User talk:Polycarpa aurata

Djm-leighpark (talk) 23:45, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Djm-leighpark: Can you please identify where you think I have "shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan"? I have never edited those articles or, indeed, any articles related to those countries. Polycarpa aurata (talk) 03:59, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

}} Djm-leighpark I am still waiting for an answer. Polycarpa aurata (talk) 14:37, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Special:Diff/1079270666. Djm-leighpark (talk) 15:42, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please read

I don't mean to be argumentative, but surely that isn't meant to apply to biographical pages? I have never seen a biography here that didn't have the date of birth. How can someone be notable enough to merit a page here but not notable enough that we wouldn't put their full date of birth? Polycarpa aurata (talk) 02:35, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well you are arguing about it. Suggest ask at

WP:DOB. I know I've done this myself (incorrectly) previously and it is quite commonly and erroneously done. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) 06:28, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

I will do as you suggest. Polycarpa aurata (talk) 22:09, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

To state the obvious your plastering of the unnecessarily person's details all over

WP:BLPN was not what I intended, and additionally it has now been taken to AfD. To say I am not happy with how you have done this would be an understatement. Djm-leighpark (talk) 11:13, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

I need to claim I have received a (non public) email from oversight on Ticket#2022032710000821 sent Sun, 27 Mar 2022 06:57:39 which has informed me: "They are completely correct; if there is a reliable source that provides a DOB, there is no *procedural* reason to remove it, only one based on discussion and consensus." Unfortunately I have read that email just now, some 30 hours later. On that basis I need to revert the full DOB and stand back from that point. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) 11:40, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Previous accounts

My analysis of your contributions indicates some probability you may have edited Wikipedia previously under another account; though that is by no means certain. If so can you please name accounts you have edited under previously or do you wish to claim

@Djm-leighpark: I don't know what "analysis" you've done, but I joined Wikipedia just after Christmas. I signed on today to find a flood of vaguely threatening message from you. Is all of this just because I added a birth date to Monisha Shah? Polycarpa aurata (talk) 15:27, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@

WP:ANI but I assure you your actions and my actions would be subjected to intense scrutiny but even if I am wrong I might reasonably to thought to be persuing a presumption of privacy. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) 16:16, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

(

Please ping me! 16:43, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

A. C. Santacruz, I appreciate your calm way of approaching things, but this feels *very* personal to me and I don't like it at all. Polycarpa aurata (talk) 17:26, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It comes with the territory of editing in Wikipedia. When you end up discussing issues at the noticeboards and you are a new editor people will usually make inquiries. It's annoying, certainly, and might feel personally hurtful at first, but once you start seeing it happen a bunch to others you understand why it happens. In any case, there is really nothing Djm can do if you say "I have not edited before Christmas 2021 and have no other accounts", which I imagine is what you meant by your above message. There's no need to make it more of a discussion that it needs to be.

Please ping me! 17:38, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

I'm sorry, but I don't need to play silly word games with someone who has suddenly taken an interest in me and started leaving me indecipherable accusations about his relative's xrays. I've had just about enough of this. Polycarpa aurata (talk) 17:59, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Djm-leighpark: So a relative of yours missed an xray appointment. Can you tell me how that is *any* way related to me or to Wikipedia? Polycarpa aurata (talk) 17:31, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Polycarpa aurata:: Because I screwed up in cancelling it early dealing with your privacy pushing which has cascaded out pushing a lot of other issues. I've also threatened a complaint against a hospital over failure to handle something. That's my fault but its affecting other people in real life. Yes that's my problem. And you've done everything but answered the straightforward question. Is there something your're not telling us? Now have your last word. I likely not to respond to it. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) 18:43, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry that you chose to put Wikipedia ahead of your relative's health but perhaps this experience it will encourage you to reflect on your priorities. I *have* answered your question but you are unwilling to accept it at face value. I should probably just take A. C. Santacruz's advice but I don't react well to people like you and I'm not going to give you the satisfaction of browbeating me into playing your game. Good luck with your spy hunting! Polycarpa aurata (talk) 14:24, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't choose to do and wouldn't choose to do that. Life happens. Accidents Happen. You still haven't answered the question. And in case you are wondering I was dragged into this one yesterday: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/BarehamOliver. So "Spy hunting" is no joke. I actually am on Wikipedia to do contact. As a spin-off there is sometimes some learning to come out of the BLPN and it is actually useful to study it closely. Very closely. And hold the DOB has been removed and re-instated by various parties. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) 14:40, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I believe a reasonable person would understand "I joined Wikipedia just after Christmas" as an answer to your question and would have no difficulty figuring out if it was an affirmative or a negative response. I would be interested to know what that same reasonable person makes of "I actually am on Wikipedia to do contact" because it means nothing to me. Polycarpa aurata (talk) 14:53, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop this Djm-leighpark. Either open an SPI or walk away. At this point the answer to "have you edited as another user" is "no". It shouldn't matter if this user has said yes, or no. If you have direct proof, then it should be pushed to SPI. All this is doing is causing a fight, Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 15:18, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The answer was no right from the beginning but Djm-leighpark wants to make me jump when he says jump. I'm not going to jump for him. Polycarpa aurata (talk) 15:23, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• There is currently a discussion at
  User:Djm-leighpark bullying. Thank you. Djm-leighpark (talk) 21:51, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Hi Polycarpa aurata! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Tops Friendly Markets several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article

Thanks. I will take that under advisement. Polycarpa aurata (talk) 16:16, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers. I'd hate to see you subject to a temporary block for breaching 3RR, as I do agree with you on the removal of that content. Sideswipe9th (talk) 16:17, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Whpq. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sharon Lee Williams that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Calling another editor racist whether explicitly or implicitly as you did here is not acceptable. Whpq (talk) 18:25, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I see you have recently created the article

Thanks for the advice, but I know what I'm doing. Polycarpa aurata (talk) 02:50, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Based on the absence of reliable sources in the article, I've tagged it for

speedy deletion, lest it bypass review due to being created directly. It's happened before, and tends to create work for others. Thanks for your indulgence.--Quisqualis (talk) 03:33, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sharon Lee Williams is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sharon Lee Williams until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Whpq (talk) 19:59, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On 3 August 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Stanley Stair, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that at 107 years old, Stanley Stair of Jamaica was at the time of his death the last surviving Caribbean veteran of World War I? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Stanley Stair. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Stanley Stair), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.  --Blablubbs (talk) 23:50, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On 13 August 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Thomas Yarborough, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in 1948, Thomas Yarborough became the first African American to be elected as a city council member in California? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Thomas Yarborough. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Thomas Yarborough), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:03, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]