User talk:Withkamlesh

Welcome!

Hello, Withkamlesh, and

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• Article Wizard
  if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

A tag has been placed on Open Journal of Psychiatry & Allied Sciences, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ♔ MONARCH Talk to me 14:43, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Withkamlesh,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Journal of Disability Studies should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Journal of Disability Studies .

If you're new to the process,

Thanks, The Amazing Spiderman (talk) 16:17, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Open Journal of Psychiatry & Allied Sciences is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Open Journal of Psychiatry & Allied Sciences until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Amazing Spiderman (talk) 14:11, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you create an inappropriate page again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. DGG ( talk ) 16:15, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 16:31, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Withkamlesh. You have new messages at Talk:List of disability studies journals.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--Bejnar (talk) 21:53, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Withkamlesh. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CalOtter (talk) 01:50, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]