User talk:RedProofHill123

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Orange Line (MBTA). Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:MBTA CRRC 01400 Series and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
  db-self
  }}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 22:14, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TeaDrinker was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published,

notable

and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

As noted by previous reviewers, the article does not demonstrate the notability of the game. A discussion of notability for video games can be found at Wikipedia:Notability (video games). The most important thing is multiple sources covering the game in depth.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
  Draft:Bejeweled Stars
  and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
  db-self
  }}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TeaDrinker (talk) 00:52, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I reworded some sections of your article

Your recent editing history at American Airlines Flight 191 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. - Ahunt (talk) 17:13, 25 February 2018 (UTC) But I’m doing it right I’m don’t knoe why you guys are saying it’s wrong it’s not far I think CNG Bot needs to watch this and automatically add all back if got removed. How can I tell CNG bot to watch it?[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:MBTA Green Line AnsaldoBreda Type 8, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at

Thank you for your attention.

RedProofHill123 (talk) 01:51, 6 April 2018 (UTC) I already summited another one because the tile can't be changed after when its created so i had to copy and paste it into another article for a better name. About this one not sure why users says it in Arabic. It's english spelling. I selected English one too for the draft.[reply]

Your behavior on the article

Being "rude" is what you were doing. You were ignoring the input of others and adding false information. Any admin would see the history page on that article and know that the other editors were frustrated at you for a good reason.

Fox 01:32, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

RedProofHill123 (talk) 02:10, 3 April 2018 (UTC) Ok I might have been a little rude, but the information was true because I saw it before. Lots of people have seen it there are R160 R trains, R143 J trains, R68A G W N trains. Youtuber's say to me "you rely too much on the websites when I have seen it myself and they also say Wiki is not a reliable source.[reply]

YouTube is not a

Fox 19:06, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello, I'm Hayman30. An edit that you recently made to Carousel (musical) seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Hayman30 (talk) 16:34, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article
  article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards
  .
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.

I am surprised you thought your edit to the Template:Infobox station documentation here to justify your edit here would go unnoticed. That is definitively not how things are done at Wikipedia. —Joeyconnick (talk) 03:38, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

RedProofHill123 (talk) 14:47, 18 April 2018 (UTC) Actually what Im doing is helping improve information on wiki. What your doing is disruptive by removing improvements. Lots of cities infoboxes have this and they don't get removed, you or anyone does not own articles.[reply]

Air France Flight 66 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection

.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. - Ahunt (talk) 00:27, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

TWA Flight 800

Multiple editors oppose the use of "all" in that infobox, as do the instructions for that template, which explicitly state: When the total_survivors parameter is zero do not add "(all)", as it is redundant. Template:Infobox_aircraft_occurrence You seem to be the only editor that is in favor. If you want to include the "all" in that infobox, you'll need to get consensus for it at the article's talk page. If you continue to add that without gaining consensus, I will have to report it to the edit warring noticeboard, which will likely result in your being blocked from editing. Geogene (talk) 00:29, 21 April 2018 (UTC) RedProofHill123 (talk) 02:41, 24 April 2018 (UTC) But I thought it does not really matter all is something useful I thought.[reply]

Draft:MBTA Green Line AnsaldoBreda Type 8 concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:MBTA Green Line AnsaldoBreda Type 8, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request

Userfication

of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at

WP:REFUND/G13

.

Thank you for your attention.

talk) 01:33, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

Block notice

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for as you clearly continued to edit war after the warnings on this talk page which has now moved on to being disruptive. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  MilborneOne (talk) 07:52, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RedProofHill123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Your reason here RedProofHill123 (talk) 16:28, 22 April 2018 (UTC)Im kinda concerned why im blocked, I was trying to improve wiki not vandilize it.[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. MER-C 16:37, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RedProofHill123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Your reason here RedProofHill123 (talk) 16:49, 22 April 2018 (UTC)I should be unblocked because the edits ive made were constructive, the other users are not being nice to me and saying that im terrible, I edit to make people not confused, and other editors dont seem to care.[reply]

Decline reason:

You were blocked for edit warring. You shouldn't edit war even if you think you're right. Instead, you should establish a consensus on the talk page. PhilKnight (talk) 20:01, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RedProofHill123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Your reason here RedProofHill123 (talk) 23:16, 22 April 2018 (UTC)We need to talk to 2 users: Spitendo and Ahunt because my block was unnecessary and was a dumb reason to get blocked, we already discussed this, and saying redundant is not a excuse for this. What Im saying is that im trying to improve things on wiki.[reply]

Decline reason:

This neither addresses nor excuses your edit warring. I'm really concerned you aren't seeing this. You had plenty of warning, and now three admins have reviewed your unblock requests and declined them. Yamla (talk) 23:42, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your draft article, Draft:MBTA Green Line AnsaldoBreda Type 8

Hello, RedProofHill123. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "MBTA Green Line AnsaldoBreda Type 8

".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission

and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at

this link

. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 20:49, 22 April 2018 (UTC) RedProofHill123 (talk) 23:45, 22 April 2018 (UTC) I wish you can unblock me, also for some reason you cant change the name after creating a new page, so I had to make a new one and copy and paste the sources from the old to the new article.[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

RedProofHill123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log

)

---

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "RedProofHill123". The reason given for RedProofHill123's block is: "Disruptive editing".

• Blocking administrator: MilborneOne (talk • blocks)

---

Decline reason: That looks as if you attempted to evade your block. Please don't do that. Huon (talk) 20:36, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 7.5 (June 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eagleash was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published,

notable

and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

May possibly be notable, but requires

reliable sources

to demonstrate this.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:MBTA Kinki Sharyo Type 7/7.5 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
  db-self
  }}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eagleash (talk) 22:16, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 7.5 (June 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published,

notable

and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

requires significant coverage in multiple independent reliable secondary sources. Blogsites are not reliable sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:MBTA Kinki Sharyo Type 7/7.5 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
  db-self
  }}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 02:11, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, RedProofHill123. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply ]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:51, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply ]

Checking needed

Please see WT:WikiProject Trains#Checking needed. Johnuniq (talk) 04:43, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

About R143 and R188 Subway page

R143 is not replace by R42 and R40 and R188 is not replace by R62A either I know you fix it on R143 and please fix the R188 also it has to be reverted done. 69.94.58.75 (talk) 21:20, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply ]

Concern regarding Draft:MBTA Kinki Sharyo Type 7/7.5

request

that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

talk) 03:01, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Concern regarding Draft:Atrium Mall (Newton, MA)

request

that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

talk) 02:01, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Disambiguation link notification for March 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject

.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Atrium Mall (Newton, MA)

Hello, RedProofHill123. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Atrium Mall

".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission

and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at

this link

. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 19:33, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

December 2022

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at The Station nightclub fire. Binksternet (talk) 04:55, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]