User talk:Pereoptic

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
91		General chemistry (talk)	Add sources
419		Neurodegenerative disease (talk)	Add sources
38		Recognition of civil marriage in Israel (talk)	Add sources
1,399		Plastic surgery (talk)	Add sources
648		Spanish naming customs (talk)	Add sources
1,564		Pharmacy (talk)	Add sources
39		Hologenome theory of evolution (talk)	Cleanup
77		Theoretical chemistry (talk)	Cleanup
15		Brain morphometry (talk)	Cleanup
31		Schild equation (talk)	Expand
21		Food physical chemistry (talk)	Expand
44		Management of Parkinson's disease (talk)	Expand
58		Internal environment (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
711		Cat anatomy (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
76		Isolation (microbiology) (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
123		Fitness culture (talk)	Merge
102		Bacterial cellular morphologies (talk)	Merge
541		Synovial joint (talk)	Merge
21		Physicians in Canada (talk)	Wikify
43		Physical organic chemistry (talk)	Wikify
17		Evolution of Macropodidae (talk)	Wikify
2		Shahar Marcus (talk)	Orphan
2		British Northrop Loom Co Ltd (talk)	Orphan
2		Alessandro La Vecchia (talk)	Orphan
13		Carbochemistry (talk)	Stub
62		PK/PD model (talk)	Stub
45		Agrostology (talk)	Stub
3		SB-649868 (talk)	Stub
30		Haloperidol decanoate (talk)	Stub
35		Pharmacoepidemiology (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 16:03, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have reverted your edit to Rotavirus. This a Featured Article and has been rigorously reviewed. You must discuss such radical edits beforehand on the Talk Page, With regard to Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section, this guideline says " Although the presence of citations in the lead is neither required in every article nor prohibited in any article, there is no exception to citation requirements specific to leads." (My emphasis). In this case, we have chosen to add citations. Best regards. Graham Beards (talk) 16:39, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Graham Beards, this is an old featured article (even the lead of the article did not provide the correct summary of the entire article). I don't emphasize on the removal of resources in the lead, however, the absence of sources in the lead of Dementia with Lewy bodies and Tourette syndrome articles gives it a visual beauty and shows the professional and comprehensive writing of the article (such as the "Abstract" section in articles published in journals).I only acted on the basis of WP:Be bold. If you are against this edit, I will discuss it on the talk page. best Pereoptic ^Talk✉️   17:11, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you will see on the Talk Page it says "This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on April 7, 2008, and on September 18, 2022." It has been maintained and updated. I would prefer changes to be discussed on the Talk Page. (Incidentally, the article has been published in a journal here: Graham Beards (2017). "Rotavirus". WikiJournal of Medicine 4 (1). doi:10.15347/WJM/2017.007. Wikidata Q43994531. ISSN 2002-4436. So I can't accept your argument [that it] "gives it a visual beauty and shows the professional and comprehensive writing of the article "). I think it has that already. Graham Beards (talk) 17:38, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@

WT:FA? Pereoptic ^Talk✉️   17:53, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

In general yes it would. But it would be unfair to single out this article. Cerebellum is similar in this regard and has also been published. During my years as FA delegate, I promoted many professionally and comprehensively written articles with citations in their leads. Graham Beards (talk) 18:06, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@

WT:FA?. Good times Pereoptic ^Talk✉️   18:32, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Template:Community portal/styles.css, a page that you created, has been deleted. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. As the page met any of these strictly-defined criteria, it was deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been deleted are:

• It appeared to be a test page. (See
  welcome page
  if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with