Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 February 23

Add links
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
<
Log
< February 22 February 24 >

February 23

Babel category duplicates

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 March 3#Babel category duplicates

Babel category enforcement

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 March 3#Babel category enforcement

User mul

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 March 3#User mul

User simple

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 March 3#User simple

Category:Clocks in Sweden

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge.
(non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 20:52, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
Nominator's rationale: Per
WP:SMALLCAT. This category has only 1 entry. Estopedist1 (talk) 22:13, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Historical rump states

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge.
(non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 20:53, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
Nominator's rationale: merge, "historical" is vague and subjective, there is no historical parent category. Marcocapelle (talk) 21:46, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Late modern rump states

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge.
(non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 20:53, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
Nominator's rationale: merge, redundant category layer with only one subcategory. Marcocapelle (talk) 21:45, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Films about real people

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 March 3#Category:Films about real people

Biographical films

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename/merge.
(non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 20:55, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
Nominator's rationale: rename/merge, most sibling categories in Category:Biographical films by subject have the format "Films of" and adding "biographical" does not seem very necessary in this particular context. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:38, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose at least some. Lupin III: The First is a film about Hitler who faked his death and escaped to South America. Other films are biographical films about Hitler, and are worth keeping separate from intentional fantasies. – Fayenatic London 21:32, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Lots of sibling categories do not make this distinction, what would you do with them? Marcocapelle (talk) 22:09, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support – I see no reason to separate films based on true stories about real people with fictional stories about them. There's sometimes a grey area and it seems needlessly complicated to split them. Although some films in the categories will not technically be biographies, I think it's understandable enough that the "Films about" categories can be subcategories of biographical cats. MClay1 (talk) 13:50, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support — even some of the "biographical" films are mostly speculative fiction. Clean up the tree, editors don't make fine distinctions.
    William Allen Simpson (talk) 06:33, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Chinese Central Asia

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus.
(non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 16:55, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
Nominator's rationale: rename and purge the two subcategories, this is clearly a collection of history articles and the main article is
Chinese Central Asia. Alternative: diffuse among Category:History of Xinjiang and siblings. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:08, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
  • Then the alternative is probably a better option. Marcocapelle (talk) 22:21, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Marcocapelle: the category is not just about Xinjiang, but generally about Chinese-ruled parts of Central Asia, the extent of which varied over time during the last two millennia. Something like what the IP below suggests would be closer to it. Constantine ✍ 07:41, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • But Xinjiang, as a name and territory, is a relatively recent thing,, whereas the phenomenon of Chinese presence/rule in Central Asia is much older. I don't see what we gain by abolishing a category that is flexibly defined to cover this historic phenomenon, in order to conform to modern borders. Constantine ✍ 17:58, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Marcocapelle: Indubitably. Because we tend to categorize things by what we are familiar with, and prefer precise delineations. I remember a striking exhibition of the pitfalls of this sort of recentism in the Historiska museum in Stockholm: on one wall, stone age tools categorized by province by museum curators ca. 1900, and on the other, modern toilet brushes, also organized by province.
My point here is that this category is not about Xinjiang or any modern political entity specifically: it is about a historical phenomenon that has no clear boundary, but has been an evolving cultural and political process. It usefulness is precisely that, just like Category:Roman North Africa or Category:Spanish Africa. Constantine ✍ 10:07, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 14:19, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Ambiguous temporally temporary perspective.
  1. The template for the article is {{History of Xinjiang}}; that really seems a more appropriate category.
  2. Apparently, I've been too concise. We've been fighting these perspective issues for many years. Greek versus Macedonian, Ukrainian versus Russian Empire, et cetera ad infinitum.
  3. The chosen solution is anchor with current modern location names, then accurately document the history from all sides.
  4. A chinese perspective might very well view these as "western", but the peoples there at the time were Turks (or some variation), who themselves divided into eastern and western regions which don't correspond to this chinese-centric nomenclature.
  5. Better to use modern locations.
William Allen Simpson (talk) 16:07, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
While the history of Xinjiang is related to this category, it also has content beyond the limits of present-day Xinjiang or 19th- & 20th-century East Turkestan: Anyang funerary bed, Emperor Taizong's campaign against Xueyantuo, Jibin, Battle of Irtysh River etc. The right question is: what is really (or should be) the scope of this category? Imho, looking at content, it deals with Chinese involvement West of the limites of China proper, mostly in the Tang dynasty (7th-10th centuries). I agree that a purely geographic term is better than a present-day jurisdiction to describe a loosely-defined region whose limits, obviously, changed in time. I note that the East Turkestan article talks about several terms used in history, also mentioning Chinese Turkestan. Maybe Chinese Central Asia should redirect there. Regarding Tang-period history, I'm afraid that the Chinese-centric view is probably unavailable seen that historiography and sources on this period are, unsurprisingly, quasi-exclusively Chinese material. Place Clichy (talk) 19:58, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 19:31, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Student religious organizations in Denmark

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge.
(non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 21:02, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
Nominator's rationale: Per
WP:SMALLCAT. This category has only 1 entry. Estopedist1 (talk) 19:24, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Freedom of religion in Finland

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge.
(non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 21:03, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
Nominator's rationale: Per
WP:SMALLCAT. This category has only 1 entry. Estopedist1 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Muslim politicians

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 March 5#Category:Muslim politicians

Category:Finnish religion academics

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge.
(non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 21:04, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
Nominator's rationale: Per
WP:SMALLCAT. This category has only 1 entry. Estopedist1 (talk) 19:03, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Architecture only containing churches

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. – Fayenatic London 11:23, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: These country/century intersections only contain 1 subcat, namely churches, in each case. Presumably they could be expanded, but unless and until an editor wants to do so, these are not useful. I have left other hierarchies e.g. China and Slovakia that contain at least one other member page. – Fayenatic London 19:38, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:50, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Notice: probably 20th-century has more potential than only churches. Pinging user:Fayenatic london--Estopedist1 (talk) 08:00, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    • I expect most of them have potential, but they are useless until someone develops them. OK, I have added Art Deco categories into C20 for Malaysia, Romania and Slovenia, and struck them from the nomination. I miss the old "popcat" template which might have prompted people to add more things that belong! There are tools that can help, e.g. https://petscan.wmflabs.org/?psid=23874026 is an intersection for C20 in Malaysia. – Fayenatic London 13:58, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • comment striked through the categories that no longer have only churches. Added some pages to them, is it enough? Pelmeen10 (talk) 23:28, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • keep the ones that are not empty and have potential. Pelmeen10 (talk) 23:28, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep I'm pretty sure they could all be given members from existing articles, and pretty easily if anyone could be bothered to do so. If they are deleted this is most unlikely to happen. Johnbod (talk) 04:36, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
And so it is proving.... Johnbod (talk) 04:48, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 19:00, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Withdrawn. Even if some centuries in Romania & Slovenia only have churches, they can all be kept as part of what is now a useful structure. – Fayenatic London 22:35, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Members of Propaganda Due

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 March 3#Category:Members of Propaganda Due

Category:Religion in the Lithuanian military

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: manual merge.
(non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 10:17, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
Nominator's rationale: Per
WP:SMALLCAT. This category has only 1 entry. Estopedist1 (talk) 18:58, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Works by gender

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 March 5#Works by gender

Category:Norwegian news reporting

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to
(non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 10:40, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
Nominator's rationale: unique category name. Content to be upmerged to Category:News media in Norway‎ Estopedist1 (talk) 17:19, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:British India emigrants to the United States

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 March 5#Category:British India emigrants to the United States

Category:Heritage registers in Estonia

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge.
(non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 10:42, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
Nominator's rationale: Per
WP:SMALLCAT. This category has only 1 entry. Estopedist1 (talk) 16:43, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Sports venues in Bekasi

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete.
(non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 10:43, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
Nominator's rationale: Multiple layers of categories for one article. Delete all. The lone article is already in the upmerge targets so no merges are needed. –Aidan721 (talk) 16:17, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Arts centres in Sweden

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge.
(non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 10:43, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
Nominator's rationale: Per
WP:SMALLCAT. This category has only 1 entry. Estopedist1 (talk) 12:33, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Depictions of people on film

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 March 5#Category:Depictions of people on film

Category:Novelty buildings in Denmark

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge.
(non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 10:48, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
Nominator's rationale: Per
WP:SMALLCAT. This category has only 1 entry. Estopedist1 (talk) 09:52, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Family tree in Greek mythology

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete.
(non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 10:48, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
Nominator's rationale: Unnecessary category with only one article. If we ever get any more Greek mythology family trees, we can create a new category. The name of this one doesn't seem grammatically correct. MClay1 (talk) 09:44, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Folly buildings in Norway

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge.
(non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 10:49, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
Nominator's rationale: Per
WP:SMALLCAT. This category has only 1 entry. Estopedist1 (talk) 09:38, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Lists of Estonian military personnel

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge.
(non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 10:49, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
Nominator's rationale: Per
WP:SMALLCAT. This category has only 1 entry. Estopedist1 (talk) 08:39, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Wikipedians who use Discord (software)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename.
(non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 10:49, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
Nominator's rationale: For consistency with the main article, which is now at the undisambiguated title Discord per Talk:Discord/Archive 1#Requested move 2 March 2022, where the software was found to be the primary topic. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 08:36, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Dream SMP members

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete.
(non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 10:50, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
Nominator's rationale: Largely uncompleted, low-traffic, and abandoned category. After a quick google search, it seems like about of half of the members of this group do not have wikipedia pages and are left off the list. Additionally, 7 of the 17 of the entries on this list simply redirect to the primary
talk) 08:04, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Annual events in Fiuggi

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete.
(non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 10:50, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
Nominator's rationale:
WP:SMALLCAT. One article. –Aidan721 (talk) 00:36, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Ana Carolina

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete.
(non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 10:50, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
Nominator's rationale: Too little content: the two subcategories and the only article are already all interlinked (note that I also just made one of the subcats.) ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:09, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom and previous precedent. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 01:00, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 12:44, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2023_February_23&oldid=1143238637"