User talk:Ritvik S

Hi Ritvik S! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cullen328 (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

An article you recently created,

Jag Janani Maa Vaishno Devi - Kahani Mata Rani Ki

added a link pointing to Puja

Vaishno Devi

added a link pointing to Jammu and Kashmir

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:20, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please note that when you add any claim to any article, you need to say in a citation where you got the information. Please do this every time. Thanks. Chiswick Chap (talk) 18:21, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ritvik S, sorry to go on about this but

Citations

really matter, as they are the only way anyone can know that Wikipedia is reliable, and the only way for other editors to verify that what you have written is correct.

Please, now that you've been editing for some months, could you take a moment to study

Verification, so that you understand how critical this is, and accordingly make sure you cite all your additions properly. I've reverted your recent uncited additions to Chakra, and expect to see everything you add from now on to come with a citation. It's quite easy, and becomes second nature once you get used to it. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:29, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sammakka Saralamma Jatara, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Koya.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:26, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Raajakumara, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gold Coast.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Narayana, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gada.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Panch Kedar into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 05:51, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Khalid Al Ameri is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khalid Al Ameri until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

TomStar81 (Talk) 12:25, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Venkat TL. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Ranganathaswamy Temple, Srirangam, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Venkat TL (talk) 05:33, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ritvik S! Your additions to

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double
  inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners
  , for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images.
  non-free content criteria
  in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 13:44, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Hello, Ritvik S. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:31, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I noted you moved

]

Your contributed article,

Expo 2020 pavilions

.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by

article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 07:27, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

December 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Nataraja, you may be blocked from editing. WikiLinuz 🍁 (talk) 17:14, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vaishno Devi, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Katra and Jammu and Kashmir.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Akilandeswari, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Puja.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains underway. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 05:04, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

+1. Unless you are sure that a page move will be uncontroversial (spelling mistakes etc), it is always best to discuss changing the article title on the talk page first.--♦IanMacM♦ ^{(talk to me)} 07:49, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to move pages to bad titles contrary to naming conventions or consensus, as you did at Jwala Ji, you may be blocked from editing. Megan B.... ^{It’s all coming to me} till the end of time 12:30, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Nayanthara. — DaxServer (talk · contribs) 09:32, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in

page-specific restrictions

, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the

guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here

. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Please desist making POV edits and POV moves — DaxServer (talk · contribs) 09:40, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your persistent disruptive editing on Netrikann

Hello

Netrikann (2021 film) page without actually hitting revert; you simply rewrite the same lines you added originally. This still constitutes edit warring, just so you know. After my first copy edit of the article, for grammatical accuracy, legibility, and succinctness, you proceeded to basically rewrite what was there before. You essentially did the same thing again today. At no point did you consider discussing the matter with me in order to achieve a consensus. This is not acceptable on Wikipedia. Please cease your disruptive editing, or this matter will be reported and your editing privileges may be curtailed. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 06:53, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

February 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   Sandstein 05:53, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ritvik S (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Trying to improve the Hindu terms understandable for people who do not understand it easily at film plots and pages.

Decline reason:

This does not address your violation of

WP:SOCK and doesn't address you fabricating source and introducing misinformation. Yamla (talk) 11:06, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note: See also Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Ritvik S. Sandstein 07:03, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Jag Janani Maa Vaishno Devi - Kahani Mata Rai Ki.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Jag Janani Maa Vaishno Devi - Kahani Mata Rai Ki.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 09:02, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Jag Janani Maa Vaishno Devi - Kahani Mata Rai Ki.webp

Thanks for uploading File:Jag Janani Maa Vaishno Devi - Kahani Mata Rai Ki.webp. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 09:02, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]