User talk:RetiredUser2

I have nominated Category:Indian women cricketers (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for renaming to Category:India women cricketers (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. -SpacemanSpiff 21:27, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:FL has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. The Evil IP address (talk) 14:54, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, RetiredUser2, formerly known as ALoan, Cirt has nominated Simon Byrne for the Featured Article Review here. Please join the discussion here whether this article meets the criteria. If the concerns are not addressed, it will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. JJ98 (Talk) 05:58, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Old Stagers has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Amateur theatre group, can find no substantial coverage in RS, just passing mentions in two obituaries, fails

WP:ORG

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:36, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Old Stagers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Old Stagers until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Jezhotwells (talk) 17:42, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You are receiving this message because of a

(delivered by mabdul 22:33, 3 December 2012 (UTC))[reply]

The article

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 23:12, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

Hello RetiredUser2, I changed the date you included[1] of when Mexico joined the League of Nations. Would you let me know where you found the date you wrote? Cheers, Tortillovsky (talk) 22:55, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Isambard Kingdom Brunel timeline has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 05:15, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Late Egyptian Dynasty list has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 14:16, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Wicket-keepers, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Joseph2302 (talk) 18:46, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thinking man's/woman's crumpet is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thinking man's/woman's crumpet until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Bilorv (talk) 22:55, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Wicket-keepers has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. StickyWicket (talk) 20:52, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

Metre squared per second is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted

.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Metre squared per second until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

PianoDan (talk) 07:40, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Did you know/Time has been listed at templates for discussion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Q28 (talk) 05:40, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]