonus points can boost a contestant's score.
• Amakuru came next with 708 points, Kigali being another featured article that scored maximum bonus points.
• Ktin, new to the WikiCup, was in fifth place with 523 points, garnered from 15 DYKs and 34 "In the news" items.
• The Rambling Man scored 511 points, many from featured article candidate reviews and from football related DYKs.
• Gog the Mild, last year's runner-up, came next with 498 points, from a featured article and numerous featured article candidate reviews.
• Hog Farm, at 452, scored for a featured article, four good articles and a number of reviews.
• Le Panini
  , another newcomer to the WikiCup, scored 438 for a featured article and three good articles.
• Lee Vilenski, last year's champion, scored 332 points, from a featured article and various other sport-related topics.

These contestants, like all the others, now have to start again from scratch. In Round 1, contestants achieved eight featured articles, three featured lists and one featured picture, as well as around two hundred DYKs and twenty-seven ITNs. They completed 97 good article reviews, nearly double the 52 good articles they claimed. Contestants also claimed for 135 featured article and featured list candidate reviews. There is no longer a requirement to mention your WikiCup participation when undertaking these reviews.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is a good article candidate, a featured process, or something else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on

If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:26, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to find out why you nominated the article titled dorathy Bachor for speedy deletion. Justice Faith (talk) 16:09, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Justice Faith, I didn't nominate the article for speedy deletion, rather for AfD. You could kindly read my nomination reason at the nomination page. Best, —Nnadigoodluck███ 16:18, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I had something else to request of to kindly. I've been working on a draft for Nengi of Big Brother Naija. I submitted it in October last year and it was reviewed in February. I was told to avoid peacock terms and also use reliable sources. I've since edited the page, I'm yet to resubmit it, just looking for some more citations. My request is that you visit the article, look at the citations used and the tone, let me know whether or not when resubmitting it would be accepted and lastly kindly let me know if you could review it on resubmission because I've noticed you're a nigerian member and so you're probably well acquainted with Nigerian personalities. In comparison to lost wiki editors. I hope you consider this. Justice Faith (talk) 16:31, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Justice Faith, I'm sorry, but Nengi of Big Brother Naija season 5 is not notable according to Wikipedia standards, just like Dorathy Bachor. Best, —Nnadigoodluck███ 16:38, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article N-Power you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:N-Power for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of F5pillar -- F5pillar (talk) 23:22, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]