User talk:Swapnilraj55

Hi Swapnilraj55! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page

Thanks for creating X Zone! I edit here too, under the username I dream of horses and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that

I wouldn't have had to put in cleanup tags if you hadn't recreated the article.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|I dream of horses}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double
  inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners
  , for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is
  Wikipedia:Copy-paste
  .
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:15, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your recent edit to List of Bhojpuri-language television channels appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. Alexf^(talk) 08:37, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It is rarely acceptable to put a link to Youtube in an article, and almost never suitable to use Youtube as a reference. There are several reasons for that, including the fact that anyone can post to Youtube, so that it isn't a reliable source, and the fact that commercial films, videos, and television programmes on Youtube are virtually always copyright violations. (Commercial companies don't usually put their material on Youtube.) Breaking sticks (talk) 21:26, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ... discospinster _talk 18:15, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Star Bestsellers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Imtiaz Ali (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:58, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi as per the

You are adding some very important information only thing missing is the style followed by the community guidelines. Warm Reagards. Sid95Q (talk) 06:29, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

here and [1] you reverted the page to a previous faulty version without any explanation and here you made disruptive edits on my userpage. Again I would request you to read

MOS:TV guidelines to make your edits more valuable. Sid95Q (talk) 02:27, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at X Zone. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's

Hi there, re: this edit, while I understand the basic desire to burn off some steam, these sorts of edits are not constructive, and could be construed as vandalism, since it's generally considered bad form to make changes in another editor's User space. But that's not really why I'm here. Sid95Q seems to believe you have potential as an editor, so I'm offering you help if you need it. There are lots of guidelines and policies that editors are expected to adhere to, since they represent widespread community expectations. These rules can be daunting and it can be upsetting to have worked on something only to have it deleted. If there are opportunities for me to help you understand some of them, please feel free to contact me on my talk page.

My first suggestion would be to familiarise yourself with

We also have a general behavioral guideline,

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Sid95Q (talk) 17:51, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Everything on Wikipedia must be verifiable as per Wikipedia:Verifiability you are adding content but you are not providing sources. It looks like you are adding content from a site can you please tell me the name of the site. Sid95Q (talk) 21:49, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Swapnilraj55. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 19:59, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]