User talk:Nyttend/Archive 56

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Talk page archives Current talk Archive 1 • Archive 2 • Archive 3 Archive 4 • Archive 5 • Archive 6 Archive 7 • Archive 8 • Archive 9 Archive 10 • Archive 11 • Archive 12 Archive 13 • Archive 14 • Archive 15 Archive 16 • Archive 17 • Archive 18 Archive 19 • Archive 20 • Archive 21 Archive 22 • Archive 23 • Archive 24 Archive 25 • Archive 26 • Archive 27 Archive 28 • Archive 29 • Archive 30 Archive 31 • Archive 32 • Archive 33 Archive 34 • Archive 35 • Archive 36 Archive 37 • Archive 38 • Archive 39 Archive 40 • Archive 41 • Archive 42 Archive 43 • Archive 44 • Archive 45 Archive 46 • Archive 47 • Archive 48 Archive 49 • Archive 50 • Archive 51 Archive 52 • Archive 53 • Archive 54 Archive 55 • Archive 56 • Archive 57 (template link) (revert point)

Any thoughts that you want to share on this topic? I thought at one time that flags were discouraged from being used in the infobox of city articles. • Sbmeirow • Talk • 13:28, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Cities/US_Guideline#Was_there_any_consensus_on_flag_icons_in_city_infoboxes?

I wonder what you think about the protection level of Template:Clear. It's been essentially untouched for nearly a decade, and in 2015 you brought it down from full&cascade protection to template protection. There seems to have been some discussion here​. I'm not sure how many uses it had at the time, but with around 2.4 million transclusions, it seems like a good candidate for full protection; I'd certainly consider it so. Admittedly, 1.8M are in user talkspace. Thoughts? ~ Amory (u • t • c) 00:19, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

In the article Calverton Park, Missouri, user Nyttend backup threw out the baby and kept the bathwater while it was trying to revert "Tidy census wording and links". There are a couple of hundred like this. Easy to find: search for "racial makup". Happy editing! Chris the speller ^yack 04:44, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

Template:Hot100brasil.com has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Launchballer 20:17, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day!

Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

From the

Birthday Committee, Megan Barris (Lets talk📧)

07:35, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day!

Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

From the

Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T)

20:46, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Im contacting you today attempting to find source material for the Sommerheim park article; I have been unsuccessful finding the original reference material in any online medium and also am wondering if you have additional sources pertaining to the initial excavations and point types found there. Im trying to find relevant info surrounding the context of these points to other finds in the area and any help with the sources you used would be greatly appreciated. Thank you! LarsTheFirst (talk) 02:45, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

Hi Nyttend. I've just reviewed and accepted the AfC draft now found at

Category:British military personnel killed at the Battle of the Somme has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Lettler^hello 03:07, 4 September 2020 (UTC)