User talk:Sawerchessread

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. An edit that you recently made to Sherlock (software) seemed to be a test and it has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 04:07, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Sawerchessread, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to

talk) 17:52, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard

to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Patientco requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Redalert2fan (talk) 17:58, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

Article Wizard, which has an option to create a draft version. Thank you. Redalert2fan (talk) 17:59, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

Your submission at
Palestine Writes
(December 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 14:13, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Sawerchessread! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 14:13, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Palestine Writes has been accepted

Palestine Writes, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now
create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation
if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation
.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Toadette (Happy holiday!) 18:46, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! Sawerchessread (talk) 19:27, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Sawerchessread. Thank you for your work on

page curation process
, had the following comments:

Thanks for writing this article, particularly considering the organization's profile following the 2023 controversy. I edited it to broaden the focus from the controversy to the organization itself; I'm sure there is more that can be added.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|JSFarman}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

JSFarman (talk) 20:33, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@JSFarman::
I think the page in general is mostly notable due to the controversy it caused later, especially as being one of the reasons that the UPenn president was forced to resign. Otherwise, there is not as many secondary, independent sources online on the festival by itself, I think.
I'll go and search regardless for information. Sawerchessread (talk) 14:26, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Goldie (restaurant) has been accepted

Goldie (restaurant), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now
create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation
if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation
.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Crunchydillpickle🥒 (talk) 19:31, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at
Sean Griffin
(December 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MicrobiologyMarcus was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
microbiologyMarcus (petri dish·growths) 02:35, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: US Campaign for Palestinian Rights has been accepted

US Campaign for Palestinian Rights, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now
create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation
if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation
.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

(t · c) buidhe 06:28, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at
Violence against Palestinian Journalists
has been accepted

Violence against Palestinian Journalists
, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now
create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation
if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation
.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

94rain Talk 05:32, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year, Sawerchessread!

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me! 02:57, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of
James Somerton
for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
James Somerton is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted
.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Somerton until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

talk) 12:50, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Sesali Bowen, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now
create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation
if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation
.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

asilvering (talk) 11:43, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the

contentious
. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

  • adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
  • comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
  • follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
  • comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
  • refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the

edit requests
on article talk pages. You will obtain this permission automatically after you have made 500 edits and your account has been open for thirty days.
Thank you for your cooperation.

Red-tailed hawk (nest) 16:29, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As a reminder: edits like
broadly construed. You should not make such edits until you have obtained the extended confirmed permission, as noted in the message above. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 16:50, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
alright, ill stop until i get the EC permission homo momo (talk) 16:52, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: MNI Coordinate System (January 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Usedtobecool was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Usedtobecool ☎️ 09:15, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at
Mark Hallett (Neurologist)
has been accepted

Mark Hallett (Neurologist)
, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now
create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation
if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation
.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Atlantic306 (talk) 21:55, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at
Andre K Isaacs
(February 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Aintabli was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Aintabli (talk) 23:51, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at
Andre K Isaacs
has been accepted

Andre K Isaacs
, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now
create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation
if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation
.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Chetsford (talk) 05:47, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mass Media in Palestine (February 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by The Herald were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
The Herald (Benison) (talk) 05:29, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

test

changed signature again User:Sawerchessread (talk) 14:47, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
I've just reviewed
Israel-Hamas War protest vote movements through New Page Patrol, and I want to thank you for your work on the article. New articles on topics like this are difficult to write and they sometimes have trouble portraying arguments neutrally, but you did a pretty good job of it. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 23:56, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
Thanks so much! glad to help User:Sawerchessread (talk) 01:04, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please be a little less trigger happy with reverting

I noticed that you reverted my grammar edit to Death of Nex Benedict of all things, before putting it back.

Please be a little less trigger happy with the reverting. You also, in a 24 hour period, twice reverted my addition about pouring water, which violates the 1RR protection. I'm not looking to do anything punitive at this time, but if this type of behavior continues, I will be forced to.

In the meantime, I think it would be right for you to self-revert your water pouring revert, just as you did with the to/and, so I don't have to pursue further action. Peter L Griffin (talk) 01:02, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Peter L Griffin at this point, let's just put in a report for edit warring. I'm setting up a report. You can add in your own diffs of my edit warring.
Let the admins sort this one out. User:Sawerchessread (talk) 01:03, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Alrighty. I'm not sure how you expect this to go, since you have made double reverts (violating 1RR) whereas all of your diffs pertaining to me are single reverts, or normal edits without any reverting. Peter L Griffin (talk) 02:08, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Casey Fiesler for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Casey Fiesler is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Casey Fiesler until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

GuardianH (talk) 01:26, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]