User talk:Radioactive39

Hi Radioactive39! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! ScrapheapNinjaShuriken77 19:08, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Fernando Alonso Brazilian GP 3.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Vladlen Manilov ✉ / 14:08, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Fernando Alonso in 201602.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:30, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm SSSB. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, 2012 United States Grand Prix, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SSSB (talk) 15:59, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thank you for your edits to Wikipedia. However, please note that WP:WikiProject Formula One has a long-standing practice and consensus against listing practice classifications as we are not a results database and the classifications have no impact or effect on any meaningful results. Thanks for understanding, SSSB (talk) 22:37, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Adding the combined practice classification table is not the practice. Island92 (talk) 01:56, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for creating List of Formula One Grand Prix wins by Juan Manuel Fangio.

Articles are

is notable to be a standalone article. When making new articles y0u are best off starting your sandbox

and then moving the completed work into the main namespace.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Chris Troutman (talk) 14:53, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

List of Formula One Grand Prix wins by Kimi Räikkönen, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Storchy (talk) 12:13, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Please do not use the Daily Mail as you did at

Template:Max Verstappen has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:06, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I noticed you manually reverted one of my edits to 2022–23 UEFA Champions League so I thought I would explain why I'd done it. It's normal practice across the European competition articles to use italic text to indicate that an infobox link is to an article about a season which is in the future. It has nothing to do with whether or not the link is a redirect or not and is consistent with the 2022–23 UEFA Europa League and 2022–23 UEFA Europa Conference League articles. I hope that makes sense but I would still like to hear your views on this. In the meantime, I will revert the page to the status quo from before this dispute.

Thanks,

Stevie fae Scotland (talk) 14:40, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

the fact that you used italics for the infobox link of the

2023-24 UEFA Champions League

article and the explanation you gave me in your recent message really does make sense. I actually made a mistake and I forgot to revert the edit by myself, which led to causing you inconveniences.

Thanks for your message, Radioactive39 (talk) 17:29, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Juan Manuel Fangio has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. SSSB (talk) 09:06, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2017 Barcelona GP3 Series round, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Russell.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission is not adequately supported by

Referencing for beginners and Citing sources

.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
  Draft:2022 Spa-Francorchamps Formula 2 round
  and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 14:55, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Radioactive39! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 14:55, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2022 Zandvoort Formula 3 round, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Schumacher.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jovanmilic97 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject

independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid

when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
  Draft:2022 Monza Formula 2 round
  and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jovanmilic97 (talk) 18:53, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Thank you for creating List of Formula One pole positions by Michael Schumacher.

Consider adding references

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bruxton}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Bruxton (talk) 14:48, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Radioactive39. Thank you for your work on

Please add references to the article and follow the guideline for citations at

MOS:CITE

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bruxton}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bruxton (talk) 15:24, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2022 Malaysian motorcycle Grand Prix, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pedro Acosta.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:56, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

The practice is points on the left. Island92 (talk) 16:13, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, Radioactive39! The list you nominated, List of Formula One Grand Prix wins by Fernando Alonso, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, PresN (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that using bold text to denote world champions/world championship contenders is a violation of

I notice that you've changed some of the asterisks to bold text. Please note that this is in violation of

WP:BOLDAVOID and will be reverted.

Using bold text is fine, so long as the asterisk is also retained. SSSB (talk) 20:28, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed a recent edit you made does not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits a summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a

 → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks!

Hello, I'm Adeletron 3030. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Lionel Messi, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Adeletron 3030 (talk • edits) 15:54, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of international goals scored by Robin van Persie, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 20:28, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at List of international goals scored by Gareth Bale, you may be blocked from editing. Mattythewhite (talk) 19:59, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's unnecessary. Consistency used per seasons before. Island92 (talk) 20:45, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@

WP:WORKINPROGRESS. It is not unnecessary, because we don't discuss it in the article (in most cases). And, if you want consistency, it should be added. It used to the the standard until nobody could be bothered to do it anymore. See 2012 United States Grand Prix as an example. SSSB (talk) 09:03, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Thank you. Island92 (talk) 09:04, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I apologise for reversing your edits earlier. On reflection, and looking at other articles, I now accept that you were correct and have reverted myself. Mea culpa! Daemonickangaroo2018 (talk) 16:09, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

as 168.121.86.161 (talk) 16:46, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Enzo Fernández. Mattythewhite (talk) 17:04, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Josha Vagnoman, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Unsourced content. Mattythewhite (talk) 16:58, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I just added the fact that Josha Vagnoman also has been honoured with the Fritz Walter Medal twice, the same edit has been made earlier to several other german players. I thought I also put a source on it. If that was not the case, then I am sorry for the inconveniences. Radioactive39 (talk) 19:14, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! TylerBurden (talk) 02:59, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Belbury. An edit that you recently made to Lewis Hamilton seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The template {{Formula One drivers from the United Kingdom}} does not exist. Belbury (talk) 18:13, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's called Kazakhstan GP, not Kazakh GP which is the name you are adding in articles.

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2021 Zandvoort Formula 3 round, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Schumacher.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Formula One pole positions by Lewis Hamilton is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Formula One pole positions by Lewis Hamilton until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Tvx1 17:35, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the following articles to which you have significantly contributed, are suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted:

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Formula One pole positions by Lewis Hamilton until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:RW Racing has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:44, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's 2023 Formula 2 Championship, without FIA. Island92 (talk) 19:19, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2022–23 Austrian Football Bundesliga, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Red Bull Salzburg.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Radioactive39. Thanks for the "Formula One drivers from <country>" templates you have created recently. Do you think there needs to be a footnote to explain the bolding (for World Champions), or do you think it's obvious? Regards. DH85868993 (talk) 00:00, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @DH85868993, thank you for your feedback. I think it should be obvious that the bold text denotes a World Champion. As far as I know, we do the same thing for every single F1 race when we create the standings after the race. Regards. Radioactive39 (talk) 08:24, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please update the standings after all matches from the same time are over. As this is just not needed, make it one edit with all results and not five small ones. Kante4 (talk) 21:29, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Kante4, I am sorry for the inconveniences. I will keep that in my mind for the future.

Regards. Radioactive39 (talk) 09:21, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And, Games were not over. I watched it on TV after you added it. Kante4 (talk) 16:29, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Again... Kante4 (talk) 18:25, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Formula One Grand Prix wins by Damon Hill is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Formula One Grand Prix wins by Damon Hill until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Tvx1 20:12, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2022–23 Swiss Super League, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Max Meyer.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at List of Formula One Grand Prix wins by Jim Clark, you may be blocked from editing. Tvx1 17:01, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2021 Abu Dhabi Grand Prix. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's

A request has been filed for the title of List of Formula One Grand Prix wins Max Verstappen requesting that it be added to the title blacklist. This has been done because the article appears to be a recreation, under a different title, of an article which is itself currently protected against recreation. Please note that titles used to circumvent the protection policy are often given the same level of protection as the original title the author is trying to circumvent, or are added to the title blacklist.

If you feel that the topic of the article meets our

Please note that repeated recreation of an article against a consensus to delete is considered disruptive and may get you

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding your continued disruptive editing. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Disruptive_editor. Thank you.Tvx1 20:45, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Mika Häkkinen has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:28, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Endrabcwizart (talk) 17:46, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Radioactive39! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. HumanBodyPiloter5 (talk) 12:32, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Tvx1 were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth
  (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent
  of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This draft is simply unsuitable for publication in this state. There is only a basic intro, with no content in that actual article body. Moreover, there are no sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
  Draft:2023 Sakhir Formula 2 round
  and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tvx1 18:27, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

General advice on AFC submissions

Please pay some basic attention before submitting a draft at Articles for Creation for review. In general, submitting a draft is the very LAST action you should do in the process. You do not submit the draft as one of the very first actions only to start building the actual content while waiting. A draft like the Formula 2 one you submitted has no chance of being accepted in that state and only serves to overload the AFC review backlog that already exists. Submitting such drafts that lack every basic requirement can be considered disruptive.Tvx1 18:34, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tvx1 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth
  (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent
  of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
  Draft:2023 Sakhir Formula 3 round
  and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tvx1 15:12, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tvx1 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth
  (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent
  of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
  Draft:2023 Sakhir Formula 3 round
  and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tvx1 15:13, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Damon Hill has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:28, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Fernando Alonso has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:35, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited FIA Formula 2 Championship, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Russell.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:List of Formula One Grand Prix wins by Max Verstappen. Thanks! Greenman (talk) 10:59, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Template:CIP Motorsports has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 08:25, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Álex Rins, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Yamaha.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Prüstel GP has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 14:48, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Snipers Team has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 00:32, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edit(s) you made did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a

 → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! --