User talk:Susanowoo

Hello, Susanowoo, and

, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called

}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Your first article
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

]

The article

reliable source

that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see

]

June 2017

Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I noticed that you recently removed content from Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Players without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Mattythewhite (talk) 21:37, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I know the right numbers of the players I changed and I add a player who was forgotten

The article

reliable source

that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see

]

I have put a lot of sources about Lamine Moro , I think it is enough to keep the article no ?

The article

reliable source

that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see

]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abubakar Mutawakil is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abubakar Mutawakil until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 23:24, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. – Train2104 (t • c) 02:25, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Gheorge-Cornea.jpg, which you've attributed to Sister of Gheorghe Cornea. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the
  CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list
  ) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter
  OTRS pending
  }} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:39, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. --Animalparty! (talk) 17:41, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please tell me precisely what I wrote who is considered as advertising. I admit that the picture of the player was taken by myself because I work for a Blog specialized in African Football. This picture was never published in a site except Wikipedia.

Nowhere in the above message accuses you of advertising. Note the message states "if you have an external relationship..." I saw you had taken and uploaded a picture (

inline citations. Cheers, --Animalparty! (talk) 22:28, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Alex Iliuciuc

Il faudrait peut être penser à alier cette pagge :

Le titre des pages sont différentes mais c'est bien la même personne

Sources

Please add your sources to Christ Konan. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 20:55, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Christ Konan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christ Konan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bbarmadillo (talk) 20:46, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why not make a specific rectangle showing the player's complete identity card as is the case for most players or coaches? This seems to me more serious and above all more legible than what we currently see.

Wikipedia page of the person

--Susanowoo (talk) 19:24, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why not make a specific rectangle showing the player's complete identity card as is the case for most players or coaches? This seems to me more serious and above all more legible than what we currently see.

Page of Paulo Jorge Silva

--Susanowoo (talk) 19:24, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why not make a specific rectangle showing the player's complete identity card as is the case for most players or coaches? This seems to me more serious and above all more legible than what we currently see.

Page of Chavda Maisha

--Susanowoo (talk) 19:24, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why not make a specific rectangle showing the player's complete identity card as is the case for most players or coaches? This seems to me more serious and above all more legible than what we currently see.

Page of Fofana Dougou Philippe

--Susanowoo (talk) 19:24, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why not make a specific rectangle showing the player's complete identity card as is the case for most players or coaches? This seems to me more serious and above all more legible than what we currently see.

Page of Richmond Adongo

--Susanowoo (talk) 19:24, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why not make a specific rectangle showing the player's complete identity card as is the case for most players or coaches? This seems to me more serious and above all more legible than what we currently see.

Page of Elroy Akbay

--Susanowoo (talk) 19:24, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why not make a specific rectangle showing the player's complete identity card as is the case for most players or coaches? This seems to me more serious and above all more legible than what we currently see.

Page of Moro Lamine

--Susanowoo (talk) 19:24, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why not make a specific rectangle showing the player's complete identity card as is the case for most players or coaches? This seems to me more serious and above all more legible than what we currently see.

Page of René Lobello

--Susanowoo (talk) 19:24, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the {{proposed deletion/dated}} tag from

]

If you really want to delete

talk) 04:22, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

April 2018

]

Gheorghe Cornea

May be the article in french FRENCH PAGE should be linked to the english page --> ENGLISH PAGE

Susanowoo (talk) 15:22, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That can be nice to link the French Page --------->Page française to the English Page ------------------> Page anglaise

Don't you think so ?

Hello, Susanowoo. It has been over six months since you last edited the

".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at

this link

. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. » Shadowowl | talk 16:10, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kayla Braffet is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kayla Braffet until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Joeykai (talk) 21:13, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Whenever I inform the community of the coach's move into the Buildcon FC club by taking the time to include in the "references" part all the proof that is needed, the "Buildcon FC" part is deleted.

This part is particularly important since it is part of the career of the professional coach who, since it seems since, is still without post.

I do not lie, I bring evidence with recognized information sites.

Why am I vandalized and censored?

Can this stop? Because it's unfair!

I would like for once to be protected by the Wikipedia community when I am a victim.

I'm waiting for your support.

Thank you

Guglielmo_Arena

--Susanowoo (talk) 12:35, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kayla Braffet is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kayla Braffet (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Joeykai (talk) 23:26, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm General Ization. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Mathieu Madénian have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. General Ization ^Talk 17:28, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is a very serious case that shakes the world of French and international humor as North American and European humorists are affected by this case.

We talk about it on the Internet, on television and on radio in France and abroad. As you will notice the sources are from French sites but also international web sites.

So what you just did is not appropriate.

So I ask that you review your judgment

--Susanowoo (talk) 23:29, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

We do not simply plop a list of links, without explanation or summary of their content, into the References section of an article here, as you did at

cite those sources as references for the added content. Having reviewed my judgment, it stands. General Ization ^Talk 23:32, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

The article Farah Yonis has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails

WP:GNG

and who has not played in a fully pro league. The claim to have played for Somalia is not supported by reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:27, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

]

The article Elroy Akbay has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about semi-pro football manager, and former semi-pro footballer, which doesn't satisfy

WP:GNG

- plenty of routine coverage in online Zimbabwean sources, but nothing significant.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jogurney (talk) 22:38, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article

because of the following concern:

Article about semi-pro footballer who isn't the subject of significant coverage in reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your

the article's talk page

.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jogurney (talk) 22:43, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Paulo Jorge Silva has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about amateur footballer and semi-pro/youth football manager. Foradejogo.net - https://www.foradejogo.net/player.php?player=197205150003 - confirms he never played professional football in Portugal. All online coverage is routine - e.g., hiring/departure announcements - and the article doesn't satisfy

WP:FOOTBALL

.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jogurney (talk) 16:37, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Jesper Fredberg.

and note that:

This has been tagged for 2 issues.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 14:08, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 14:12, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have to continually correct the censorship of my work on this page.

Both sections "FC Conthey" and "Buildcon FC" are continuously erased.

Although my work is sourced as the Wikipedia charter, it is continually erased.

Would it be possible to protect my content on behalf of the work I'm doing for the Wikipedia community?

thank you so much

--Susanowoo (talk) 10:35, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Mamadouwague.jpg, which you've attributed to Mamadou Wagué. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the
  CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list
  ) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter
  OTRS pending
  }} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:35, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

]

A tag has been placed on

. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

]

The article

reliable source

that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see

]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply ]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sandoz (Youtuber) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandoz (Youtuber) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Abishe (talk) 02:01, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 12:51, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mamahuhu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mamahuhu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 00:22, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can someone glue this page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barikisu_Issahaku to the french page https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barikisu_Issahaku

Thanks a lot

--Susanowoo (talk) 20:36, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the sources attached to this article are all about Montassar Louhichi, not about the article subject.

An article you recently created,

]

September 2020

Hi there - Wikipedia relies on

]

I did , please have a look well , the link is in the second paragrap external link number 4

--Susanowoo (talk) 09:19, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Photo taken during a training with the National Team of Israel in september 2020.jpeg

Thanks for uploading

- just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:File copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 20:45, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:46, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply ]

Spiderone 21:50, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Spiderone 22:07, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Susanowoo. It has been over six months since you last edited the

".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at

this link

. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:42, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply ]

The article

reliable source

that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see

]

I have provided new sources on articles, is it ok now ? Susanowoo (talk) 19:31, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article

that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see

]

The file File:Maishachavda.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Uploaded for Chavda Maisha. No other use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 13:46, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Barikisu Issahaku in the locker room of his club in March 2020.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Uploaded for Barikisu Issahaku. No other use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 11:56, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Resting690078.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused personal photo. Out of scope.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 12:35, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

]

Disambiguation link notification for December 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Susanowoo! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 11:36, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Neveselbert. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Mikhail Gorbachev, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 00:45, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lionel Soccoia during the match in 2018.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 13:28, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

]

Disambiguation link notification for October 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Murita Storey, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages English and French.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]