Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Agriculture

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete and redirect to

Portal:Agriculture and agronomy. — JJMC89(T·C) 01:23, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

Portal:Agriculture

Portal:Agriculture (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Automated pseudo-portal based on two navboxes: {{

WP:REDUNDANTFORK
of the head article.

There is no manual version to revert to. For over 13 years after its creation in 2005, the page was a redirect to

Portal:Agriculture and agronomy (which was renamed a few times along the way). Then in January 2019‎, @The Transhumanist converted[1]
it to an automated portal.

This is obviously a major topic;

WP:REDUNDANTFORK, in accordance with whatever criteria the community may have agreed at that time. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 04:44, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

PS The old Portal:Agriculture and agronomy currently redirects to Portal:Agriculture. If this page is deleted, the the old Agriculture and agronomy portal should be reverted back to is last live version[2]. It has a minor forest of subpages, as can be seen at Special:PrefixIndex/Portal:Agriculture and agronomy: 50 selected articles. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 06:11, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. On the assumption that this portal is deleted, I'd suggest moving
    Portal:Agriculture and agronomy to this title. I note that UnitedStatesian has already restored the old manual version. Espresso Addict (talk) 03:21, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply
    ]
Yes BHG and EA, I went ahead and restored
Portal:Agriculture and agronomy. Agree that a move (including all subpages) should follow any deletion of Portal:Agriculture; I will take care of it should that time arrive. UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:26, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply
]
We're not saying there couldn't theoretically be a decent portal; we are saying that this particular one is quite useless and redundant, and hasn't been maintained for many years, nor does there appear to be anyone around now with the time and skill to do that job. I'm certainly not interested, and I brought the main articles on the topic to GA; and it was hard to find anyone to assist me with that one-off task, let alone the unending work of keeping a portal vaguely interesting and fresh. Read the other editors's comments above. Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:31, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
"Useless" is a matter of opinion; failure to maintain is not a reason to delete; and there is no deadline. Redundancy, however, IS a good reason. I'd prefer redirecting the Ag&Agron portal to this one and sorting out the content through editing, but Wagger's suggestion below is just as acceptable.--Paul McDonald (talk) 11:59, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Portal:Agriculture and agronomy to revert to the pre-TTH status quo. WaggersTALK 10:39, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.