User talk:Tregias003

Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I noticed that you recently removed content from Ole Gunnar Solskjær without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Mattythewhite (talk) 16:37, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Serge Gnabry, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Kosack (talk) 11:52, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Lucas Hernandez. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mattythewhite (talk) 23:25, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges.

This edit has been discussed before, and rejected. If you think it is appropriate, please start a discussion on the Talk page rather than repeatedly trying to force it through. RolandR (talk) 12:26, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Declan Rice. Mattythewhite (talk) 13:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you're bordering on a block judging by your previous warnings above but I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt. Please do not remove information from articles like you did at Daniel James (footballer) without explaining why. Thanks. Kosack (talk) 07:41, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Divock Origi. Kosack (talk) 14:50, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but your

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Salma Hayek. Geraldo Perez (talk) 15:18, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ad Orientem (talk) 16:07, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please cite your source for the changes you made to United States. The current source in the article doesn't support the claims you're making for various ethnicities. Schazjmd (talk) 21:00, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Angelos Charisteas. Robby.is.on (talk) 16:34, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Robby.is.on (talk) 16:43, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at José Ángel Crespo, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:51, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Gheorghe Hagi. Robby.is.on (talk) 17:59, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

I noticed your recent edit to Serge Gnabry does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a

 → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. It's not clear why you're making your changes. Please communicate your intentions. Thank you.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Lothar Matthäus. --Jaellee (talk) 10:58, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:53, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Mattythewhite (talk) 22:34, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. Vaselineeeeeeee^★★★ 18:06, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Jupp Heynckes. Mattythewhite (talk) 10:53, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at George Weah, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Mattythewhite (talk) 16:56, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ _Talk 00:11, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:09, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Gaizka Mendieta. Kosack (talk) 18:12, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Brian Laudrup, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Mattythewhite (talk) 23:06, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Javert2113. I noticed that you recently removed content from Jesus without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — Javert2113 (Siarad.|¤) 15:36, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Mattythewhite (talk) 11:33, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there - Wikipedia relies on

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Thiago Silva, you may be blocked from editing. Mattythewhite (talk) 23:05, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Roy Keane. Mattythewhite (talk) 14:27, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Yuri Melikov, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Russian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:44, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at José Holebas, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Unsourced content. Mattythewhite (talk) 00:59, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks to prevent you from persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Mattythewhite (talk) 20:43, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 21:54, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]