Wikipedia:Featured article review/Roman–Persian Wars/archive2
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was delisted by Nikkimaria via FACBot (talk) 4:17, 18 September 2021 (UTC) [1].
Roman–Persian Wars
- Notified: Yannismarou as the FAC/GA nominator and ZxxZxxZ and burh as frequent editors, the projects listed on the talk page
Review section
I am nominating this featured article for review because some of the issues raised in March
]- The heavy reliance on primary sources and somewhat outdated secondary sources is a major issue. It is a broad topic, so maybe improvement should begin from child articles (e.g. Roman–Parthian War of 58–63, Parthian war of Caracalla, etc. also in poor condition) --Z 07:15, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Trappist_the_monk/HarvErrors shows a lot of the secondary sources are not linked to - so if they are still useful they should perhaps be moved to "further reading" Chidgk1 (talk) 15:12, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC - Agree the sourcing isn't quite up to par, although its better than Thrasybulus or War against Nabis (both recent FAR delistings). Unfortunately, there has no significant engagement yet. Hog Farm Talk 14:38, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
FARC section
- Issues raised in the review section largely concern sourcing. Nikkimaria (talk) 16:37, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist per above. Also, regardless of the sourcing quality the references section also needs cleanup. (t · c) buidhe 17:31, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist no significant progress to improve article. Z1720 (talk) 02:07, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This removal candidate has been delisted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please leave the {{featured article review}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Nikkimaria (talk) 04:17, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.