User talk:StAnselm/2010

I'm not sure this subject is suitable for a stand-alone article, but could easily be a major section of Judas Iscariot, with your article title redirecting to that section. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 02:27, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On second thought, you've provided more than enough to show that a stand-alone article is merited. Good work! - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 06:34, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, St.A. In an effort to give some organization to the multiple articles on grace, I standardized their titles to "Grace (Prevenient)" as you have seen in the template. A user objects and has begun an RM on every "grace" page. The main article said "Christian" but contained two non-Christian divine grace entries which I moved to their respective religious articles on grace. If you have an opinion pro or con, or a third option for the direction of the titles, please indicate that on each articles talk page under the RM section at the bottom.

I'm willing to work further on the main article. I reworked the lead this afternoon, adding reliable sources. I don't understand the complaints "This article has multiple issues. Please help improve the article or discuss these issues on the talk page. Neutrality is disputed. While Kripa (philosophy) and Non-Theism were in the Christian article, we had major neutrality issues. I moved them to their respective articles. In your opinion, what are the remaining neutrality issues that need attention? Thanks, ─AFA Prof01 (talk) 07:55, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page .

Materialscientist (talk) 18:03, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you have removed this entry from the Biblical nameless article page.

The reference comes from the Book of Maccabees 2 Ch7: 1-42. This Book is an essential book of The Bible for a Catholic as defined at the Council of Trent.

If you treat this article page, The Biblical Nameless, from a narrow point of view then there should not be any entry on this page.

The Books that are an essential part of the Catholic Bible are: Tobit, Judith, Esther, Books of Maccabees, The Book of Wisdom, Ecclesiasticus, Baruch, parts of Daniel, & Revelation. These are in addition to The Hebrew Bible.

Hence, I ask you to reverse your deletion.

Are we truly "singing from different song-sheets"?

MacOfJesus (talk) 22:06, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have left a follow-up comment on The Biblical Nameless article page.

MacOfJesus (talk) 20:54, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page .

Materialscientist (talk) 12:09, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

StAnselm, nice username! "Nor do I seek to understand that I may believe, but I believe that I may understand. For this, too, I believe, that, unless I first believe, I shall not understand."...one of my favorites.--NortyNort (talk) 22:07, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the last message on my talk page. I am sorry that we have been unable to go further on this. It is such a narrow field, and all. The Septuagent goes right back to Saint Jerome's first Bible, in Latin. We owe so much to our fore-fathers who handed on this treasure to us we call faith. We need to guard it too, as Saint Athanasius who was so fearless to hand on the faith intact; ("Arius" by Rowan Williams). Sorry, it was Saint Augustine who was baptised by Saint Ambrose of Milan. Where does life go on without agreement? I have referred you to Rowan Williams book "Arius", Arius wanted a faith that was not dependant on Mystery and could be reasonable and understandable. I studied this afresh for my writing on the article pages Saint Athanasius and Saint Augustine.

Einstine, referred to mystery as somethig that we cannot work out and maybe never be able to work out, but we can see clearly in it's end result.

MacOfJesus (talk) 15:10, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks and well done for sorting out the biblical Tamars! I keep an eye on the rivers, so it's good to see someone take them on. DuncanHill (talk) 13:54, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to be a very knowledgeable and reputable wikipedian. Single purpose user TruTelr (talk) keeps vandalizing the Barry McCarty page by removing information cited by third party sources. Specifically, he states that all of the references naming Barry McCarty as Harriet Miers's minister in 2005 are incorrect. This fact is significant as it brought McCarty significant national media coverage during Miers's nomination to the Supreme Court. I bring this to you since you've previously commented on the page.

I've asked

Great job sorting out the mess on that page; it's greatly appreciated!

talk) 07:39, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

Sir, Inferno is not a made-up unit. It is a unit in Astrophysics. It is equal to 1 billion kelvin (appx. = 1 billion degree celcius) Here's the link for the info <http://encyclopedia.farlex.com/inferno> பரிதிமதி (talk) 15:26, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I notice you've cleaned this page up a bit - great work! -- Chuq (talk) 22:20, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Do not vandalize an article that is under a deletion +tag. Please stop. If you continue to

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Lamech (father of Noah), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20060916223601AA5x9qL. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on

section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright

infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Shadowjams (talk) 09:54, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the welcome!

Thanks for the welcome! I'm editing the page for Dardanus with citations of the Bible and a book by E. Raymond Capt, would that be okay? I know how biased the Bible is, so I was not sure.  :\

CaradocTheKing (talk) 13:49, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My bad!

Thanks for the welcome for real now. Ahahaha. Sorry I forgot to sign my post.  :) CaradocTheKing (talk) 13:35, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Will Do

Just published now. Thanks for the help.  :)

CaradocTheKing (talk) 13:49, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Liberation of Saint Peter

nominate ) 16:02, 29 April 2010 (UTC) Proposed deletion of Beowulf: The Legend The article Beowulf: The Legend has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: No indication of notability While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons . You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{ dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page . Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{ talk) 05:08, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply ] Removal of PROD from Artabanus V of Parthia Hello StAnselm, this is an automated message from AfD for community discussion. Thank you, SDPatrolBot (talk) 09:41, 3 May 2010 (UTC) (Learn how to opt out of these messages) 09:41, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply ] I'll restore it to the redirect to the general Artabanus page, which can explain the numbering. Gdr 18:00, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply] DYK nomination of Session of Christ Hi! I have reviewed your Did You Know? nomination of Session of Christ, and identified what I believe to be a string of serious problems with the article making it ineligible for DYK. In my opinion it would take a substantial rewrite of the article to address these problems such that it is unlikely to be ready prior to Ascension Day. However, if you end up making changes and would like me to revisit the nomination please feel free to leave a message on my talk page. A full explanation of my concerns can be found at the nomination discussion. - DustFormsWords (talk) 23:06, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply] DYK for Session of Christ nominate ) 16:02, 13 May 2010 (UTC) DYK for John's vision of the Son of Man DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 12:02, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply] Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:StAnselm/2010&oldid=430508867" Toggle limited content width