User talk:Palm dogg/Archive 4
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hi, when you get the chance, can you reduce the size of and
) 00:25, 5 March 2010 (UTC)- Hi, I have striked my oppose and made some suggestions on talk) 00:55, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
- The organization section is no longer fully referenced. Regards, talk) 18:30, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
- The organization section is no longer fully referenced. Regards,
Nawa-I-Barakzayi District reviews
Hi Palm dogg. Glad you found the peer review of Nawa-I-Barakzayi District article at Wikipedia:Peer review/Nawa-I-Barakzayi District/archive1 to be helpful. Actually, it is not necessarily over. The peer review has not been closed. You could, like many editors do, respond to the comments there, for example inserting your responses and/or asking questions. If you respond that you have edited to address a specific concern, then the reviewer who raised the concern may well give you further feedback on how you did. Also i noticed you have somehow put it up for GAR, but it seems not properly done as it is currently showing you yourself as the GA reviewer, and it also seems not correct to do while the peer review is still open, though i am not well informed about GA. I participate in the PR review process sometimes but frankly unfamiliar with how the GA process works. Anyhow, you could comment further in the PR or simply ask there that it be closed. --doncram (talk) 01:05, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
Happy Palm dogg's Day!
User:Palm dogg has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian, Peace, A record of your Day will always be kept |
For a userbox you can add to your userbox page, see
• 00:02, 31 March 2010 (UTC)Your GA nomination of Nawa-I-Barakzayi District
The article
DYK nomination
I have reviewed the DYK nomination of
11:28, 9 May 2010 (UTC)Main page appearance
Hello! This is a note to let the main editors of
Iraq War in Anbar Province
I have to say I am very impressed by this article. For what its worth, well done. Anotherclown (talk) 11:33, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks! I served there, so it's a labor of love on my part! Palm_Dogg (talk) 12:59, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
USMC Portal
I see that you are still an active editor. Would you be willing to take on maintenance of the USMC Portal? It has not seen regular maintenance for a long time. I hope you can do this. I rarely on Wikipedia these days and haven't been working on the Portal for years.
If you can't do this, perhaps you could recruit some fellow editors who have a passion for the Marine Corps.
— ERcheck (talk) 08:55, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry but I kind of go in one-two month bursts of editing myself. I'd suggest just merging into the general Portal:Military of the United States. Palm_Dogg (talk) 13:13, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
- I made some changes to it -- removed the "in the news" section — which requires at least monthly attention. The rest is automatic. I
Nawa-I-Barakzayi District
An article that you have been involved in editing, Nawa-I-Barakzayi District has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the good article reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. AIRcorn (talk) 22:52, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
IWiAP
Psst...articles can't be at A-class review and FAC at the same time! Cheers, Nikkimaria (talk) 01:26, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
- I know, but User:Dank recommended it and I'm kind-of in a dead-end without copy editors. Palm_Dogg (talk) 02:08, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
- Ah ... sorry for being unclear, I meant you should take it to A-class if it failed FAC. I've just supported, and you should be okay on the prose requirements. Btw, I'm gathering sources for an article on robotics in the Iraq War ... don't know if that interests you, but you're welcome to co-nominate if you like. - Dank (push to talk) 12:32, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
- Much appreciated! For robotics, anything on the Danger Room blog should help out. I have to confess, though, that aside from the UAV's (and even then I'm only partial to the blimps) I'm not a big fan. Yes, it was safer to send a robot to defuse an IED than a man, but I just saw so many examples of needless technology -- the Army's robotic dogs and mules are my favorites -- that I'm skeptical of the field. Palm_Dogg (talk) 12:52, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
- Ah ... sorry for being unclear, I meant you should take it to A-class if it failed FAC. I've just supported, and you should be okay on the prose requirements. Btw, I'm gathering sources for an article on robotics in the Iraq War ... don't know if that interests you, but you're welcome to co-nominate if you like. - Dank (push to talk) 12:32, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
Iraq War in Anbar Province A class review
Hi, I've just deleted Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Iraq War in Anbar Province as a housekeeping measure. This will make it easier for you to re-start the review in the event that the FAC isn't successful (the alternative is messing around with archives, which seems unnecessary). Regards,
Battle of Piva Forks
G'day, Palm_Dogg, I've been doing some work on articles around the topic of the
- I just created it. The dramatic expansion was done by Iraq War in Anbar Province and Nawa-I-Barakzayi District. If/when I finish those, I'll take another look. Palm_Dogg (talk) 16:21, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
- No worries, good luck with those articles. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 23:53, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
FAC
I'm willing to help. I'd love to see this article featured. I think it's just a matter of pulling the text into line with the sources in some places. There aren't large discrepancies, but enough minor gaps to be concerning. --Laser brain (talk) 17:18, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks! The other reason is I'm tied up this week until my Wiki-Duty on Friday, when I will be "standing" barracks duty all day with nothing to do except edit Wikipedia. I'll go through what I can before then, and then roll into it hard on Friday morning. Palm_Dogg (talk) 18:00, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
- Just created a Military History A-Class Review, if you want to jump in on that. Palm_Dogg (talk) 14:17, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
Graham says one thing needs looking at. - Dank (push to talk) 03:47, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
DYK nomination of September 2012 Camp Bastion raid
DYK for September 2012 Camp Bastion raid
DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Main page appearance: Iraq War in Anbar Province
This is a note to let the main editors of
The
Full article...)
Precious
triumph of the will
Thank you for quality articles on battles and wars, such as
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:20, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
Seven years ago, you were recipient no. 430 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:58, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
FAR
I have nominated
FAR - Starship Troopers edition
So I just about to submit Starship Troopers to FAR and I noticed that another of your articles you helped promote, Battle of Badr, is there as well. I don't know if I should submit it now even though it is not in a good condition at all. GamerPro64 18:39, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
- I put Starship Troopers up for FAR right here. Hopefully it can retain its status as it looks like it has potential to stay a Featured Article. GamerPro64 19:23, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago
Ten years! |
---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:49, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
"Poor Bloody Infantry" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect
Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from United States color-coded war plans into War Plan White. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution
. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 19:49, 23 October 2020 (UTC)