User talk:Owndifiction

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Sulfurboy were:

This submission is not adequately supported by

peacock terms

that promote the subject.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

riddled with puffery and possibly

WP:OR

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pierre Cachia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Pierre Cachia, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 22:55, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Owndifiction! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 22:55, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject

independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid

when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
  Draft:Text World Theory
  and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
  Draft:Text World Theory, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7
  }}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 23:37, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject

independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid

when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pierre Cachia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Pierre Cachia, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 18:22, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

This submission reads more like an

encyclopedic manner

.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

It seems from the references that this is notable. However, it will need to be much more fully cited, to show where the various statements derive. Please use WP:CITE BOOK for the references, and link to worldcat, not google.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
  Draft:Text World Theory
  and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
  Draft:Text World Theory, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7
  }}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 23:41, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
2,064		Politics of the United Kingdom (talk)	Add sources
61,724		Dominic Raab (talk)	Add sources
9		Herbert Bowden, Baron Aylestone (talk)	Add sources
3,188		Records of prime ministers of the United Kingdom (talk)	Add sources
940		Royal Library of the Netherlands (talk)	Add sources
2,087		Hugh Glass (talk)	Add sources
170		Premiership of Theresa May (talk)	Cleanup
141		Why The Future Doesn't Need Us (talk)	Cleanup
34		Bablake School (talk)	Cleanup
5,438		Brexit (talk)	Expand
13		Young Britons' Foundation (talk)	Expand
9,687		2020 Labour Party leadership election (talk)	Expand
288		Lee family (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
1,390		Soft drink (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
196		Alastair Windsor, 2nd Duke of Connaught and Strathearn (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
161,838		talk )	Merge
303		Antisemitism in Europe (talk)	Merge
834		Bill of Rights 1689 (talk)	Merge
56		Charles Townshend (talk)	Wikify
360		Anglophile (talk)	Wikify
557		talk )	Wikify
3		William Harrison Riley (talk)	Orphan
2		talk )	Orphan
2		Alexei Voronov (talk)	Orphan
19		Samuel Sandys, 1st Baron Sandys (talk)	Stub
25		Zeitgeist (Levellers album) (talk)	Stub
5		Nandini Das (talk)	Stub
14		Cheltenham Secondary College (talk)	Stub
93		Bejam (talk)	Stub
86		Bedchamber crisis (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 16:32, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here

.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

• Draft:Text World Theory
  may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-- RoySmith (talk) 20:40, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Owndifiction. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:44, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Owndifiction. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:30, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Owndifiction. It has been over six months since you last edited the

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:41, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Hello, Owndifiction. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:51, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Owndifiction. It has been over six months since you last edited the

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 17:01, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]