User talk:Truthbetold27

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eagleash was:

This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Essentially blank apart from one 'isolated' citation.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Truthbetold27/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eagleash (talk) 22:18, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I was watching the tutorial, I thought I did the right steps...I guess I got it wrong...my frist time here, hehe...I'll check with the teahouse...thanks! Truthbetold27 (talk) 00:14, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Truthbetold27! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Eagleash (talk) 22:18, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:Truthbetold27/sandbox. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 18:05, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you insert a spam link to Wikipedia again, as you did at Diet (nutrition), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Zefr (talk) 17:30, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize, I didn't know it was considered spam...I'll do more reading...do I delete my edit? Truthbetold27 (talk) 17:42, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It has already been removed as "Nonsense content and spam source". Theroadislong (talk) 17:52, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much, I do not have very clear what is considered a reliable source, then, even though I read about it, could you be so kind to clarify to me, please? Truthbetold27 (talk) 17:59, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Lard Almighty (talk) 18:01, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Truthbetold27! While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 20:09, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! I am reading to get a better understanding of what can or can not be used on Wikipedia. I will get back to you if I have further questions...Happy Easter to all of you! Truthbetold27 (talk) 20:52, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, if I understand correctly, because I have been reading the information that you kindly provided me with, I can report information I found in a book and cite the ISBN, correct? Truthbetold27 (talk) 22:05, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

See

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  331dot (talk) 19:53, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.