User talk:Varoon2542

Bagumba May I have your arbitration, please ? He is like stalking me Varoon2542 (talk) 09:54, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 16:09, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

The complaint was made by 116.71.160.23. It seems to me that 116.71.160.23 is just a single editor hopping IPs. I find it a bit rich that an unidentified editor who doesn't even have a user page is complaining against me. The only identified one is Satrar

I've already sought arbitration for what I feel is hounding (please look above). I'm also keen on settling this issue. Regards Varoon2542 (talk) 16:26, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. -Satrar (talk) 19:32, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. For example, a large number of your recent edits undo other users' edits at Religion in Mauritius with no explanation. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Snuish (talk) 21:52, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Kajol. Thank you. — DaxServer (t · m · c) 18:21, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Francis Xavier into Goa Inquisition. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 02:07, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Professor Penguino (talk) 22:30, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Professor Penguino Hello, Can you please tell me to what article you are referring to? Regards Varoon2542 (talk) 20:53, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• You cited

  <ref name="statsmauritius.govmu.org"/>

  but neglected to define that named reference. AnomieBOT attempted to fix the problem by guessing that you may have meant http://statsmauritius.govmu.org/English/CensusandSurveys/Documents/HPC/2011/HPC_TR_Vol2_Demography_Yr11.pdf. That's a dead link, but even if corrected to https://statsmauritius.govmu.org/Documents/Census_and_Surveys/HPC/2011/HPC_TR_Vol2_Demography_Yr11.pdf, that file doesn't contain the number 812,769. Nor can I find that number in any other file within Mauritius' 2011 census.
• You also cited

  {{cite journal|last1=Government|first1=India|title=Population of Non-resident indians country wise|date=2012}}

  {{Cite journal}} requires the name of a journal, which you didn't provide. If the author is really the Government of India, it's unlikely that it was really from an academic journal. More likely it was published in a book with an ISBN or on the web with a URL. In any case, you've provided insufficient information for a reader to verify the statement.

You've been around a while, so referencing for beginners may be too basic for you, but you may still find it useful because it links to more advanced referencing topics. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. --Worldbruce (talk) 16:06, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

The last ethnic statistics in Mauritius date to 1972 before they were outlawed. Since then, the census compiles figures on religious affiliation and ancestral languages

As 48.5% of the population is Hindu and 17.2% Muslim and all of them from the pre-partition Indian subcontinent, it is widely accepted that they are as much desis as any members of the subcontinental diaspora. I don't think there's any rationale for accepting the source material for Maldives and Bhutan but not for Mauritius

Despite the lack of updated ethnic statistics in Mauritius, indo-mauritians like me get included in all articles on indian diaspora abroad. I thought there was a general consensus on this issue

Regards Varoon2542 (talk) 01:03, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think you're missing my point. I'm not questioning whether there are desis in Mauritius. The problem is that your description of your sources is so woefully incomplete as to render them unverifiable. A URL that directly supports the number 812,769 would be ideal. If the information is available only in print, then sufficient bibliographic information is needed so that a reader can obtain the source and verify that it says 812,769. (If that number doesn't appear in the source, but you're adding numbers to arrive at that figure, you should also explain your process in sufficient detail that a reader can replicate your results). --Worldbruce (talk) 15:30, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please have a look at the page mentioned in the section title (an explanatory essay on en.wp policy), as well as the page concerning restoring challenged edits:

I see you've been warned about edit warring too. Pot calling the kettle black?

Should I point out that you have been chastised for playing down the antisemitic nature of the sentence "we will make a Shoah"?

The information in the lead corresponds to the sources. They stay until consensus says otherwise. So far, you're the only one complaining Varoon2542 (talk) 01:08, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you are edit warring now to insert a grammatical error. Note that "a 17-year-old" is a substantive noun. You are mistaken that "adjective order" applies in such a case. As it happens, I'm an English teacher. :)

In the Marianne article you added after I removed the TOI article which said the reports were unconfirmed, the head of the CRIF says he doesn't want to play up conflict between ethnic groups because of a kid spray-painting something on a wall. -- SashiRolls ^{🌿 · 🍥} 01:20, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I was born and bred in Mauritius where I passed my, Cambridge organised, A Levels in English. Now, I'm a lawyer in France. :)

I stand by that order. Now, I won't be fighting over it. Let us see what those who have english as first language think of it

What the head of the CRIF says or doesn't say to downplay an antisemitic tag doesn't make the tag less antisemitic. On the contrary, it speaks a lot about his fear. Varoon2542 (talk) 01:26, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't disagree that that was indeed what he sought to convey. Concerning your grammar mistake, I am a native speaker: it is a very common French mistake to say "a French" for "a French person". The rules on this are inconsistent depending on nationality. No biggy, it will get fixed... probably by somebody adding man, teenager, youth, or boy again.  :)

Would I be correct that you do not intend to defend your choice to focus on "Arabo-Islamic" integration on the talk page despite the policy explanations furnished above? -- SashiRolls ^{🌿 · 🍥} 01:20, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I did not pick the term "French" instead of "Frenchman", "boy", "man" or "youth". I think "French youth" would have been more appropriate

I merely corrected the order. I'm quite surprised that an english teacher and, even more so, a native speaker is questioning the order. The order depends on intrinsicality. A person's age change ultimately, a nationality generally doesn't. It's a horrible rainy day not a rainy horrible day just like it's a seven year old american boy not an american seven year old boy.

I've already defended my stand on the addition of "arabo-islamic integration" on the talk page. The sources point to the nature of the debate being focussed on the ethnic and religious origins of the shooting victim and, later on, rioters. Whether you agree with the nature of the debate or not is irrelevant. The debate took place with these discussed. That's the information. Varoon2542 (talk) 01:55, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Plz stick to the source. You continue reverting the edit even though the source does not comply with it. All the sources mentioned describe her as melody queen or queen of playback singing which does not equal to most celebrated singer. There is very little consensus regarding that she is most celebrated singer of India when there are singers like Mohd Rafi. This argument is highly debatable. Arorapriyansh333 (talk) 08:58, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Seewoosagur Ramgoolam. The sources other than Indian express one are not considered reliable. Also, be informed of wiki policies. You can't decide anything, you need to write what source say. Admantine123 (talk) 08:13, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And how did you decide that only one source is reliable?

The sources you are criticising are mauritian sources and the one you are backing is an indian one. What is this? Indian imperialism?

Should I remind you that the article is on a MAURITIAN statesman?

I'm saying this for the last time. Indian constitutional provisions have no relevancy in Mauritius. There are no forward, backward, scheduled caste, schedules tribe in Mauritian law, societal discourse, anywhere. Just because one clueless indian journalist used one of those terms, doesn't make it more relevant in the mauritian context.

If you knew anything about Mauritius, you would have known that in Mauritius what you indians call forward castes are termed "Grand nations" and what you call backward castes are called "Ti nations" but you don't speak Mauritian creole, do you? What do you exactly know about Mauritius?

One of the sources I inserted is the only comprehensive research work on the issue of castes in Mauritius. It was done by a french professor and it's available in English. The second one is by a Mauritian researcher. Give them a read

BTW, you are not only edit warring, you are also removing sources that go against your narrative which is dishonest and malicious

If you want to disprove my point then go find a Mauritian article that makes reference to indian terminology in Mauritius. Feel free to learn french fast to read "Le Mauricien" or you could read some of the articles published in English by "L'Express"

I don't care much about your threats. If you wish to have me banned, move the issue on the relevant page and let us see what the administrators think. Varoon2542 (talk) 23:08, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Novem Linguae Hello, I'm not asking for help right now but in case the matter were to escalate, I would eventually like your arbitration. I'm acting in good faith. Regards Varoon2542 (talk) 23:32, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there. I haven't looked into this in detail, but as a newer editor it is often a good idea to follow the advice of more experienced editors. If someone with 19,000 edits is telling you that you're using unreliable sources, then maybe you are using unreliable sources and should avoid placing those in articles. Try to be a sponge until you get a bit more experience. There's a lot to learn. Hope this helps. Happy editing. –Novem Linguae (talk) 20:47, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

		The Current Events Barnstar
		In recognition of your contributions to the article Killing of Nahel Merzouk. --Cdjp1 talk 15:57, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you !

That's very kind of you. Truly appreciate it :) Varoon2542 (talk) 23:36, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Exodus of Kashmiri Hindus into Kashmir division. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 19:11, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake ! I don't actually understand how some of these technical issues work. I'm working on it. Regards Varoon2542 (talk) 23:40, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Simpler explanation: When you copy from one Wikipedia article to another, you need to provide attribution. This is done by saying in your edit summary that the material was copied, and where you got it. Please have a look at this edit summary for an example of how it is done. Please let me know if you have any questions, or have a look at WP:Copying within Wikipedia for more information. Thanks, — Diannaa (talk) 00:48, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Stop edit warring on

I've answered back on the talk page. Tell me what you think of it. I'm quite surprised that someone who is removing academic references is somehow being given a pat on the back Varoon2542 (talk) 12:03, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Here are the diffs of your 4 reverts on Killing of Nahel Merzouk in the last 80 minutes. There are intervening edits by others in between each edit. I would like to give you a chance to self-revert before someone takes this to the edit-warring noticeboard. I notice you just deleted the last warning given to you about edit-warring on this page.

• 12:13 23 July
• 12:49 23 July
• 12:55 23 July
• 13:32 23 July

Regards, -- SashiRolls ^{🌿 · 🍥} 13:42, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also, you asked @

WP:NPA and strike these personal attacks from the talk pages. Thank you. -- SashiRolls ^{🌿 · 🍥} 14:10, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

I strongly suggest you remove all three. Notably islamogauchiste comment seems clearly unacceptable as putting aside it being a personal attack, it was also completely irrelevant to the discussion. You might be lucky and escape sanction for the racist and xenophobe comments since SashiRolls did just bring up your ethnicity without reason and in a manner that can reasonably be considered offensive but I wouldn't count on that either. Ultimately SashiRolls said what they said and people can judge it for themselves without you offering commentary. One personal attack doesn't excuse other personal attacks no matter how justified you may feel your comments are. 19:12, 23 July 2023 (UTC) Nil Einne (talk) 19:12, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am not going to get further involved here except to note that I made no personal attacks. Saying someone is a XXX person is not a personal attack, whether XXX=Zambian, French, Muslim, American, or Chinese... It was however apparently a mistaken identity, for which I apologize. -- SashiRolls ^{🌿 · 🍥} 19:55, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Varoon2542_reported_by_User:SashiRolls_(Result:_). Thank you. -- SashiRolls ^{🌿 · 🍥} 16:23, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Request restoration of some of my editing privileges. Thank you. You have come up in the context of you interactions with SashiRolls. Nil Einne (talk) 07:13, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about the revert there. I misread your summary. Tim O'Doherty (talk) 14:48, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No offense, my edit was later reverted by someone else since long now :) Varoon2542 (talk) 15:20, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Fowler&fowler. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Kashmir division have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Please note that the lead sentence and infobox maps are an aspect of the WikiProjects India-Pakistan-China consensus of August 2019. We cannot tamper with them unless we have created a new consensus. Also, we can't do a data dump of the Exodus of Kashmiri Hindus into this article. By a long-maintained consensus only highly distilled summaries of a few sentences can go into Jammu and Kashmir (state) if there is consensus for them, not into this article, Best regards, Fowler&fowler«Talk» 20:40, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]