User talk:TheAlderaanian

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

TheAlderaanian (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Caught by a colocation web host block but this host or IP is not a web host. My IP address is 96.46.1.74. TheAlderaanian (talk) 08:08, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

You should be able to edit now. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:18, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Again, please refer to the ongoing discussion at Talk:Donald Trump to provide input about the page. TheAlderaanian (talk) 03:46, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Right, but he has reportedly still told people that he will be, which is significant enough to warrant a mention since no other U.S. President has tried to do this before. His belief that the election would be somehow overturned by January was also a “fairy-tale,” but nonetheless the fact his attempts to do so were significant enough to be extensively covered in the article. Also, if you left a message under my comment with a “::” you wouldn’t have to start a new section with every comment. TheAlderaanian (talk) 22:05, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Can you please get rid of Donald Trump saying that he’s going to be “reinstated” as President by August on his Wikipedia page at the Post-Presidency section? We all know it’s his fairytale fantasy of him wanting to be President again, but it’s not going to happen. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:85:4680:B0A0:B49F:C191:E6B:249D (talk) 18:21, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the edit is currently under discussion at Talk:Donald Trump and I do not want to remove it without a consensus. The article has also been revised since I edited it and I think a variant of the current state of the article reading "In June 2021, multiple national publications reported that Trump had told several people he could be reinstated as president in August," should be retained. TheAlderaanian (talk) 20:24, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TheAlderaanian! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 20:22, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply ] Getting Started Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions Directories and indexes Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper) Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Category:Films with viral marketing campaigns, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 05:32, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. wumbolo ^^^ 15:50, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Noting for posterity that this warning was about the creation of Category:Conspiracy theories promoted by Donald Trump, and the G10 tag was declined by an administrator. Leviv ich 16:29, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has opened an investigation into

sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ck4829, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations

, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

wumbolo ^^^ 15:53, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Conspiracy theories promoted by Donald Trump, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. wumbolo ^^^ 21:47, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:People with honorary American citizenship, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor ^(talk) 05:29, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

See discussion Talk:Timeline of nuclear weapons development NPguy (talk) 15:28, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

You're invited to an RfC on the question of, "Within the section on the Iran-Contra affair, should we include the aspect of drug trafficking on the part of some Nicaraguan Contras?"

Talk:Ronald_Reagan#rfc_85A761C

Thanks,

FriendlyRiverOtter (talk) 16:47, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:40, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Smiley's People, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cigarette lighter (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:24, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited David Duke, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ADL (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:04, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:12, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Waterloo (1970 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IV Corps (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:38, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Operation Felix, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spanish Africa.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Sliders episodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Love potion.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:24, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited CIA cryptonym, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Palestine.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:20, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. Thanks! {{u|Sdkb}} ^talk 18:27, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a

 → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks!
Patrick. ツ

I see you have decided not con consider using edit summaries. I suggest, one more time, that you should be using them to explain why you're doing what you're doing. Walter Görlitz (talk) 23:30, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Racial segregation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 2001 England riots.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited CNN controversies, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 2008 United States presidential primaries.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called

page-specific restrictions

, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the

guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here

. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 17:22, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited French franc, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brabant.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Timeline of international climate politics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Water availability.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited History of eugenics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Danish Empire.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you are going to copy/paste a citation into articles, please make sure that the citation template is correctly formatted so that I and others don't have to follow after you fixing the errors. I've been seeing a lot of this citation template recently:

{{Cite book|last=Clark|first=Nancy L.|url=https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/883649263|title=South Africa : the rise and fall of apartheid|date=2016|others=William H. Worger|isbn=978-1-138-12444-8|edition=Third edition|location=Abingdon, Oxon|oclc=883649263}}

Clark, Nancy L. (2016). South Africa : the rise and fall of apartheid. William H. Worger (Third edition ed.). Abingdon, Oxon.

OCLC 883649263. {{cite book}}: |edition= has extra text (help)CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link

)

{{Cite book |last=Clark |first=Nancy L. |first2=William H. |last2=Worger |title=South Africa: the rise and fall of apartheid |date=2016 |isbn=978-1-138-12444-8 |edition=Third |location=Abingdon, Oxon |oclc=883649263}}

Clark, Nancy L.; Worger, William H. (2016). South Africa: the rise and fall of apartheid (Third ed.). Abingdon, Oxon.

OCLC 883649263.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link

)

—Trappist the monk (talk) 14:55, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Superman III, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. The category being added must already exist, and must be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Please note in particular that just because a film includes comedic elements doesn't mean it's considered a comedy film. DonIago (talk) 15:23, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi TheAlderaanian, can you please make sure that when you edit articles (DOY ones in particular), you provide an accurate edit summary (

Additionally, please take a look at

WP:EVENTDOY. I see you adding a fair amount of events that don't have articles about the events. Just because a notable company does something, doesn't mean it rises to the level for inclusion. Thanks! Toddst1 (talk) 00:57, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

He was never going to appear in On Her Majesty's Secret Service and it had nothing to do with You Only Live Twice. If you're quoting some book for this nonsense, the author obviously doesn't know what he was writing about. Gert Fröbe would have played Goldfinger's twin in Diamonds are Forever....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 11:39, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

{{Unblock-auto|96.46.1.74|The IP address that you are currently using has been blocked because it is believed to be a web host provider or colocation provider.|ST47}}

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

History of the United States (1865–1918)

added a link pointing to Spanish Africa

Labor history of the United States

added a link pointing to James Carey

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

History of terrorism

added links pointing to Samuel Green and Anti-apartheid

History of the United States (1865–1918)

added a link pointing to Spanish Africa

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Commanders of World War II, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Minister of National Defence.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Re this edit - the edit summary is misleading, as the edit was not only to the Sexuality section. Also I think you would do well to read

Hello, I am terribly sorry about that. I did not mean to publish that edit with the blurb about Dunkirk still included. My mistake. I will make sure to double-check more closely in the future. TheAlderaanian (talk) 20:46, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]